Skip to main content
Top
Published in: La radiologia medica 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of uterine scar after previous caesarean section: comparison with 3T-magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging

Authors: Federica Fiocchi, Elisabetta Petrella, Luca Nocetti, Serena Currà, Guido Ligabue, Tiziana Costi, Pietro Torricelli, Fabio Facchinetti

Published in: La radiologia medica | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in the analysis of caesarean scars in women with prior caesarean section (pCS) and investigate the potential added value of diffusion tensor imaging (3T-MR-DTI) with fibre tracking reconstruction, compared with transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS).

Methods

Thirty women who had previously undergone elective CS in a singleton pregnancy at term were examined (19 women with one pCS formed group 1 and 11 women with two pCS formed group 2). Patients underwent TVUS and 3T-MR-DTI within 2 days. Twelve women with prior vaginal delivery served as controls and underwent only 3T-MR. Uterine fibre architecture was depicted by MR-DTI with 3D tractography reconstruction providing quali-quantitative analysis of fibre, described as the reduction of number of longitudinal fibres that run through the uterine scar.

Results

Six subjects were excluded. According to 3T-MR morphology, scars were described as linear (n = 12) and retracting (n = 12); disagreement with TVUS was 54 %. The thickness of myometrium at the scar level was found to be significantly greater with 3T-MR compared to TVUS in linear scars (p = 0.01). No difference was found among retracting scars. In controls, according to 3T-MR-DTI, longitudinal myometrial fibres running in the anterior wall were similar to those in the posterior wall at same level −2 %; −27 % + 22 %). In groups 1 and 2 there was significant reduction in anterior fibres compared to posterior ones (−53 %; −77 % − 34 %; p = 0.0001). Among retracting scars, fibre reduction was significantly higher compared to linear scars, p < 0.016.

