Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Toxicology 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Original Article

On-site oral fluid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) screening after controlled smoked, vaporized, and oral cannabis administration

Authors: Madeleine J. Swortwood, Matthew N. Newmeyer, Osama A. Abulseoud, Maria Andersson, Allan J. Barnes, Karl B. Scheidweiler, Marilyn A. Huestis

Published in: Forensic Toxicology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Increasing driving under the influence of cannabis cases is an important short-term consequence of cannabis legalization. On-site oral fluid (OF) testing devices provide advantages for roadside drug screening, because OF Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) indicates more recent cannabis intake than urine, and it can be collected non-invasively by law enforcement personnel. THC presence in OF primarily results from oromucosal contamination during cannabis inhalation. To date, on-site OF devices were not investigated following edible cannabis. We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of the Dräger DrugTest® 5000 [DT5000] and Alere™ DDS®2 [DDS2] at various OF THC confirmatory cutoffs following controlled smoked, vaporized, and edible cannabis in frequent and occasional smokers. Times of last positive (t last) were evaluated for each device, cutoff, and smoking group. At a 5 µg/L OF THC confirmation cutoff, overall performance criteria exceeded the recommended 80% for both devices. At lower THC confirmation cutoffs (1–2 µg/L), true positive results were maximized but sensitivity was <80%. When confirmation cutoffs were below manufacturers’ screening cutoffs (5 µg/L DT5000, 25 µg/L DDS2), false negative results increased. No differences in t last were observed for DT5000 between the three administration routes, but later t last times were observed after smoking compared to vaporization with DDS2. Frequent smokers had significantly later median t last (5 h) compared to occasional smokers (1.5–3.5 h) for all conditions. There were no true positive results at 44 and 50 h with the DT5000 and DDS2, respectively. OF screening followed by confirmatory OF analysis is an important strategy for investigations of driving under the influence of drugs, with these data improving interpretation of cannabinoid OF results.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Asbridge M, Mann R, Cusimano MD, Trayling C, Roerecke M, Tallon JM, Whipp A, Rehm J (2014) Cannabis and traffic collision risk: findings from a case-crossover study of injured drivers presenting to emergency departments. Int J Public Health 59:395–404. doi:10.1007/s00038-013-0512-z PubMedCrossRef Asbridge M, Mann R, Cusimano MD, Trayling C, Roerecke M, Tallon JM, Whipp A, Rehm J (2014) Cannabis and traffic collision risk: findings from a case-crossover study of injured drivers presenting to emergency departments. Int J Public Health 59:395–404. doi:10.​1007/​s00038-013-0512-z PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berning A, Compton R, Wochinger K (2015) Results of the 2013-2014 national roadside survey of alcohol and drug use by drivers. Traffic Safety Facts: Research Note, DOT HS 812 118 Washington, DC Berning A, Compton R, Wochinger K (2015) Results of the 2013-2014 national roadside survey of alcohol and drug use by drivers. Traffic Safety Facts: Research Note, DOT HS 812 118 Washington, DC
6.
go back to reference Niedbala RS, Kardos KW, Fritch DF, Kardos S, Fries T, Waga J, Robb J, Cone EJ (2001) Detection of marijuana use by oral fluid and urine analysis following single-dose administration of smoked and oral marijuana. J Anal Toxicol 25:289–303. doi:10.1093/jat/25.5.289 PubMedCrossRef Niedbala RS, Kardos KW, Fritch DF, Kardos S, Fries T, Waga J, Robb J, Cone EJ (2001) Detection of marijuana use by oral fluid and urine analysis following single-dose administration of smoked and oral marijuana. J Anal Toxicol 25:289–303. doi:10.​1093/​jat/​25.​5.​289 PubMedCrossRef
9.
12.
