Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Predicting the optimal entry point for femoral antegrade nailing using a new measurement approach

Authors: Jing-xin Zhao, Xiu-yun Su, Zhe Zhao, Li-cheng Zhang, Zhi Mao, Hao Zhang, Li-hai Zhang, Pei-fu Tang

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To establish a new reliable approach for measuring proximal femoral anatomical parameters and determining the optimal entry point of the antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing.

Methods

A new method for measuring the proximal femoral anatomy and locating the optimal entry point for the antegrade nailing was developed using Mimics and 3-Matic softwares (Materialise, Haasrode, Belgium). After verifying the reliability of the measurement method using 15 pairs of the femoral models by the intraclass correlation coefficient, the anatomical parameters of 200 Chinese femurs were measured, and statistical analyses were performed to compare the proximal femoral anatomical parameters between different genders or lateralities and determine the most relevant factors of the optimal entry point.

Results

Reliability study showed that both intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability of the current measurement approach were excellent. After independent samples \(T\)-test, the proximal femoral anatomical parameters were shown significant difference between genders. Stepwise regression statistical analyses showed that the most relevant factors of the distances between the optimal entry point and the femoral head centre, the femoral neck axis and the tip of the greater trochanter were the 3D femoral neck-shaft angle (Pearson’s \(r = -0.621\); the model’s \(P < 0.001,\, R^{2}= 0.437\)), the femoral radius (Pearson’s \(r = -0.413\); the model’s \(P < 0.001,\, R^{2}= 0.254\)) and the femoral length (Pearson’s r = 0.316; the model’s \(P < 0.001,\, R^{2} = 0.154\)), respectively.

Conclusions

The current study provided a new and reliable measurement approach to evaluating the anatomical morphology of the proximal femur and revealed the most influential factors on the locations of the simulated optimal entry point for the proximal femoral antegrade IM nailing. Furthermore, this study was useful for establishing methodological basis for future researches and developments of the custom-made IM nailing and affiliated surgical instruments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ansari Moein CM, Gerrits PD, ten Duis HJ (2013) Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: time for standardised terminology? Injury 44(6):722–725CrossRefPubMed Ansari Moein CM, Gerrits PD, ten Duis HJ (2013) Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: time for standardised terminology? Injury 44(6):722–725CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Georgiadis GM, Olexa TA, Ebraheim NA (1996) Entry sites for antegrade femoral nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 330:281–287CrossRefPubMed Georgiadis GM, Olexa TA, Ebraheim NA (1996) Entry sites for antegrade femoral nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 330:281–287CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Helmy N, Jando VT, Lu T, Chan H, O’Brien PJ (2008) Muscle function and functional outcome following standard antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 22(1):10–15CrossRefPubMed Helmy N, Jando VT, Lu T, Chan H, O’Brien PJ (2008) Muscle function and functional outcome following standard antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 22(1):10–15CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Charopoulos I, Giannoudis PV (2009) Ideal entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: controversies and innovations. Injury 40(8):791–794CrossRefPubMed Charopoulos I, Giannoudis PV (2009) Ideal entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: controversies and innovations. Injury 40(8):791–794CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dora C, Leunig M, Beck M, Rothenfluh D, Ganz R (2001) Entry point soft tissue damage in antegrade femoral nailing: a cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma 15(7):488–493CrossRefPubMed Dora C, Leunig M, Beck M, Rothenfluh D, Ganz R (2001) Entry point soft tissue damage in antegrade femoral nailing: a cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma 15(7):488–493CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Harper MC, Carson WL (1987) Curvature of the femur and the proximal entry point for an intramedullary rod. Clin Orthop Relat Res 220:155–161PubMed Harper MC, Carson WL (1987) Curvature of the femur and the proximal entry point for an intramedullary rod. Clin Orthop Relat Res 220:155–161PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kanawati AJ, Jang B, McGee R, Sungaran J (2014) The influence of entry point and radius of curvature on femoral intramedullary nail position in the distal femur. J Orthop 11(2):68–71PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kanawati AJ, Jang B, McGee R, Sungaran J (2014) The influence of entry point and radius of curvature on femoral intramedullary nail position in the distal femur. J Orthop 11(2):68–71PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Papadakis SA, Shepherd L, Babourda EC, Papadakis S (2005) Piriform and trochanteric fossae. A drawing mismatch or a terminology error? A review. Surg Radiol Anat 27(3):223–226CrossRefPubMed Papadakis SA, Shepherd L, Babourda EC, Papadakis S (2005) Piriform and trochanteric fossae. A drawing mismatch or a terminology error? A review. Surg Radiol Anat 27(3):223–226CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ricci WM, Schwappach J, Tucker M, Coupe K, Brandt A, Sanders R, Leighton R (2006) Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20(10):663–667CrossRefPubMed Ricci WM, Schwappach J, Tucker M, Coupe K, Brandt A, Sanders R, Leighton R (2006) Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20(10):663–667CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kale SP, Patil N, Pilankar S, Karkhanis AR, Bagaria V (2006) Correct anatomical location of entry point for antegrade femoral nailing. Injury 37(10):990–993CrossRefPubMed Kale SP, Patil N, Pilankar S, Karkhanis AR, Bagaria V (2006) Correct anatomical location of entry point for antegrade femoral nailing. Injury 37(10):990–993CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Streubel PN, Wong AH, Ricci WM, Gardner MJ (2011) Is there a standard trochanteric entry site for nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures? J Orthop Trauma 25(4):202–207CrossRefPubMed Streubel PN, Wong AH, Ricci WM, Gardner MJ (2011) Is there a standard trochanteric entry site for nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures? J Orthop Trauma 25(4):202–207CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gausepohl T, Pennig D, Koebke J, Harnoss S (2002) Antegrade femoral nailing: an anatomical determination of the correct entry point. Injury 33(8):701–705CrossRefPubMed Gausepohl T, Pennig D, Koebke J, Harnoss S (2002) Antegrade femoral nailing: an anatomical determination of the correct entry point. Injury 33(8):701–705CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CW (2012) Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 263(2):475–483CrossRefPubMed Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CW (2012) Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 263(2):475–483CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Elbuken F, Baykara M, Ozturk C (2012) Standardisation of the neck-shaft angle and measurement of age-, gender- and BMI-related changes in the femoral neck using DXA. Singapore Med J 53(9):587–590PubMed Elbuken F, Baykara M, Ozturk C (2012) Standardisation of the neck-shaft angle and measurement of age-, gender- and BMI-related changes in the femoral neck using DXA. Singapore Med J 53(9):587–590PubMed
15.
go back to reference Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(4):556–560CrossRefPubMed Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(4):556–560CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Husmann O, Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, de Roguin B, Argenson JN (1997) Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 12(4):444–450CrossRefPubMed Husmann O, Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, de Roguin B, Argenson JN (1997) Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 12(4):444–450CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bonneau N, Libourel PA, Simonis C, Puymerail L, Baylac M, Tardieu C, Gagey O (2012) A three-dimensional axis for the study of femoral neck orientation. J Anat 221(5):465–476PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bonneau N, Libourel PA, Simonis C, Puymerail L, Baylac M, Tardieu C, Gagey O (2012) A three-dimensional axis for the study of femoral neck orientation. J Anat 221(5):465–476PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Martin CM, Turgeon JG, Goela A, Rice CL, Wilson TD (2014) A three-dimensional measurement approach for the morphology of the femoral head. J Anat 225(3):358–366 Martin CM, Turgeon JG, Goela A, Rice CL, Wilson TD (2014) A three-dimensional measurement approach for the morphology of the femoral head. J Anat 225(3):358–366
19.
go back to reference Mahaisavariya B, Sitthiseripratip K, Tongdee T, Bohez ELJ, Vander Sloten J, Oris P (2002) Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. Med Eng Phys 24(9):617–622CrossRefPubMed Mahaisavariya B, Sitthiseripratip K, Tongdee T, Bohez ELJ, Vander Sloten J, Oris P (2002) Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. Med Eng Phys 24(9):617–622CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Schumann S, Tannast M, Nolte LP, Zheng G (2010) Validation of statistical shape model based reconstruction of the proximal femur: a morphology study. Med Eng Phys 32(6):638–644CrossRefPubMed Schumann S, Tannast M, Nolte LP, Zheng G (2010) Validation of statistical shape model based reconstruction of the proximal femur: a morphology study. Med Eng Phys 32(6):638–644CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Eliasziw M, Donner A (1987) A cost-function approach to the design of reliability studies. Stat Med 6(6):647–655CrossRefPubMed Eliasziw M, Donner A (1987) A cost-function approach to the design of reliability studies. Stat Med 6(6):647–655CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19(1):231–240PubMed Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19(1):231–240PubMed
23.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cerveri P, Marchente M, Bartels W, Corten K, Simon JP, Manzotti A (2010) Automated method for computing the morphological and clinical parameters of the proximal femur using heuristic modeling techniques. Ann Biomed Eng 38(5):1752–1766CrossRefPubMed Cerveri P, Marchente M, Bartels W, Corten K, Simon JP, Manzotti A (2010) Automated method for computing the morphological and clinical parameters of the proximal femur using heuristic modeling techniques. Ann Biomed Eng 38(5):1752–1766CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Anastopoulos G, Chissas D, Dourountakis J, Ntagiopoulos PG, Magnisalis E, Asimakopoulos A, Xenakis TA (2010) Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Injury 41(3):300–305CrossRefPubMed Anastopoulos G, Chissas D, Dourountakis J, Ntagiopoulos PG, Magnisalis E, Asimakopoulos A, Xenakis TA (2010) Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Injury 41(3):300–305CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predicting the optimal entry point for femoral antegrade nailing using a new measurement approach
Authors
Jing-xin Zhao
Xiu-yun Su
Zhe Zhao
Li-cheng Zhang
Zhi Mao
Hao Zhang
Li-hai Zhang
Pei-fu Tang
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1182-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 10/2015 Go to the issue