Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Metastasis | Short communication

Random forest classifiers aid in the detection of incidental osteoblastic osseous metastases in DEXA studies

Authors: Samir D. Mehta, Ronnie Sebro

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) studies are used for screening patients for low bone mineral density (BMD). Patients with breast and prostate cancer are often treated with hormone-altering drugs that result in low BMD. These patients may have incidental osteoblastic metastases of the spine that may be detected on screening DEXA studies. The aim of this pilot study is to assess whether random forest classifiers or support vector machines can identify patients with incidental osteoblastic metastases of the spine from screening DEXA studies and to evaluate which technique is better.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the DEXA studies from 200 patients (155 normal control patients and 45 patients with osteoblastic metastases of one or more lumbar vertebral bodies from L1 to L4). The dataset was split into training (80%) and validation (20%) datasets. The optimal random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were obtained. Receiver-operator-characteristic curves were compared with DeLong’s test.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) of the optimal RF classifier were 77.8%, 100.0%, 98.0% and 0.889, respectively, in the validation dataset. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of the optimal SVM classifier were 33.3%, 96.8%, 82.5% and 0.651 in the validation dataset. The RF classifier was significantly better than the SVM classifier (P = 0.008). Only 7 of the 45 patients with osteoblastic metastases (15.6%) were prospectively identified by the radiologist interpreting the study.

