Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2017

01-07-2017 | Clinical Study

A phase II trial of arsenic trioxide and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy for patients with malignant gliomas

Authors: Priya Kumthekar, Sean Grimm, James Chandler, Minesh Mehta, Maryanne Marymont, Robert Levy, Kenji Muro, Irene Helenowski, Katie McCarthy, Leanne Fountas, Jeffrey Raizer

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Standard treatment for GBM is radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is synergistic with RT based on several mechanisms of action previously identified, however not tested herein. The MTD of ATO, RT and TMZ was determined in a Phase I trial. We now present the combined Phase I/II data. Patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas were eligible for treatment. Patients were treated with RT (60 GY), TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily × 42 days) and ATO 0.20 mg/kg daily in week 1 then twice a week ×5 weeks, after completing RT they were treated with TMZ 5/28 for up to 12 months. MRIs were performed every 8 weeks. A total of 42 patients were enrolled in both the Phase I and II trials for this study treatment. Of the 42 enrolled patients (24 M and 18 W) the median age was 54 (24–80) and median KPS 90 (60–100). 28 patients had a GBM and 14 had anaplastic glioma (AG). All patients completed RT/TMZ/ATO and went on to maintenance TMZ. Median number of post RT cycles of TMZ was 4 (0–12). Median PFS was 7 m for GBM and 75 m for AG and median OS was 17 m for GBM and NR for AG. Best response was CR in 2, SD in 28, PR in 5 and PD in 7. There were no unexpected adverse events. Grade 3 toxicities likely attributable to ATO included prolonged Qtc (n = 1), elevated liver enzymes (n = 2 for ALT/n = 1 for AST) and elevated bilirubin (n = 1). Adding ATO to RT and TMZ is feasible with no increased side effects. The addition of arsenic did not improve overall survival in the GBM patients as compared to historic data. MGMT status was analyzed in 20 of the 42 patients where tissue was available for retrieval and MGMT testing.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stupp R et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10(5):459–466CrossRefPubMed Stupp R et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10(5):459–466CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wick W (2015) Long-term analysis of the NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with PCV or temozolomide. ASCO Conference Wick W (2015) Long-term analysis of the NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with PCV or temozolomide. ASCO Conference
3.
go back to reference Dolecek TA et al (2012) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005–2009. Neuro Onco 14(Suppl 5):v1–v49CrossRef Dolecek TA et al (2012) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005–2009. Neuro Onco 14(Suppl 5):v1–v49CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gilbert MR, Sulman EP, Mehta MP (2014) Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370(21):2048–2049CrossRefPubMed Gilbert MR, Sulman EP, Mehta MP (2014) Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370(21):2048–2049CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kizilbash SH et al (2014) The impact of concurrent temozolomide with adjuvant radiation and IDH mutation status among patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. J Neurooncol 120(1):85–93CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kizilbash SH et al (2014) The impact of concurrent temozolomide with adjuvant radiation and IDH mutation status among patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. J Neurooncol 120(1):85–93CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Miller WH Jr., et al (2002) Mechanisms of action of arsenic trioxide. Cancer Res 62(14):3893–3903PubMed Miller WH Jr., et al (2002) Mechanisms of action of arsenic trioxide. Cancer Res 62(14):3893–3903PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ning S, Knox SJ (2006) Optimization of combination therapy of arsenic trioxide and fractionated radiotherapy for malignant glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(2):493–498CrossRefPubMed Ning S, Knox SJ (2006) Optimization of combination therapy of arsenic trioxide and fractionated radiotherapy for malignant glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(2):493–498CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ning S, Knox SJ (2004) Increased cure rate of glioblastoma using concurrent therapy with radiotherapy and arsenic trioxide. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(1):197–203CrossRefPubMed Ning S, Knox SJ (2004) Increased cure rate of glioblastoma using concurrent therapy with radiotherapy and arsenic trioxide. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(1):197–203CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zhen Y et al (2010) Arsenic trioxide-mediated Notch pathway inhibition depletes the cancer stem-like cell population in gliomas. Cancer Lett 292(1):64–72CrossRefPubMed Zhen Y et al (2010) Arsenic trioxide-mediated Notch pathway inhibition depletes the cancer stem-like cell population in gliomas. Cancer Lett 292(1):64–72CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nasr R (2010) Eradication of acute promyelocytic leukemia-initiating cells by PML/RARA-targeting. Int J Hematol 91(5):742–747CrossRefPubMed Nasr R (2010) Eradication of acute promyelocytic leukemia-initiating cells by PML/RARA-targeting. Int J Hematol 91(5):742–747CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Fatoo A et al (2011) Understanding the role of tumor stem cells in glioblastoma multiforme: a review article. J Neurooncol 103(3):397–408CrossRefPubMed Fatoo A et al (2011) Understanding the role of tumor stem cells in glioblastoma multiforme: a review article. J Neurooncol 103(3):397–408CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Grimm SA et al (2012) Phase I study of arsenic trioxide and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy in patients with malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 110(2):237–243CrossRefPubMed Grimm SA et al (2012) Phase I study of arsenic trioxide and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy in patients with malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 110(2):237–243CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Macdonald DR et al (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8(7):1277–1280CrossRefPubMed Macdonald DR et al (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8(7):1277–1280CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Iwanami A et al (2013) PML mediates glioblastoma resistance to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-targeted therapies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(11):4339–4344CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iwanami A et al (2013) PML mediates glioblastoma resistance to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-targeted therapies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(11):4339–4344CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A phase II trial of arsenic trioxide and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy for patients with malignant gliomas
Authors
Priya Kumthekar
Sean Grimm
James Chandler
Minesh Mehta
Maryanne Marymont
Robert Levy
Kenji Muro
Irene Helenowski
Katie McCarthy
Leanne Fountas
Jeffrey Raizer
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2469-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2017 Go to the issue