Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 9/2018

Open Access 01-09-2018 | Review Article

From ideas to long-term studies: 3D printing clinical trials review

Authors: Jan Witowski, Mateusz Sitkowski, Tomasz Zuzak, Jasamine Coles-Black, Jason Chuen, Piotr Major, Michał Pdziwiatr

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Although high costs are often cited as the main limitation of 3D printing (3DP) in the medical field, current lack of clinical evidence is asserting itself as an impost as the field begins to mature. The aim is to review clinical trials in the field of 3DP, an area of research which has grown dramatically in recent years.

Methods

We surveyed clinical trials registered in 15 primary registries worldwide, including ClinicalTrials.gov. All trials which utilized 3DP in a clinical setting were included in this review. Our search was performed on December 15, 2017. Data regarding the purpose of the study, inclusion criteria, number of patients enrolled, primary outcomes, centers, start and estimated completion dates were extracted.

Results

A total of 92 clinical trials with \({N}=6\)252 patients matched the criteria and were included in the study. A total of 42 (45.65%) studies cited China as their location. Only 10 trials were multicenter and 2 were registered as international. The discipline that most commonly utilized 3DP was Orthopedic Surgery, with 25 (27.17%) registered trials. At the time of data extraction, 17 (18.48%) clinical trials were complete.

Conclusions

After several years of case reports, feasibility studies and technical reports in the field, larger-scale studies are beginning to emerge. There are almost no international register entries. Although there are new emerging areas of study in disciplines that may benefit from 3DP, it is likely to remain limited to very specific applications.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Velazquez ER, Parmar C, Jermoumi M, Mak RH, van Baardwijk A, Fennessy FM, Lewis JH, De Ruysscher D, Kikinis R, Lambin P, Aerts HJWL (2013) Volumetric CT-based segmentation of NSCLC using 3D-Slicer. Sci Rep 3:3529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Velazquez ER, Parmar C, Jermoumi M, Mak RH, van Baardwijk A, Fennessy FM, Lewis JH, De Ruysscher D, Kikinis R, Lambin P, Aerts HJWL (2013) Volumetric CT-based segmentation of NSCLC using 3D-Slicer. Sci Rep 3:3529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Eng MH, Wang DD, Greenbaum AB, Gheewala N, Kupsky D, Aka T, Song T, Kendall BJ, Wyman J, Myers E, Forbes M, O’Neill WW (2018) Prospective, randomized comparison of 3-dimensional computed tomography guidance versus TEE data for left atrial appendage occlusion (PRO3DLAAO). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27514 CrossRefPubMed Eng MH, Wang DD, Greenbaum AB, Gheewala N, Kupsky D, Aka T, Song T, Kendall BJ, Wyman J, Myers E, Forbes M, O’Neill WW (2018) Prospective, randomized comparison of 3-dimensional computed tomography guidance versus TEE data for left atrial appendage occlusion (PRO3DLAAO). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ccd.​27514 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien P-A, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8 CrossRefPubMed McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien P-A, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(09)61116-8 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharm Ther 39:704–711 Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharm Ther 39:704–711
17.
go back to reference Michalski M, Ross J (2014) The shape of things to come: 3d printing in medicine. JAMA 312:2213–2214CrossRefPubMed Michalski M, Ross J (2014) The shape of things to come: 3d printing in medicine. JAMA 312:2213–2214CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hell MM, Achenbach S, Yoo IS, Franke J, Blachutzik F, Roether J, Graf V, Raaz-Schrauder D, Marwan M, Schlundt C (2017) 3D printing for sizing left atrial appendage closure device: head-to-head comparison with computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography. EuroIntervention. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00359 PubMedCrossRef Hell MM, Achenbach S, Yoo IS, Franke J, Blachutzik F, Roether J, Graf V, Raaz-Schrauder D, Marwan M, Schlundt C (2017) 3D printing for sizing left atrial appendage closure device: head-to-head comparison with computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography. EuroIntervention. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4244/​EIJ-D-17-00359 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Robinson SS, Alaie S, Sidoti H, Auge J, Baskaran L, Avilés-Fernández K, Hollenberg SD, Shepherd RF, Min JK, Dunham SN (2018) Patient-specific design of a soft occluder for the left atrial appendage. Nat Biomed Eng 2:8–16CrossRef Robinson SS, Alaie S, Sidoti H, Auge J, Baskaran L, Avilés-Fernández K, Hollenberg SD, Shepherd RF, Min JK, Dunham SN (2018) Patient-specific design of a soft occluder for the left atrial appendage. Nat Biomed Eng 2:8–16CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rymuza B, Grodecki K, Kamiński J, Scisło P, Huczek Z (2017) Holographic imaging during transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Kardiol Pol 75:1056CrossRefPubMed Rymuza B, Grodecki K, Kamiński J, Scisło P, Huczek Z (2017) Holographic imaging during transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Kardiol Pol 75:1056CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
From ideas to long-term studies: 3D printing clinical trials review
Authors
Jan Witowski
Mateusz Sitkowski
Tomasz Zuzak
Jasamine Coles-Black
Jason Chuen
Piotr Major
Michał Pdziwiatr
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1793-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 9/2018 Go to the issue