Conclusions

RF classifiers can be used as a useful adjunct to identify incidental lumbar spine osteoblastic metastases in screening DEXA studies.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Qaseem A, Forciea MA, McLean RM, Denberg TD, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians (2017) Treatment of low bone density or osteoporosis to prevent fractures in men and women: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 166(11):818–839CrossRefPubMed Qaseem A, Forciea MA, McLean RM, Denberg TD, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians (2017) Treatment of low bone density or osteoporosis to prevent fractures in men and women: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 166(11):818–839CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Golob AL, Laya MB (2015) Osteoporosis: screening, prevention, and management. Med Clin N. Am 99(3):587–606CrossRefPubMed Golob AL, Laya MB (2015) Osteoporosis: screening, prevention, and management. Med Clin N. Am 99(3):587–606CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lewiecki EM (2013) Bone density measurement and assessment of fracture risk. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56(4):667–676CrossRefPubMed Lewiecki EM (2013) Bone density measurement and assessment of fracture risk. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56(4):667–676CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2011) Screening for osteoporosis: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 154(5):356–364CrossRef U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2011) Screening for osteoporosis: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 154(5):356–364CrossRef
8.
go back to reference WHO Scientific Group on the Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis (2000: Geneva, Switzerland) (2003). Prevention and management of osteoporosis: report of a WHO scientific group WHO Scientific Group on the Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis (2000: Geneva, Switzerland) (2003). Prevention and management of osteoporosis: report of a WHO scientific group
9.
go back to reference Mazess RB, Barden HS (1988) Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Ann Chir Gynaecol 77(5–6):197–203PubMed Mazess RB, Barden HS (1988) Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Ann Chir Gynaecol 77(5–6):197–203PubMed
10.
go back to reference Syed Z, Khan A (2002) Bone densitometry: applications and limitations. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 24(6):476–484CrossRefPubMed Syed Z, Khan A (2002) Bone densitometry: applications and limitations. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 24(6):476–484CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Watts NB (2004) Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int 15(11):847–854CrossRefPubMed Watts NB (2004) Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int 15(11):847–854CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. University of Sheffield, UK World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases. University of Sheffield, 2007 Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. University of Sheffield, UK World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases. University of Sheffield, 2007
14.
go back to reference Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S, Dawson-Hughes B (2014) The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 29(11):2520–2526. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2269 CrossRefPubMed Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S, Dawson-Hughes B (2014) The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 29(11):2520–2526. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jbmr.​2269 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Eastell R, Hannon RA, Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Clack G, Adams JE, ATAC Trialists group (2006) Effect of an aromatase inhibitor on bmd and bone turnover markers: 2-year results of the Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial (18233230). J Bone Miner Res 21(8):1215–1223CrossRefPubMed Eastell R, Hannon RA, Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Clack G, Adams JE, ATAC Trialists group (2006) Effect of an aromatase inhibitor on bmd and bone turnover markers: 2-year results of the Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial (18233230). J Bone Miner Res 21(8):1215–1223CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mincey BA, Duh MS, Thomas SK, Moyneur E, Marynchencko M, Boyce SP, Mallett D, Perez EA (2006) Risk of cancer treatment-associated bone loss and fractures among women with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors. Clin Breast Cancer 7(2):127–132CrossRefPubMed Mincey BA, Duh MS, Thomas SK, Moyneur E, Marynchencko M, Boyce SP, Mallett D, Perez EA (2006) Risk of cancer treatment-associated bone loss and fractures among women with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors. Clin Breast Cancer 7(2):127–132CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hillner BE, Ingle JN, Chlebowski RT, Gralow J, Yee GC, Janjan NA, Cauley JA, Blumenstein BA, Albain KS, Lipton A, Brown S, American Society of Clinical Oncology (2003) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(21):4042–4057 Epub 2003 Sep 8 CrossRefPubMed Hillner BE, Ingle JN, Chlebowski RT, Gralow J, Yee GC, Janjan NA, Cauley JA, Blumenstein BA, Albain KS, Lipton A, Brown S, American Society of Clinical Oncology (2003) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(21):4042–4057 Epub 2003 Sep 8 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Diamond TH, Higano CS, Smith MR, Guise TA, Singer FR (2004) Osteoporosis in men with prostate carcinoma receiving androgen-deprivation therapy: recommendations for diagnosis and therapies. Cancer 100:892–899CrossRefPubMed Diamond TH, Higano CS, Smith MR, Guise TA, Singer FR (2004) Osteoporosis in men with prostate carcinoma receiving androgen-deprivation therapy: recommendations for diagnosis and therapies. Cancer 100:892–899CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Smith MR (2003) Diagnosis and management of treatment-related osteoporosis in men with prostate carcinoma. Cancer 97(3 Suppl):789–795CrossRefPubMed Smith MR (2003) Diagnosis and management of treatment-related osteoporosis in men with prostate carcinoma. Cancer 97(3 Suppl):789–795CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2018) Early and locally advanced breast cancer: Diagnosis and treatment (NG101) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2018) Early and locally advanced breast cancer: Diagnosis and treatment (NG101)
21.
go back to reference Bazzocchi A, Ferrari F, Diano D, Albisinni U, Battista G, Rossi C, Guglielmi G (2012) Incidental findings with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: spectrum of possible diagnoses. Calcif Tissue Int 91(2):149–156CrossRefPubMed Bazzocchi A, Ferrari F, Diano D, Albisinni U, Battista G, Rossi C, Guglielmi G (2012) Incidental findings with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: spectrum of possible diagnoses. Calcif Tissue Int 91(2):149–156CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kahn CE Jr (2017) From images to actions: opportunities for artificial intelligence in radiology. Radiology 285(3):719–720CrossRefPubMed Kahn CE Jr (2017) From images to actions: opportunities for artificial intelligence in radiology. Radiology 285(3):719–720CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kahn CE Jr (1994) Artificial intelligence in radiology: decision support systems. Radiographics 14(4):849–861CrossRefPubMed Kahn CE Jr (1994) Artificial intelligence in radiology: decision support systems. Radiographics 14(4):849–861CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wu Y, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA, Metz CE (1993) Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 187(1):81–87CrossRefPubMed Wu Y, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA, Metz CE (1993) Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 187(1):81–87CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kruppa J, Liu Y, Biau G, Kohler M, König IR, Malley JD, Ziegler A (2014) Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: theory. Biom J 56(4):534–563CrossRefPubMed Kruppa J, Liu Y, Biau G, Kohler M, König IR, Malley JD, Ziegler A (2014) Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: theory. Biom J 56(4):534–563CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ben-Hur A, Horn D, Siegelmann H, Vapnik V (2001) Support vector clustering. J Mach Learn Res 2:125–137 Ben-Hur A, Horn D, Siegelmann H, Vapnik V (2001) Support vector clustering. J Mach Learn Res 2:125–137
28.
go back to reference DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRefPubMed DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Random forest classifiers aid in the detection of incidental osteoblastic osseous metastases in DEXA studies
Authors
Samir D. Mehta
Ronnie Sebro
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-01933-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 5/2019 Go to the issue