go back to reference Anizan S, Milman G, Desrosiers N, Barnes AJ, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA (2013) Oral fluid cannabinoid concentrations following controlled smoked cannabis in chronic frequent and occasional smokers. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:8451–8461. doi:10.1007/s00216-013-7291-5 PubMedCrossRef Anizan S, Milman G, Desrosiers N, Barnes AJ, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA (2013) Oral fluid cannabinoid concentrations following controlled smoked cannabis in chronic frequent and occasional smokers. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:8451–8461. doi:10.​1007/​s00216-013-7291-5 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fabritius M, Chtioui H, Battistella G, Annoni JM, Dao K, Favrat B, Fornari E, Lauer E, Maeder P, Giroud C (2013) Comparison of cannabinoid concentrations in oral fluid and whole blood between occasional and regular cannabis smokers prior to and after smoking a cannabis joint. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:9791–9803. doi:10.1007/s00216-013-7412-1 PubMedCrossRef Fabritius M, Chtioui H, Battistella G, Annoni JM, Dao K, Favrat B, Fornari E, Lauer E, Maeder P, Giroud C (2013) Comparison of cannabinoid concentrations in oral fluid and whole blood between occasional and regular cannabis smokers prior to and after smoking a cannabis joint. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:9791–9803. doi:10.​1007/​s00216-013-7412-1 PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Hartman RL, Anizan S, Jang M, Brown TL, Yun K, Gorelick DA, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Gaffney G, Huestis MA (2015) Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled vaporizer administration with and without alcohol. Forensic Toxicol 33:260–278. doi:10.1007/s11419-015-0269-6 CrossRef Hartman RL, Anizan S, Jang M, Brown TL, Yun K, Gorelick DA, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Gaffney G, Huestis MA (2015) Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled vaporizer administration with and without alcohol. Forensic Toxicol 33:260–278. doi:10.​1007/​s11419-015-0269-6 CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Swortwood MJ, Newmeyer MN, Abulseoud OA, Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA (2016) Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled smoked, vaporized, and oral cannabis administration. Drug Test Anal. doi:10.1002/dta.2092 Swortwood MJ, Newmeyer MN, Abulseoud OA, Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA (2016) Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled smoked, vaporized, and oral cannabis administration. Drug Test Anal. doi:10.​1002/​dta.​2092
17.
go back to reference SAMHSA (2015) Mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs. Fed Reg 80:28054–28101 SAMHSA (2015) Mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs. Fed Reg 80:28054–28101
18.
go back to reference Verstraete A, Knoche A, Jantos R, Skopp G, Gjerde H, Vindenes V, Mørland J, Langel K, Lillsunde P (2011) Per se limits—methods of defining cut-off values for zero tolerance. Driv Under Influ Drugs Alcohol Med Deliv 1.4.2:1–58 Verstraete A, Knoche A, Jantos R, Skopp G, Gjerde H, Vindenes V, Mørland J, Langel K, Lillsunde P (2011) Per se limits—methods of defining cut-off values for zero tolerance. Driv Under Influ Drugs Alcohol Med Deliv 1.4.2:1–58
19.
go back to reference Blencowe T, Pehrsson A, Lillsunde P (2010) Analytical evaluation of oral fluid screening devices and preceding selection procedures. Driv Under Influ Drugs Alcohol Med Deliv 3.2.2 Revision 2.0:1–113 Blencowe T, Pehrsson A, Lillsunde P (2010) Analytical evaluation of oral fluid screening devices and preceding selection procedures. Driv Under Influ Drugs Alcohol Med Deliv 3.2.2 Revision 2.0:1–113
20.
go back to reference Blencowe T, Pehrsson A, Lillsunde P, Vimpari K, Houwing S, Smink B, Mathijssen R, Van der Linden T, Legrand S-A, Pil K, Verstraete A (2011) An analytical evaluation of eight on-site oral fluid drug screening devices using laboratory confirmation results from oral fluid. Forensic Sci Int 208:173–179. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.11.026 PubMedCrossRef Blencowe T, Pehrsson A, Lillsunde P, Vimpari K, Houwing S, Smink B, Mathijssen R, Van der Linden T, Legrand S-A, Pil K, Verstraete A (2011) An analytical evaluation of eight on-site oral fluid drug screening devices using laboratory confirmation results from oral fluid. Forensic Sci Int 208:173–179. doi:10.​1016/​j.​forsciint.​2010.​11.​026 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vanstechelman S, Isalberti C, Van der Linden T, Pil K, Legrand SA, Verstraete AG (2012) Analytical evaluation of four on-site oral fluid drug testing devices. J Anal Toxicol 36:136–140. doi:10.1093/jat/bkr016 PubMedCrossRef Vanstechelman S, Isalberti C, Van der Linden T, Pil K, Legrand SA, Verstraete AG (2012) Analytical evaluation of four on-site oral fluid drug testing devices. J Anal Toxicol 36:136–140. doi:10.​1093/​jat/​bkr016 PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Logan BK, Mohr AL, Talpins SK (2014) Detection and prevalence of drug use in arrested drivers using the Dräger DrugTest 5000 and Affiniton DrugWipe oral fluid drug screening devices. J Anal Toxicol 38:444–450. doi:10.1093/jat/bku050 PubMedCrossRef Logan BK, Mohr AL, Talpins SK (2014) Detection and prevalence of drug use in arrested drivers using the Dräger DrugTest 5000 and Affiniton DrugWipe oral fluid drug screening devices. J Anal Toxicol 38:444–450. doi:10.​1093/​jat/​bku050 PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Strano-Rossi S, Castrignano E, Anzillotti L, Serpelloni G, Mollica R, Tagliaro F, Pascali JP, di Stefano D, Sgalla R, Chiarotti M (2012) Evaluation of four oral fluid devices (DDS®, Drugtest 5000®, Drugwipe 5 + ® and RapidSTAT®) for on-site monitoring drugged driving in comparison with UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. Forensic Sci Int 221:70–76. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.04.003 Strano-Rossi S, Castrignano E, Anzillotti L, Serpelloni G, Mollica R, Tagliaro F, Pascali JP, di Stefano D, Sgalla R, Chiarotti M (2012) Evaluation of four oral fluid devices (DDS®, Drugtest 5000®, Drugwipe 5 + ® and RapidSTAT®) for on-site monitoring drugged driving in comparison with UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. Forensic Sci Int 221:70–76. doi:10.​1016/​j.​forsciint.​2012.​04.​003
25.
