Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 10/2020

Open Access 01-10-2020 | Heart Failure

Development of a conceptual model and patient-reported outcome measures for assessing symptoms and functioning in patients with heart failure

Authors: Olga Moshkovich, Katy Benjamin, Katie Hall, Ryan Murphy, Robyn von Maltzahn, Boris Gorsh, Vanja Sikirica, Rajnish Saini, Dennis Sprecher

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Heart failure (HF) is a common condition that places considerable burden on patients. We aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess the symptoms and impacts of HF.

Methods

Phase 1: a targeted literature review, expert interviews, and concept elicitation (CE) interviews with patients with HF (n = 26) were used to develop a conceptual model of the core symptoms and impacts of HF. To capture these concepts, three new fit-for-purpose PRO questionnaires were constructed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration PRO guidance. Phase 2: three ‘waves’ of cognitive interviews were conducted with patients with HF (n = 28) to validate and refine the questionnaires.

Results

Three key symptoms—shortness of breath, oedema, and fatigue—were identified across the literature review, expert interviews and CE interviews. Several additional symptoms, cognitive changes and impacts of HF were reported in the CE interviews and included in the conceptual model. A 10-item symptom questionnaire (Heart Failure-Daily Symptom Diary) was constructed; cognitive testing showed that the final PRO measure was easy to understand/complete and relevant to patients with HF, confirming content validity. Two HF impact questionnaires were developed (Assessing Dyspnoea’s Impact on Mobility and Sleep and Heart Failure-Functional Status Assessment), but required refinement to ensure patient understanding.

Conclusions

Patient input contributed to the development of a PRO instrument for assessing physical and cognitive symptoms important to patients with HF using novel measurement strategies. Inclusion of daily metrics offers differentiation from other qualified instruments and may provide clinical insight for improving lifestyles. Additionally, two draft PRO measures may, after further validation, be useful to assess the impacts of HF.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
15.
go back to reference Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1—Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014.CrossRefPubMed Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1—Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​014.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2—Assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013.CrossRefPubMed Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2—Assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​013.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rector, T., Kubo, S., & Cohn, J. (1987). Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure—Part 2: Content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 3, 198–209. Rector, T., Kubo, S., & Cohn, J. (1987). Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure—Part 2: Content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 3, 198–209.
24.
go back to reference Braunstein, J. B., Anderson, G. F., Gerstenblith, G., Weller, W., Niefeld, M., Herbert, R., et al. (2003). Noncardiac comorbidity increases preventable hospitalizations and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42(7), 1226–1233.CrossRef Braunstein, J. B., Anderson, G. F., Gerstenblith, G., Weller, W., Niefeld, M., Herbert, R., et al. (2003). Noncardiac comorbidity increases preventable hospitalizations and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42(7), 1226–1233.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of a conceptual model and patient-reported outcome measures for assessing symptoms and functioning in patients with heart failure
Authors
Olga Moshkovich
Katy Benjamin
Katie Hall
Ryan Murphy
Robyn von Maltzahn
Boris Gorsh
Vanja Sikirica
Rajnish Saini
Dennis Sprecher
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Heart Failure
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02537-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Quality of Life Research 10/2020 Go to the issue