Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Urban Health 3/2016

01-06-2016

Who Adolescents Trust May Impact Their Health: Findings from Baltimore

Authors: Kristin Mmari, Beth Marshall, Hannah Lantos, Robert Wm. Blum

Published in: Journal of Urban Health | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

This study is one of the first to explore the relevance of trust to the health of adolescents living in a disadvantaged urban setting. The primary objectives were to determine the differences in the sociodemographic characteristics between adolescents who do and do not trust and to examine the associations between trust and health. Data were drawn from the Well-Being of Adolescents in Vulnerable Environments (WAVE) study, which is a cross-sectional global study of adolescents in very low-income urban settings conducted in 2011–2013. This paper focused on 446 adolescents in Baltimore as it was the primary site where trust was explicitly measured. For the main analyses, six health outcomes were examined: (1) self-rated health; (2) violence victimization; (3) binge drinking; (4) marijuana use; (5) post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); and (6) condom use at last sex. Independent variables included sociodemographic variables (age, gender, current school enrolment, perceived relative wealth, and family structure) and two dimensions of trust: community trust (trust in individuals/groups within neighborhood) and institutional trust (trust in authorities). The results show that more than half the sample had no trust in police, and a high proportion had no trust in other types of authority. Among girls, those with higher levels of community trust were less likely to be victimized and involved in binge drinking. Meanwhile, girls with higher levels of institutional trust were more likely to use a condom and less likely to have used marijuana. Among boys, those with higher levels of community trust were more likely to use a condom, while those with higher levels of institutional trust were less likely to use marijuana, but more likely binge drink. Overall, this study highlights the importance of trust for adolescent health. Most surprising were the differences in the associations between boys and girls with regard to the type of trust and specific health outcome that was significant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Taylor DL, Biafora FA, Warhet GJ. Racial mistrust and disposition to deviance among African American, Haitian, and other Caribbean Island adolescent boys. Law Hum Behav. 1994; 18(3): 291–303.CrossRef Taylor DL, Biafora FA, Warhet GJ. Racial mistrust and disposition to deviance among African American, Haitian, and other Caribbean Island adolescent boys. Law Hum Behav. 1994; 18(3): 291–303.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Anderson E. Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton; 1999. Anderson E. Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton; 1999.
4.
go back to reference Subramanian SV, Kim DJ, Kawachi I. Social trust and self-rated health in US communities: a multilevel analysis. J Urban Health. 2002; 79(4 Suppl 1): S21–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Subramanian SV, Kim DJ, Kawachi I. Social trust and self-rated health in US communities: a multilevel analysis. J Urban Health. 2002; 79(4 Suppl 1): S21–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference McPherson K, McGee C, Morgan A. The role and impact of social capital on the health and wellbeing of children and adolescents: a systematic review. Glasgow, Scotland: Glasgow Centre for Population Health; 2013. McPherson K, McGee C, Morgan A. The role and impact of social capital on the health and wellbeing of children and adolescents: a systematic review. Glasgow, Scotland: Glasgow Centre for Population Health; 2013.
6.
go back to reference Tough P. How children succeed: grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. London, England: Random House Books; 2013. Tough P. How children succeed: grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. London, England: Random House Books; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Furstenburg F, Hughes ME. Successful development of at risk youth. J Marriage Fam. 1995; 57: 580–92.CrossRef Furstenburg F, Hughes ME. Successful development of at risk youth. J Marriage Fam. 1995; 57: 580–92.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carpiano RM, Fitterer LM. Questions of trust in health research on social capital: what aspects of personal network social capital do they measure? Soc Sci Med. 2014; 116: 225–34.CrossRefPubMed Carpiano RM, Fitterer LM. Questions of trust in health research on social capital: what aspects of personal network social capital do they measure? Soc Sci Med. 2014; 116: 225–34.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rotter RJ. Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. Am Psychol. 1980; 35: 1–7.CrossRef Rotter RJ. Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. Am Psychol. 1980; 35: 1–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Smith TW. Factors relating to misanthropy in contemporary American Society. Soc Sci Res. 1997; 26: 170–96.CrossRef Smith TW. Factors relating to misanthropy in contemporary American Society. Soc Sci Res. 1997; 26: 170–96.