Top

Published in:

01-01-2006 | HIV Perspectives After 25 Years

HIV Behavioral Research Online

Authors: Mary Ann Chiasson, DrPH, Jeffrey T. Parsons, James M. Tesoriero, Alex Carballo-Dieguez, Sabina Hirshfield, Robert H. Remien

Published in: Journal of Urban Health | Issue 1/2006

Abstract

Internet access has caused a global revolution in the way people of all ages and genders interact. Many have turned to the Internet to seek love, companionship, and sex, prompting researchers to move behavioral studies online. The sexual behavior of men who have sex with men (MSM) has been more closely studied than that of any other group online given the abundance of gay-oriented websites and concerns about increasing transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Not only does the Internet provide a new medium for the conduct of behavioral research and for participant recruitment into an array of research studies, it has the as yet unrealized potential to reach huge numbers of MSM with innovative harm reduction and prevention messages tailored to individualized needs, interests, and risk behavior. Internet-based research on sexual behavior has many advantages in rapidity of recruitment of diverse samples which include individuals unreachable through conventional methods (i.e., non-gay identified and geographically and socially isolated MSM, etc.). Internet-based research also presents some new methodologic challenges in study design, participant recruitment, survey implementation, and interpretation of results. In addition, there are ethical issues unique to online research including difficulties in verifying informed consent, obstacles to surveying minors, and the ability to assure anonymity. This paper presents a review of Internet-based research on sexual behavior in MSM, a general discussion of the methodologic and ethical challenges of Internet-based research, and recommendations for future interdisciplinary research.

Cooper A, Scherer C, Boies S, Gordon B. Sexuality on the Internet: from sexual exploration to pathological expression. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1999;30(2):154–164.CrossRef

Toomey K, Rothenberg R. Sex and cyberspace—virtual networks leading to high-risk sex. JAMA. 2000;284(4):485–487.CrossRefPubMed

Benotsch E, Kalichman S, Cage M. Men who have met sex partners via the Internet: prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Arch Sex Behav. Apr 2002;31(2):177–183.CrossRefPubMed

Bull S, McFarlane M. Soliciting sex on the Internet: what are the risks for sexually transmitted diseases and HIV? Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27(9):545–550.PubMedCrossRef

Bull S, McFarlane M, Rietmeijer C. HIV and sexually transmitted infection risk behaviors among men seeking sex with men on-line. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(6):988–989.PubMed

Elford J. Surfing for sex. AIDS Focus. 2002;17:1–3.

Elford J, Bolding G, Davis M, Sherr L, Hart G. The Internet and HIV: an examination of high risk sexual behaviour among London gay men who seek sex on the Internet. Paper presented at: Third International Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, 2002; Maastricht, NL.

Elford J, Bolding G, Sherr L. Seeking sex on the Internet and sexual risk behaviour among gay men using London gyms. AIDS. 2001;15(11):1409–1415.CrossRefPubMed

Hospers H, Harterink P, Van Den Hoek K, Veenstra J. Chatters on the Internet: a special target group for HIV prevention. AIDS Care. 2002;14(4):539–544.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Jones S. Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1997.

11.

McFarlane M, Bull S, Rietmeijer C. The Internet as a newly emerging risk environment for sexually transmitted diseases. JAMA. 2000;284(4):443–446.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Parsons J, Koken J, Bimbi D. The use of the Internet by gay and bisexual male escorts: sex workers as sex educators. AIDS Care. 2004;16(8):1021–1035.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Rhodes S, DiClement R, Cecil H, Hergenrather K, Yee L. Risk among men who have sex with men in the United States: a comparison of an Internet sample and a conventional outreach sample. AIDS Educ Prev. February 2002;14(1):41–50.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Ross M, Tikkanen R, Mansson S. Differences between Internet samples and conventional samples of men who have sex with men: implications for research and HIV interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:749–758.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Tikkanen R, Ross M. Looking for sexual compatibility: experiences among Swedish men in visiting Internet gay chat rooms. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2000;3(4):605–616.CrossRef

16.

Padgett P. The effects of the Internet on women's sexual health and sexuality. Paper presented at: STD/HIV Prevention and the Internet; August 25–27, 2003; Washington, DC.

17.

Kim A, Kent C, McFarland W, Klausner J. Cruising on the Internet highway. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;28(1):89–93.PubMed

18.

