Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2019

01-09-2019 | Metastasis | Clinical Study

Stereotactic radiosurgery in elderly patients with brain metastases: comparison with non-elderly patients using database of a multi-institutional prospective observational study (JLGK0901-Elderly)

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly used for elderly patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, no studies based on a large sample size have been reported. To compare SRS treatment results between elderly and non-elderly patients, we performed a subset study of elderly patients using our prospectively-accumulated multi-institution study database (JLGK0901 Study, Lancet Oncol 15:387–395, 2014).

Methods

During the 2009–2011 period, 1194 eligible patients undergoing gamma knife SRS alone for newly diagnosed BMs were enrolled in this study from 23 gamma knife facilities in Japan. Observation was discontinued at the end of 2013. The 1194 patients were divided into the two age groups, 693 elderly ( ≥ 65 years) and 501 non-elderly ( < 65 years) patients. Our study protocol neither set an upper age limit nor required dose de-escalation.

Results

Median post-SRS survival time was significantly shorter in the elderly than in the non-elderly patient group (10.3 vs 14.3 months, HR 1.380, 95% CI 1.218–1.563, p < 0.0001). However, regarding all secondary endpoints including neurological death, neurological deterioration, SRS-related complications, leukoencephalopathy, local recurrence, newly-developed tumors, meningeal dissemination, salvage SRS, whole brain radiotherapy and surgery and decreased mini-mental state examination scores, the elderly patient group was not inferior to the non-elderly patient group. In the 693 elderly patients, there was no post-SRS median survival time difference between those with 5–10 versus 2–4 tumors (10.8 vs 8.9 months, HR 0.936, 95% CI 0.744–1.167, p = 0.5601).

Conclusions

We conclude that elderly BM patients are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
11.
go back to reference Randolph DM, McTyre E, Klepin H, Peiffer AM, Ayala-Peacock D, Lester S et al (2017) Impact of radiosurgical management of geriatric patients with brain metastases: Clinical and quality of life outcomes. J Radiosurg SBRT 5:35–42PubMedPubMedCentral Randolph DM, McTyre E, Klepin H, Peiffer AM, Ayala-Peacock D, Lester S et al (2017) Impact of radiosurgical management of geriatric patients with brain metastases: Clinical and quality of life outcomes. J Radiosurg SBRT 5:35–42PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Gregucci F, Fiorentino A, Corradini S, Figlia V, Mazzola R, Ricchetti F et al (2019) Linac-based radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy in elderly patients: A mono-institutional experience on 110 brain metastases. Strahlenther Onkol. 195:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-018-1405-0 CrossRefPubMed Gregucci F, Fiorentino A, Corradini S, Figlia V, Mazzola R, Ricchetti F et al (2019) Linac-based radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy in elderly patients: A mono-institutional experience on 110 brain metastases. Strahlenther Onkol. 195:218–225. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00066-018-1405-0 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Higuchi Y et al (2017) a multi-institutional prospective observational study of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901 study update): Irradiation-related complications and long-term maintenance of mini-mental state examination scores. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.037 CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Higuchi Y et al (2017) a multi-institutional prospective observational study of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901 study update): Irradiation-related complications and long-term maintenance of mini-mental state examination scores. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:31–40. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2017.​04.​037 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Serizawa T, Yamamoto M, Higuchi Y et al (2019) Local tumor progression treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: differences between patients with 2–4 versus 5–10 brain metastases based on an update of a multi-institutional prospective observational study (JLGK0901). J Neurosurg 26:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.JNS183085 CrossRef Serizawa T, Yamamoto M, Higuchi Y et al (2019) Local tumor progression treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: differences between patients with 2–4 versus 5–10 brain metastases based on an update of a multi-institutional prospective observational study (JLGK0901). J Neurosurg 26:1–10. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3171/​2019.​1.​JNS183085 CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE (1999) Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: New representations of old estimators. Stat Med 18:695–706CrossRefPubMed Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE (1999) Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: New representations of old estimators. Stat Med 18:695–706CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fine JP, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94:496–509CrossRef Fine JP, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94:496–509CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stereotactic radiosurgery in elderly patients with brain metastases: comparison with non-elderly patients using database of a multi-institutional prospective observational study (JLGK0901-Elderly)
Publication date
01-09-2019
Keyword
Metastasis
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03242-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2019 Go to the issue