Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 6/2019

Open Access 01-06-2019

Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers

Authors: Valerie Shilling, Rachel Starkings, Valerie Jenkins, David Cella, Lesley Fallowfield

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The caregiver roles and responsibilities scale (CRRS) was developed to facilitate formal assessment of broad life impacts for informal (i.e. unpaid) caregivers to people with cancer. Here we report the development and initial validation.

Methods

The CRRS was developed from the thematic analysis of two interview studies with cancer patients (stage III-IV breast, gynaecological, lung or melanoma) and caregivers. In the evaluation studies, participants completed the CRRS alongside the Caregiver Quality of Life—Cancer, the main criterion measure for concurrent validity, and the WHOQOL-BREF for additional convergent validity data. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, 7-days and 2-months. Demographic data and patient characteristics were collected at baseline.

Results

Two-hundred and forty-five caregivers to people with stage I-IV breast, colorectal, gynaecological, head and neck, lung or renal cancer or melanoma completed the CRRS at least once. The final 41 core items selected comprised five subscales: Support and Impact, Lifestyle, Emotional Health and Wellbeing, Self-care and Financial Wellbeing as well as three standalone items. Missing data rate was low (0.6%); there were no ceiling or floor effects for total scores. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92 for the CRRS-41; 0.75–0.87 for the subscales. CRRS showed good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.91), sensitivity to change and the predicted pattern of correlation with validation measures r = 0.75–0.89. The standalone 7-item jobs and careers subscale requires further validation.

