Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Prevention Science 3/2019

01-04-2019

Advances in Statistical Methods for Causal Inference in Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Section

Authors: Wolfgang Wiedermann, Nianbo Dong, Alexander von Eye

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The board of the Society for Prevention Research noted recently that extant methods for the analysis of causality mechanisms in prevention may still be too rudimentary for detailed and sophisticated analysis of causality hypotheses. This Special Section aims to fill some of the current voids, in particular in the domain of statistical methods of the analysis of causal inference. In the first article, Bray et al. propose a novel methodological approach in which they link propensity score techniques and Latent Class Analysis. In the second article, Kelcey et al. discuss power analysis tools for the study of causal mediation effects in cluster-randomized interventions. Wiedermann et al. present, in the third article, methods of Direction Dependence Analysis for the identification of confounders and for inference concerning the direction of causal effects in mediation models. A more general approach to the identification of causal structures in non-experimental data is presented by Shimizu in the fourth article. This approach is based on linear non-Gaussian acyclic models. Molenaar introduces vector-autoregressive methods for the optimal representation of Granger causality in time-dependent data. The Special Section concludes with a commentary by Musci and Stuart. In this commentary, the contributions of the articles in the Special Section are highlighted from the perspective of the experimental causal research tradition.
Literature
go back to reference Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. G. C., Sprague, B. N., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23, 447–458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. G. C., Sprague, B. N., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23, 447–458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press. Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Bray, B. C., Dziak, J. J., Patrick, M. E., & Lanza, S. T. (2018). Inverse propensity score weighting with a latent class exposure: Estimating the causal effect of reported reasons for alcohol use on problem alcohol use 16 years later. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0883-8. Bray, B. C., Dziak, J. J., Patrick, M. E., & Lanza, S. T. (2018). Inverse propensity score weighting with a latent class exposure: Estimating the causal effect of reported reasons for alcohol use on problem alcohol use 16 years later. Prevention Science. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11121-018-0883-8.
go back to reference Hyvärinen, A., & Smith, S. M. (2013). Pairwise likelihood ratios for estimation of non-Gaussian structural equation models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14, 111–152.PubMed Hyvärinen, A., & Smith, S. M. (2013). Pairwise likelihood ratios for estimation of non-Gaussian structural equation models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14, 111–152.PubMed
go back to reference Lanza, S. T., Schuler, M. S., & Bray, B. C. (2016). Latent class analysis with causal inference: The effect of adolescent depression on young adult substance use profile. In W. Wiedermann & A. von Eye (Eds.), Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research (pp. 385–404). Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.CrossRef Lanza, S. T., Schuler, M. S., & Bray, B. C. (2016). Latent class analysis with causal inference: The effect of adolescent depression on young adult substance use profile. In W. Wiedermann & A. von Eye (Eds.), Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research (pp. 385–404). Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.CrossRef
go back to reference MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Taylor & Francis. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Taylor & Francis.
go back to reference Musci, R. J., & Stuart, E. (2018). Ensuring causal, not casual, inference. Prevention Science, (in press). Musci, R. J., & Stuart, E. (2018). Ensuring causal, not casual, inference. Prevention Science, (in press).
go back to reference Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Peters, J., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2017). Elements of causal inference: Foundations and learning algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press. Peters, J., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2017). Elements of causal inference: Foundations and learning algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Shimizu, S., & Bollen, K. (2014). Bayesian estimation of causal direction in acyclic structural equation models with individual-specific confounder variables and non-Gaussian distributions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 2629–2652.PubMed Shimizu, S., & Bollen, K. (2014). Bayesian estimation of causal direction in acyclic structural equation models with individual-specific confounder variables and non-Gaussian distributions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 2629–2652.PubMed
go back to reference Shimizu, S., Hoyer, P. O., Hyvärinen, A., & Kerminen, A. (2006). A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2003–2030. Shimizu, S., Hoyer, P. O., Hyvärinen, A., & Kerminen, A. (2006). A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2003–2030.
go back to reference VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Wiedermann, W., & von Eye, A. (2016). Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research. Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.CrossRef Wiedermann, W., & von Eye, A. (2016). Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research. Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Advances in Statistical Methods for Causal Inference in Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Section
Authors
Wolfgang Wiedermann
Nianbo Dong
Alexander von Eye
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Prevention Science / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0978-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Prevention Science 3/2019 Go to the issue