Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 5/2016

Open Access 01-05-2016

Treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients taking empagliflozin compared with patients taking glimepiride

Authors: Costel Chirila, Qingyao Zheng, Eric Davenport, Dagmar Kaschinski, Egon Pfarr, Thomas Hach, Roberto Palencia

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This exploratory analysis assessed and compared patients’ treatment satisfaction with empagliflozin plus metformin versus glimepiride plus metformin, using data obtained from the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, status version (DTSQs) collected in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial.

Methods

Observed values for DTSQs scale score and each of its eight items were summarized by visit and treatment arm. Changes from baseline in these scores were analyzed using linear mixed models for repeated measures.

Results

The baseline scale score and item scores were comparable between empagliflozin plus metformin (n = 765) and glimepiride plus metformin (n = 780). Compared with baseline, patients reported significant treatment satisfaction increases and significant decreases in perceived hyperglycemia with both treatments at all visits. Also, compared with baseline, a significant increase in perceived frequency of hypoglycemia was observed in the glimepiride treatment group at all visits. No statistically significant treatment difference was observed in DTSQs scale score and its items at week 104. The difference between the treatment groups was significant and in favor of empagliflozin from week 28 onward for perceived frequency of hyperglycemia (P ≤ 0.006) and perceived frequency of hypoglycemia (P ≤ 0.011).

Conclusions

Despite positive trends in favor of empagliflozin, there was no significant difference in DTSQs scale score between empagliflozin and glimepiride at 104 weeks. However, when compared with glimepiride, empagliflozin demonstrated significantly lower perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia at all visits from week 28 onward. This finding is consistent with the clinical results reported for the EMPA-REG H2H-SU trial.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Pyerot, M., & Rubin, R. R. (2009). How does treatment satisfaction work? Modeling determinants of treatment satisfaction and care. Diabetes Care, 32, 1411–1417.CrossRef Pyerot, M., & Rubin, R. R. (2009). How does treatment satisfaction work? Modeling determinants of treatment satisfaction and care. Diabetes Care, 32, 1411–1417.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bradley, C., & Gamsu, D. S. (1994). Guidelines for encouraging psychological well-being: Report of a working group of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe and International Diabetes Federation European Region St Vincent Declaration Action Programme for Diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 11, 510–516.CrossRefPubMed Bradley, C., & Gamsu, D. S. (1994). Guidelines for encouraging psychological well-being: Report of a working group of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe and International Diabetes Federation European Region St Vincent Declaration Action Programme for Diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 11, 510–516.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bradley, C., & Gilbride, C. J. B. (2008). Improving treatment satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes: The role of once-daily insulin glargine. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Journal, 10(suppl 2), 50–65.CrossRef Bradley, C., & Gilbride, C. J. B. (2008). Improving treatment satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes: The role of once-daily insulin glargine. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Journal, 10(suppl 2), 50–65.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Blonde, L. (2010). Current antihyperglycemic treatment guidelines and algorithms for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The American Journal of Medicine, 123, S12–S18.CrossRefPubMed Blonde, L. (2010). Current antihyperglycemic treatment guidelines and algorithms for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The American Journal of Medicine, 123, S12–S18.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wright, E. M. (2001). Renal Na(+)-glucose cotransporters. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 280(1), F10–F18.PubMed Wright, E. M. (2001). Renal Na(+)-glucose cotransporters. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 280(1), F10–F18.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Wright, E. M., & Turk, E. (2004). The sodium/glucose cotransport family SLC5. Pflügers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology, 447(5), 510–518.CrossRefPubMed Wright, E. M., & Turk, E. (2004). The sodium/glucose cotransport family SLC5. Pflügers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology, 447(5), 510–518.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ferrannini, E., Seman, L., Seewaldt-Becker, E., Hantel, S., Pinnetti, S., & Woerle, H. J. (2010). The potent and highly selective sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor BI 10773 is safe and efficacious as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia, 53, S531. Ferrannini, E., Seman, L., Seewaldt-Becker, E., Hantel, S., Pinnetti, S., & Woerle, H. J. (2010). The potent and highly selective sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor BI 10773 is safe and efficacious as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia, 53, S531.
9.
go back to reference Rosenstock, J., Seman, L. J., Jelaska, A., Hantel, S., Pinnetti, S., Hach, T., et al. (2013). Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes with mild hyperglycaemia. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 15(12), 1154–1160.CrossRefPubMed Rosenstock, J., Seman, L. J., Jelaska, A., Hantel, S., Pinnetti, S., Hach, T., et al. (2013). Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes with mild hyperglycaemia. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 15(12), 1154–1160.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Häring, H. U., Merker, L., Seewaldt-Becker, E., Weimer, M., Meinicke, T., Woerle, H. J., et al. (2013). Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 36, 3396–3404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Häring, H. U., Merker, L., Seewaldt-Becker, E., Weimer, M., Meinicke, T., Woerle, H. J., et al. (2013). Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 36, 3396–3404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Ridderstråle, M., Andersen, K. R., Zeller, C., Kim, G., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & EMPA-REG H2H-SU trial investigators. (2014). Comparison of empagliflozin and glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 104-week randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2(9), 691–700.CrossRef Ridderstråle, M., Andersen, K. R., Zeller, C., Kim, G., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & EMPA-REG H2H-SU trial investigators. (2014). Comparison of empagliflozin and glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 104-week randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2(9), 691–700.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Inzucchi, S. E., Bergenstal, R. M., Buse, J. B., Diamant, M., Ferrannini, E., Nauck, M., et al. (2015). Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 38, 140–149.CrossRefPubMed Inzucchi, S. E., Bergenstal, R. M., Buse, J. B., Diamant, M., Ferrannini, E., Nauck, M., et al. (2015). Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 38, 140–149.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bradley, C., & Lewis, K. S. (1990). Measures of psychological well-being and treatment satisfaction developed from the responses of people with tablet-treated diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 7, 445–451.CrossRefPubMed Bradley, C., & Lewis, K. S. (1990). Measures of psychological well-being and treatment satisfaction developed from the responses of people with tablet-treated diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 7, 445–451.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bradley, C. (1994). Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: (DTSQ). In C. Bradley (Ed.), Handbook of psychology and diabetes: A guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice (pp. 111–132). Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers. Bradley, C. (1994). Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: (DTSQ). In C. Bradley (Ed.), Handbook of psychology and diabetes: A guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice (pp. 111–132). Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
16.
go back to reference Gelhorn, H. L., Stringer, S. M., Brooks, A., Thompson, C., Monz, B. U., Boye, K. S., et al. (2013). Preferences for medication attributes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 15(9), 802–809.CrossRefPubMed Gelhorn, H. L., Stringer, S. M., Brooks, A., Thompson, C., Monz, B. U., Boye, K. S., et al. (2013). Preferences for medication attributes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 15(9), 802–809.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Howorka, K., Pumprla, J., Schlusche, C., Wagner-Nosiska, D., Schabmann, A., & Bradley, C. (2000). Dealing with ceiling baseline treatment satisfaction level in patients with diabetes under flexible, functional insulin treatment: assessment of improvements in treatment satisfaction with a new insulin analogue. Quality of Life Research, 9, 915–930.CrossRefPubMed Howorka, K., Pumprla, J., Schlusche, C., Wagner-Nosiska, D., Schabmann, A., & Bradley, C. (2000). Dealing with ceiling baseline treatment satisfaction level in patients with diabetes under flexible, functional insulin treatment: assessment of improvements in treatment satisfaction with a new insulin analogue. Quality of Life Research, 9, 915–930.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bradley, C., Plowright, R., Stewart, J., Valentine, J., & Witthaus, E. (2007). The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version (DTSQc) evaluated in insulin glargine trials shows greater responsiveness to improvements than the original DTSQ. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bradley, C., Plowright, R., Stewart, J., Valentine, J., & Witthaus, E. (2007). The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version (DTSQc) evaluated in insulin glargine trials shows greater responsiveness to improvements than the original DTSQ. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Bradley, C. (2006). Feedback on the FDA’s February 2006 draft guidance on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures from a developer of PRO measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bradley, C. (2006). Feedback on the FDA’s February 2006 draft guidance on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures from a developer of PRO measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients taking empagliflozin compared with patients taking glimepiride
Authors
Costel Chirila
Qingyao Zheng
Eric Davenport
Dagmar Kaschinski
Egon Pfarr
Thomas Hach
Roberto Palencia
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1140-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Quality of Life Research 5/2016 Go to the issue