Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
HSS Journal ®
Published in: HSS Journal ® 1/2005

01-09-2005 | Original Article

Radiostereometric Analysis: The Hip

Authors: F. Bottner, MD, E. Su, B. Nestor, MD, B. Azzis, T. P. Sculco, MD, M. Bostrom, MD

Published in: HSS Journal ® | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Excerpt

Radiostereometric analysis is an accurate method of determining the migration and wear of orthopaedic implants such as total hip arthroplasties. While the overall concept of RSA is relatively straightforward: determining the precise location of two distinct objects relative to each other in three dimension such as the relative position of the femoral component and the proximal femur, the actual practical application is somewhat more complex. In radiostereometric analysis the position in space of the original object is reconstructed from a two dimensional x-ray film (Fig. 1). In order to reconstruct the position of segments within the human body, each segment is marked with at least three tantalum beads. Movement between segments is then calculated by localizing each segment in a coordinate system. …
Literature
1.
Davidson M (1898) Roentgen rays and localization. An apparatus for exact measurement and localization by means of roentgen rays. Brit Med J 10
2.
Selvik, G 1989Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal systemActa Orthop Scand232151
3.
Ryd, L, Yuan, X, Lofgren, H 2000Methods for determining the accuracy of radiostereometric analysisActa Orthop Scand71403408CrossRefPubMed
4.
Sutherland, CJ, Wilde, AH, Borden, LS, Marks, KE 1982A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Müller curved-stem total hip replacement arthroplastiesJ Bone Jt Surg64-A970982
5.
Malchau, H, Kärrholm, J, Wang, YX, Herberts, P 1995Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty: digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patientsActa Orthop Scand66418424PubMed
6.
Biedermann, R, Krismer, M, Stöckl, B, Mayrhofer, P, Ornstein, E, Franzen, H 1999Accuracy of EBRA-FCA in the measurement of migration of femoral components of total hip replacementJ Bone Jt Surg81-B266272CrossRef
7.
Soballe, K, Toksvig-Larsen, S, Gelineck, J, Fruensgaard, S, Hansen, ES, Ryd, L, Lucht, U, Bünger, C 1993Migration of hydroxyapatite coated femoral prostheses. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric studyJ Bone Jt Surg75-B681687
8.
Önsten, I, Berzins, A, Shott, S, Sumner, DR 2001Accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in the measurement of THR femoral component translations: human and canine in vitro modelsJ Orthop Res1911621167CrossRefPubMed
9.
Mjoberg, B 1986Loosening of the cemented hip prosthesis. Theimportance of head injuryActa Orthop Scand221 140
10.
Ryd, L 1992Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of prosthetic fixation in the hip and knee jointClin Ortop2765665
11.
Kärrholm, J, Borssen, B, Lowenhielm, G, Snorrason, F 1994Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter: 4–7 year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prosthesesJ Bone Jt Surg76-B912917
12.
Huiskes, R, Verdonschot, N, Nivbrant, B 1998Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplastyClin Ortop355103112CrossRef
13.
Dall, DM, Learmonth, ID, Solomon, MI, Miles, AW, Davenport, JM 1993Fracture and loosening of charnley femoral stemsJ Bone Jt Surg75-B259265
14.
Rockborn, P, Olsson, SS 1993Loosening and bone resorption in Exeter hip arthroplasties. Review at a minimum of five yearsJ Bone Jt Surg75-B865868
15.
Stefansdottir, A, Franzen, H, Johnsson, R, Ornstein, E, Sundberg, M 2004Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stem. A radiostereometric analysis of 22 primary hip arthroplasties followed for 5 yearsActa Orthop Scand75408414CrossRefPubMed
16.
Kärrholm, J, Malchau, H, Snorrason, F, Herberts, P 1994Micromotion of femoral stems in total hip arthroplastyJ Bone Jt Surg76-A16921705
17.
Hamadouche, M, Witvoet, J, Porcher, R, Meunier, A, Sedel, L, Nizard, R 2001Hydroxyapatite-coated versus grit-blasted femoral stems. A prospective randomized study using EBRA-FCAJ Bone Jt Surg83-B979987CrossRef
18.
Garcia-Cimbrelo, E, Cruz-Pardos, A, Madero, R, Ortega-Andreu, M 2003Total hip arthroplasty with use of the cementless Zweymüller Alloclassic system. A ten to thirteen year follow-up studyJ Bone Jt Surg85-A296303
19.
Grübl, A, Chiari, C, Gruber, M, Kaider, A, Gottsauner-Wolf, F 2002Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup. A minimum ten-year follow-upJ Bone Jt Surg84-A425431
20.
