Top

Quality of Life Research

Published in:

01-10-2021 | Analgesics in Dentistry

Assessing hospitalized patients’ quality of life from external indices: the perspectives of lay people and health professionals

Authors: Maria Teresa Muñoz Sastre, Sylvie Castanié, Paul Clay Sorum, Etienne Mullet

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 10/2021

Abstract

Purpose

We examined the way people assess hospitalized patients’ quality of life from what they immediately observe when entering the patient’s room, from what they learn by conversing with the patient, and from what they know about the patient’s social life.

Methods

A sample of 474 adults (among them 7 physicians, 57 nurses, and 42 nurse’s aides) aged 18–90 years was presented with 54 realistic scenarios depicting the situation of a terminally ill patient, and created by orthogonally combining the levels of four factors: chronic pain (e.g., requiring powerful painkillers), social support (e.g., some visits), mental status (e.g., alterations of consciousness), and physical autonomy. In each case, they assessed the patient’s health-related quality of life.

Results

Through cluster analysis, three different positions related to what is important when judging the quality of life of a hospitalized patient were found. They were labeled Almost Always Low (40%), Depends on Personal and Social Circumstances (49%), and Depends Mainly on Social Support (11%). Health professionals did not differ fundamentally from lay people in their positions regarding what determines the health-related quality of life of their patients.

Conclusion

Many people take a particularly pessimistic view of the quality of life of people whose health is unlikely to improve. Others think that, in certain circumstances, a certain quality of life can be preserved but for this to happen, the situation must be nearly ideal. A minority expressed a position consistent with the insistence of voluntary patient-visiting associations on the importance of providing hospitalized patients with social support.

Muñoz Sastre, M. T. (1999). Lay conceptions of well-being and rules used to judge well-being in young adults, middle-aged and elderly people. Social Indicators Research, 47, 203–231CrossRef

Theuns, P., Hofmans, J., & Verresen, N. (2007). A functional measurement inquiry on the contribution of different life domains to overall subjective well-being. Teorie and Modelli [Special Issue on Functional Measurement], 12, 181–189

Theuns, P., Verresen, N., Mairesse, O., Goossens, R., Michiels, L., Peeters, E., & Wastiau, M. (2010). An experimental approach to the joint effects of relations with partner, friends and parents on happiness. Psicológica [Special Issue on Functional Measurement], 31, 629–645

The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208CrossRef

Calvert, M., Pall, H., Hoppitt, T., Eaton, B., Savill, E., & Sackley, C. (2013). Health-related quality of life and supportive care in patients with rare long-term neurological conditions. Quality of Life Research, 22, 1231–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0269-5CrossRefPubMed

Chen, G., Ratcliffe, J., Kaambwa, B., McCaffrey, N., & Richardson, J. (2018). Empirical comparison between capability and two health-related quality of life measures. Social Indicators Research, 140, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1788-9CrossRef

Dickerson, J. F., Feeny, D. H., Clarke, G. N., MacMillan, A. L., & Lynch, F. L. (2018). Evidence on the longitudinal construct validity of major generic and utility measures of health-related quality of life in teens with depression. Quality of Life Research, 27, 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1728-9CrossRefPubMed

Graybeal, C., DeSantis, B., Duncan, B. L., Reese, R. J., Brandt, K., & Bohanske, R. T. (2018). Health-related quality of life and the physician–patient alliance: A preliminary investigation of ultra-brief, real-time measures for primary care. Quality of Life Research, 27, 3275–3279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1967-4CrossRefPubMed

Pan, C.-W., Wang, S., Wang, P., Xu, C.-L., & Song, E. (2018). Diabetic retinopathy and health-related quality of life among Chinese with known type 2 diabetes mellitus. Quality of Life Research, 27, 2087–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1876-6CrossRefPubMed

10.

Muñoz Sastre, M. T., & Mullet, E. (2012). How people assess elderly people’s quality of life or anticipate their future quality of life from health status information (reprinted). In M. Vassar (Ed.), Psychology of life satisfaction. (pp. 72–85). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

11.

Bélanger, L., Bussières, S., Rainville, F., Coulombe, M., & Desmartis, M. (2017). Hospital visiting policies – impacts on patients, families and staff: A review of the literature to inform decision-making. Journal of Hospital Administration, 6, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v6n6p51CrossRef

12.

VMEH (2020). Visite des malades dans les établissements hospitaliers [Social support to hospitalized patients]. Retrieved April 30, 2021 from https://www.vmeh-national.com/

13.

Yap, S. C. Y., Wortman, J., Anusic, I., Baker, S. G., Scherer, L. D., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2017). The effect of mood on judgments of subjective well-being: Nine tests of the judgment model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000115CrossRefPubMed

14.

Anderson, N. H. (2019). Moral science. London: Routledge.

15.

Hofmans, J., & Mullet, E. (2013). Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: A clustering-based approach. Quality and Quantity, 47, 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9529-7CrossRef

16.

Jones, J. M., McPherson, C. J., Zimmermann, C., Rodin, G., Le, L. W., & Cohen, S. R. (2011). Assessing agreement between terminally ill cancer patients’ reports of their quality of life and family caregiver and palliative care physician proxy ratings. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 42, 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.11.018CrossRefPubMed

17.

Gamelin, A., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2006). Eliciting utilities using functional methodology: People’s disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Quality of Life Research, 15, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-2830-yCrossRefPubMed

Title: Assessing hospitalized patients’ quality of life from external indices: the perspectives of lay people and health professionals
Authors: Maria Teresa Muñoz Sastre
Sylvie Castanié
Paul Clay Sorum
Etienne Mullet
Publication date: 01-10-2021
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Keyword: Analgesics in Dentistry
Published in: Quality of Life Research / Issue 10/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02863-9

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Assessing hospitalized patients’ quality of life from external indices: the perspectives of lay people and health professionals

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2021

Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures

Could the EQ-5D-3L predict all-cause mortality in older Chinese? Evidence from a 5-year longitudinal study in eastern China

An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

Australian adolescent population norms for the child health utility index 9D—results from the young minds matter survey

Health-related quality of life outcomes and influencing factors in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms after endovascular treatment

The effect of functioning on Quality of Life Inventory-Disability measured quality of life is not mediated or moderated by parental psychological distress