Conclusions

Initial evaluation shows the CRRS has good validity and reliability and is a promising tool for the assessment of the effects of cancer and cancer treatment on the lives and wellbeing of informal caregivers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Glajchen, M. (2004). The emerging role and needs of family caregivers in cancer care. The Journal of Supportive Oncology, 2(2), 145–155.PubMed Glajchen, M. (2004). The emerging role and needs of family caregivers in cancer care. The Journal of Supportive Oncology, 2(2), 145–155.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Northouse, L. L., et al. (2010). Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicans, 60(5), 317–339. Northouse, L. L., et al. (2010). Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicans, 60(5), 317–339.
3.
go back to reference Kim, Y., et al. (2006). Psychological adjustment of cancer caregivers with multiple roles. Psychooncology, 15(9), 795–804.CrossRefPubMed Kim, Y., et al. (2006). Psychological adjustment of cancer caregivers with multiple roles. Psychooncology, 15(9), 795–804.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fletcher, B. S., et al. (2012). The cancer family caregiving experience: An updated and expanded conceptual model. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16(4), 387–398.CrossRefPubMed Fletcher, B. S., et al. (2012). The cancer family caregiving experience: An updated and expanded conceptual model. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16(4), 387–398.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Weitzner, M. A., Haley, W. E., & Chen, H. (2000). The family caregiver of the older cancer patient. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, 14(1), 269–281.CrossRefPubMed Weitzner, M. A., Haley, W. E., & Chen, H. (2000). The family caregiver of the older cancer patient. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, 14(1), 269–281.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cameron, J. I., et al. (2002). Lifestyle interference and emotional distress in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. Cancer, 94(2), 521–527.CrossRefPubMed Cameron, J. I., et al. (2002). Lifestyle interference and emotional distress in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. Cancer, 94(2), 521–527.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Do, E. K., Cohen, S. A., & Brown, M. J. (2014). Socioeconomic and demographic factors modify the association between informal caregiving and health in the Sandwich Generation. BMC Public Health, 14, 362.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Do, E. K., Cohen, S. A., & Brown, M. J. (2014). Socioeconomic and demographic factors modify the association between informal caregiving and health in the Sandwich Generation. BMC Public Health, 14, 362.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Wadhwa, D., et al. (2013). Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology, 22(2), 403–410.PubMed Wadhwa, D., et al. (2013). Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology, 22(2), 403–410.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Shilling, V., et al. (2016). Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 25(8), 1859–1876.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shilling, V., et al. (2016). Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 25(8), 1859–1876.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Shilling, V., et al. (2017). The pervasive nature of uncertainty—a qualitative study of patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 11(5), 590–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shilling, V., et al. (2017). The pervasive nature of uncertainty—a qualitative study of patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 11(5), 590–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Hendriksen, E., et al. (2015). Worried together: A qualitative study of shared anxiety in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and their family caregivers. Support Care Cancer, 23(4), 1035–1041.CrossRefPubMed Hendriksen, E., et al. (2015). Worried together: A qualitative study of shared anxiety in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and their family caregivers. Support Care Cancer, 23(4), 1035–1041.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Olson, R. E. (2014). Indefinite loss: The experiences of carers of a spouse with cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care (Engl), 23(4), 553–561.CrossRef Olson, R. E. (2014). Indefinite loss: The experiences of carers of a spouse with cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care (Engl), 23(4), 553–561.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Miller, L. E. (2012). Sources of uncertainty in cancer survivorship. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 6(4), 431–440.CrossRefPubMed Miller, L. E. (2012). Sources of uncertainty in cancer survivorship. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 6(4), 431–440.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Catt, S., et al. (2017). Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: A systematic review. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 11(2), 211–232.CrossRefPubMed Catt, S., et al. (2017). Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients’ everyday lives: A systematic review. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 11(2), 211–232.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fallowfield, L. J., et al. (2017). Quality of survival: A new concept framework to assess the quality of prolonged life in cancer. Expert Review of Quality of Life in Cancer Care, 2(4), 225–232.CrossRef Fallowfield, L. J., et al. (2017). Quality of survival: A new concept framework to assess the quality of prolonged life in cancer. Expert Review of Quality of Life in Cancer Care, 2(4), 225–232.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shilling, V., et al. (2018) Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 27, 2923–2934.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shilling, V., et al. (2018) Development and validation of the patient roles and responsibilities scale in cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 27, 2923–2934.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference de Souza, J. A., et al. (2014). The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer The COST measure. Cancer, 120(20), 3245–3253.CrossRefPubMed de Souza, J. A., et al. (2014). The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer The COST measure. Cancer, 120(20), 3245–3253.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cella, D. F., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579.CrossRefPubMed Cella, D. F., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Peterman, A. H., et al. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy—spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 49–58.CrossRef Peterman, A. H., et al. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy—spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 49–58.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Skevington, S. M., et al. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.CrossRefPubMed Skevington, S. M., et al. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Weitzner, M. A., et al. (1999). The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale: Development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Quality of Life Research, 8(1–2), 55–63.CrossRefPubMed Weitzner, M. A., et al. (1999). The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale: Development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Quality of Life Research, 8(1–2), 55–63.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
go back to reference Given, C. W., et al. (1992). The caregiver reaction assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairments. Research in Nursing & Health, 15(4), 271–283.CrossRef Given, C. W., et al. (1992). The caregiver reaction assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairments. Research in Nursing & Health, 15(4), 271–283.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Patrick, D. L., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1–eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977.CrossRefPubMed Patrick, D. L., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1–eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Patrick, D. L., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2–assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988.CrossRefPubMed Patrick, D. L., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2–assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Mokkink, L. B., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mokkink, L. B., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Girgis, A., et al. (2013). Some things change, some things stay the same: a longitudinal analysis of cancer caregivers' unmet supportive care needs. Psycho-Oncology, 22(7), 1557–1564.CrossRefPubMed Girgis, A., et al. (2013). Some things change, some things stay the same: a longitudinal analysis of cancer caregivers' unmet supportive care needs. Psycho-Oncology, 22(7), 1557–1564.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Tolbert, E., et al. (2018). A qualitative exploration of the experiences, needs, and roles of caregivers during and after cancer treatment: “That’s what I say. I’m a relative survivor”. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 12(1), 134–144.CrossRefPubMed Tolbert, E., et al. (2018). A qualitative exploration of the experiences, needs, and roles of caregivers during and after cancer treatment: “That’s what I say. I’m a relative survivor”. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 12(1), 134–144.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hwang, S. S., et al. (2003). Caregiver unmet needs, burden, and satisfaction in symptomatic advanced cancer patients at a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Palliative & Support Care, 1(4), 319–329.CrossRef Hwang, S. S., et al. (2003). Caregiver unmet needs, burden, and satisfaction in symptomatic advanced cancer patients at a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Palliative & Support Care, 1(4), 319–329.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ferrell, B., & Wittenberg, E. (2017). A review of family caregiving intervention trials in oncology. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicans, 67(4), 318–325. Ferrell, B., & Wittenberg, E. (2017). A review of family caregiving intervention trials in oncology. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicans, 67(4), 318–325.
31.
go back to reference Dionne-Odom, J. N., et al. (2018). Participation and interest in support services among family caregivers of older adults with cancer. Psychooncology, 27(3), 969–976.CrossRefPubMed Dionne-Odom, J. N., et al. (2018). Participation and interest in support services among family caregivers of older adults with cancer. Psychooncology, 27(3), 969–976.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Halpern, M. T., Fiero, M. H., & Bell, M. L. (2017). Impact of caregiver activities and social supports on multidimensional caregiver burden: Analyses from nationally-representative surveys of cancer patients and their caregivers. Quality of Life Research, 26(6), 1587–1595.CrossRefPubMed Halpern, M. T., Fiero, M. H., & Bell, M. L. (2017). Impact of caregiver activities and social supports on multidimensional caregiver burden: Analyses from nationally-representative surveys of cancer patients and their caregivers. Quality of Life Research, 26(6), 1587–1595.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers
Authors
Valerie Shilling
Rachel Starkings
Valerie Jenkins
David Cella
Lesley Fallowfield
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02154-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Quality of Life Research 6/2019 Go to the issue