Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Quality of Life Research
Published in: Quality of Life Research 3/2011

Open Access 01-04-2011

Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008

Authors: Sun Sun, Jiaying Chen, Magnus Johannesson, Paul Kind, Ling Xu, Yaoguang Zhang, Kristina Burström

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To measure and analyse national EQ-5D data and to provide norms for the Chinese general population by age, sex, educational level, income and employment status.

Methods

The EQ-5D instrument was included in the National Health Services Survey 2008 (n = 120,703) to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). All descriptive analyses by socio-economic status (educational level, income and employment status) and by clinical characteristics (discomfort during the past 2 weeks, diagnosed with chronic diseases during the past 6 months and hospitalised during the past 12 months) were stratified by sex and age group.

Results

Health status declines with advancing age, and women reported worse health status than men, which is in line with EQ-5D population health studies in other countries and previous population health studies in China. The EQ-5D instrument distinguished well for the known groups: positive association between socio-economic status and HRQoL was observed among the Chinese population. Persons with clinical characteristics had worse HRQoL than those without.

Conclusions

This study provides Chinese population HRQoL data measured by the EQ-5D instrument, based on a national representative sample. The main findings for different subgroups are consistent with results from EQ-5D population studies in other countries, and discriminative validity was supported.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
Liu, Y., Hsiao, W. C., & Eggleston, K. (1999). Equity and health care: The Chinese experience. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 1349–1356.CrossRef
5.
6.
7.
8.
Wagstaff, A., Paci, P., & van Doorslaer, E. (1991). On the measurement of inequalities in health. Social Science & Medicine, 33(5), 545–557.CrossRef
9.
Mackenbach, J. P., & Kunst, A. E. (1997). Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: An overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Social Science & Medicine, 44(6), 757–771.CrossRef
10.
Shi, L. Y. (1993). Health care in China: A rural urban comparison after the socioeconomic reforms. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 71(6), 723–736.PubMed
11.
Henderson, G., Akin, J., Li, Z. M., Jin, S. G., Ma, H. J., & Ge, K. Y. (1994). Equity and the utilization of health services: Report of an eight-province survey in China. Social Science & Medicine, 39(5), 687–699.CrossRef
12.
Pei, X., & Rodriguez, E. (2006). Provincial income inequality and self-reported health status in China during 1991–7. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 60, 1065–1069.CrossRef
13.
Anson, O., & Sun, S. (2004). Health inequalities in rural China: Evidence from Hebei Province. Health Place, 10, 75–84.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Tang, S., Meng, Q., Chen, L., Bekedam, H., Evans, T., & Whitehead, M. (2008). Tackling the challenges to health equity in China. Lancet, 372, 1493–1501.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Yu, M. Y., & Sarri, R. (1997). Women’s health status and gender inequality in China. Social Science & Medicine, 45, 1885–1898.CrossRef
16.
Anson, O., & Sun, S. (2002). Gender and health in rural China evidence from HeBei Province. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1039–1054.CrossRef
17.
18.
Gao, J., Qian, J. C., Tang, S. L., Eriksson, B., & Blas, E. (2002). Health equity in transition from planned market economy in China. Health Policy Plan, 17, 20–29.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Yang, G. H., Zhao, W. H., Wan, X., Zhai, Y., Chen, L. C., & Koplan, J. P. (2008). Emergence of chronic non-communicable diseases in China. Lancet, 372, 1697–1705.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Xu, J., Guo, R., Huang, H. Y., Zhang, Q., & Xu, J. (2006). Self-rated health status of pregnant and postpartum women. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, 26(7), 984–986. [Article in Chinese].PubMed
21.
Spiker, B., & Revicki, D. A. (1996). Taxonomy of quality of life. In B. Spiker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (pp. 25–32). Philadelphia: Lippingcott-Raven Publishers.
22.
Hawthorne, G., Richardson, J., & Day, N. A. (2001). A comparison of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Annals of Medicine, 33, 358–370.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 337–343.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Kind, P., Dolan, P., Gudex, C., & Williams, A. (1998). Variations in population health status: Results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 316, 736–741.PubMed
25.
Szende, A., & Williams, A. (Eds.). (2004). Measuring self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Hungary: Spring Med Publishing Ltd.
26.
