Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Urban Health 4/2010

01-07-2010

Why the Wait? Delayed HIV Diagnosis among Men Who Have Sex with Men

Authors: Kimberly M. Nelson, MPH, Hanne Thiede, Stephen E. Hawes, Matthew R. Golden, Rebecca Hutcheson, James W. Carey, Ann Kurth, Richard A. Jenkins

Published in: Journal of Urban Health | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

We sought to identify factors associated with delayed diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; testing HIV-seropositive 6 months or more after HIV seroconversion), by comparing delayed testers to non-delayed testers (persons who were diagnosed within 6 months of HIV seroconversion), in King County, Washington among men who have sex with men (MSM). Participants were recruited from HIV testing sites in the Seattle area. Delayed testing status was determined by the Serologic Testing Algorithm for Recent HIV Seroconversion or a self-reported previous HIV-negative test. Quantitative data on sociodemographic characteristics, health history, and drug-use and sexual behaviors were collected via computer-assisted self-interviews. Qualitative semi-structured interviews regarding testing and risk behaviors were also conducted. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with delayed diagnosis. Content analysis was used to establish themes in the qualitative data. Out of the 77 HIV-seropositive MSM in this sample, 39 (51%) had evidence of delayed diagnosis. Factors associated with delayed testing included being African-American, homeless, “out” to 50% or less people about male-male sex, and having only one sex partner in the past 6 months. Delayed testers often cited HIV-related sickness as their reason for testing and fear and wanting to be in denial of their HIV status as reasons for not testing. Delayed testers frequently did not identify as part of the MSM community, did not recognize that they were at risk for HIV acquisition, and did not feel a responsibility to themselves or others to disclose their HIV status. This study illustrates the need to further explore circumstances around delayed diagnosis in MSM and develop outreach methods and prevention messages targeted specifically to this potentially highly marginalized population in order to detect HIV infections earlier, provide HIV care, and prevent new infections.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV prevalence estimates—United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008; 57(39): 1073–1076. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV prevalence estimates—United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008; 57(39): 1073–1076.
2.
go back to reference Hall H, Song R, Rhodes P, et al. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA. 2008; 300(5): 520–529.CrossRefPubMed Hall H, Song R, Rhodes P, et al. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA. 2008; 300(5): 520–529.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sanchez T, Finlayson T, Drake A, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors—United States, National HIV behavioral surveillance system: men who have sex with men, November 2003-April 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006; 55(6): 1–16.PubMed Sanchez T, Finlayson T, Drake A, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors—United States, National HIV behavioral surveillance system: men who have sex with men, November 2003-April 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006; 55(6): 1–16.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Weinhardt L, Carey M, Johnson B, Bickham N. Effects of HIV counseling and testing on sexual risk behavior: a meta-analytic review of published research, 1985-1997. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9): 1397–1405.CrossRefPubMed Weinhardt L, Carey M, Johnson B, Bickham N. Effects of HIV counseling and testing on sexual risk behavior: a meta-analytic review of published research, 1985-1997. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9): 1397–1405.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt J, Janssen R. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005; 39(4): 446–453.CrossRefPubMed Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt J, Janssen R. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005; 39(4): 446–453.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gorbach P, Drumright L, Daar E, Little S. Transmission behaviors of recently HIV-infected men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006; 42(1): 80–85.CrossRefPubMed Gorbach P, Drumright L, Daar E, Little S. Transmission behaviors of recently HIV-infected men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006; 42(1): 80–85.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV prevalence, unrecognized infection, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men—five U.S. cities, June 2004-April 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005; 54(24): 597–601. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV prevalence, unrecognized infection, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men—five U.S. cities, June 2004-April 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005; 54(24): 597–601.
8.
go back to reference Carr J, Turner N. Characterizing populations that receive late diagnosis of HIV to target prevention efforts. Presented in the HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Unit, Public Health-Seattle and King County and the Infectious Disease and Reproductive Health Assessment Unit, Washington State Department of Health HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Report. 2006; 68: 19–26. Carr J, Turner N. Characterizing populations that receive late diagnosis of HIV to target prevention efforts. Presented in the HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Unit, Public Health-Seattle and King County and the Infectious Disease and Reproductive Health Assessment Unit, Washington State Department of Health HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Report. 2006; 68: 19–26.
9.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Late versus early testing of HIV—16 sites, United States, 2000-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003; 52(25): 581–586. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Late versus early testing of HIV—16 sites, United States, 2000-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003; 52(25): 581–586.
10.
