Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Quality of Life Research
Published in: Quality of Life Research 4/2012

Open Access 01-05-2012

Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review

Authors: Jasper M. Schellingerhout, Arianne P. Verhagen, Martijn W. Heymans, Bart W. Koes, Henrica C. de Vet, Caroline B. Terwee

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of the original versions of neck-specific questionnaires.

Methods

Bibliographic databases were searched for articles concerning the development or evaluation of the measurement properties of an original version of a self-reported questionnaire, evaluating pain and/or disability, which was specifically developed or adapted for patients with neck pain. The methodological quality of the selected studies and the results of the measurement properties were critically appraised and rated using a checklist, specifically designed for evaluating studies on measurement properties.

Results

The search strategy resulted in a total of 3,641 unique hits, of which 25 articles, evaluating 8 different questionnaires, were included in our study. The Neck Disability Index is the most frequently evaluated questionnaire and shows positive results for internal consistency, content validity, structural validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness, but a negative result for reliability. The other questionnaires show positive results, but the evidence for each measurement property is mostly limited, and at least 50% of the information on measurement properties per questionnaire is lacking.

Conclusions

Our findings imply that studies of high methodological quality are needed to properly assess the measurement properties of the currently available questionnaires. Until high quality studies are available, we recommend using these questionnaires with caution. There is no need for the development of new neck-specific questionnaires until the current questionnaires have been adequately assessed.
Literature
1.
Vernon, H., & Mior, S. (1991). The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 14(7), 409–415.PubMed
2.
Wheeler, A. H., Goolkasian, P., Baird, A. C., & Darden, B. V. (1999). Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity. Spine, 24(13), 1290–1294.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Pietrobon, R., Coeytaux, R. R., Carey, T. S., Richardson, W. J., & DeVellis, R. F. (2002). Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: A systematic review. Spine, 27(5), 515–522.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Nordin, M., Carragee, E. J., Hogg-Johnson, S., Weiner, S. S., Hurwitz, E. L., Peloso, P. M., et al. (2008). Assessment of neck pain and its associated disorders: Results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine, 33(4 Suppl), S101–122.PubMedCrossRef
6.
MacDermid, J. C., Walton, D. M., Avery, S., Blanchard, A., Etruw, E., McAlpine, C., et al. (2009). Measurement properties of the Neck Disability Index: A systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 39(5), 400–417.PubMed
7.
Vernon, H. (2008). The Neck Disability Index: State-of-the-art, 1991–2008. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 31(7), 491–502.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Menezes Costa Lda, C., Maher, C. G., McAuley, J. H., & Costa, L. O. (2009). Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(9), 934–943.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Schellingerhout, J. M., Heymans, M. W., Verhagen, A. P., de Vet, H. C., Koes, B. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). Measurement properties of translations of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 87.
11.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745.PubMedCrossRef
12.
de Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). When to use agreement versus reliability measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(10), 1033–1039.CrossRef
13.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1(8476), 307–310.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Terwee, C. B., Roorda, L. D., Knol, D. L., De Boer, M. R., & De Vet, H. C. (2009). Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1062–1067.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2009). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 22.CrossRef
16.
Furlan, A. D., Pennick, V., Bombardier, C., van Tulder, M., & Editorial Board, C. B. R. G. (2009). 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane back review group. Spine, 34(18), 1929–1941.PubMedCrossRef
17.
van Tulder, M., Furlan, A., Bombardier, C., Bouter, L., Board, Editorial., & k Review, G. (2003). Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine, 28(12), 1290–1299.
18.
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Goolkasian, P., Wheeler, A. H., & Gretz, S. S. (2002). The neck pain and disability scale: Test–retest reliability and construct validity. Clinical Journal of Pain, 18(4), 245–250.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Jordan, A., Manniche, C., Mosdal, C., & Hindsberger, C. (1998). The Copenhagen neck functional disability scale: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 21(8), 520–527.PubMed
21.
Chan Ci En, M., Clair, D. A., & Edmondston, S. J. (2009). Validity of the Neck Disability Index and neck pain and disability scale for measuring disability associated with chronic, non-traumatic neck pain. Manual Therapy, 14(4), 433–438.CrossRef
22.
Chok, B., & Gomez, E. (2000). The reliability and application of the Neck Disability Index in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Singapore, 3, 16–19.
23.
Gay, R. E., Madson, T. J., & Cieslak, K. R. (2007). Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 30(4), 259–262.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Bolton, J. E. (2004). Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: Detecting clinically significant improvement. Spine, 29(21), 2410–2417. discussion 2418.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Fairbank, J. C., Couper, J., Davies, J. B., & O’Brien, J. P. (1980). The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy, 66(8), 271–273.