Elford J, Bolding G, Sherr L. Seeking sex on the Internet and sexual risk behaviour among gay men using London gyms. AIDS. 2001;15(11):1409–1415.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Tikkanen R, Ross M. Technological tearoom trade: characteristics of Swedish men visiting gay Internet chat rooms. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15(2):122–132.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Weatherburn P, Hickson F, Reid D. Gay Men's Use of the Internet and Other Settings Where HIV Prevention Occurs. London: Sigma Research; 2003.

21.

Ashton M, Sopwith W, Clark P, McKelvey D, Lighton L, Mandal D. An outbreak no longer: factors contributing to the return of syphilis in Greater Manchester. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79:291–293.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Klausner J, Wolf W, Fischer-Ponce L, Zolt I, Katz M. Tracing a syphilis outbreak through cyberspace. JAMA. Jul 26 2000;284(4):447–449.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Tashima K, Alt E, Harwell J, Fiebich-Perez D, Flanigan T. Internet sex-seeking leads to acute HIV infection: a report of two cases. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:285–286.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Baker P. Fantabulosa: A Dictionary of Polari & Gay Slang. New York: Continuum; 2002.

25.

Elwood W, Green K, Carter K. Gentlemen don't speak: communication norms and condom use in bathhouses. J Appl Commun Res. 2003;31:277–298.CrossRef

26.

Silverstein C, Picano F. The Joy of Gay Sex. New York: Harpers Resource; 2003.

27.

Mettey A, Crosby R, DiClemente R, Holtgrave D. Associations between Internet sex seeking and STI associated risk behaviours among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79:466–468.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Taylor M, Aynalem G, Smith L, Bemis C, Kenney K, Kerndt P. Correlates of Internet use to meet sex partners among men who have sex with men diagnosed with early syphilis in Los Angeles County. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31:552–556.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Bull S, Lloyd L, Rietmeijer C, McFarlane M. Recruitment and retention of an online sample for an HIV prevention intervention targeting men who have sex with men: the smart sex quest project. AIDS Care. 2004;16(8):931–943.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Hirshfield S, Remien R, Humberstone M, Walavalkar I, Chiasson M. Substance use and high-risk sex among men who have sex with men: a national online study in the USA. AIDS Care. 2004;16(8):1036–1047.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Chiasson M, Hirshfield S, Humberstone M, Remien R, Wolitski R, Wong T. A comparison of online and offline risk in MSM. Paper presented at: 12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; February 25, 2005; Boston, MA.

32.

Bolding G, Davis M, Hart G, Sherr L, Elford J. Gay men who look for sex on the Internet: is there more HIV/STI risk with online partners? AIDS. 2005;19(9):961–968.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Bolding G, Davis M, Sherr L, Hart G, Elford J. Use of gay Internet sites and views about online health promotion among men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 2004; 16(8):993–1001.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Kalichman S, Rompa D. HIV treatment adherence and unprotected sex practices in people receiving antiretroviral therapy. Sex Transm Infect. Feb 2003;79(1):59–61.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Fernandez M, Varga L, Perrino T, et al. The Internet as recruitment tool for HIV studies: a viable strategy for researching at-risk Hispanic MSM in Miami? AIDS Care. November 2004;16(8):953–963.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Fernandez M, Perrino T, Collazo J, et al. Surfing new territory: club-drug use and risky sex among Hispanic men who have sex with men recruited on the Internet. J Urban Health. 2005;82(1 Suppl 1):i79–i88.PubMed

37.

Davis M, Bolding G, Hart G, Sherr L, Elford J. Reflecting on the experience of interviewing online: perspectives from the Internet and HIV study in London. AIDS Care. 2004;16:944–952.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Gaither C. Group Roams Chat Rooms to Talk to Gay Men About AIDS. N Y Times. November 9, 2000;E:8.

39.

Mustanski B. Getting wired: exploiting the Internet for the collection of valid sexuality data. J Sex Res. 2001;38:292–301.

40.

Birnbaum M. Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:803–832.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Rhodes S, Bowie D, Hergenrather K. Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57: 68–73.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Bowen A, Williams M, Horvath K. Using the Internet to recruit rural MSM for HIV risk assessment: sampling issues. AIDS Behav. 2004;8(3):311–319.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Riggle E, Rostosky S, Reedy C. Online surveys for BGLT research: issues and techniques. J Homosex. 2005;49(2):1–21.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Nielsen J. Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing; 2000.