Luo, N., Johnson, J. A., Shaw, J. W., Feeny, D., & Coons, S. J. (2005). Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utility index. Medical Care, 43(11), 1078–1086.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Fryback, D. G., Dunham, N. C., Palta, M., Hanmer, J., Buechner, J., & Cherepanov, D. (2007). US norms for six generic health-related quality of life indexes from the National Health Measurement Study. Medical Care, 45(12), 1162–1170.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Burström, K., Johannesson, M., & Diderichsen, F. (2001). Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 10, 621–635.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Burström, K., Johannesson, M., & Rehnberg, C. (2007). Deteriorating health status in Stockholm 1998–2002: Results from repeated population surveys using the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 16, 1547–1553.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Sorensen, J., Davidsen, M., Gudex, C., Pedersen, K. M., & Bronnum-Hansen, H. (2009). Danish EQ-5D population norms. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37, 467–474.PubMedCrossRef
31.
König, H. H., Bernert, S., Angermeyer, M. C., Mattschinger, H., Martinez, M., & Vilagut, G. (2009). Comparison of population health status in six European countries. Medical Care, 47(2), 255–261.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Luo, N., Chew, L. H., Fong, K. Y., Koh, D. R., Ng, S. C., & Yoon, K. H. (2003). Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with rheumatic disease in Singapore. Journal of Rheumatology, 30(10), 2268–2274.PubMed
33.
Sakamaki, H., Ikeagami, N., Uchigata, Y., Iwamoto, Y., Origasa, H., et al. (2006). Measurement of HRQoL using EQ-5D in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan. Value Health, 9(1), 47–53.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Shaheen, R., & Lindholm, L. (2006). Quality of life among pregnant women with chronic energy deficiency in rural Bangladesh. Health Policy, 78(2–3), 128–134.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Misajon, R., Manderson, L., Pallant, J. F., Omar, Z., Bennett, E., & Rahim, R. B. (2006). Impact, distress and HRQoL among Malaysian men and women with morbidity impairment. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(4), 95.CrossRef
36.
Park, S. M., Park, M. H., Won, J. H., Lee, K. O., Choe, W. S., Heo, D. S., et al. (2006). EuroQol and survival prediction in terminal cancer patients: A multicenter prospective study in hospice-palliative care units. Supportive Care in Cancer, 14(4), 329–333.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Jia, T. W., Zhou, X. N., Wang, X. H., Utzninger, J., Steinmann, P., & Wu, X. H. (2007). Assessment of the age-specific disability weight of chronic shcistosmiasis japonica. Bulletin of World Health Organization, 85(6), 458–465.CrossRef
38.
Sakthong, P., Charoevnisuthiwongs, R., & Shabunthom, R. (2008). A comparison of EQ-5D index scores using the UK, US, and Japan preference weights in a Thai sample with type 2 diabetes. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 23(6), 71.CrossRef
39.
Tsuchiya, A., Ikeda, S., Ikegami, N., Nishimura, S., Sakai, I., Fukuda, T., et al. (2002). Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: The case of Japan. Health Economics, 11(4), 341–353.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Wang, H., David, A., Mullahy, K., & Mullahy, J. (2005). Variation in Chinese population health related quality of life: Results from a EuroQol study in Beijing, China. Quality of Life Research, 14, 119–132.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Ting, J. C., Tarn, Y. H., Ching, L. H., Liou, W. S., Shaw, J. W., & Chiou, X. G. (2007). Taiwanese version of the EQ-5D: Validation in a representative sample of the Taiwanese population. Journal Formosan Medical Association, 106(12), 1023–1031.CrossRef
42.
Kil, S. R., Lee, S. I., Yun, S. C., An, H. M., & Jo, M. W. (2008). The decline of health-related quality of life associated with some diseases in Korean adults. Journal of Preventive Medical Public Health, 41(6), 434–441. [Article in Korean].CrossRef
43.
Lubetkin, E. L., Jia, H., & Gold, M. R. (2004). Construct validity of the EQ-5D in low-income Chinese American Primary care patients. Quality of Life Research, 13(8), 1459–1468.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Leung, B., Luo, N., So, L., & Quan, H. (2007). Comparing three measures of health status (perceived health with Likert-type scale, EQ-5D, and number of chronic condition) in Chinese and white Canadians. Medical Care, 45(7), 610–617.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Centre for Health Statistics, Information of Ministry of Health of People’s Republic of China. (2009). An analysis report of National Health Services Survey in China, 2008. Beijing, China: Centre for Health Statistics and Information of Ministry of Health of People’s Republic of China. [Report in Chinese].
46.