Healy, WL, Casey, DJ, Iorio, R, Appleby, D 2002Evaluation of the porous-coated anatomic hip at 12 yearsJ Arthroplast17856863CrossRef
21.
Kawamura, H, Dunbar, MJ, Murray, P, Bourne, RB, Rorabeck, CH 2001The porous coated anatomic total hip replacment. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study of a cementless total hip arthroplastyJ Bone Jt Surg83-A13331338
22.
Keisu, KS, Orozco, F, Sharkey, PF, Hozack, WJ, Rothman, RH, McGurgan, FX 2001Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. Two to eleven-year follow-upJ Bone Jt Surg83-A359363
23.
Kim, YH 2002Bilateral cemented and cementless total hip arthroplastyJ Arthroplast17434440CrossRef
24.
Nercessian, OA, Wu, WH, Sarkissian, H 2001Clinical and radiographic results of cementless AML total hip arthroplasty in young patientsJ Arthroplast16312316CrossRef
25.
Tanzer, M, Chan, S, Brooks, CE, Bobyn, JD 2001Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral component. A minimum 6-year follow-upJ Arthroplast166470CrossRef
26.
Kim, YH, Oh, SH, Kim, JS 2003Primary total hip arthroplasty with a second generation cementless total hip prosthesis in patients younger than fifty years of ageJ Bone Jt Surg85-A109114
27.
Keisu, KS, Orozco, F, McCallum, JD, Bissett, G, Hozack, WJ, Sharkey, PF, Rothman, RH 2001Cementless femoral fixation in the rheumatoid patient undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Minimum 5-year resultsJ Arthroplast16415421CrossRef
28.
Bottner F, Zawadsky M, Su E, Bostrom M, Palm L, Ryd L, Sculco TP (2005) The impact of the weight bearing protocol on implant migration after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A radistereometric analysis. Clin Ortop (accepted for publication)
29.
Rorabeck, CH, Bourne, RB, Mulliken, BD, Nayak, N, Laupacis, A, Tugwell, P, Feeney, D 1996The Nicolas Andry Award. Comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplastyClin Ortop325330344CrossRef
30.
Thanner, J 1999The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation of different fixation principlesActa Orthop Scand286141
31.
Hacking, SA, Bobyn, JD, Tanzer, M, Krygier, JJ 1999The osseous response to corundum blasted implant surfaces in canine total hip arthroplasty modelClin Ortop364240253CrossRef
32.
Zhang, Y, Ahn, PB, Fitzpatrick, DC, Heiner, AD, Poggie, RA, Brown, TD 1999Interfacial frictional behavior: cancellous bone, cortical bone, and a novel porous tantalum biomaterialJ Musculoskelet Res3245251CrossRef
33.
Bobyn, JD, Stackpool, GJ, Hacking, SA, Tanzer, M, Krygier, JJ 1999Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterialJ Bone Jt Surg81-B907914CrossRef
34.
Amstutz, HC 2000Innovations in design and technology: the story of hip arthroplastyClin Ortop3782330CrossRef
35.
Amstutz, HC, Dorey, F, O’Carroll, PF 1986THARIS resurfacing arthroplasty. Evolution and long-term resultsClin Ortop21392114
36.
Ritter, MA, Gioe, TJ 1986Conventional versus resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. A long-term prospective study of concomitant bilateral implantation of prosthesesJ Bone Jt Surg68-A216225
37.
Tracy, RB, McBryde, CW, Pynsent, PB 2005Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five yearsJ Bone Jt Surg87-B167170CrossRef
38.
Glyn-Jones, S, Gill, HS, McLardy-Smith, , Murray, DW 2004Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two year studyJ Bone Jt Surg86-B172176CrossRef
39.
Itayem, R, Arndt, A, Nistor, L, McMinn, D, Lundberg, A 2005Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two yearsJ Bone Jt Surg87-B158162CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radiostereometric Analysis: The Hip
Authors
F. Bottner, MD
E. Su
B. Nestor, MD
B. Azzis
T. P. Sculco, MD
M. Bostrom, MD
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
HSS Journal ® / Issue 1/2005
Print ISSN: 1556-3316
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3324
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-005-0114-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

HSS Journal ® 1/2005 Go to the issue

Original Article

The Delay in Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Review of 102 Patients

Radiology and Imaging Corner

Multiple Hereditary Exostoses

Original Article

The Use of Reinfusion Drains after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Treated with Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Thromboembolic Prophylaxis

Original Article

The Clinical Use of Allografts, Demineralized Bone Matrices, Synthetic Bone Graft Substitutes and Osteoinductive Growth Factors: A Survey Study

Ethics

Justice and Health Care in the Rheumatic Diseases

OriginalPaper

Foreword from the Surgeon-in Chief