Top

Published in:

01-06-2007 | Original Paper

Gender Similarities and Differences in the Association Between Risk and Protective Factors and Self-Reported Serious Delinquency

Authors: Abigail A. Fagan, M. Lee Van Horn, J. David Hawkins, Michael W. Arthur

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 2/2007

Abstract

Boys consistently report higher rates of serious offending during late adolescence than do girls, yet research is mixed regarding the ways in which males and females may differentially experience risk and protection in their families, schools, peer groups, and as individuals. This article examines gender differences in 22 psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with serious delinquency. Based on self-reported information from 7,829 10th-grade students completing the Communities That Care Youth Survey, all psychosocial factors were significantly related to serious delinquency for both sexes. For 12 of the 22 factors, the strength of the association was significantly greater for males, and, for 18 factors, boys reported higher levels of risk exposure and lower levels of protection than did girls. Together, these findings suggest that boys’ greater involvement in serious delinquency is due to the combination of experiencing more risk and less protection than girls and the greater association of these predictors with serious delinquency for boys compared to girls. Implications for prevention programming are discussed.

Data from 10th graders was available from only 40 of the 41 communities in 2002.

Arnold, R. A. (1990). Processes of victimization and criminalization of black women. Social Justice, 17, 153–166.

Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni Jr., A. J. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601.PubMedCrossRef

Belknap, J. (2001). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and criminal justice (2nd edn.). Cincinnati, OH: Wadsworth.

Blitstein, J. L., Murray, D. M., Lytle, L. A., Birnbaum, A. S., & Perry, C. L. (2005). Predictors of violent behavior in an early adolescent cohort: Similarities and differences across genders. Health Education and Behavior, 32, 175–194.PubMedCrossRef

Blum, J., Ireland, M., & Blum, R. W. (2003). Gender differences in youth violence: A report from Add Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 234–240.PubMedCrossRef

Bottcher, J. (1995). Gender as social control: A qualitative study of incarcerated youths and their siblings in greater Sacramento. Justice Quarterly, 12, 33–57.CrossRef

Canter, R. J. (1982). Family correlates of male and female delinquency. Criminology, 20, 149–167.CrossRef

Cernkovich, S., & Giordano, P. C. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 25, 295–319.CrossRef

Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497–535.CrossRef

Elliott, D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination-The American Society of Criminology 1993 Presidential Address. Criminology, 32, 1–21.CrossRef

Fagan, A. A. (2001). The gendered cycle of violence: Comparing the effects of child abuse and neglect on criminal offending for males and females. Violence and Victims, 16, 457–474.PubMed

Farrington, D. P., & Painter, K. A. (2003). Gender differences in offending: implications for risk-focused prevention. London: Home Office RDA Online Report OLR09/04.

Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2002). Male and female offending trajectories. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 159–177.PubMedCrossRef

Glaser, R. R., Van Horn, M. L., Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2005). Measurement properties of the Communities That Care Youth Survey across demographic groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 73–102.CrossRef

Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 87–114). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Greenfeld, L. A., & Snell, T. L. (1999). Women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Communities That Care prevention strategies guide. South Deerfield, MA: Channing Bete.

Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., & Harachi, T. W. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders (pp. 106–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., Harachi, T. W., et al. (2000). Predictors of youth violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Heimer, K. (1995). Gender, race, and the pathways to delinquency: an interactionist perspective. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 140–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Liu, X., & Kaplan, H. B. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in adolescent delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of mediating mechanisms. Criminology, 37, 195–215.CrossRef

Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: Vol. 7 (pp. 29–149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mazerolle, P. (1998). Gender, general strain, and delinquency: An empirical examination. Justice Quarterly, 15, 65–91.CrossRef

Mears, D. P., Ploeger, M., & Warr, M. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 251–266.CrossRef

Miller, J., & White, N. A. (2003). Gender and adolescent relationship violence: A contextual examination. Criminology, 41, 1207–1248.CrossRef

Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge Studies in Criminology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrica, 54, 557–585.CrossRef

Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376–398.CrossRef

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus 3.1 (Version 3.1). Los Angeles.

Piquero, N. L., & Sealock, M. D. (2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew's Gender/GST hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 21, 125–158.CrossRef

Resnick, M. D., Ireland, M., & Borowsky, I. (2004). Youth violence perpetration: What protects? What predicts? Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 424.e421–424.e410.CrossRef

Richie, B. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of Black battered women. New York: Routledge.

Rowe, D. C., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Flannery, D. J. (1995). Sex differences in crime: Do means and within-sex variation have similar causes? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 84–100.CrossRef

Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 140–172.CrossRef

Snyder, H. N. (2003). Juvenile arrests 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.

Widom, C. S. (1989). The cycle of violence. Science, 244, 160–166.PubMedCrossRef

Wiebush, R. G., Baird, C., Kinsberg, B., & Onek, D. (1995). Risk assessment and classification for serious, violent and chronic juvenile offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.), Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 171–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multiple group data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 219–240, 269–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Title: Gender Similarities and Differences in the Association Between Risk and Protective Factors and Self-Reported Serious Delinquency
Authors: Abigail A. Fagan
M. Lee Van Horn
J. David Hawkins
Michael W. Arthur
Publication date: 01-06-2007
Publisher: Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Published in: Prevention Science / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0062-1

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Gender Similarities and Differences in the Association Between Risk and Protective Factors and Self-Reported Serious Delinquency

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Methamphetamine Use and Sexual Risk Behaviors in U.S. High School Students: Findings from a National Risk Behavior Survey

Fidelity of Implementation in Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND): A Comparison of Classroom Teachers and Program Specialists

Intervention Effects on Foster Preschoolers’ Attachment-Related Behaviors From a Randomized Trial

Alcohol Outlet Characteristics and Alcohol Sales to Youth: Results of Alcohol Purchase Surveys in 45 Oregon Communities

An Innovative, Effective and Cost Effective Survey Method Using a Survey-Check Response Format

Alcohol Use and Sexual Risks for HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Review of Empirical Findings