Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Quality of Life Research
Published in: Quality of Life Research 2/2008

Open Access 01-03-2008

Effectiveness of health-related quality-of-life measurement in clinical practice: a prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic liver disease and their physicians

Authors: Jolie J. Gutteling, Anne-Sophie E. Darlington, Harry L. A. Janssen, Hugo J. Duivenvoorden, Jan J. V. Busschbach, Robert A. de Man

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study assessed the effectiveness of computerized measurement and feedback of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in daily clinical practice in patients with chronic liver disease.

Methods

One hundred and sixty-two patients (61% men; mean age 47.5 years) regularly completed computerized HRQoL questionnaires before each consultation for the duration of 1 year. Six physicians were randomly assigned to the experimental group and received an instant online graphical output of data. Five other physicians were randomly assigned to the control group and conducted their consultations as usual. Differences between groups on generic- and disease-specific HRQoL, patient management, and patient satisfaction with the consultation were assessed, as were physicians’ experiences with HRQoL data and effects on their consultations.

Results

No direct effect of the experimental condition on patients’ HRQoL was found. However, an interaction effect of the experimental condition and age was found: older patients in the experimental group had significantly better disease-specific HRQoL (F = 4.16; P = 0.04) and generic mental HRQoL (F = 4.62; P = 0.03) than patients in the control group. Also, male patients in the experimental group had better generic mental HRQoL than patients in the control group (F = 6.10; P = 0.02). Physicians in the experimental group altered their treatment policy significantly more often than did physicians in the control group (z = −3.73, P = 0.00), and their experiences with the availability of HRQoL information were generally positive. The scores on patient satisfaction with the consultation did not differ significantly between the experimental and control groups (z = −1.20, P = 0.23).

