Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HSS Journal ® 2/2013

01-07-2013 | Original Article

The Validity and Reliability of Preoperative Radiographic Canal Diameter Measurements of the Femur

Authors: Kenneth P. Walsh, BA, John R. Fowler, MD, Oliver Chen, MD, John P. Gaughan, PhD, Sayed Ali, MD, Mahin Rehman, BS, Saqib Rehman, MD

Published in: HSS Journal ® | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background:

The femoral canal is frequently measured preoperatively in cases where an intramedullary device is planned for operative fixation of a fracture. To our knowledge, a formal assessment of validity and reliability of preoperative canal measurements has not been previously performed.

Questions/Purposes:

This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of preoperative canal measurements of the femur made on plain radiographs using comparison with curved planar reformation software as the gold standard.

Methods:

Fifty-six patients were identified based on availability of anterior–posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of the femur and computed tomography (CT) of the lower extremity. Four “raters” measured the canal diameter at its narrowest point and the distance from the lesser trochanter to the isthmus on the AP, lateral radiograph, and CT. The width of the femoral nail on AP radiographs was also measured to determine magnification error. Curved planar reformation (CPR) was used to provide the most accurate calculation of the canal diameter.

Results:

Compared to the isthmus position determined by CPR, the measurement was most accurate on an AP and the diameter of the canal was most accurate using coronal CT, followed by AP radiographs. The measured canal diameter of the fractured femur on APs was compared to that of the used implant and varied by 1 mm.

Discussion/Conclusion:

The AP plain radiographic measurement was found to be more accurate for determination of the canal diameter compared to the lateral radiograph. These findings confirm the utility of preoperative canal measurements in predicting the feasibility of placing a specific size intramedullary implant.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bong MR, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Egol KA. Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(2):97-106.PubMed Bong MR, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Egol KA. Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(2):97-106.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Conover WJ, Iman RL. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Statistician. 1981;35(3):124-129. Conover WJ, Iman RL. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Statistician. 1981;35(3):124-129.
3.
go back to reference King RJ, Craig PR, Boreham BG, Majeed MA, Moran CG. The magnification of digital radiographs in the trauma patient: Implications for templating. Injury. 2009;40(2):173-176.PubMedCrossRef King RJ, Craig PR, Boreham BG, Majeed MA, Moran CG. The magnification of digital radiographs in the trauma patient: Implications for templating. Injury. 2009;40(2):173-176.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Krouwer JS. Why Bland–Altman plots should use X, not (Y + X)/2 when X is a reference method. Statistics in Medicine. 2008;27:778-780.PubMedCrossRef Krouwer JS. Why Bland–Altman plots should use X, not (Y + X)/2 when X is a reference method. Statistics in Medicine. 2008;27:778-780.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:148-165.PubMed Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:148-165.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN, Esteve P, de Roguin B. The morphology of the proximal femur: a three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (British Volume). 1992;74(1):28-32. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN, Esteve P, de Roguin B. The morphology of the proximal femur: a three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (British Volume). 1992;74(1):28-32.
7.
go back to reference Sen RK, Tripathy SK, Kumar R, et al. Proximal femoral medullary canal diameters in Indians: correlation between anatomic, radiographic, and computed tomographic measurements. J Orthop Surg. 2010;18(2):189-194. Sen RK, Tripathy SK, Kumar R, et al. Proximal femoral medullary canal diameters in Indians: correlation between anatomic, radiographic, and computed tomographic measurements. J Orthop Surg. 2010;18(2):189-194.
8.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;2:420-428.CrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;2:420-428.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Uzel AP, Deloumeaux J, Rouvillain JL, Laflamme GY, Durandeau A, Caix P. Comparative study of femoral diaphysealmorphometry in two male populations, in France and a French west indies island: an example of clinical relevance of comparative anatomy for orthopedic practice. Surg Radio Anat. 2011;33(3):235-240.CrossRef Uzel AP, Deloumeaux J, Rouvillain JL, Laflamme GY, Durandeau A, Caix P. Comparative study of femoral diaphysealmorphometry in two male populations, in France and a French west indies island: an example of clinical relevance of comparative anatomy for orthopedic practice. Surg Radio Anat. 2011;33(3):235-240.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Validity and Reliability of Preoperative Radiographic Canal Diameter Measurements of the Femur
Authors
Kenneth P. Walsh, BA
John R. Fowler, MD
Oliver Chen, MD
John P. Gaughan, PhD
Sayed Ali, MD
Mahin Rehman, BS
Saqib Rehman, MD
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HSS Journal ® / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1556-3316
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3324
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-013-9334-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

HSS Journal ® 2/2013 Go to the issue