Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Prevention Science 2/2013

01-04-2013

Subgroups Analysis when Treatment and Moderators are Time-varying

Authors: Daniel Almirall, Daniel F. McCaffrey, Rajeev Ramchand, Susan A. Murphy

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Prevention scientists are often interested in understanding characteristics of participants that are predictive of treatment effects because these characteristics can be used to inform the types of individuals who benefit more or less from treatment or prevention programs. Often, effect moderation questions are examined using subgroups analysis or, equivalently, using covariate × treatment interactions in the context of regression analysis. This article focuses on conceptualizing and examining causal effect moderation in longitudinal settings in which both treatment and the putative moderators are time-varying. Studying effect moderation in the time-varying setting helps identify which individuals will benefit more or less from additional treatment services on the basis of both individual characteristics and their evolving outcomes, symptoms, severity, and need. Examining effect moderation in these longitudinal settings, however, is difficult because moderators of future treatment may themselves be affected by prior treatment (for example, future moderators may be mediators of prior treatment). This article introduces moderated intermediate causal effects in the time-varying setting, describes how they are part of Robins’ Structural Nested Mean Model, discusses two problems with using a traditional regression approach to estimate these effects, and describes a new approach (a two-stage regression estimator) to estimate these effects. The methodology is illustrated using longitudinal data to examine the time-varying effects of receiving community-based substance abuse treatment as a function of time-varying severity (or need).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Almirall, D., Ten Have, T., & Murphy, S. (2009). Structural nested mean models for assessing time-varying effect moderation. Biometrics, 66, 131–139.PubMedCrossRef Almirall, D., Ten Have, T., & Murphy, S. (2009). Structural nested mean models for assessing time-varying effect moderation. Biometrics, 66, 131–139.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Barber, J., Murphy, S., & Verbitsky, N. (2004). Adjusting for time-varying confounding in survival analysis. Sociological Methodology, 34, 163–192.CrossRef Barber, J., Murphy, S., & Verbitsky, N. (2004). Adjusting for time-varying confounding in survival analysis. Sociological Methodology, 34, 163–192.CrossRef
go back to reference Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRef Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bray, B., Almirall, D., Zimmerman, R., Lynam, D., & Murphy, S. (2006). Assessing the total effect of time-varying predictors in prevention research. Prevention Science, 7, 1–17.PubMedCrossRef Bray, B., Almirall, D., Zimmerman, R., Lynam, D., & Murphy, S. (2006). Assessing the total effect of time-varying predictors in prevention research. Prevention Science, 7, 1–17.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999). Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology, 10, 37–48.PubMedCrossRef Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999). Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology, 10, 37–48.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–970.CrossRef Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–970.CrossRef
go back to reference Murphy, S. (2005). An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Statistics in Medicine, 24, 1455–1481.PubMedCrossRef Murphy, S. (2005). An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Statistics in Medicine, 24, 1455–1481.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Murphy, S., Laan, M. J. van der, Robins, J. M., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2001). Marginal mean models for dynamic regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1410–1423.PubMedCrossRef Murphy, S., Laan, M. J. van der, Robins, J. M., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2001). Marginal mean models for dynamic regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1410–1423.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pearl, J. (1998). Graphs, causality, and structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 27, 226–284.CrossRef Pearl, J. (1998). Graphs, causality, and structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 27, 226–284.CrossRef
go back to reference Robins, J. M. (1987). A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods. Journal of Chronic Disease, 40(Supplement 2), 139s–161s.CrossRef Robins, J. M. (1987). A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods. Journal of Chronic Disease, 40(Supplement 2), 139s–161s.CrossRef
go back to reference Robins, J. M. (1989). The control of confounding by intermediate variables. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 679–701.PubMedCrossRef Robins, J. M. (1989). The control of confounding by intermediate variables. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 679–701.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Robins, J. M. (1994). Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 23, 2379–2412.CrossRef Robins, J. M. (1994). Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 23, 2379–2412.CrossRef
go back to reference Robins, J. M. (1997). Latent variable modeling and applications to causality. In M. Berkane (Ed.), Causal inference from complex longitudinal data (pp. 69–117). New York: Springer. Robins, J. M. (1997). Latent variable modeling and applications to causality. In M. Berkane (Ed.), Causal inference from complex longitudinal data (pp. 69–117). New York: Springer.
go back to reference Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11, 550–560.PubMedCrossRef Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11, 550–560.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rosenbaum, P. (1984). The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 147, 656–666.CrossRef Rosenbaum, P. (1984). The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 147, 656–666.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRef Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Subgroups Analysis when Treatment and Moderators are Time-varying
Authors
Daniel Almirall
Daniel F. McCaffrey
Rajeev Ramchand
Susan A. Murphy
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Prevention Science / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0208-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Prevention Science 2/2013 Go to the issue