Conclusions

The added value of 3T-MR with DTI lies in the prompt evaluation of muscle fibre remaining at scar level.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ et al (2011) Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 60:1–70PubMed Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ et al (2011) Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 60:1–70PubMed
2.
go back to reference Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Ananth CV (2006) Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 107:771–778CrossRefPubMed Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Ananth CV (2006) Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 107:771–778CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rasmussen S, Albrechtsen S, Dalaker K (2000) Obstetric history and the risk of placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:502–507CrossRefPubMed Rasmussen S, Albrechtsen S, Dalaker K (2000) Obstetric history and the risk of placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:502–507CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kastner ES, Figueroa R, Garry D, Maulik D (2002) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: experience at a community teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol 99:971–975CrossRefPubMed Kastner ES, Figueroa R, Garry D, Maulik D (2002) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: experience at a community teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol 99:971–975CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fleisch MC, Lux J, Schoppe M et al (2008) Placenta percreta leading to spontaneous complete uterine rupture in the second trimester. Example of a fatal complication of abnormal placentation following uterine scarring. Gynecol Obstet Invest 65:81–83CrossRefPubMed Fleisch MC, Lux J, Schoppe M et al (2008) Placenta percreta leading to spontaneous complete uterine rupture in the second trimester. Example of a fatal complication of abnormal placentation following uterine scarring. Gynecol Obstet Invest 65:81–83CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ben Nagi J, Ofili-Yebovi D, Marsh M, Jurkovic D (2005) First-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy evolving into placenta previa/accreta at term. J Ultrasound Med 24:1569–1573PubMed Ben Nagi J, Ofili-Yebovi D, Marsh M, Jurkovic D (2005) First-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy evolving into placenta previa/accreta at term. J Ultrasound Med 24:1569–1573PubMed
7.
go back to reference Diaz SD, Jones JE, Seryakov M, Mann WJ (2002) Uterine rupture and dehiscence: ten-year review and case-control study. South Med J 95:431–435CrossRefPubMed Diaz SD, Jones JE, Seryakov M, Mann WJ (2002) Uterine rupture and dehiscence: ten-year review and case-control study. South Med J 95:431–435CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gilliam M (2006) Cesarean delivery on request: reproductive consequences. Semin Perinatol 30:257–260CrossRefPubMed Gilliam M (2006) Cesarean delivery on request: reproductive consequences. Semin Perinatol 30:257–260CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kennare R, Tucker G, Heard A, Chan A (2007) Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109(2 Pt 1):270–276CrossRefPubMed Kennare R, Tucker G, Heard A, Chan A (2007) Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109(2 Pt 1):270–276CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P et al (2004) Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. Br Med J 329:19–25CrossRef Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P et al (2004) Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. Br Med J 329:19–25CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Souza JP, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P et al (2010) WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med 10:71CrossRef Souza JP, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P et al (2010) WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med 10:71CrossRef
12.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2010) ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: (2010) vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 116:450–463CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2010) ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: (2010) vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 116:450–463CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gholitabar M, Ullman R, James D, Griffiths M (2011) Guideline Development Group of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Caesarean section: summary of updated NICE guidance. Br Med J 343:d7108CrossRef Gholitabar M, Ullman R, James D, Griffiths M (2011) Guideline Development Group of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Caesarean section: summary of updated NICE guidance. Br Med J 343:d7108CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J et al (2009) Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(3):320.e1–320.e6 Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J et al (2009) Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(3):320.e1–320.e6
15.
go back to reference Fukuda M, Fukud K, Mochizuki M (1988) Examination of previous caesarean section scars by ultrasound. Arch Gynecol Obstet 243:221–224CrossRefPubMed Fukuda M, Fukud K, Mochizuki M (1988) Examination of previous caesarean section scars by ultrasound. Arch Gynecol Obstet 243:221–224CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rozenberg P, Goffinet P, Phillippe HG, Nisand I (1996) Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 347:281–284CrossRefPubMed Rozenberg P, Goffinet P, Phillippe HG, Nisand I (1996) Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 347:281–284CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cheung VY, Constantinescu OC, Ahluwalia BS (2004) Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery. J Ultrasound Med 23:1441–1447PubMed Cheung VY, Constantinescu OC, Ahluwalia BS (2004) Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery. J Ultrasound Med 23:1441–1447PubMed
18.
go back to reference Cheung VY (2005) Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27:674–681PubMed Cheung VY (2005) Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27:674–681PubMed
19.