Centre for Health Statistics, Information of Ministry of Health of People’s Republic of China. (2008). The protocol and guidelines for the 4th National Health Service Survey. Beijing, China: Centre for Health Statistics and Information of Ministry of Health of People’s Republic of China. [In Chinese].
47.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burström, K., Cavrini, G., et al. (2010). Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: Results from a multinational study. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 887–897.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Burström, K., Egmar, A.C., Lugnér, A., Eriksson, M., & Svartengren, M. (2010). A Swedish child-friendly pilot version of the EQ-5D instrument—the development process. European Journal of Public Health. doi:10.​1093/​eurpub/​ckq037.
49.
SAS Institute Inc. (2006). Base SAS ® 9.1.3 Procedures Guide (Second Ed, Vols. 1, 2, 3, and 4). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
50.
Marmot, M. (2004). The status syndrome: How social standing affects our health and longevity. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
51.
52.
53.
Bowling, A., Bond, M., Jenkinson, C., & Lamping, D. L. (1999). Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire: Which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Health Life Survey. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 21(3), 255–270.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Weinberger, M., Oddone, E. Z., Samsa, G. P., & Landsman, P. B. (1996). Are health-related quality of life measures affected by the mode of administration? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(2), 135–140.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Bowling, A. (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health (Oxf), 27, 281–291.CrossRef
56.
Norman, R., King, M., Clarke, D., Viney, R., Cronin, P., & Street, D. (2010). Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of on line and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off task. Quality of Life Research, 19, 499–508.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Wu, A. W., Jacobson, D. L., Berzon, R. A., Revicki, D. A., van der Horst, C., Fichtenbaum, C. J., et al. (1997). The effect of mode of administration of medical outcomes study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS. Quality of Life Research, 6, 3–10.PubMed
58.
Bharmal, M., & Thomas, J. (2006). Comparing the EQ-5D and SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. Value in Health, 9(4), 262–271.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Lubetkin, E. I., Jia, H. M., Franks, P., & Gold, M. R. (2005). Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: Examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Quality of Life Research, 14, 2187–2196.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Fu, A. Z., & Kattan, M. W. (2006). Racial and ethnic differences in preference-based health status measure. Current Medical Research Opinion, 22(12), 2348–2349.CrossRef
61.
Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China (2004). Zhongguo de she hui bao zhang zhuang kuang he zheng ce. Situation and policy regarding China’s social welfare. (In Chinese).
62.
63.
Sen, A. (2002). Health: Perception versus observation: Self reported morbidity has severe limitations and can be extremely misleading. British Medical Journal, 324, 860–861.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Symon, Z., Daignault, S., Symon, R., Dunn, R. L., Sanda, M. G., & Sandler, H. M. (2006). Measuring patient’s expectations regarding health-related quality-of-life outcomes associated with prostate cancer surgery or radiotherapy. Urology, 68(6), 1224–1229.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Sun, S., Chen, J., Johannesson, M., Kind, P., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., & Burström, K. (2010). Regional differences in health status in China: Population EQ-5D results from the National Health Services Survey 2008. (Submitted).
Metadata
Title
Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008
Authors
Sun Sun
Jiaying Chen
Magnus Johannesson
Paul Kind
Ling Xu
Yaoguang Zhang
Kristina Burström
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9762-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Quality of Life Research 3/2011 Go to the issue

ReviewPaper

Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of inhaled asthma medications: systematic review and research needs

OriginalPaper

Factors associated with health-related quality of life among Belgrade University students

Brief Communication

Translation of the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21) into three south Asian languages and preliminary evaluation of SDI-21(Urdu)

OriginalPaper

Comparison of the quality of life between patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and healthy controls

OriginalPaper

Assessing longitudinal quality of life in prostate cancer patients and their spouses: a multilevel modeling approach

OriginalPaper

Comparison of self-reported health-related quality of life between Taiwan hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: a multi-center collaborative study