Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 8/2018

Open Access 01-08-2018 | Review

Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of self-administered measurement instruments

Authors: Janneke van Roij, Heidi Fransen, Lonneke van de Poll-Franse, Myrte Zijlstra, Natasja Raijmakers

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are becoming increasingly important in clinical practice. The implementation of PROMS in routine practice is challenging because information regarding psychometric quality of measurement instruments is fragmented and standardization is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of self-administered HRQoL measurement instruments for use in patients with advanced cancer in clinical practice.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL to identify studies concerning self-administered HRQoL measurement instruments in patients with advanced cancer between January 1990 and September 2016. Quality of the measurement instruments was assessed by predefined criteria derived from the COSMIN checklist.

Results

Sixty-nine articles relating to 39 measurement instruments met the inclusion criteria. Information regarding important measurement properties was often incomplete. None of the instruments performed sufficient on all measurement properties. Considering available information, the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL appeared to have adequate psychometric properties, together with the EORTC QLQ-BM22.

Conclusions

Many of the existing HRQoL measurement instruments have not yet been evaluated in an adequate manner. Validation of self-administered HRQoL measurement instruments is an ongoing development and should be prioritized. This review contributes to improved clarity regarding the availability and quality of HRQoL measurement instruments for patients with advanced cancer and supports health care professionals in an adequate selection of suitable PROMs in clinical practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Temel, J. S., Greer, J. A., Muzikansky, A., et al. (2010). Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(8), 733–742.PubMedCrossRef Temel, J. S., Greer, J. A., Muzikansky, A., et al. (2010). Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(8), 733–742.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Coons, S. J., Rao, S., Keininger, D. L., & Hays, R. D. (2000). A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, 17(1), 13–35.PubMedCrossRef Coons, S. J., Rao, S., Keininger, D. L., & Hays, R. D. (2000). A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, 17(1), 13–35.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaasa, S., & Loge, J. H. (2003). Quality of life in palliative care: Principles and practice. Palliative Medicine, 17(1), 11–20.PubMedCrossRef Kaasa, S., & Loge, J. H. (2003). Quality of life in palliative care: Principles and practice. Palliative Medicine, 17(1), 11–20.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Conroy, T., Bleiberg, H., & Glimelius, B. (2003). Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: What has been learnt? European Journal of Cancer, 39(3), 287–294.PubMedCrossRef Conroy, T., Bleiberg, H., & Glimelius, B. (2003). Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: What has been learnt? European Journal of Cancer, 39(3), 287–294.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Saeteren, B., Lindström, U., & Nåden, D. (2011). Latching onto life: Living in the area of tension between the possibility of life and the necessity of death. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(5–6), 811–818.PubMedCrossRef Saeteren, B., Lindström, U., & Nåden, D. (2011). Latching onto life: Living in the area of tension between the possibility of life and the necessity of death. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(5–6), 811–818.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Detmar, S. B., Aaronson, N. K., Wever, L. D., et al. (2000). How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients’ and oncologists’ preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(18), 3295–3301.PubMedCrossRef Detmar, S. B., Aaronson, N. K., Wever, L. D., et al. (2000). How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients’ and oncologists’ preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(18), 3295–3301.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mystakidou, K., Tsilika, E., Parpa, E., et al. (2008). Demographic and clinical predictors of spirituality in advanced cancer patients: A randomized control study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(13), 1779–1785.PubMedCrossRef Mystakidou, K., Tsilika, E., Parpa, E., et al. (2008). Demographic and clinical predictors of spirituality in advanced cancer patients: A randomized control study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(13), 1779–1785.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Edwards, A., Pang, N., Shiu, V., et al. (2010). The understanding of spirituality and the potential role of spiritual care in end-of-life and palliative care: A meta-study of qualitative research. Palliative Medicine, 24(8), 753–770.PubMedCrossRef Edwards, A., Pang, N., Shiu, V., et al. (2010). The understanding of spirituality and the potential role of spiritual care in end-of-life and palliative care: A meta-study of qualitative research. Palliative Medicine, 24(8), 753–770.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Winkelman, W. D., Lauderdale, K., Balboni, M. J., et al. (2011). The relationship of spiritual concerns to the quality of life of advanced cancer patients: Preliminary findings. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(9), 1022–1028.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Winkelman, W. D., Lauderdale, K., Balboni, M. J., et al. (2011). The relationship of spiritual concerns to the quality of life of advanced cancer patients: Preliminary findings. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(9), 1022–1028.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kimmel, P. L., Emont, S. L., Newmann, J. M., et al. (2003). ESRD patient quality of life: Symptoms, spiritual beliefs, psychosocial factors, and ethnicity. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 42(4), 713–721.PubMedCrossRef Kimmel, P. L., Emont, S. L., Newmann, J. M., et al. (2003). ESRD patient quality of life: Symptoms, spiritual beliefs, psychosocial factors, and ethnicity. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 42(4), 713–721.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Steinhauser, K. E., Christakis, N. A., Clipp, E. C., et al. (2000). Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA, 284(19), 2476–2482.PubMedCrossRef Steinhauser, K. E., Christakis, N. A., Clipp, E. C., et al. (2000). Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA, 284(19), 2476–2482.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Etkind, S. N., Daveson, B. A., Kwok, W., et al. (2015). Capture, transfer, and feedback of patient-centered outcomes data in palliative care populations: Does it make a difference? A systematic review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(3), 611–624.PubMedCrossRef Etkind, S. N., Daveson, B. A., Kwok, W., et al. (2015). Capture, transfer, and feedback of patient-centered outcomes data in palliative care populations: Does it make a difference? A systematic review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(3), 611–624.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Kris, M. G., et al. (2016). Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: A randomized controlled trial. ‎Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(6), 557–565.PubMedCrossRef Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Kris, M. G., et al. (2016). Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: A randomized controlled trial. ‎Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(6), 557–565.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fayers, P., & Machin, D. (2008). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Biometrics, 64(3), 996.CrossRef Fayers, P., & Machin, D. (2008). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Biometrics, 64(3), 996.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kotronoulas, G., Kearney, N., Maguire, R., et al. (2014). What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(14), 1480–1501.PubMedCrossRef Kotronoulas, G., Kearney, N., Maguire, R., et al. (2014). What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(14), 1480–1501.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Takeuchi, E. E., Keding, A., Awad, N., et al. (2011). Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(21), 2910–2917.PubMedCrossRef Takeuchi, E. E., Keding, A., Awad, N., et al. (2011). Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(21), 2910–2917.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Marshall, S., Haywood, K., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: A structured review. ‎Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12(5), 559–568.PubMedCrossRef Marshall, S., Haywood, K., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: A structured review. ‎Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12(5), 559–568.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Howell, D., Molloy, S., Wilkinson, K., et al. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: A scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Annals of Oncology, 26(9), 1846–1858.PubMedCrossRef Howell, D., Molloy, S., Wilkinson, K., et al. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: A scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Annals of Oncology, 26(9), 1846–1858.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bruley, D. K. (1999). Beyond reliability and validity: Analysis of selected quality-of-life instruments for use in palliative care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 2(3), 299–309.PubMedCrossRef Bruley, D. K. (1999). Beyond reliability and validity: Analysis of selected quality-of-life instruments for use in palliative care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 2(3), 299–309.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hearn, J., & Higginson, I. J. (1997). Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: A review. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 19(2), 193–199.PubMedCrossRef Hearn, J., & Higginson, I. J. (1997). Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: A review. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 19(2), 193–199.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jordhoy, M. S., Inger Ringdal, G., Helbostad, J. L., et al. (2007). Assessing physical functioning: A systematic review of quality of life measures developed for use in palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 21(8), 673–682.PubMedCrossRef Jordhoy, M. S., Inger Ringdal, G., Helbostad, J. L., et al. (2007). Assessing physical functioning: A systematic review of quality of life measures developed for use in palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 21(8), 673–682.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kaasa, S., & Loge, J. H. (2002). Quality-of-life assessment in palliative care. Lancet Oncology, 3(3), 175–182.PubMedCrossRef Kaasa, S., & Loge, J. H. (2002). Quality-of-life assessment in palliative care. Lancet Oncology, 3(3), 175–182.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kirkova, J., Davis, M. P., Walsh, D., et al. (2006). Cancer symptom assessment instruments: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(9), 1459–1473.PubMedCrossRef Kirkova, J., Davis, M. P., Walsh, D., et al. (2006). Cancer symptom assessment instruments: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(9), 1459–1473.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Massaro, T., & McMillan, S. C. (2000). Instruments for assessing quality of life in palliative care settings. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 6(9), 429–433.PubMedCrossRef Massaro, T., & McMillan, S. C. (2000). Instruments for assessing quality of life in palliative care settings. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 6(9), 429–433.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference McMillan, S. C. (1996). Quality-of-Life Assessment in Palliative Care. Cancer Control, 3(3), 223–229.PubMedCrossRef McMillan, S. C. (1996). Quality-of-Life Assessment in Palliative Care. Cancer Control, 3(3), 223–229.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mularski, R. A., Dy, S. M., Shugarman, L. R., et al. (2007). A systematic review of measures of end-of-life care and its outcomes. Health Services Research, 42(5), 1848–1870.