Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Toxicology 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Short Communication

Detection of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in exhaled breath after cannabis smoking and comparison with oral fluid

Authors: Pascal Kintz, Patrick Mura, Carole Jamey, Jean-Sébastien Raul

Published in: Forensic Toxicology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Exhaled breath is commonly used in alcohol testing, but has been recently demonstrated by scientists from Sweden, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, and the United States to contain a large number of both volatile and non-volatile substances that can be measured using dedicated devices. ExaBreath® is a sampling device that collects the bio-aerosol particles from the donor. Approximately 2 min exhaled breath is enough for the test. The device collects the very small bio-aerosols on a filter, which is consecutively incubated into methanol to release drugs at a laboratory. Four occasional cannabis smokers were recruited for this study. Oral fluid, collected with the Quantisal® device, and exhaled breath were simultaneously collected up to 6 h after smoking a standard joint of cannabis. ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) was tested using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) or gas chromatography–MS/MS for exhaled breath and oral fluid, respectively. Linearity, precision and limit of quantification (5 pg/filter and 0.5 ng/mL for exhaled breath and oral fluid, respectively) were established. In each analytical batch, low and high controls were included. THC was identified in exhaled breath up to 6 h after smoking from all the four subjects, with concentrations in the range 15–1598 pg/filter. THC breath concentrations significantly decreased with time after smoking in all four participants. All the oral fluid specimens tested positive for THC over the 6 h of the study, with concentrations in the range 1–89 ng/mL. 11-Nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the main metabolite of THC was also analysed, but was undetectable in both exhaled breath and oral fluid. This study gives further support to the possibility of using exhaled breath as a new matrix to document exposure to drugs, particularly for cannabis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kintz P (2011) Alternative matrices to urine. In: Verstraete A (ed) Workplace drug testing. Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp 187–215 Kintz P (2011) Alternative matrices to urine. In: Verstraete A (ed) Workplace drug testing. Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp 187–215
2.
go back to reference Jones AW, Andersson L (2003) Comparison of ethanol concentrations in venous blood and end-expired breath during a controlled drinking study. Forensic Sci Int 132:18–25CrossRefPubMed Jones AW, Andersson L (2003) Comparison of ethanol concentrations in venous blood and end-expired breath during a controlled drinking study. Forensic Sci Int 132:18–25CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Skoglund C, Hermansson U, Beck O (2015) Clinical trial of a new technique for drugs of abuse testing: a new possible sampling technique. J Subst Abuse Treat 48:132–136CrossRefPubMed Skoglund C, Hermansson U, Beck O (2015) Clinical trial of a new technique for drugs of abuse testing: a new possible sampling technique. J Subst Abuse Treat 48:132–136CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Berchtold C, Bosilkovska M, Daali Y, Walder B, Zenobi R (2014) Real-time monitoring of exhaled drugs by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 33:394–413CrossRefPubMed Berchtold C, Bosilkovska M, Daali Y, Walder B, Zenobi R (2014) Real-time monitoring of exhaled drugs by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 33:394–413CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Beck O, Sandqvist S, Dubbelboer I, Franck J (2011) Detection of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in exhaled breath collected from cannabis users. J Anal Toxicol 35:541–544CrossRefPubMed Beck O, Sandqvist S, Dubbelboer I, Franck J (2011) Detection of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in exhaled breath collected from cannabis users. J Anal Toxicol 35:541–544CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Himes S, Scheidweiler K, Beck O, Gorelick D, Desrosiers N, Huestis M (2013) Cannabinoids in exhaled breath following controlled administration of smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 59:1780–1789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Himes S, Scheidweiler K, Beck O, Gorelick D, Desrosiers N, Huestis M (2013) Cannabinoids in exhaled breath following controlled administration of smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 59:1780–1789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
go back to reference Kintz P, Brunet B, Muller JF, Serra W, Villain M, Cirimele V, Mura P (2009) Evaluation of the Cozart DDSV test for cannabis in oral fluid. Ther Drug Monit 31:131–134CrossRefPubMed Kintz P, Brunet B, Muller JF, Serra W, Villain M, Cirimele V, Mura P (2009) Evaluation of the Cozart DDSV test for cannabis in oral fluid. Ther Drug Monit 31:131–134CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lee D, Schwope DM, Milman G, Barnes AJ, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA (2012) Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 58:748–756CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee D, Schwope DM, Milman G, Barnes AJ, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA (2012) Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 58:748–756CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Detection of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in exhaled breath after cannabis smoking and comparison with oral fluid
Authors
Pascal Kintz
Patrick Mura
Carole Jamey
Jean-Sébastien Raul
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Forensic Toxicology / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1860-8965
Electronic ISSN: 1860-8973
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-016-0333-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Forensic Toxicology 1/2017 Go to the issue