Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Oral Radiology
Published in: Oral Radiology 2/2023

Open Access 19-08-2022 | Original Article

Deep-learning systems for diagnosing cleft palate on panoramic radiographs in patients with cleft alveolus

Authors: Chiaki Kuwada, Yoshiko Ariji, Yoshitaka Kise, Motoki Fukuda, Masako Nishiyama, Takuma Funakoshi, Rihoko Takeuchi, Airi Sana, Norinaga Kojima, Eiichiro Ariji

Published in: Oral Radiology | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to create effective deep learning-based models for diagnosing the presence or absence of cleft palate (CP) in patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft alveolus (CA) on panoramic radiographs.

Methods

The panoramic images of 491 patients who had unilateral or bilateral cleft alveolus were used to create two models. Model A, which detects the upper incisor area on panoramic radiographs and classifies the areas into the presence or absence of CP, was created using both object detection and classification functions of DetectNet. Using the same data for developing Model A, Model B, which directly classifies the presence or absence of CP on panoramic radiographs, was created using classification function of VGG-16. The performances of both models were evaluated with the same test data and compared with those of two radiologists.

Results

The recall, precision, and F-measure were all 1.00 in Model A. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were 0.95, 0.93, 0.70, and 0.63 for Model A, Model B, and the radiologists, respectively. The AUCs of the models were significantly higher than those of the radiologists.

Conclusions

The deep learning-based models developed in the present study have potential for use in supporting observer interpretations of the presence of cleft palate on panoramic radiographs.
Literature
1.
2.
Kuwada C, Ariji Y, Kise Y, Funakoshi T, Fukuda M, Kuwada T, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Detection and classification of unilateral cleft alveolus with and without cleft palate on panoramic radiographs using a deep learning system. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Jeon SJ, Yun JP, Yeom HG, Shin WS, Lee JH, Jeong SH, et al. Deep-learning for predicting C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars on panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50(5):20200513.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Hiraiwa T, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kise Y, Nakata K, Katsumata A, et al. A deep-learning artificial intelligence system for assessment of root morphology of the mandibular first molar on panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(3):20180218.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Ariji Y, Yanashita Y, Kutsuna S, Muramatsu C, Fukuda M, Kise Y, et al. Automatic detection and classification of radiolucent lesions in the mandible on panoramic radiographs using a deep learning object detection technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;128(4):424–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Ishibashi K, Ariji Y, Kuwada C, Kimura M, Hashimoto K, Umemura M, et al. Efficacy of a deep leaning model created with the transfer learning method in detecting sialoliths of the submandibular gland on panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022;133(2):238–44.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Kuwada C, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kise Y, Fujita H, Katsumata A, et al. Deep learning systems for detecting and classifying the presence of impacted supernumerary teeth in the maxillary incisor region on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020;130(4):464–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Yang H, Jo E, Kim HJ, Cha IH, Jung YS, Nam W, Kim JY, Kim JK, Kim YH, Oh TG, Han SS, Kim H, Kim D. Deep learning for automated detection of cyst and tumors of the jaw in panoramic radiographs. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1839.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Kwon O, Yong TH, Kang SR, Kim JE, Huh KH, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, Yi WJ. Automatic diagnosis for cysts and tumors of both jaws on panoramic radiographs using a deep convolution neural network. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020;49(8):20200185.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Fukuda M, Inamoto K, Shibata N, Ariji Y, Yanashita Y, Kutsuna S, et al. Evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for detecting vertical root fracture on panoramic radiography. Oral Radiol. 2020;36(4):337–43.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Watanabe H, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kuwada C, Kise Y, Nozawa M, et al. Deep learning object detection of maxillary cyst-like lesions on panoramic radiographs: preliminary study. Oral Radiol. 2021;37(3):487–93.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Ekert T, Krois J, Meinhold L, Elhennawy K, Emara R, Golla T, et al. Deep learning for the radiographic detection of apical lesions. J Endod. 2019;45(7):917–22 (e5).CrossRefPubMed
13.
Takahashi T, Nozaki K, Gonda T, Mameno T, Wada M, Ikebe K. Identification of dental implants using deep learning-pilot study. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6(1):53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Kılıc MC, Bayrakdar IS, Çelik Ö, Bilgir E, Orhan K, Aydın OB, et al. Artificial intelligence system for automatic deciduous tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50(6):20200172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Kuwana R, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kise Y, Nozawa M, Kuwada C, Muramatsu C, Katsumata A, Fujita H, Ariji E. Performance of deep learning object detection technology in the detection and diagnosis of maxillary sinus lesions on panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50(1):20200171.PubMed
16.
Ono S, Ishimaru M, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of surgery for cleft lip and palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:2219–24.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Sato Y, et al. Population attributable fractions of modifiable risk factors for nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: a prospective cohort study from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. J Epidemiol. 2021;31(4):272–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Raghavan U, Vijayadev V, Rao D, Ullas G. Postoperative management of cleft lip and palate surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 2018;34(6):605–11.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Allori AC, Mulliken JB, Meara JG, Shusterman S, Marcus JR. Classification of cleft lip/palate: then and now. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(2):175–88.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In Proceedings of the 2015 3rd IAPR Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition (ACPR), ICLR, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2015, pp. 730–734.
21.
England JR, Cheng PM. Artificial intelligence for medical image analysis: a guide for authors and reviewers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(3):513–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Fukuda M, Ariji Y, Kise Y, Nozawa M, Kuwada C, Funakoshi T, Muramatsu C, Fujita H, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Comparison of 3 deep learning neural networks for classifying the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020;130(3):336–43.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Deep-learning systems for diagnosing cleft palate on panoramic radiographs in patients with cleft alveolus
Authors
Chiaki Kuwada
Yoshiko Ariji
Yoshitaka Kise
Motoki Fukuda
Masako Nishiyama
Takuma Funakoshi
Rihoko Takeuchi
Airi Sana
Norinaga Kojima
Eiichiro Ariji
Publication date
19-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Oral Radiology / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00644-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Oral Radiology 2/2023 Go to the issue

Original Article

Magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis for quantitative evaluation of the mandibular condyle in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Original Article

MRI of odontogenic maxillofacial infections: diagnostic accuracy and reliability

Original Article

The dimensional and morphological assessment of frontal air sinus in different ages, genders and ethnicities (Arabian-Caucasian and Han-Chinese sub-populations)

Original Article

Magnetic resonance imaging of methotrexate-related lymphoproliferative disorder with a chief complaint of oral symptoms

Original Article

Are maxillary sinus variations related to maxillary sinus diameters?

Original Article

Analysis of image defects in digital intraoral radiography based on photostimulable phosphor plates