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mularski, R. A., Dy, S. M., Shugarman, L. R., et al. (2007). A systematic review of measures of end-of-life care and its outcomes. Health Services Research, 42(5), 1848–1870.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Albers, G., Echteld, M. A., de Vet, H. C., et al. (2010). Evaluation of quality-of-life measures for use in palliative care: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 24(1), 17–37.PubMedCrossRef Albers, G., Echteld, M. A., de Vet, H. C., et al. (2010). Evaluation of quality-of-life measures for use in palliative care: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 24(1), 17–37.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Henoch, I., Axelsson, B., & Bergman, B. (2010). The Assessment of Quality of life at the End of Life (AQEL) questionnaire: A brief but comprehensive instrument for use in patients with cancer in palliative care. Quality of Life Research, 19(5), 739–750.PubMedCrossRef Henoch, I., Axelsson, B., & Bergman, B. (2010). The Assessment of Quality of life at the End of Life (AQEL) questionnaire: A brief but comprehensive instrument for use in patients with cancer in palliative care. Quality of Life Research, 19(5), 739–750.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Thavarajah, N., Ray, S., Bedard, G., et al. (2015). Psychometric validation of the Brain Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (BASIQ) version 1.0 to assess quality of life in patients with brain metastases. CNS Oncology, 4(1), 11–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Thavarajah, N., Ray, S., Bedard, G., et al. (2015). Psychometric validation of the Brain Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (BASIQ) version 1.0 to assess quality of life in patients with brain metastases. CNS Oncology, 4(1), 11–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Chang, V. T., Hwang, S. S., Kasimis, B., & Thaler, H. T. (2004). Shorter symptom assessment instruments: The Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (CMSAS). Cancer Investment, 22(4), 526–536.CrossRef Chang, V. T., Hwang, S. S., Kasimis, B., & Thaler, H. T. (2004). Shorter symptom assessment instruments: The Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (CMSAS). Cancer Investment, 22(4), 526–536.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Chow, E., Hird, A., Velikova, G., et al. (2009). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with bone metastases: The EORTC QLQ-BM22. European Journal of Cancer, 45(7), 1146–1152.PubMedCrossRef Chow, E., Hird, A., Velikova, G., et al. (2009). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with bone metastases: The EORTC QLQ-BM22. European Journal of Cancer, 45(7), 1146–1152.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Chow, E., Nguyen, J., Zhang, L., et al. (2012). International field testing of the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases. Cancer, 118(5), 1457–1465.PubMedCrossRef Chow, E., Nguyen, J., Zhang, L., et al. (2012). International field testing of the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases. Cancer, 118(5), 1457–1465.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Zeng, L., Chow, E., Bedard, G., et al. (2012). Quality of life after palliative radiation therapy for patients with painful bone metastases: Results of an international study validating the EORTC QLQ-BM22. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 84(3), 337–342.CrossRef Zeng, L., Chow, E., Bedard, G., et al. (2012). Quality of life after palliative radiation therapy for patients with painful bone metastases: Results of an international study validating the EORTC QLQ-BM22. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 84(3), 337–342.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Zeng, L., Chow, E., Zhang, L., et al. (2012). An international prospective study establishing minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C30 in cancer patients with bone metastases. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Support Care Cancer, 20(12), 3307–3313.CrossRef Zeng, L., Chow, E., Zhang, L., et al. (2012). An international prospective study establishing minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C30 in cancer patients with bone metastases. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Support Care Cancer, 20(12), 3307–3313.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wong, E., Zhang, L., Kerba, M., et al. (2015). Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-BN20 in patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer, 23(9), 2731–2737.PubMedCrossRef Wong, E., Zhang, L., Kerba, M., et al. (2015). Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-BN20 in patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer, 23(9), 2731–2737.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bedard, G., Zeng, L., Zhang, L., et al. (2016). Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL to determine meaningful change in palliative advanced cancer patients. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12(1), 38–46.CrossRef Bedard, G., Zeng, L., Zhang, L., et al. (2016). Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL to determine meaningful change in palliative advanced cancer patients. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12(1), 38–46.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. A., Aaronson, N. K., et al. (2006). The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. European Journal of Cancer, 42(1), 55–64.PubMedCrossRef Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. A., Aaronson, N. K., et al. (2006). The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. European Journal of Cancer, 42(1), 55–64.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Bedard, G., Zeng, L., Zhang, L., et al. (2014). Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced cancer. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10(2), 109–117.PubMedCrossRef Bedard, G., Zeng, L., Zhang, L., et al. (2014). Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced cancer. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10(2), 109–117.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Giesinger, J. M., Kieffer, J. M., Fayers, P. M., et al. (2016). Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 79–88.PubMedCrossRef Giesinger, J. M., Kieffer, J. M., Fayers, P. M., et al. (2016). Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 79–88.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.PubMedCrossRef Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Kaasa, S., Bjordal, K., Aaronson, N., et al. (1995). The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30): Validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy. European Journal of Cancer, 31A(13–14), 2260–2263.PubMedCrossRef Kaasa, S., Bjordal, K., Aaronson, N., et al. (1995). The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30): Validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy. European Journal of Cancer, 31A(13–14), 2260–2263.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference McLachlan, S. A., Devins, G. M., & Goodwin, P. J. (1998). Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 34(4), 510–517.PubMedCrossRef McLachlan, S. A., Devins, G. M., & Goodwin, P. J. (1998). Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 34(4), 510–517.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Osoba, D., Zee, B., Pater, J., et al. (1994). Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer. Quality of Life Research, 3(5), 353–364.PubMedCrossRef Osoba, D., Zee, B., Pater, J., et al. (1994). Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer. Quality of Life Research, 3(5), 353–364.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N., et al. (2006). Item response theory was used to shorten EORTC QLQ-C30 scales for use in palliative care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(1), 36–44.PubMedCrossRef Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N., et al. (2006). Item response theory was used to shorten EORTC QLQ-C30 scales for use in palliative care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(1), 36–44.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Stromgren, A. S., Groenvold, M., Pedersen, L., et al. (2002). Symptomatology of cancer patients in palliative care: Content validation of self-assessment questionnaires against medical records. European Journal of Cancer, 38(6), 788–794.PubMedCrossRef Stromgren, A. S., Groenvold, M., Pedersen, L., et al. (2002). Symptomatology of cancer patients in palliative care: Content validation of self-assessment questionnaires against medical records. European Journal of Cancer, 38(6), 788–794.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Sharp, L. K., Knight, S. J., Nadler, R., et al. (1999). Quality of life in low-income patients with metastatic prostate cancer: Divergent and convergent validity of three instruments. Quality of Life Research, 8(5), 461–470.PubMedCrossRef Sharp, L. K., Knight, S. J., Nadler, R., et al. (1999). Quality of life in low-income patients with metastatic prostate cancer: Divergent and convergent validity of three instruments. Quality of Life Research, 8(5), 461–470.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Stiel, S., Psych, D., Kues, K., et al. (2011). Assessment of quality of life in patients receiving palliative care: Comparison of measurement tools and single item on subjective well-being. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(5), 599–606.PubMedCrossRef Stiel, S., Psych, D., Kues, K., et al. (2011). Assessment of quality of life in patients receiving palliative care: Comparison of measurement tools and single item on subjective well-being. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(5), 599–606.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Hjermstad, M. J., Bergenmar, M., Fisher, S. E., et al. (2012). The EORTC QLQ-OH17: A supplementary module to the EORTC QLQ-C30 for assessment of oral health and quality of life in cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 48(14), 2203–2211.PubMedCrossRef Hjermstad, M. J., Bergenmar, M., Fisher, S. E., et al. (2012). The EORTC QLQ-OH17: A supplementary module to the EORTC QLQ-C30 for assessment of oral health and quality of life in cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 48(14), 2203–2211.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Vivat, B., Young, T., Efficace, F., et al. (2013). Cross-cultural development of the EORTC QLQ-SWB36: A stand-alone measure of spiritual wellbeing for palliative care patients with cancer. Palliative Medicine, 27(5), 457–469.PubMedCrossRef Vivat, B., Young, T., Efficace, F., et al. (2013). Cross-cultural development of the EORTC QLQ-SWB36: A stand-alone measure of spiritual wellbeing for palliative care patients with cancer. Palliative Medicine, 27(5), 457–469.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Bedard, G., Zeng, L., Zhang, L., et al. (2013). Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton symptom assessment system in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 46(2), 192–200.PubMedCrossRef Bedard, G., Zeng, L., Zhang, L., et al. (2013). Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton symptom assessment system in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 46(2), 192–200.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Chang, V. T., Hwang, S. S., & Feuerman, M. (2000). Validation of the edmonton symptom assessment scale. Cancer, 88(9), 2164–2171.PubMedCrossRef Chang, V. T., Hwang, S. S., & Feuerman, M. (2000). Validation of the edmonton symptom assessment scale. Cancer, 88(9), 2164–2171.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Bush, S. H., Parsons, H. A., Palmer, J. L., et al. (2010). Single- vs. multiple-item instruments in the assessment of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 39(3), 564–571.PubMedCrossRef Bush, S. H., Parsons, H. A., Palmer, J. L., et al. (2010). Single- vs. multiple-item instruments in the assessment of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 39(3), 564–571.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Nekolaichuk, C. L., Maguire, T. O., Suarez-Almazor, M., et al. (1999). Assessing the reliability of patient, nurse, and family caregiver symptom ratings in hospitalized advanced cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(11), 3621–3630.PubMedCrossRef Nekolaichuk, C. L., Maguire, T. O., Suarez-Almazor, M., et al. (1999). Assessing the reliability of patient, nurse, and family caregiver symptom ratings in hospitalized advanced cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(11), 3621–3630.