Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Psychiatric Quarterly 3/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Paper

Psychiatrists’ Comfort Using Computers and Other Electronic Devices in Clinical Practice

Authors: Farifteh F. Duffy, Laura J. Fochtmann, Diana E. Clarke, Keila Barber, Seung-Hee Hong, Joel Yager, Eve K. Mościcki, Robert M. Plovnick

Published in: Psychiatric Quarterly | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

This report highlights findings from the Study of Psychiatrists’ Use of Informational Resources in Clinical Practice, a cross-sectional Web- and paper-based survey that examined psychiatrists’ comfort using computers and other electronic devices in clinical practice. One-thousand psychiatrists were randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile and asked to complete the survey between May and August, 2012. A total of 152 eligible psychiatrists completed the questionnaire (response rate 22.2 %). The majority of psychiatrists reported comfort using computers for educational and personal purposes. However, 26 % of psychiatrists reported not using or not being comfortable using computers for clinical functions. Psychiatrists under age 50 were more likely to report comfort using computers for all purposes than their older counterparts. Clinical tasks for which computers were reportedly used comfortably, specifically by psychiatrists younger than 50, included documenting clinical encounters, prescribing, ordering laboratory tests, accessing read-only patient information (e.g., test results), conducting internet searches for general clinical information, accessing online patient educational materials, and communicating with patients or other clinicians. Psychiatrists generally reported comfort using computers for personal and educational purposes. However, use of computers in clinical care was less common, particularly among psychiatrists 50 and older. Information and educational resources need to be available in a variety of accessible, user-friendly, computer and non-computer-based formats, to support use across all ages. Moreover, ongoing training and technical assistance with use of electronic and mobile device technologies in clinical practice is needed. Research on barriers to clinical use of computers is warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Davies K, Harrison J: The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: A review of the evidence. Health Information and Libraries Journal 24(2):78–94, 2007.CrossRefPubMed Davies K, Harrison J: The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: A review of the evidence. Health Information and Libraries Journal 24(2):78–94, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hsiao CJ, Hing E: Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013. NCHS Data Brief 143:1–8, 2014.PubMed Hsiao CJ, Hing E: Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013. NCHS Data Brief 143:1–8, 2014.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Patel V1, Jamoom E, Hsiao CJ, et al.: Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011. Journal of General Internal Medicine 28(7):957–964, 2013. Patel V1, Jamoom E, Hsiao CJ, et al.: Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011. Journal of General Internal Medicine 28(7):957–964, 2013.
4.
go back to reference Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE: Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic healthrecord systems. Health Affairs (Millwood) 31(5):1108–1114, 2012. Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE: Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic healthrecord systems. Health Affairs (Millwood) 31(5):1108–1114, 2012.
5.
go back to reference DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al.: Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine 359(1):50–60, 2008. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al.: Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine 359(1):50–60, 2008.
6.
go back to reference Grinspan ZM, Banerjee S, Kaushal R, et al.: Physician specialty and variations in adoption of electronic health records. Applied Clinical Informatics 22;4(2):225–240, 2013. Grinspan ZM, Banerjee S, Kaushal R, et al.: Physician specialty and variations in adoption of electronic health records. Applied Clinical Informatics 22;4(2):225–240, 2013.
7.
go back to reference Kokkonen EW, Davis SA, Lin HC, et al.: Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 20(e1):e33–e38, 2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kokkonen EW, Davis SA, Lin HC, et al.: Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 20(e1):e33–e38, 2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Li C: Use of health information technology by office-based physicians: Comparison of two contemporaneous public-use physician surveys. Perspectives in Health Information Management 8:1f, 2011.PubMedPubMedCentral Li C: Use of health information technology by office-based physicians: Comparison of two contemporaneous public-use physician surveys. Perspectives in Health Information Management 8:1f, 2011.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Mojtabai R: Datapoints: Use of information technology by psychiatrists and other medical providers. Psychiatric Services 58(10):1261, 2007.CrossRefPubMed Mojtabai R: Datapoints: Use of information technology by psychiatrists and other medical providers. Psychiatric Services 58(10):1261, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sturm R: Datapoints: The role of computer use in different medical specialties. Psychiatric Services 52(4):443, 2001.CrossRefPubMed Sturm R: Datapoints: The role of computer use in different medical specialties. Psychiatric Services 52(4):443, 2001.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Crossing the Quality Chasm: Adaptation to Mental Health and Addictive Disorders. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series. Washington (DC), National Academies Press (US), 2006. Summary. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19817/. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Crossing the Quality Chasm: Adaptation to Mental Health and Addictive Disorders. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series. Washington (DC), National Academies Press (US), 2006. Summary. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK19817/​.