26.
Hains, F., Waalen, J., & Mior, S. (1998). Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 21(2), 75–80.PubMed
27.
van der Velde, G., Beaton, D., Hogg-Johnston, S., Hurwitz, E., & Tennant, A. (2009). Rasch analysis provides new insights into the measurement properties of the Neck Disability Index. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 61(4), 544–551.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Stratford, P., Riddle, D., Binkley, J., Spadoni, G., Westaway, M., & Padfield, B. (1999). Using the Neck Disability Index to make decisions concerning individual patients. Physiotherapy Canada, 51(2), 107.
29.
Cleland, J. A., Childs, J. D., & Whitman, J. M. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(1), 69–74.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Young, B. A., Walker, M. J., Strunce, J. B., Boyles, R. E., Whitman, J. M., & Childs, J. D. (2009). Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine Journal, 9(10), 802–808.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Cleland, J. A., Fritz, J. M., Whitman, J. M., & Palmer, J. A. (2006). The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine, 31(5), 598–602.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Hoving, J. L., O’Leary, E. F., Niere, K. R., Green, S., & Buchbinder, R. (2003). Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain, 102(3), 273–281.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Riddle, D. L., & Stratford, P. W. (1998). Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Physical Therapy, 78(9), 951–963.PubMed
34.
Stewart, M., Maher, C. G., Refshauge, K. M., Bogduk, N., & Nicholas, M. (2007). Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash. Spine, 32(5), 580–585.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Million, R., Nilsen, K. H., Jayson, M. I., & Baker, R. D. (1981). Evaluation of low back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back supports. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 40(5), 449–454.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Bolton, J. E., & Humphreys, B. K. (2002). The Bournemouth Questionnaire: A short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 25(3), 141–148.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Bolton, J. E., & Breen, A. C. (1999). The Bournemouth Questionnaire: A short-form comprehensive outcome measure. I. Psychometric properties in back pain patients. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 22(8), 503–510.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Leak, A. M., Cooper, J., Dyer, S., Williams, K. A., Turner-Stokes, L., & Frank, A. O. (1994). The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and disability. British Journal of Rheumatology, 33(5), 469–474.CrossRef
39.
Sim, J., Jordan, K., Lewis, M., Hill, J., Hay, E. M., & Dziedzic, K. (2006). Sensitivity to change and internal consistency of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and derivation of a minimal clinically important difference. Clinical Journal of Pain, 22(9), 820–826.CrossRef
40.
Pinfold, M., Niere, K. R., O’Leary, E. F., Hoving, J. L., Green, S., & Buchbinder, R. (2004). Validity and internal consistency of a Whiplash-specific disability measure. Spine, 29(3), 263–268.CrossRef
41.
Ferrari, R., Russell, A., & Kelly, A. J. (2006). Assessing whiplash recovery—the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire. Australian Family Physician, 35(8), 653–654.
42.
Willis, C., Niere, K. R., Hoving, J. L., Green, S., O’Leary, E. F., & Buchbinder, R. (2004). Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire. Pain, 110(3), 681–688.CrossRef
43.
White, P., Lewith, G., & Prescott, P. (2004). The core outcomes for neck pain: Validation of a new outcome measure. Spine, 29(17), 1923–1930.CrossRef
44.
Deyo, R. A., Battie, M., Beurskens, A. J., Bombardier, C., Croft, P., Koes, B., et al. (1998). Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine, 23(18), 2003–2013.CrossRef
45.
Rebbeck, T. J., Refshauge, K. M., Maher, C. G., & Stewart, M. (2007). Evaluation of the core outcome measure in whiplash. Spine, 32(6), 696–702.CrossRef
46.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Gibbons, E., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments) checklist. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 82.CrossRef
47.
Terwee, C. B., Schellingerhout, J. M., Verhagen, A. P., de Vet, H. C., & Koes, B. W. (2011). Methodological quality of studies on the measurement properties of neck pain and disability questionnaires: A systematic review. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 34(4), 261–272.CrossRef
48.
Wiitavaara, B., Bjorklund, M., Brulin, C., & Djupsjobacka, M. (2009). How well do questionnaires on symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders capture the experiences of those who suffer from neck-shoulder disorders? A content analysis of questionnaires and interviews. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 10, 30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review
Authors
Jasper M. Schellingerhout
Arianne P. Verhagen
Martijn W. Heymans
Bart W. Koes
Henrica C. de Vet
Caroline B. Terwee
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9965-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Quality of Life Research 4/2012 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Psychometric properties of instruments to measure the quality of end-of-life care and dying for long-term care residents with dementia

Commentary

Can quality or quality-of-life be defined?

Erratum

Erratum to: Impaired health status and care dependency in patients with advanced COPD or chronic heart failure

OriginalPaper

Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist

OriginalPaper

PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale: an item response theory analysis

OriginalPaper

Translating ‘distress’ and screening for emotional distress in multicultural cancer patients in Israel