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Philip, J., Smith, W. B., Craft, P., & Lickiss, N. (1998). Concurrent validity of the modified Edmonton symptom assessment system with the rotterdam symptom checklist and the brief pain inventory. Support Care Cancer, 6(6), 539–541.PubMedCrossRef Philip, J., Smith, W. B., Craft, P., & Lickiss, N. (1998). Concurrent validity of the modified Edmonton symptom assessment system with the rotterdam symptom checklist and the brief pain inventory. Support Care Cancer, 6(6), 539–541.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Watanabe, S. M., Nekolaichuk, C. L., & Beaumont, C. (2012). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, a proposed tool for distress screening in cancer patients: Development and refinement. Psychooncology, 21(9), 977–985.PubMedCrossRef Watanabe, S. M., Nekolaichuk, C. L., & Beaumont, C. (2012). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, a proposed tool for distress screening in cancer patients: Development and refinement. Psychooncology, 21(9), 977–985.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Claessens, P., Menten, J., Schotsmans, P., & Broeckaert, B. (2011). Development and validation of a modified version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in a Flemish palliative care population. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 28(7), 475–482.PubMedCrossRef Claessens, P., Menten, J., Schotsmans, P., & Broeckaert, B. (2011). Development and validation of a modified version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in a Flemish palliative care population. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 28(7), 475–482.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Krabbe, P. F., Peerenboom, L., Langenhoff, B. S., & Ruers, T. J. (2004). Responsiveness of the generic EQ-5D summary measure compared to the disease-specific EORTC QLQ C-30. Quality of Life Research, 13(7), 1247–1253.PubMedCrossRef Krabbe, P. F., Peerenboom, L., Langenhoff, B. S., & Ruers, T. J. (2004). Responsiveness of the generic EQ-5D summary measure compared to the disease-specific EORTC QLQ C-30. Quality of Life Research, 13(7), 1247–1253.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Ribaudo, J. M., Cella, D., Hahn, E. A., et al. (2000). Re-validation and shortening of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 9(10), 1137–1146.PubMedCrossRef Ribaudo, J. M., Cella, D., Hahn, E. A., et al. (2000). Re-validation and shortening of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 9(10), 1137–1146.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Salsman, J. M., Beaumont, J. L., Wortman, K., et al. (2015). Brief versions of the FACIT-fatigue and FAACT subscales for patients with non-small cell lung cancer cachexia. Support Care Cancer, 23(5), 1355–1364.PubMedCrossRef Salsman, J. M., Beaumont, J. L., Wortman, K., et al. (2015). Brief versions of the FACIT-fatigue and FAACT subscales for patients with non-small cell lung cancer cachexia. Support Care Cancer, 23(5), 1355–1364.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Thavarajah, N., Bedard, G., Zhang, L., et al. (2014). Psychometric validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy–brain (FACT-Br) for assessing quality of life in patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer, 22(4), 1017–1028.PubMedCrossRef Thavarajah, N., Bedard, G., Zhang, L., et al. (2014). Psychometric validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy–brain (FACT-Br) for assessing quality of life in patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer, 22(4), 1017–1028.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Lyons, K. D., Bakitas, M., Hegel, M. T., et al. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative care (FACIT-Pal) scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37(1), 23–32.PubMedCrossRef Lyons, K. D., Bakitas, M., Hegel, M. T., et al. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative care (FACIT-Pal) scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37(1), 23–32.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Zeng, L., Bedard, G., Cella, D., et al. (2013). Preliminary results of the generation of a shortened quality-of-life assessment for patients with advanced cancer: The FACIT-Pal-14. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 16(5), 509–515.PubMedCrossRef Zeng, L., Bedard, G., Cella, D., et al. (2013). Preliminary results of the generation of a shortened quality-of-life assessment for patients with advanced cancer: The FACIT-Pal-14. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 16(5), 509–515.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Gao, W., Stark, D., Bennett, M. I., et al. (2012). Using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire to screen psychological distress from survivorship to end-of-life care: Dimensionality and item quality. Psychooncology, 21(9), 954–961.PubMedCrossRef Gao, W., Stark, D., Bennett, M. I., et al. (2012). Using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire to screen psychological distress from survivorship to end-of-life care: Dimensionality and item quality. Psychooncology, 21(9), 954–961.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Le Fevre, P., Devereux, J., Smith, S., et al. (1999). Screening for psychiatric illness in the palliative care inpatient setting: A comparison between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the General Health Questionnaire-12. Palliative Medicine, 13(5), 399–407.PubMedCrossRef Le Fevre, P., Devereux, J., Smith, S., et al. (1999). Screening for psychiatric illness in the palliative care inpatient setting: A comparison between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the General Health Questionnaire-12. Palliative Medicine, 13(5), 399–407.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference McMillan, S. C., & Mahon, M. (1994). Measuring quality of life in hospice patients using a newly developed Hospice Quality of Life Index. Quality of Life Research, 3(6), 437–447.PubMedCrossRef McMillan, S. C., & Mahon, M. (1994). Measuring quality of life in hospice patients using a newly developed Hospice Quality of Life Index. Quality of Life Research, 3(6), 437–447.