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Alesina A, La Ferrara E. Who trusts others? J Pubic Econ. 2002; 85(2): 207–34.CrossRef Alesina A, La Ferrara E. Who trusts others? J Pubic Econ. 2002; 85(2): 207–34.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Uslaner EM. The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2002.CrossRef Uslaner EM. The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2002.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sampson RJ, Graif C. Neighborhood social capital as differential social organization resident and leadership dimensions. Am Behav Sci. 2009; 52(11): 1579–605. Sampson RJ, Graif C. Neighborhood social capital as differential social organization resident and leadership dimensions. Am Behav Sci. 2009; 52(11): 1579–605.
14.
go back to reference Ross CE, Mirowsky J, Pribesh S. Powerlessness and the amplification of threat: neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and mistrust. Am Sociol Rev. 2001; 66(4): 568–591.CrossRef Ross CE, Mirowsky J, Pribesh S. Powerlessness and the amplification of threat: neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and mistrust. Am Sociol Rev. 2001; 66(4): 568–591.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997; 277(5328): 918–24.CrossRefPubMed Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997; 277(5328): 918–24.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD. Durable inequality. Poverty Traps. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 2006:176–203. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD. Durable inequality. Poverty Traps. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 2006:176–203.
17.
go back to reference Hardin R. Trust and trustworthiness. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2002. Hardin R. Trust and trustworthiness. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2002.
18.
go back to reference Suttles G. The social order of the slum: ethnicity and territory in the inner city. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press; 1968. Suttles G. The social order of the slum: ethnicity and territory in the inner city. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press; 1968.
19.
go back to reference Decker MR, Marshall BD, Emerson M, et al. Respondent-driven sampling for an adolescent health study in vulnerable urban settings: a multi-country study. J Adolesc Health. 2014; 55(6): S6–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Decker MR, Marshall BD, Emerson M, et al. Respondent-driven sampling for an adolescent health study in vulnerable urban settings: a multi-country study. J Adolesc Health. 2014; 55(6): S6–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Naef M, Schupp J. Measuring trust: experiments and surveys in contrast and combination. SOEPpaper No. 167 (2009). Accessed from doi:10.2139/ssrn.1367375 Naef M, Schupp J. Measuring trust: experiments and surveys in contrast and combination. SOEPpaper No. 167 (2009). Accessed from doi:10.2139/ssrn.1367375
21.
go back to reference Weathers FW, Ruscio AM, Keane TM. Psychometric properties of nine scoring rules for the clinician-administered posttraumatic stress disorder scale. Psychol Assess. 1999; 11: 124–33.CrossRef Weathers FW, Ruscio AM, Keane TM. Psychometric properties of nine scoring rules for the clinician-administered posttraumatic stress disorder scale. Psychol Assess. 1999; 11: 124–33.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Volz E, Heckathorn DD. Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling. J Off Stat. 2008; 24(1): 79. Volz E, Heckathorn DD. Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling. J Off Stat. 2008; 24(1): 79.
23.
go back to reference Vandello JA, Bosson JK. Hard won and easily lost: a review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychol Men Masculinity. 2013; 14(2): 101.CrossRef Vandello JA, Bosson JK. Hard won and easily lost: a review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychol Men Masculinity. 2013; 14(2): 101.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mahalik JR, Lombardi CM, Sims J, Coley RL, Lynch AD. Gender, male-typicality, and social norms predicting adolescent alcohol intoxication and marijuana use. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 143: 71–80.CrossRefPubMed Mahalik JR, Lombardi CM, Sims J, Coley RL, Lynch AD. Gender, male-typicality, and social norms predicting adolescent alcohol intoxication and marijuana use. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 143: 71–80.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cuesta J, Alda E. The effects of trust on victimization in Colombia. J Peace Res. 2012; 49(6): 833–46.CrossRef Cuesta J, Alda E. The effects of trust on victimization in Colombia. J Peace Res. 2012; 49(6): 833–46.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Who Adolescents Trust May Impact Their Health: Findings from Baltimore
Authors
Kristin Mmari
Beth Marshall
Hannah Lantos
Robert Wm. Blum
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Urban Health / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Electronic ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0038-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Urban Health 3/2016 Go to the issue