Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons’ task performance and ergonomics

Authors: Juan A. Sánchez-Margallo, Francisco M. Sánchez-Margallo

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study is to assess the surgeons’ performance and ergonomics during the use of a robotic-driven needle holder in laparoscopic suturing tasks.

Methods

Six right-handed laparoscopic surgeons with different levels of experience took part in this study. Participants performed a set of three different intracorporeal suturing tasks organized in ten trials during a period of five weeks. Surgeons used both conventional (Conv) and robotic (Rob) laparoscopic needle holders. Precision using the surgical needle, quality of the intracorporeal suturing performance, execution time and leakage pressure for the urethrovesical anastomosis, as well as the ergonomics of the surgeon’s hand posture, were analyzed during the first, fifth and last trials.

Results

No statistically significant differences in precision and quality of suturing performance were obtained between both groups of instruments. Surgeons required more time using the robotic instrument than using the conventional needle holder to perform the urethrovesical anastomosis, but execution time was significantly reduced after training (\(p<\) 0.05). There were no differences in leakage pressure for the anastomoses carried out by both instruments. After training, novice surgeons significantly improved the ergonomics of the wrist (\(p<\) 0.05) and index finger (Conv: 36.381\(^{\circ }\pm 3.587^{\circ }\), Rob: 30.389\(^{\circ }\pm 4.100^{\circ }\); p = 0.024) when using the robotic instrument compared to the conventional needle holder.