45.

Reips U. Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Exp Psychol. 2002;49(4):243–256.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Perlis TE, Des Jarlais D, Friedman S, Arasteh K, Turner C. Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. Addiction. February 2004;99:885–896.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Kissinger P, Rice J, Farley T, et al. Application of computer-assisted interviews to sexual behavior research. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149(10):950–954.PubMed

48.

Kurth A, Partin D, Golden M, et al. A comparison between audio computer-assisted self-interviews and clinician interviews for obtaining the sexual history. Sex Transm Dis. December 2004;31(12):719–726.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Newman J, Des Jarlais D, Turner C, Gribble J, Cooley P, Paone D. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(2):294–297.PubMed

50.

Elford J, Bolding G, Davis M, Sherr L, Hart G. Web-based behavioural surveillance among men who have sex with men: a comparison of online and offline samples in London, UK. Paper presented at: STD/HIV Prevention and the Internet 2003, 2003; Washington, DC.

51.

Keller H, Lee S. Ethical issues surrounding human subjects research using the Internet. J Ethics Behav. 2003;13(3):211–219.CrossRef

52.

Lenhart A, Horrigan J, Rainie L, et al. The ever-shifting Internet population: a new look at Internet access and the digital divide. The Pew Internet & American Life Project. April 2003.

53.

Binik Y, Mah K, Kiesler S. Ethical issues in conducting sex research on the Internet. J Sex Res. 1999;36(1):82–90.CrossRef

54.

Wasow O, Mera H. Community Connect Inc. Presentation on Black Planet. New York: Community Connect Inc.; March 25, 2005.

55.

Dillman D, Bowker D. The web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. In: Reips U, Bosnjak M, eds. Dimensions of Internet Science. Lengerich: Pabst Science; 2001.

56.

Brownlow C, O'Dell L. Ethical issues for qualitative research in on-line communities. Disabil Soc. 2002;17(6):685–694.CrossRef

57.

Childress C. Ethical issues in providing online psychotherapeutic interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2000;2(1):e5.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Eysenbach G, Till J. Ethical issues in qualitative research on Internet communities. BMJ. 2001;323(7321):1103–1105.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Finn J, Lavitt M. Computer based self-help groups for sexual abuse survivors. Soc Work Groups. 1994;17(1/2):41–46.

60.

Flicker S, Haans D, Skinner H. Ethical dilemmas in research on Internet communities. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(1):124–134.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Haigh C, Jones N. An overview of the ethics of cyber-space research and the implication for nurse educators. Nurse Educ Today. 2005;25:3–8.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Kraut R, Olson J, Banaji M, Bruckman A, Cohen J, Couper M. Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the conduct of research on the Internet. Am Psychol. 2004;59(2):105–117.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Pittenger D. Internet research: an opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research. Ethics Behav. 2003;14(1):45–60.CrossRef

64.

Nosek B, Banaji M, Greenwald A. E-research: ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. J Soc Issues. 2002;58(1):161–176.CrossRef

65.

Sharf B. Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. Women Health. 1997;26(1):65–84.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Winzelberg A. The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders. Comput Hum Behav. 1997;13:393–407.CrossRef

67.

Herring S. Linguistic and critical analysis of computer-mediated communications: some ethical and scholarly considerations. Inf Soc. 1996;12:153–168.

68.

Walther J. Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics Inf Technol. 2002;4:205–216.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Singer E, Hippler H, Schwartz N. Confidentiality assurances in surveys: reassurance or threat? Int J Public Opin Res. 1992;4:256–268.CrossRef

Title: HIV Behavioral Research Online
Authors: Mary Ann Chiasson, DrPH
Jeffrey T. Parsons
James M. Tesoriero
Alex Carballo-Dieguez
Sabina Hirshfield
Robert H. Remien
Publication date: 01-01-2006
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Urban Health / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Electronic ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-005-9008-3

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

HIV Behavioral Research Online

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Promoting Environmental Health Policy Through Community Based Participatory Research: A Case Study from Harlem, New York

Integrating HIV Prevention Activities into the HIV Medical Care Setting: A Report from the NYC HIV Centers Consortium

Introduction to Special Section of JUH on Consortium Papers

A Coordinated Relocation Strategy for Enhancing Case Management of Lead Poisoned Children: Outcomes and Costs

Reflections on AIDS: Lessons for the Future

Aging and HIV Infection