Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oral Radiology 3/2017

Open Access 01-09-2017 | Original Article

Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study

Authors: Alberto Di Blasio, Chiara Di Blasio, Giuseppe Pedrazzi, Diana Cassi, Marisabel Magnifico, Edoardo Manfredi, Mauro Gandolfini

Published in: Oral Radiology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of noninvasive measurement of the ANB angle using photographic and ultrasonographic methods.

Methods

Twenty consecutive orthodontic patients were evaluated. The ANB angle and soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, and B cephalometric points were measured by lateral teleradiography; these measurements were made by two expert operators. The soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, and B cephalometric points was measured by ultrasonography; these measurements were also made by two expert operators. On a 1:1 photographic profile print on which the ultrasonographic points were marked, the ANB ultrasonographic angle was measured. The following comparisons were considered: averaged and single measurements of N, A, and B points by first versus second ultrasonographer; averaged and single ultrasonographic versus radiographic soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, B points; and averaged and single ultrasonographic versus radiographic measurements of ANB angle.

Results

High correlation and concordance of the averaged and single measurements, but no significant difference, was found between the two ultrasonographers. No statistically significant difference was found between the two methods for measuring averaged soft tissue thickness, but a 20% difference was found for the single measurements. High correlation and concordance between the ultrasonographic and radiographic measurements, but no significant difference, was found between the single and averaged ANB angle measurements.