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference McMillan, S. C., & Weitzner, M. (1998). Quality of life in cancer patients: Use of a revised Hospice Index. Cancer Practice, 6(5), 282–288.PubMedCrossRef McMillan, S. C., & Weitzner, M. (1998). Quality of life in cancer patients: Use of a revised Hospice Index. Cancer Practice, 6(5), 282–288.PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Hopwood, P., Howell, A., & Maguire, P. (1991). Screening for psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced breast cancer: Validation of two self-report questionnaires. British Journal of Cancer, 64(2), 353–356.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hopwood, P., Howell, A., & Maguire, P. (1991). Screening for psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced breast cancer: Validation of two self-report questionnaires. British Journal of Cancer, 64(2), 353–356.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Locke, D. E., Decker, P. A., Sloan, J. A., et al. (2007). Validation of single-item linear analog scale assessment of quality of life in neuro-oncology patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34(6), 628–638.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Locke, D. E., Decker, P. A., Sloan, J. A., et al. (2007). Validation of single-item linear analog scale assessment of quality of life in neuro-oncology patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34(6), 628–638.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Pratheepawanit, N., Salek, M. S., & Finlay, I. G. (1999). The applicability of quality-of-life assessment in palliative care: Comparing two quality-of-life measures. Palliative Medicine, 13(4), 325–334.PubMedCrossRef Pratheepawanit, N., Salek, M. S., & Finlay, I. G. (1999). The applicability of quality-of-life assessment in palliative care: Comparing two quality-of-life measures. Palliative Medicine, 13(4), 325–334.PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Lua, P. L., Salek, S., Finlay, I., & Lloyd-Richards, C. (2005). The feasibility, reliability and validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cardiff Short Form (MQOL-CSF) in palliative care population. Quality of Life Research, 14(7), 1669–1681.PubMedCrossRef Lua, P. L., Salek, S., Finlay, I., & Lloyd-Richards, C. (2005). The feasibility, reliability and validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cardiff Short Form (MQOL-CSF) in palliative care population. Quality of Life Research, 14(7), 1669–1681.PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Cohen, S. R., & Mount, B. M. (2000). Living with cancer: “Good” days and “bad” days–what produces them? Can the McGill quality of life questionnaire distinguish between them? Cancer, 89(8), 1854–1865.PubMedCrossRef Cohen, S. R., & Mount, B. M. (2000). Living with cancer: “Good” days and “bad” days–what produces them? Can the McGill quality of life questionnaire distinguish between them? Cancer, 89(8), 1854–1865.PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Cohen, S. R., Mount, B. M., Tomas, J. J., & Mount, L. F. (1996). Existential well-being is an important determinant of quality of life. Evidence from the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire. Cancer, 77(3), 576–586.PubMedCrossRef Cohen, S. R., Mount, B. M., Tomas, J. J., & Mount, L. F. (1996). Existential well-being is an important determinant of quality of life. Evidence from the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire. Cancer, 77(3), 576–586.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Cohen, S. R., Mount, B. M., Strobel, M. G., & Bui, F. (1995). The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: A measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliative Medicine, 9(3), 207–219.PubMedCrossRef Cohen, S. R., Mount, B. M., Strobel, M. G., & Bui, F. (1995). The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: A measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliative Medicine, 9(3), 207–219.PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Cohen, S. R., Mount, B. M., Bruera, E., et al. (1997). Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: A multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain. Palliative Medicine, 11(1), 3–20.PubMedCrossRef Cohen, S. R., Mount, B. M., Bruera, E., et al. (1997). Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: A multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain. Palliative Medicine, 11(1), 3–20.PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Webber, K., & Davies, A. N. (2011). Validity of the memorial symptom assessment scale-short form psychological subscales in advanced cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 42(5), 761–767.PubMedCrossRef Webber, K., & Davies, A. N. (2011). Validity of the memorial symptom assessment scale-short form psychological subscales in advanced cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 42(5), 761–767.PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Byock, I. R., & Merriman, M. P. (1998). Measuring quality of life for patients with terminal illness: The Missoula-VITAS quality of life index. Palliative Medicine, 12(4), 231–244.PubMedCrossRef Byock, I. R., & Merriman, M. P. (1998). Measuring quality of life for patients with terminal illness: The Missoula-VITAS quality of life index. Palliative Medicine, 12(4), 231–244.PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Schwartz, C. E., Merriman, M. P., Reed, G., & Byock, I. (2005). Evaluation of the Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index–revised: Research tool or clinical tool? Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8(1), 121–135.PubMedCrossRef Schwartz, C. E., Merriman, M. P., Reed, G., & Byock, I. (2005). Evaluation of the Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index–revised: Research tool or clinical tool? Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8(1), 121–135.PubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Romero, M. M., Flood, L. S., Gasiewicz, N. K., et al. (2015). Validation of the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Survey as a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Patients with Malignant Brain Tumors and Their Caregivers. Nursing Clinics of North America, 50(4), 679–690.PubMedCrossRef Romero, M. M., Flood, L. S., Gasiewicz, N. K., et al. (2015). Validation of the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Survey as a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Patients with Malignant Brain Tumors and Their Caregivers. Nursing Clinics of North America, 50(4), 679–690.PubMedCrossRef
81.
go back to reference Yost, K. J., Eton, D. T., Garcia, S. F., & Cella, D. (2011). Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(5), 507–516.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yost, K. J., Eton, D. T., Garcia, S. F., & Cella, D. (2011). Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(5), 507–516.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Antunes, B., Murtagh, F., Bausewein, C., et al. (2015). Screening for depression in advanced disease: Psychometric properties, sensitivity, and specificity of two items of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(2), 277–288.PubMedCrossRef Antunes, B., Murtagh, F., Bausewein, C., et al. (2015). Screening for depression in advanced disease: Psychometric properties, sensitivity, and specificity of two items of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(2), 277–288.PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Hearn, J., & Higginson, I. J. (1999). Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: The palliative care outcome scale. Palliative Care Core Audit Project Advisory Group. Quality in Health Care, 8(4), 219–227.PubMedCrossRef Hearn, J., & Higginson, I. J. (1999). Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: The palliative care outcome scale. Palliative Care Core Audit Project Advisory Group. Quality in Health Care, 8(4), 219–227.PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Siegert, R. J., Gao, W., Walkey, F. H., & Higginson, I. J. (2010). Psychological well-being and quality of care: A factor-analytic examination of the palliative care outcome scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 40(1), 67–74.PubMedCrossRef Siegert, R. J., Gao, W., Walkey, F. H., & Higginson, I. J. (2010). Psychological well-being and quality of care: A factor-analytic examination of the palliative care outcome scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 40(1), 67–74.PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Muriel, A. C., Moore, C. W., Baer, L., et al. (2012). Measuring psychosocial distress and parenting concerns among adults with cancer: The Parenting Concerns Questionnaire. Cancer, 118(22), 5671–5678.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Muriel, A. C., Moore, C. W., Baer, L., et al. (2012). Measuring psychosocial distress and parenting concerns among adults with cancer: The Parenting Concerns Questionnaire. Cancer, 118(22), 5671–5678.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
86.
go back to reference Chochinov, H. M., Hassard, T., McClement, S., et al. (2008). The patient dignity inventory: A novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 36(6), 559–571.PubMedCrossRef Chochinov, H. M., Hassard, T., McClement, S., et al. (2008). The patient dignity inventory: A novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 36(6), 559–571.PubMedCrossRef
87.
go back to reference Albers, G., Pasman, H. R., Rurup, M. L., et al. (2008). Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory. Cancer, 112(11), 2509–2517.CrossRef Albers, G., Pasman, H. R., Rurup, M. L., et al. (2008). Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory. Cancer, 112(11), 2509–2517.CrossRef
88.
go back to reference Mack, J. W., Nilsson, M., Balboni, T., et al. (2008). Peace, equanimity, and acceptance in the cancer experience (PEACE): Validation of a scale to assess acceptance and struggle with terminal illness. Cancer, 112(11), 2509–2517.PubMedCrossRef Mack, J. W., Nilsson, M., Balboni, T., et al. (2008). Peace, equanimity, and acceptance in the cancer experience (PEACE): Validation of a scale to assess acceptance and struggle with terminal illness. Cancer, 112(11), 2509–2517.PubMedCrossRef
89.
go back to reference Hadorn, D. C., Sorensen, J., & Holte, J. (1995). Large-scale health outcomes evaluation: How should quality of life be measured? Part II–Questionnaire validation in a cohort of patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48(5), 619–629.PubMedCrossRef Hadorn, D. C., Sorensen, J., & Holte, J. (1995). Large-scale health outcomes evaluation: How should quality of life be measured? Part II–Questionnaire validation in a cohort of patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48(5), 619–629.PubMedCrossRef
90.
go back to reference Steinhauser, K. E., Bosworth, H. B., Clipp, E. C., et al. (2002). Initial assessment of a new instrument to measure quality of life at the end of life. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 5(6), 829–841.PubMedCrossRef Steinhauser, K. E., Bosworth, H. B., Clipp, E. C., et al. (2002). Initial assessment of a new instrument to measure quality of life at the end of life. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 5(6), 829–841.PubMedCrossRef
91.
go back to reference Steinhauser, K. E., Clipp, E. C., Bosworth, H. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life at the end of life: Validation of the QUAL-E. Palliat Support Care, 2(1), 3–14.PubMedCrossRef Steinhauser, K. E., Clipp, E. C., Bosworth, H. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life at the end of life: Validation of the QUAL-E. Palliat Support Care, 2(1), 3–14.PubMedCrossRef
92.
go back to reference Lo, C., Burman, D., Swami, N., et al. (2011). Validation of the QUAL-EC for assessing quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 47(4), 554–560.PubMedCrossRef Lo, C., Burman, D., Swami, N., et al. (2011). Validation of the QUAL-EC for assessing quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 47(4), 554–560.PubMedCrossRef
93.
go back to reference Shahidi, J., Bernier, N., & Cohen, S. R. (2010). Quality of life in terminally ill cancer patients: Contributors and content validity of instruments. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 26(2), 88–93. Shahidi, J., Bernier, N., & Cohen, S. R. (2010). Quality of life in terminally ill cancer patients: Contributors and content validity of instruments. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 26(2), 88–93.