go back to reference Toennes SW, Schneider K, Wunder C, Kauert GF, Moeller MR, Theunissen EL, Ramaekers JG (2013) Influence of ethanol on the pharmacokinetic properties of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid. J Anal Toxicol 37:152–158. doi:10.1093/jat/bkt002 PubMedCrossRef Toennes SW, Schneider K, Wunder C, Kauert GF, Moeller MR, Theunissen EL, Ramaekers JG (2013) Influence of ethanol on the pharmacokinetic properties of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid. J Anal Toxicol 37:152–158. doi:10.​1093/​jat/​bkt002 PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Mitchell JM, Cone EJ, Flegel R, LoDico C, Herrman ES, Bigelow G, Vandrey R (2015) Oral administration of cannabis in brownies. Paper presented at the Society of Forensic Toxicologists Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, 23 Oct 2015 Mitchell JM, Cone EJ, Flegel R, LoDico C, Herrman ES, Bigelow G, Vandrey R (2015) Oral administration of cannabis in brownies. Paper presented at the Society of Forensic Toxicologists Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, 23 Oct 2015
30.
go back to reference Newmeyer MN, Swortwood MJ, Barnes AJ, Abulseoud OA, Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA (2016) Free and glucuronide cannabinoids’ pharmacokinetics after controlled smoked, vaporized and oral cannabis administration in frequent and occasional cannabis users: identification of recent cannabis intake. Clin Chem. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2016.263475 PubMed Newmeyer MN, Swortwood MJ, Barnes AJ, Abulseoud OA, Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA (2016) Free and glucuronide cannabinoids’ pharmacokinetics after controlled smoked, vaporized and oral cannabis administration in frequent and occasional cannabis users: identification of recent cannabis intake. Clin Chem. doi:10.​1373/​clinchem.​2016.​263475 PubMed
32.
33.
go back to reference Desrosiers NA, Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA (2015) Quantification of six cannabinoids and metabolites in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 7:684–694. doi:10.1002/dta.1753 PubMedCrossRef Desrosiers NA, Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA (2015) Quantification of six cannabinoids and metabolites in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 7:684–694. doi:10.​1002/​dta.​1753 PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bosker WM, Theunissen EL, Conen S, Kuypers KP, Jeffery WK, Walls HC, Kauert GF, Toennes SW, Moeller MR, Ramaekers JG (2012) A placebo-controlled study to assess standardized field sobriety tests performance during alcohol and cannabis intoxication in heavy cannabis users and accuracy of point of collection testing devices for detecting THC in oral fluid. Psychopharmacology 223:439–446. doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2732-y PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bosker WM, Theunissen EL, Conen S, Kuypers KP, Jeffery WK, Walls HC, Kauert GF, Toennes SW, Moeller MR, Ramaekers JG (2012) A placebo-controlled study to assess standardized field sobriety tests performance during alcohol and cannabis intoxication in heavy cannabis users and accuracy of point of collection testing devices for detecting THC in oral fluid. Psychopharmacology 223:439–446. doi:10.​1007/​s00213-012-2732-y PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Toennes SW, Steinmeyer S, Maurer H-J, Moeller MR, Kauert GF (2005) Screening for drugs of abuse in oral fluid—correlation of analysis results with serum in forensic cases. J Anal Toxicol 29:22–27. doi:10.1093/jat/29.1.22 Toennes SW, Steinmeyer S, Maurer H-J, Moeller MR, Kauert GF (2005) Screening for drugs of abuse in oral fluid—correlation of analysis results with serum in forensic cases. J Anal Toxicol 29:22–27. doi:10.​1093/​jat/​29.​1.​22
Metadata
Title
On-site oral fluid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) screening after controlled smoked, vaporized, and oral cannabis administration
Authors
Madeleine J. Swortwood
Matthew N. Newmeyer
Osama A. Abulseoud
Maria Andersson
Allan J. Barnes
Karl B. Scheidweiler
Marilyn A. Huestis
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Forensic Toxicology / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1860-8965
Electronic ISSN: 1860-8973
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-016-0348-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Forensic Toxicology 1/2017 Go to the issue