Conclusions

Computerized measurement and feedback of HRQoL in a daily clinical practice of an outpatient department of hepatology did not improve HRQoL for the entire group of chronic liver patients but, rather, improved disease-specific HRQoL of older patients with chronic liver disease and mental HRQoL of older patients and male patients with chronic liver disease. It also had an effect on patient management.
Literature
1.
Aaronson, N. K. (1988). Quality of life: What is it? How should it be measured? Oncology, 2(5), 69–76.
2.
Passik, S. D., Dugan, W., McDonald, M. V., Rosenfeld, B., Theobald, D. E., & Edgerton S. (1998). Oncologists’ recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(4), 1594–1600.PubMed
3.
Detmar, S. B., Aaronson, N. K., Wever, L. D., Muller, M., & Schornagel, J. H. (2000). How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients’ and oncologists’ preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(18), 3295–3301.PubMed
4.
Laine, C., Davidoff, F., Lewis, C. E., et al. (1996). Important elements of outpatient care: A comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 125(8), 640–645.PubMed
5.
Schor, E. L., Lerner, D. J., & Malspeis, S. (1995). Physicians’ assessment of functional health status and well-being. The patient’s perspective. Archives of Internal Medicine, 155(3), 309–314.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Ong, L. M., de Haes, J. C., Hoos, A. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995). Doctor–patient communication: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 40(7), 903–918.CrossRef
7.
Stewart, M. A. (1995). Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: A review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 152(9), 1423–1433.PubMed
8.
Zachariae, R., Pedersen, C. G., Jensen, A. B., Ehrnrooth, E., Rossen, P. B., & von der Maase, H. (2003). Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. British Journal of Cancer, 88(5), 658–665.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D. V., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 228(23), 3027–3034.CrossRef
10.
Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Velikova, G., Brown, J. M., Smith, A. B., & Selby, P. J. (2002). Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor–patient interactions in oncology. British Journal of Cancer, 86(1), 51–59.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Taenzer, P., Bultz, B. D., Carlson, L. E., et al. (2000). Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology, 9(3), 203–213.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Boyes, A., Newell, S., Girgis, A., McElduff, P., & Sanson-Fisher, R. (2006). Does routine assessment and real-time feedback improve cancer patients’ psychosocial well-being? European Journal of Cancer Care, 15(2), 163–171.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Detmar, S. B., & Aaronson, N. K. (1998). Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. European Journal of Cancer, 34(8), 1181–1186.PubMedCrossRef
15.
McLachlan, S. A., Allenby, A., Matthews, J., et al. (2001). Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19(21), 4117–4125.PubMed
16.
Rubenstein, L. V., McCoy, J. M., Cope, D. W., et al. (1995). Improving patient quality of life with feedback to physicians about functional status. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10(11), 607–614.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Gilbody, S. M., House, A. O., & Sheldon, T. (2002). Routine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcome – a systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 32(8), 1345–1356.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5(4), 401–416.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Kazis, L. E., Callahan, L. F., Meenan, R. F., & Pincus, T. (1990). Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(11), 1243–1253.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Espallargues, M., Valderas, J. M., & Jordi, A. (2000). Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: A systematic review of its impact. Medical Care, 38(2), 175–186.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Mandayam, S., Jamal, M. M., & Morgan, T. R. (2004). Epidemiology of alcoholic liver disease. Seminars in Liver Disease, 24(3), 217–232.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Younossi, Z. M., Guyatt, G., Kiwi, M., Boparai, N., & King, D. (1999). Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut, 45(2), 295–300.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Younossi, Z. M., & Guyatt, G. (1998). Quality-of-life assessments and chronic liver disease. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 93(7), 1037–1041.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Unal, G., de Boer, J. B., Borsboom, G. J., Brouwer, J. T., Essink-Bot, M., & de Man, R. A. (2001). A psychometric comparison of health-related quality of life measures in chronic liver disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(6), 587–596.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Gutteling, J. J., de Man, R. A., van der Plas, S. M., Schalm, S. W., Busschbach, J. J., & Darlington, A. S. (2006). Determinants of quality of life in chronic liver patients. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapy, 23(11), 1629–1635.CrossRef
26.
Bayliss, M. S., Gandek, B., Bungay, K. M., Sugano, D., Hsu, M. A., & Ware, J. E. Jr. (1998). A questionnaire to assess the generic and disease-specific health outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Quality of Life Research, 7(1), 39–55.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Gralnek, I. M., Hays, R. D., Kilbourne, A., et al. (2000). Development and evaluation of the Liver Disease Quality of Life instrument in persons with advanced, chronic liver disease – the LDQOL 1.0. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 95(12), 3552–3565.PubMed
28.
van der Plas, S. M., Hansen, B. E., de Boer, J. B., et al. (2004). The Liver Disease Symptom Index 2.0; validation of a disease-specific questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 13(8), 1469–1481.PubMedCrossRef
29.
van der Plas, S. M. (2004). Health related quality of chronic liver patients: A Dutch population-based study. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus Medical Center.
30.
Younossi, Z. M., Boparai, N., Price, L. L., Kiwi, M. L., McCormick, M., & Guyatt, G. (2001). Health-related quality of life in chronic liver disease: The impact of type and severity of disease. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 96(7), 2199–2205.PubMedCrossRef
31.
van der Plas, S. M., Hansen, B. E., de Boer, J.B., et al. (2003). Generic and disease-specific health related quality of life in non-cirrhotic, cirrhotic and transplanted liver patients: A cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterology, 3(1), 33.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Ware, J. Jr., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Sixma, H. J., Kerssens, J. J., Campen, C. V., & Peters, L. (1998). Quality of care from the patients’ perspective: From theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument. Health Expectations, 1(2), 82–95.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.CrossRef
35.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
36.
Wasson, J., Hays, R, Rubenstein, L., et al. (1992). The short-term effect of patient health status assessment in a health maintenance organization. Quality of Life Research, 1(2), 99–106.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Wagner, A. K., Ehrenberg, B. L., Tran, T. A., Bungay, K. M., Cynn, D. J., Rogers, W. H. (1997). Patient-based health status measurement in clinical practice: A study of its impact on epilepsy patients’ care. Quality of Life Research, 6(4), 329–341.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Lohr, K. N. (1992). Applications of health status assessment measures in clinical practice. Overview of the third conference on advances in health status assessment. Medical Care, 30(5 Suppl), MS1–MS14.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of health-related quality-of-life measurement in clinical practice: a prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic liver disease and their physicians
Authors
Jolie J. Gutteling
Anne-Sophie E. Darlington
Harry L. A. Janssen
Hugo J. Duivenvoorden
Jan J. V. Busschbach
Robert A. de Man
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9308-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Quality of Life Research 2/2008 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

The feasibility and responsiveness of the health utilities index in patients with early-stage breast cancer: A prospective longitudinal study

OriginalPaper

The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature

OriginalPaper

Is parental rearing an associated factor of quality of life in adulthood?

OriginalPaper

Determinants of objective and subjective quality of life in first-time-admission schizophrenic patients in Poland: a longitudinal study

Brief Communication

Measuring health-related quality of life in Greek children: psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM 4.0 Generic Core Scales

Brief Communcation

Validation of the Japanese version of EORTC QLQ-CR38