12.
go back to reference McGregor B, Mack D, Wrenn G, et al.: Improving service coordination and reducing mental health disparities through adoption of electronic health records. Psychiatric Services 66(9):985–987, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McGregor B, Mack D, Wrenn G, et al.: Improving service coordination and reducing mental health disparities through adoption of electronic health records. Psychiatric Services 66(9):985–987, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Das AK: Computers in psychiatry: A review of past programs and an analysis of historical trends. Psychiatric Quarterly 73(4):351–365, 2002.CrossRefPubMed Das AK: Computers in psychiatry: A review of past programs and an analysis of historical trends. Psychiatric Quarterly 73(4):351–365, 2002.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Allen M, Currie LM, Graham M, et al.: The classification of clinicians’ information needs while using a clinical information system. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 26–30, 2003. Allen M, Currie LM, Graham M, et al.: The classification of clinicians’ information needs while using a clinical information system. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 26–30, 2003.
16.
go back to reference Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al.: AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Canadian Medical Association Journal 182(18):E839–E842, 2010.CrossRef Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al.: AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Canadian Medical Association Journal 182(18):E839–E842, 2010.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Collins SA, Currie LM, Bakken S, et al.: Information needs, Infobutton Manager use, and satisfaction by clinician type: A case study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16(1):140–142, 2009. Collins SA, Currie LM, Bakken S, et al.: Information needs, Infobutton Manager use, and satisfaction by clinician type: A case study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16(1):140–142, 2009.
18.
go back to reference Currie LM, Graham M, Allen M, et al.: Clinical information needs in context: An observational study of clinicians while using a clinical information system. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 190–194, 2003. Currie LM, Graham M, Allen M, et al.: Clinical information needs in context: An observational study of clinicians while using a clinical information system. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 190–194, 2003.
19.
go back to reference Dawes M, Sampson U: Knowledge management in clinical practice: A systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics 71(1):9–15, 2003.CrossRefPubMed Dawes M, Sampson U: Knowledge management in clinical practice: A systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics 71(1):9–15, 2003.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al.: Analysis of questions asked by family physicians regarding patient care. Western Journal of Medicine 172(5):315–319, 2000. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al.: Analysis of questions asked by family physicians regarding patient care. Western Journal of Medicine 172(5):315–319, 2000.
21.
go back to reference Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al.: Obstacles to answering doctors’ questions about patient care with evidence: Qualitative study. BMJ 324(7339):710, 2002. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al.: Obstacles to answering doctors’ questions about patient care with evidence: Qualitative study. BMJ 324(7339):710, 2002.
22.
go back to reference Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Maviglia SM, et al.: Patient-care questions that physicians are unable to answer. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(4):407–414, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Maviglia SM, et al.: Patient-care questions that physicians are unable to answer. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(4):407–414, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Gonzalez-Gonzalez AI, Dawes M, Sanchez-Mateos J, et al.: Information needs and information-seeking behavior of primary care physicians. Annals of Family Medicine 5(4):345–352, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gonzalez-Gonzalez AI, Dawes M, Sanchez-Mateos J, et al.: Information needs and information-seeking behavior of primary care physicians. Annals of Family Medicine 5(4):345–352, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Graber MA, Randles BD, Ely JW, et al.: Answering clinical questions in the ED. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 26(2):144–147, 2008.CrossRefPubMed Graber MA, Randles BD, Ely JW, et al.: Answering clinical questions in the ED. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 26(2):144–147, 2008.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Graber MA, Randles BD, Monahan J, et al.: What questions about patient care do physicians have during and after patient contact in the ED? The taxonomy of gaps in physician knowledge. Emergency Medicine Journal 24(10):703–706, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Graber MA, Randles BD, Monahan J, et al.: What questions about patient care do physicians have during and after patient contact in the ED? The taxonomy of gaps in physician knowledge. Emergency Medicine Journal 24(10):703–706, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Hersh WR, Crabtree MK, Hickam DH, et al.: Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 88(4): 323–331, 2000.PubMedPubMedCentral Hersh WR, Crabtree MK, Hickam DH, et al.: Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 88(4): 323–331, 2000.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Meats E, Brassey J, Heneghan C, et al.: Using the Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database: How do clinicians really search? Journal of Medical Library Association 95(2):156–163, 2007. Meats E, Brassey J, Heneghan C, et al.: Using the Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database: How do clinicians really search? Journal of Medical Library Association 95(2):156–163, 2007.
28.
go back to reference Norlin C, Sharp AL, Firth SD: Unanswered questions prompted during pediatric primary care visits. Ambulatory Pediatrics 7(5):396–400, 2007.CrossRefPubMed Norlin C, Sharp AL, Firth SD: Unanswered questions prompted during pediatric primary care visits. Ambulatory Pediatrics 7(5):396–400, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Raglan GB, Margolis B, Paulus RA, et al.: Electronic health record adoption among obstetrician/gynecologists in the United States: Physician practices and satisfaction. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 2015. Raglan GB, Margolis B, Paulus RA, et al.: Electronic health record adoption among obstetrician/gynecologists in the United States: Physician practices and satisfaction. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 2015.
34.
go back to reference Jamoom E, Beatty P, Bercovitz A, et al.: Physician adoption of electronic health record systems: United States, 2011. NCHS Data Brief (98):1–8, 2012.PubMed Jamoom E, Beatty P, Bercovitz A, et al.: Physician adoption of electronic health record systems: United States, 2011. NCHS Data Brief (98):1–8, 2012.PubMed
35.
go back to reference McGinn CA, Grenier S, Duplantie J, et al.: Comparison of user groups’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: A systematic review. BMC Medicine 9:46, 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McGinn CA, Grenier S, Duplantie J, et al.: Comparison of user groups’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: A systematic review. BMC Medicine 9:46, 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Rao SR, Desroches CM, Donelan K, et al.: Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18(3):271–275, 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rao SR, Desroches CM, Donelan K, et al.: Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18(3):271–275, 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Furukawa MF, et al.: More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. Health Affairs (Millwood) 33(9):1664–1671, 2014.CrossRef Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Furukawa MF, et al.: More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. Health Affairs (Millwood) 33(9):1664–1671, 2014.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Ashman J: Trends in electronic health record system use among office-based physicians: United States, 2007-2012. National Health Statistics Reports 75:1–18, 2014.PubMed Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Ashman J: Trends in electronic health record system use among office-based physicians: United States, 2007-2012. National Health Statistics Reports 75:1–18, 2014.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Hogan SO, Kissam SM: Measuring meaningful use. Health Affairs (Millwood) 29(4):601–606, 2010.CrossRef Hogan SO, Kissam SM: Measuring meaningful use. Health Affairs (Millwood) 29(4):601–606, 2010.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ryan AM, Bishop TF, Shih S, et al.: Small physician practices in new york needed sustained help to realize gains in quality from use of electronic health records. Health Affairs (Millwood) 32(1):53–62, 2013.CrossRef Ryan AM, Bishop TF, Shih S, et al.: Small physician practices in new york needed sustained help to realize gains in quality from use of electronic health records. Health Affairs (Millwood) 32(1):53–62, 2013.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Pincus HA, Page AE, Druss B, et al.: Can psychiatry cross the quality chasm? Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance use conditions. American Journal of Psychiatry 164(5):712–719, 2007.CrossRefPubMed Pincus HA, Page AE, Druss B, et al.: Can psychiatry cross the quality chasm? Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance use conditions. American Journal of Psychiatry 164(5):712–719, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Psychiatrists’ Comfort Using Computers and Other Electronic Devices in Clinical Practice
Authors
Farifteh F. Duffy
Laura J. Fochtmann
Diana E. Clarke
Keila Barber
Seung-Hee Hong
Joel Yager
Eve K. Mościcki
Robert M. Plovnick
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Psychiatric Quarterly / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0033-2720
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6709
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-015-9410-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Psychiatric Quarterly 3/2016 Go to the issue