Conclusion

Ultrasonography seems to be a noninvasive and reliable technique for measurement of the ANB angle and may replace radiographic measurement in some cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Devereux L, Moles D, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:175–81.CrossRef Devereux L, Moles D, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:175–81.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nijkamp P, Habets L, Aartman I, Zentner A. The influence of cephalometrics on orthodontic treatment planning. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:630–5.CrossRefPubMed Nijkamp P, Habets L, Aartman I, Zentner A. The influence of cephalometrics on orthodontic treatment planning. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:630–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference AlBarakati SF, Kula KS, Ghoneima AA. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2012;41:11–7.CrossRef AlBarakati SF, Kula KS, Ghoneima AA. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2012;41:11–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application in orthodontia. Angle Orthod. 1931;1:45–66. Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application in orthodontia. Angle Orthod. 1931;1:45–66.
5.
go back to reference Broadbent BH. The face of the normal child. Angle Orthod. 1937;7:183–233. Broadbent BH. The face of the normal child. Angle Orthod. 1937;7:183–233.
6.
go back to reference Brodie AG, Downs WB, Goldstein A, Myer E. Cephalometric appraisal of orthodontic results. Angle Orthod. 1938;8:261–351. Brodie AG, Downs WB, Goldstein A, Myer E. Cephalometric appraisal of orthodontic results. Angle Orthod. 1938;8:261–351.
7.
go back to reference Brodie AG. On the growth pattern of the human head from the third month to the eighth year of life. Am J Anat. 1941;68:209–62.CrossRef Brodie AG. On the growth pattern of the human head from the third month to the eighth year of life. Am J Anat. 1941;68:209–62.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Downs WB. Variations in the facial relationship. Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34:812–40.CrossRefPubMed Downs WB. Variations in the facial relationship. Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34:812–40.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 1959;29:8–29. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 1959;29:8–29.
12.
go back to reference Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1960;46:721–54.CrossRef Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1960;46:721–54.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brevi B, Di Blasio A, Di Blasio C, Piazza F, D’Ascanio L, Sesenna E. Which cephalometric analysis for maxillo-mandibular surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015;35:332–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Brevi B, Di Blasio A, Di Blasio C, Piazza F, D’Ascanio L, Sesenna E. Which cephalometric analysis for maxillo-mandibular surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015;35:332–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Bianchi B, Ferri A, Brevi B, Di Blasio A, Copelli C, Di Blasio C, et al. Orthognathic surgery for the complete rehabilitation of Moebius patients: principles, timing and our experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41:e1–e4.CrossRefPubMed Bianchi B, Ferri A, Brevi B, Di Blasio A, Copelli C, Di Blasio C, et al. Orthognathic surgery for the complete rehabilitation of Moebius patients: principles, timing and our experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41:e1–e4.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cassi D, Di Blasio A, Gandolfini M. Determination of vertical dimension in prosthodontic rehabilitation of a growing patient with severe oligodontia. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:61–4.PubMed Cassi D, Di Blasio A, Gandolfini M. Determination of vertical dimension in prosthodontic rehabilitation of a growing patient with severe oligodontia. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:61–4.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Di Blasio C, Di Blasio A, Pedrazzi G, Anghinoni M, Sesenna E. How does the mandible grow after early high condylectomy? J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:764–71.CrossRefPubMed Di Blasio C, Di Blasio A, Pedrazzi G, Anghinoni M, Sesenna E. How does the mandible grow after early high condylectomy? J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:764–71.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Delaire J. Architectural and structural teleradiographic analysis of the face. Orthod Fr. 1971;42:411–27. [ArticleFrench].PubMed Delaire J. Architectural and structural teleradiographic analysis of the face. Orthod Fr. 1971;42:411–27. [ArticleFrench].PubMed
18.
go back to reference Delaire J. Architectural and structural craniofacial analysis of profile. Theoretical principles. Some examples of use in maxillofacial surgery. Revue Stomatol. 1978;79:1–33. Delaire J. Architectural and structural craniofacial analysis of profile. Theoretical principles. Some examples of use in maxillofacial surgery. Revue Stomatol. 1978;79:1–33.
19.
go back to reference Delaire J. Architectural and structural craniofacial analysis (lateral view). Theoretical principles. Some example of its use in maxillofacial surgery (author’s transl). Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1978;79:1–33. [ArticleFrench].PubMed Delaire J. Architectural and structural craniofacial analysis (lateral view). Theoretical principles. Some example of its use in maxillofacial surgery (author’s transl). Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1978;79:1–33. [ArticleFrench].PubMed
20.
go back to reference Delaire J, Schendel SA, Tulasne JF. An architectural and structural craniofacial analysis: a new lateral cephalometric analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981;52:226–38.CrossRefPubMed Delaire J, Schendel SA, Tulasne JF. An architectural and structural craniofacial analysis: a new lateral cephalometric analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981;52:226–38.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (Users Edition). ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP.37:1–332. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (Users Edition). ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP.37:1–332.
22.
go back to reference Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:115–50.PubMed Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:115–50.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Di Blasio A, Mandelli G, Generali I, Gandolfini M. Facial aesthetics and childhood. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2009;10:131–4.PubMed Di Blasio A, Mandelli G, Generali I, Gandolfini M. Facial aesthetics and childhood. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2009;10:131–4.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:299–312.CrossRefPubMed Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:299–312.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:395–411.CrossRefPubMed Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:395–411.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Arnett GW, Gunson JG. Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:290–5.CrossRefPubMed Arnett GW, Gunson JG. Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:290–5.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Arnett GW, McLaughlin RP. Facial and dental planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. London: Mosby; 2004. Arnett GW, McLaughlin RP. Facial and dental planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. London: Mosby; 2004.
28.
go back to reference Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Worley CM Jr, et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:239–53.CrossRefPubMed Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Worley CM Jr, et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:239–53.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Chaconas SJ, Engel GA, Gianelly AA, Gorman JC, Grummons DC, Lemchen MS, et al. The DigiGraph work station. Part 1. Basic concepts. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:360–7.PubMed Chaconas SJ, Engel GA, Gianelly AA, Gorman JC, Grummons DC, Lemchen MS, et al. The DigiGraph work station. Part 1. Basic concepts. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:360–7.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Chaconas SJ, Jacobson RL, Lemchen MS. DigiGraph work station. 3. Accuracy of cephalometric analyses. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:467–71.PubMed Chaconas SJ, Jacobson RL, Lemchen MS. DigiGraph work station. 3. Accuracy of cephalometric analyses. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:467–71.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Prawat JS, Nieberg L, Cisneros GJ, Acs G. A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:271–6.PubMed Prawat JS, Nieberg L, Cisneros GJ, Acs G. A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:271–6.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Tsang KH, Cooke MS. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:1–13.CrossRefPubMed Tsang KH, Cooke MS. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:1–13.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Doll GM, Zentner A, Krummenauer F, Gärtner H. Reliability and validity of the Digigraph 100 in orthodontic diagnosis. J Orofac Orthop. 2001;62:116–32.CrossRefPubMed Doll GM, Zentner A, Krummenauer F, Gärtner H. Reliability and validity of the Digigraph 100 in orthodontic diagnosis. J Orofac Orthop. 2001;62:116–32.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study
Authors
Alberto Di Blasio
Chiara Di Blasio
Giuseppe Pedrazzi
Diana Cassi
Marisabel Magnifico
Edoardo Manfredi
Mauro Gandolfini
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Oral Radiology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-017-0275-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Oral Radiology 3/2017 Go to the issue