Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Targeted Oncology 2/2019

01-04-2019 | NSCLC | Original Research Article

Distribution of ALK Fusion Variants and Correlation with Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Crizotinib

Authors: Yudong Su, Xiang Long, Yang Song, Peng Chen, Shanqing Li, Huaxia Yang, Pancheng Wu, Yanyu Wang, Zhongxing Bing, Zhili Cao, Lei Cao, Yijun Wu, Zhe Zhang, Jing Liu, Bing Li, Jianxing Xiang, Ke Ma, Tengfei Zhang, Lu Zhang, Xinru Mao, Hao Liu, Puyuan Xing, Naixin Liang

Published in: Targeted Oncology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a molecular subgroup with high sensitivity to ALK inhibitors. Crizotinib, a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treating ALK-rearranged NSCLC, has shown remarkable response in ALK-positive NSCLC. However, heterogeneity of clinical responses exists among different ALK fusion partners. Several small studies have investigated the correlation between fusion partners and efficacy, but not yielded consistent results.

Objective

We investigated the prevalence of ALK rearrangements in a Chinese NSCLC population, and correlated clinical outcomes of crizotinib with different ALK partners/variants.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed genomic profiling and clinical data of 110 ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients from five centers. The clinical response to crizotinib and survival data in ALK-positive patients was retrospectively analyzed.

Results

A total of 134 ALK rearrangements with 39 partners were identified in 110 patients (5.6%) among a cohort of 1971 NSCLC patients. The most frequently occurring ALK fusion partner was EML4, which was identified in 71.6% (96/134) of all of the rearrangements in 87.3% (96/110) patients, and with variant 3 (41/96, 42.7%) as the main variant type. No statistically significant differences in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were found between EML4-ALK and non-EML4-ALK NSCLC patients in our cohort (PFS, p = 0.207; OS, p = 0.678). Outcomes did not differ significantly between patients above and below 40 years of age (PFS, p = 0.427; OS, p = 0.686), nor between patients treated with crizotinib in different lines of therapy (PFS, p = 0.171; OS, p = 0.922). For EML4-ALK-positive NSCLC (n = 96), patients harboring variant 3 or variant 5 displayed significantly lower PFS and OS than those with other variants (PFS, 8.6 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.046; OS, 31.0 vs. 37.6 months, p = 0.026). In addition, patients with a single EML4-ALK rearrangement event displayed favorable PFS (10.0 vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.040) and OS (36.0 vs. 20.0 months, p = 0.029) compared to those harboring multiple ALK rearrangements.

Conclusions

This study illustrates the patterns of ALK fusion variants present in Chinese NSCLC patients and might help explain heterogeneous clinical outcomes to crizotinib treatment according to different ALK fusion variants.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
Metadata
Title
Distribution of ALK Fusion Variants and Correlation with Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Crizotinib
Authors
Yudong Su
Xiang Long
Yang Song
Peng Chen
Shanqing Li
Huaxia Yang
Pancheng Wu
Yanyu Wang
Zhongxing Bing
Zhili Cao
Lei Cao
Yijun Wu
Zhe Zhang
Jing Liu
Bing Li
Jianxing Xiang
Ke Ma
Tengfei Zhang
Lu Zhang
Xinru Mao
Hao Liu
Puyuan Xing
Naixin Liang
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Targeted Oncology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1776-2596
Electronic ISSN: 1776-260X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-019-00631-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Targeted Oncology 2/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine