Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 10/2015

Open Access 01-10-2015

Can adult weights be used to value child health states? Testing the influence of perspective in valuing EQ-5D-Y

Authors: Paul Kind, Kristina Klose, Narcis Gusi, Pedro R. Olivares, Wolfgang Greiner

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To test whether or not adults assign the same values to hypothetical health states that describe health in adults as when those same descriptions refer to the health of a child.

Methods

A two-part self-completion questionnaire was designed in which respondents were asked firstly to rate a fixed set of EQ-5D-Y health states on a 0–100 visual analogue scale as if they themselves were in these states. Two versions of the questionnaire were produced each with a different second part. One version instructed respondents to value the same states but to imagine them describing another adult. The second version required respondents to value these states as if they applied to a 10-year-old child. Questionnaires were distributed to adults recruited in three countries (Germany, Spain and England) using convenience sampling methods.

Results

A total of 1085 questionnaires were completed. Despite some significant differences in the characteristics of the achieved samples in the three countries involved, the rank order of health states was largely consistent across each adult/child reference perspective. In all countries, the mean values were lower when health states described children rather than adults. Significant differences were found for 16/24 states when values for those states applied to adult respondent themselves were compared with the values for those states applied to a 10-year-old child. A near-uniform pattern was found across all three countries in which health state values for children were found to be lower than for adults.

Conclusions

Values for health states when ascribed to adults are higher than when those same states are associated with children. Were EQ-5D-3L values for adults applied to EQ-5D-Y health states, then this would effectively lead to an misrepresentation of the value assigned to a health status in children.

Footnotes
1

German and Spanish language versions of the questionnaire are available on request.

 
Literature
  1. Brooks, R., Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (Eds.). (2003). The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective. Evidence from the EuroQol BIOMED Research Programme. Springer.
  2. Ungar, W. (2011). Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: Are QALYs contraindicated? PharmacoEconomics, 29(8), 641–652.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Griebsch, I., Coast, J., & Brown, J. (2005). Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: A critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Pediatrics, 2005(115), e600.View Article
  4. Noyes, J., & Edwards, R. T. (2011). EQ-5D for the assessment of health-related quality of life and resource allocation in children: A systematic methodological review. Value in Health, 14(8), 1117–1129.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Ratcliffe, J., Couzner, L., Flynn, T., Sawyer, M., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., & Burgess, L. (2011). Valuing child health utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: A feasibility study to compare best–worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 9(1), 15–27.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Lancsar, E., Wildman, J., Donaldson, C., Ryan, M., & Baker, R. (2011). Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. Journal of Health Economics, 30, 466–478.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Lavelle, T. A., Meltzer, M. I., Gebremariam, A., Lamarand, K., Fiore, A. E., & Prosser, L. A. (2011). Community-based values for 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 illnesses and vaccination-related adverse events. PLoS One, 6(12), e27777. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0027777.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  8. Eisenberg, D., Freed, G. L., Davis, M. M., Singer, D., & Prosser, L. A. (2011). Valuing health at different ages. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 9(3), 149–156.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burström, K., Cavrini, G., Devlin, N., Egmar, A-C., Greiner, W., Gusi, N., Herdman, M., Jelsma, J., Kind, P., Scalone, L., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2010). Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 875–886.
  10. Hennessey, S., & Kind, P. (2002). Measuring health status in children : developing and testing a child-friendly version of EQ-5D. In P. Kind, S. Macran (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th plenary meeting of the EuroQoL group (pp. 291–310). Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  11. Ravens-Sieberer, U., Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burström, K., Cavrini, G., et al. (2010). Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: Results from a multinational study. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 887–897.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  12. Eidt-Koch, D., Mittendorf, T., & Greiner, W. (2009). Cross-sectional validity of the EQ-5D-Y as a generic health outcome instrument in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis in Germany. BMC Pediatrics, 9, 55.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  13. Scalone, L., Tomasetto, C., Matteucci, M. C., Selleri, P., Broccoli, S., Pacelli, B., & Cavrini, G. (2011). Assessing quality of life in children and adolescents: development and validation of the Italian version of the EQ-5D-Y Italian. Journal of Public Health, 8(4), 331–341.
  14. Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M. F., Kind, P., Parkin, D., et al. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20, 1727–1736.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  15. Schünemann, H. J., Griffith, L., Jaeschke, R., Goldstein, R., Stubbing, D., & Guyatt, G. H. (2003). Evaluation of the minimal important difference for the feeling thermometer and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(2003), 1170–1176.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Prosser, L. A., Payne, K., Rusinak, D., Uyeki, T., & Messonnier, M. (2011). Valuing health across the lifespan: Health state preferences for seasonal influenza illnesses in patients of different ages. Value in Health, 14, 135–143.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Carroll, A. E., & Downs, S. M. (2009). Improving decision analyses: Parent preferences (utility values) for pediatric health outcomes. Journal of Pediatrics, 2009(155), 21–25.View Article
Metadata
Title
Can adult weights be used to value child health states? Testing the influence of perspective in valuing EQ-5D-Y
Authors
Paul Kind
Kristina Klose
Narcis Gusi
Pedro R. Olivares
Wolfgang Greiner
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0971-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

Quality of Life Research 10/2015 Go to the issue