Conclusions

Results have shown that, although both instruments offer similar technical performance, the robotic-driven instrument results in better ergonomics for the surgeon’s hand posture compared to the use of a conventional laparoscopic needle holder in intracorporeal suturing.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Xourafas D, Tavakkoli A, Clancy TE, Ashley SW (2015) Distal pancreatic resection for neuroendocrine tumors: Is laparoscopic really better than open? J Gastrointest Surg 19:831–840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xourafas D, Tavakkoli A, Clancy TE, Ashley SW (2015) Distal pancreatic resection for neuroendocrine tumors: Is laparoscopic really better than open? J Gastrointest Surg 19:831–840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Medeiros LR, Stein AT, Fachel J, Garry R, Furness S (2008) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:387–399CrossRefPubMed Medeiros LR, Stein AT, Fachel J, Garry R, Furness S (2008) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:387–399CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–24CrossRefPubMed Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–24CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Morandeira-Rivas A, Millán-Casas L, Moreno-Sanz C, Herrero-Bogajo ML, Tenías-Burillo JM, Giménez-Salillas L (2012) Ergonomics in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: survey results. J Gastrointest Surg 16:2151–9CrossRefPubMed Morandeira-Rivas A, Millán-Casas L, Moreno-Sanz C, Herrero-Bogajo ML, Tenías-Burillo JM, Giménez-Salillas L (2012) Ergonomics in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: survey results. J Gastrointest Surg 16:2151–9CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pérez-Duarte FJ, Lucas-Hernández M, Matos-Azevedo A, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Díaz-Güemes I, Sánchez-Margallo FM (2014) Objective analysis of surgeons’ ergonomy during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery through the use of surface electromyography and a motion capture data glove. Surg Endosc 28:1314–20CrossRefPubMed Pérez-Duarte FJ, Lucas-Hernández M, Matos-Azevedo A, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Díaz-Güemes I, Sánchez-Margallo FM (2014) Objective analysis of surgeons’ ergonomy during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery through the use of surface electromyography and a motion capture data glove. Surg Endosc 28:1314–20CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pérez-Duarte FJ, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Martín-Portugués I, Sánchez-Hurtado MA, Lucas-Hernández M, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Usón J (2013) Ergonomic analysis of muscle activity in the forearm and back muscles during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:203–207CrossRefPubMed Pérez-Duarte FJ, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Martín-Portugués I, Sánchez-Hurtado MA, Lucas-Hernández M, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Usón J (2013) Ergonomic analysis of muscle activity in the forearm and back muscles during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:203–207CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rassweiler JJ, Klein J, Tschada A, Gözen AS (2017) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy using an ergonomic chair: demonstration of technique and matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 119:349–357CrossRefPubMed Rassweiler JJ, Klein J, Tschada A, Gözen AS (2017) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy using an ergonomic chair: demonstration of technique and matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 119:349–357CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tung KD, Shorti RM, Downey EC, Bloswick DS, Merryweather AS (2015) The effect of ergonomic laparoscopic tool handle design on performance and efficiency. Surg Endosc 29:2500–5CrossRefPubMed Tung KD, Shorti RM, Downey EC, Bloswick DS, Merryweather AS (2015) The effect of ergonomic laparoscopic tool handle design on performance and efficiency. Surg Endosc 29:2500–5CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Goossens RH, Snijders CJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2002) Improved usability of a new handle design for laparoscopic dissection forceps. Surg Endosc 16(1):201–7CrossRefPubMed Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Goossens RH, Snijders CJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2002) Improved usability of a new handle design for laparoscopic dissection forceps. Surg Endosc 16(1):201–7CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bensignor T, Morel G, Reversat D, Fuks D, Gayet B (2016) Evaluation of the effect of a laparoscopic robotized needle holder on ergonomics and skills. Surg Endosc 30:446–54CrossRefPubMed Bensignor T, Morel G, Reversat D, Fuks D, Gayet B (2016) Evaluation of the effect of a laparoscopic robotized needle holder on ergonomics and skills. Surg Endosc 30:446–54CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zapardiel I, Hernandez A, De Santiago J (2015) The efficacy of robotic driven handheld instruments for the acquisition of basic laparoscopic suturing skills. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 186:106–109CrossRefPubMed Zapardiel I, Hernandez A, De Santiago J (2015) The efficacy of robotic driven handheld instruments for the acquisition of basic laparoscopic suturing skills. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 186:106–109CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sánchez-Margallo FM, Sánchez-Margallo JA (2016) Analysis of surgeons’ muscle activity during the use of a handheld robotic instrument in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. In: Duffy V, Lightner N (eds) Advances in human factors and ergonomics in healthcare. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–15 Sánchez-Margallo FM, Sánchez-Margallo JA (2016) Analysis of surgeons’ muscle activity during the use of a handheld robotic instrument in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. In: Duffy V, Lightner N (eds) Advances in human factors and ergonomics in healthcare. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–15
14.
go back to reference Kroeze SGC, Mayer EK, Chopra S, Aggarwal R, Darzi A, Patel A (2009) Assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills of urology residents: a pan-European study. Eur Urol 56:865–72CrossRefPubMed Kroeze SGC, Mayer EK, Chopra S, Aggarwal R, Darzi A, Patel A (2009) Assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills of urology residents: a pan-European study. Eur Urol 56:865–72CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sánchez-Margallo FM, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Pagador JB, Moyano JL, Moreno J, Usón J (2010) Ergonomic assessment of hand movements in laparoscopic surgery using the CyberGlove\(\textregistered \). In: Computational biomechanics for medicine. Springer, New York, pp 121–128 Sánchez-Margallo FM, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Pagador JB, Moyano JL, Moreno J, Usón J (2010) Ergonomic assessment of hand movements in laparoscopic surgery using the CyberGlove\(\textregistered \). In: Computational biomechanics for medicine. Springer, New York, pp 121–128
17.
go back to reference Iacoponi S, Terán M, De Santiago J, Zapardiel I (2015) Laparoscopic hysterectomy with a handheld robotic device in a case of uterine sarcoma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 54:84–85CrossRefPubMed Iacoponi S, Terán M, De Santiago J, Zapardiel I (2015) Laparoscopic hysterectomy with a handheld robotic device in a case of uterine sarcoma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 54:84–85CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sieber MA, Fellmann-Fischer B, Mueller M (2017) Performance of Kymerax precision-drive articulating surgical system compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments in a pelvitrainer model. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5438-8 Sieber MA, Fellmann-Fischer B, Mueller M (2017) Performance of Kymerax precision-drive articulating surgical system compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments in a pelvitrainer model. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-017-5438-8
19.
go back to reference Matern U (2009) Ergonomic deficiencies in the operating room: examples from minimally invasive surgery. Work 32:1–4 Matern U (2009) Ergonomic deficiencies in the operating room: examples from minimally invasive surgery. Work 32:1–4
20.
go back to reference Matern U, Waller P (1999) Instruments for minimally invasive surgery. Principles of ergonomic handles. Surg Endosc 13:174–182CrossRefPubMed Matern U, Waller P (1999) Instruments for minimally invasive surgery. Principles of ergonomic handles. Surg Endosc 13:174–182CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons’ task performance and ergonomics
Authors
Juan A. Sánchez-Margallo
Francisco M. Sánchez-Margallo
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1636-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 12/2017 Go to the issue