go back to reference Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S (2004) Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 87:215–219CrossRefPubMed Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S (2004) Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 87:215–219CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Gotoh H, Masuzaki H, Yoshida A et al (2000) Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 95:596–600CrossRefPubMed Gotoh H, Masuzaki H, Yoshida A et al (2000) Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 95:596–600CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L (2010) Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 117:1119–1126CrossRef Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L (2010) Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 117:1119–1126CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C et al (2004) Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:289–292CrossRefPubMed Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C et al (2004) Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:289–292CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E et al (2008) Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:72–77CrossRefPubMed Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E et al (2008) Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:72–77CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Armstrong V, Hansen WF, Van Voorhis BJ, Syrop CH (2003) Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 101:61–65CrossRefPubMed Armstrong V, Hansen WF, Van Voorhis BJ, Syrop CH (2003) Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 101:61–65CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L (2009) High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:90–97CrossRefPubMed Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L (2009) High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:90–97CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L (2010) Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:75–83CrossRefPubMed Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L (2010) Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:75–83CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lim RP, Lee VS, Bennett GL et al (2006) Imaging the female pelvis at 3.0 T. Top Magn Reson Imaging 17:427–443CrossRefPubMed Lim RP, Lee VS, Bennett GL et al (2006) Imaging the female pelvis at 3.0 T. Top Magn Reson Imaging 17:427–443CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Beddy P, O’Neill AC, Yamamoto AK et al (2012) FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging. Radiographics 32:241–254CrossRefPubMed Beddy P, O’Neill AC, Yamamoto AK et al (2012) FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging. Radiographics 32:241–254CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Langer JE, Oliver ER, Lev-Toaff AS, Coleman BG (2012) Imaging of the female pelvis through the life cycle. Radiographics 32:1575–1597CrossRefPubMed Langer JE, Oliver ER, Lev-Toaff AS, Coleman BG (2012) Imaging of the female pelvis through the life cycle. Radiographics 32:1575–1597CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Rodgers SK, Kirby CL, Smith RJ, Horrow MM (2012) Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics 32:1693–1712CrossRefPubMed Rodgers SK, Kirby CL, Smith RJ, Horrow MM (2012) Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics 32:1693–1712CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Bruno CH (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging in 300 cases of placenta accreta: surgical correlation of new findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:716–724CrossRefPubMed Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Bruno CH (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging in 300 cases of placenta accreta: surgical correlation of new findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:716–724CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Mukherjee P, Berman JI, Chung SW et al (2008) Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fibre tractography: theoretic underpinnings. Am J Neuroradiol 29:632–664CrossRefPubMed Mukherjee P, Berman JI, Chung SW et al (2008) Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fibre tractography: theoretic underpinnings. Am J Neuroradiol 29:632–664CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Weiss S, Jaermann T, Schmid P et al (2006) Three-dimensional fibre architecture of the nonpregnant human uterus determined ex vivo using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 288:84–90CrossRefPubMed Weiss S, Jaermann T, Schmid P et al (2006) Three-dimensional fibre architecture of the nonpregnant human uterus determined ex vivo using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 288:84–90CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Fiocchi F, Nocetti L, Siopis E et al (2012) In-vivo 3T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging for detection of the fibre architecture of the human uterus: a feasibility and quantitative study. Br J Radiol 85:e1009–e1017CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Fiocchi F, Nocetti L, Siopis E et al (2012) In-vivo 3T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging for detection of the fibre architecture of the human uterus: a feasibility and quantitative study. Br J Radiol 85:e1009–e1017CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
35.
go back to reference Li T, Mirowitz SA (2003) Fast T2-weighted MR imaging: impact of variation in pulse sequence parameters on image quality and artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging 21:745–753CrossRefPubMed Li T, Mirowitz SA (2003) Fast T2-weighted MR imaging: impact of variation in pulse sequence parameters on image quality and artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging 21:745–753CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Martin DR, Friel HT, Danrad R et al (2005) Approach to abdominal imaging at 1.5 Tesla and optimization at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13:241–254CrossRefPubMed Martin DR, Friel HT, Danrad R et al (2005) Approach to abdominal imaging at 1.5 Tesla and optimization at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13:241–254CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ, Nisand I (1996) Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 347:281–284CrossRefPubMed Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ, Nisand I (1996) Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 347:281–284CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Tanik A, Ustun C, Cil E, Arslan A (1996) Sonographic evaluation of the wall thickness of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean section. J Clin Ultrasound 24:355–357CrossRefPubMed Tanik A, Ustun C, Cil E, Arslan A (1996) Sonographic evaluation of the wall thickness of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean section. J Clin Ultrasound 24:355–357CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Berghella V (2012) Maternal-Fetal & Obstetric Evidence Based Guidelines, two-volume set, 2nd edn. (ISBN-10:1841848263; ISBN-13: 978-1841848266) Berghella V (2012) Maternal-Fetal & Obstetric Evidence Based Guidelines, two-volume set, 2nd edn. (ISBN-10:1841848263; ISBN-13: 978-1841848266)
40.
go back to reference Wang CB, Chiu WWC, Lee CY et al (2009) Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:85–89CrossRefPubMed Wang CB, Chiu WWC, Lee CY et al (2009) Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:85–89CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Usta IM, Hobeika EM, Musa AA et al (2005) Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1045–1049CrossRefPubMed Usta IM, Hobeika EM, Musa AA et al (2005) Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1045–1049CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of uterine scar after previous caesarean section: comparison with 3T-magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging
Authors
Federica Fiocchi
Elisabetta Petrella
Luca Nocetti
Serena Currà
Guido Ligabue
Tiziana Costi
Pietro Torricelli
Fabio Facchinetti
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
La radiologia medica / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0033-8362
Electronic ISSN: 1826-6983
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0431-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

La radiologia medica 2/2015 Go to the issue