go back to reference Mayben J, Kramer J, Kallen M, Franzini L, Lairson D, Giordano T. Predictors of delayed HIV diagnosis in a recently diagnosed cohort. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007; 21(3): 195–204.CrossRefPubMed Mayben J, Kramer J, Kallen M, Franzini L, Lairson D, Giordano T. Predictors of delayed HIV diagnosis in a recently diagnosed cohort. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007; 21(3): 195–204.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mugavero M, Castellano C, Edelman D, Hicks C. Late diagnosis of HIV infection: the role of age and sex. Am J Med. 2007; 120(4): 370–373.CrossRefPubMed Mugavero M, Castellano C, Edelman D, Hicks C. Late diagnosis of HIV infection: the role of age and sex. Am J Med. 2007; 120(4): 370–373.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schwarcz S, Hsu L, Dilley J, Loeb L, Nelson K, Boyd S. Late diagnosis of HIV infection: trends, prevalence, and characteristics of persons whose HIV diagnosis occurred within 12 months of developing AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006; 43(4): 491–494.CrossRefPubMed Schwarcz S, Hsu L, Dilley J, Loeb L, Nelson K, Boyd S. Late diagnosis of HIV infection: trends, prevalence, and characteristics of persons whose HIV diagnosis occurred within 12 months of developing AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006; 43(4): 491–494.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Late HIV testing—34 states, 1996-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 58(24): 661–665. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Late HIV testing—34 states, 1996-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 58(24): 661–665.
14.
go back to reference MacKellar D, Valleroy L, Secura G, et al. Unrecognized HIV infection, risk behaviors, and perceptions of risk among young men who have sex with men: opportunities for advancing HIV prevention in the third decade of HIV/AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005; 38(5): 603–614.CrossRefPubMed MacKellar D, Valleroy L, Secura G, et al. Unrecognized HIV infection, risk behaviors, and perceptions of risk among young men who have sex with men: opportunities for advancing HIV prevention in the third decade of HIV/AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005; 38(5): 603–614.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference MacKellar D, Valleroy L, Behel S, et al. Unintentional HIV exposures from young men who have sex with men who disclose being HIV-negative. AIDS. 2006; 20(12): 1637–1644.CrossRefPubMed MacKellar D, Valleroy L, Behel S, et al. Unintentional HIV exposures from young men who have sex with men who disclose being HIV-negative. AIDS. 2006; 20(12): 1637–1644.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in HIV/AIDS diagnoses among men who have sex with men—33 states, 2001-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008; 57(25): 681–686. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in HIV/AIDS diagnoses among men who have sex with men—33 states, 2001-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008; 57(25): 681–686.
17.
go back to reference Thiede H, Jenkins R, Carey J, et al. Determinants of recent HIV infection among Seattle-area men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(Suppl 1): S157–S164.PubMed Thiede H, Jenkins R, Carey J, et al. Determinants of recent HIV infection among Seattle-area men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(Suppl 1): S157–S164.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kothe D, Byers R, Caudill S, et al. Performance characteristics of a new less sensitive HIV-1 enzyme immunoassay for use in estimating HIV seroincidence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003; 33(5): 625–634.CrossRefPubMed Kothe D, Byers R, Caudill S, et al. Performance characteristics of a new less sensitive HIV-1 enzyme immunoassay for use in estimating HIV seroincidence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003; 33(5): 625–634.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Spradley J. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1979. Spradley J. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1979.
20.
go back to reference CDC EZ-Text: software for collection, management and analysis of semi-structured qualitative databases [computer program]. Version 4.04. Atlanta: developed by Manila Consulting Group, Inc. for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008. CDC EZ-Text: software for collection, management and analysis of semi-structured qualitative databases [computer program]. Version 4.04. Atlanta: developed by Manila Consulting Group, Inc. for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.
21.
go back to reference Hruschka D, Schwartz D, St. John DC, Picone-DeCaro E, Jenkins RA, Carey JW. Reliability in coding open-ended data: lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods. 2004; 16(3): 307–331.CrossRef Hruschka D, Schwartz D, St. John DC, Picone-DeCaro E, Jenkins RA, Carey JW. Reliability in coding open-ended data: lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods. 2004; 16(3): 307–331.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Smith R, Rossetto K, Peterson B. A meta-analysis of disclosure of one’s HIV-positive status, stigma and social support. AIDS Care. Jun 2008; 1–10. Smith R, Rossetto K, Peterson B. A meta-analysis of disclosure of one’s HIV-positive status, stigma and social support. AIDS Care. Jun 2008; 1–10.
23.
go back to reference Des Jarlais D, Paone D, Milliken J, et al. Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: a quasi-randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 353(9165): 1657–1661.CrossRefPubMed Des Jarlais D, Paone D, Milliken J, et al. Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: a quasi-randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 353(9165): 1657–1661.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Perlis T, Des Jarlais D, Friedman S, Arasteh K, Turner C. Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. Addiction. 2004; 99(7): 885–896.CrossRefPubMed Perlis T, Des Jarlais D, Friedman S, Arasteh K, Turner C. Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. Addiction. 2004; 99(7): 885–896.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Metzger D, Koblin B, Turner C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152(2): 99–106.CrossRefPubMed Metzger D, Koblin B, Turner C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152(2): 99–106.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Williams M, Freeman R, Bowen A, et al. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000; 12(3): 199–213.PubMed Williams M, Freeman R, Bowen A, et al. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000; 12(3): 199–213.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Golden M, Gift T, Brewer D, et al. Peer referral for HIV case-finding among men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2006; 20(15): 1961–1968.CrossRefPubMed Golden M, Gift T, Brewer D, et al. Peer referral for HIV case-finding among men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2006; 20(15): 1961–1968.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Why the Wait? Delayed HIV Diagnosis among Men Who Have Sex with Men
Authors
Kimberly M. Nelson, MPH
Hanne Thiede
Stephen E. Hawes
Matthew R. Golden
Rebecca Hutcheson
James W. Carey
Ann Kurth
Richard A. Jenkins
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Urban Health / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Electronic ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9434-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Journal of Urban Health 4/2010 Go to the issue