94.
go back to reference Steel, K., Ljunggren, G., Topinkova, E., et al. (2003). The RAI-PC: An assessment instrument for palliative care in all settings. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 20(3), 211–219.PubMedCrossRef Steel, K., Ljunggren, G., Topinkova, E., et al. (2003). The RAI-PC: An assessment instrument for palliative care in all settings. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 20(3), 211–219.PubMedCrossRef
95.
go back to reference de Haes, J. C., van Knippenberg, F. C., & Neijt, J. P. (1990). Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: Structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. British Journal of Cancer, 62(6), 1034–1038.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef de Haes, J. C., van Knippenberg, F. C., & Neijt, J. P. (1990). Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: Structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. British Journal of Cancer, 62(6), 1034–1038.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
96.
go back to reference Janssen, S. J., Teunis, T., van Dijk, E., et al. (2017). Validation of the Spine Oncology Study Group-Outcomes Questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with metastatic spine disease. Spine Journal, 17(6), 768–776.PubMedCrossRef Janssen, S. J., Teunis, T., van Dijk, E., et al. (2017). Validation of the Spine Oncology Study Group-Outcomes Questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with metastatic spine disease. Spine Journal, 17(6), 768–776.PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., Van den Berg, M., et al. (2012). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: Development of the Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List (SAIL). Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 30(2), 141–167.PubMedCrossRef de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., Van den Berg, M., et al. (2012). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: Development of the Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List (SAIL). Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 30(2), 141–167.PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Sharma, R. K., Astrow, A. B., Texeira, K., & Sulmasy, D. P. (2012). The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): Development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 44(1), 44–51.PubMedCrossRef Sharma, R. K., Astrow, A. B., Texeira, K., & Sulmasy, D. P. (2012). The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): Development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 44(1), 44–51.PubMedCrossRef
99.
go back to reference Steinmann, D., Schafer, C., van Oorschot, B., et al. (2009). Effects of radiotherapy for brain metastases on quality of life (QoL). Prospective pilot study of the DEGRO QoL working party. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 185(3), 190–197.PubMedCrossRef Steinmann, D., Schafer, C., van Oorschot, B., et al. (2009). Effects of radiotherapy for brain metastases on quality of life (QoL). Prospective pilot study of the DEGRO QoL working party. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 185(3), 190–197.PubMedCrossRef
100.
go back to reference Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ, 324(7351), 1417.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ, 324(7351), 1417.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
102.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724.PubMedCrossRef Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724.PubMedCrossRef
103.
go back to reference Wintner, L. M., Sztankay, M., Aaronson, N., et al. (2016). The use of EORTC measures in daily clinical practice-A synopsis of a newly developed manual. ‎European Journal of Cancer, 68, 73–81.PubMedCrossRef Wintner, L. M., Sztankay, M., Aaronson, N., et al. (2016). The use of EORTC measures in daily clinical practice-A synopsis of a newly developed manual. ‎European Journal of Cancer, 68, 73–81.PubMedCrossRef
104.
go back to reference Aspinal, F., Hughes, R., Dunckley, M., & Addington-Hall, J. (2006). What is important to measure in the last months and weeks of life?: A modified nominal group study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(4), 393–403.PubMedCrossRef Aspinal, F., Hughes, R., Dunckley, M., & Addington-Hall, J. (2006). What is important to measure in the last months and weeks of life?: A modified nominal group study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(4), 393–403.PubMedCrossRef
105.
go back to reference Teno, J. M., Byock, I., & Field, M. J. (1999). Research agenda for developing measures to examine quality of care and quality of life of patients diagnosed with life-limiting illness. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 17(2), 75–82.PubMedCrossRef Teno, J. M., Byock, I., & Field, M. J. (1999). Research agenda for developing measures to examine quality of care and quality of life of patients diagnosed with life-limiting illness. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 17(2), 75–82.PubMedCrossRef
106.
go back to reference Stewart, A. L., Teno, J., Patrick, D. L., & Lynn, J. (1999). The concept of quality of life of dying persons in the context of health care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 17(2), 93–108.PubMedCrossRef Stewart, A. L., Teno, J., Patrick, D. L., & Lynn, J. (1999). The concept of quality of life of dying persons in the context of health care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 17(2), 93–108.PubMedCrossRef
108.
go back to reference Cocks, K., King, M. T., Velikova, G., et al. (2011). Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(1), 89–96.PubMedCrossRef Cocks, K., King, M. T., Velikova, G., et al. (2011). Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(1), 89–96.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of self-administered measurement instruments
Authors
Janneke van Roij
Heidi Fransen
Lonneke van de Poll-Franse
Myrte Zijlstra
Natasja Raijmakers
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1809-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Quality of Life Research 8/2018 Go to the issue