Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2016

01-09-2016 | Clinical Study

A randomized phase II trial of standard dose bevacizumab versus low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine (CCNU) in adults with recurrent glioblastoma

Authors: Shiao-Pei Weathers, Xiaosi Han, Diane D. Liu, Charles A. Conrad, Mark R. Gilbert, Monica E. Loghin, Barbara J. O’Brien, Marta Penas-Prado, Vinay K. Puduvalli, Ivo Tremont-Lukats, Rivka R. Colen, W. K. Alfred Yung, John F. de Groot

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Antiangiogenic therapy can rapidly reduce vascular permeability and cerebral edema but high doses of bevacizumab may induce selective pressure to promote resistance. This trial evaluated the efficacy of low dose bevacizumab in combination with lomustine (CCNU) compared to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients (N = 71) with recurrent glioblastoma who previously received radiation and temozolomide were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive bevacizumab monotherapy (10 mg/kg) or low dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) in combination with lomustine (90 mg/m2). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) based on a blinded, independent radiographic assessment of post-contrast T1-weighted and non-contrast T2/FLAIR weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using RANO criteria. For 69 evaluable patients, median PFS was not significantly longer in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.34 months, CI 2.96–8.34) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (4.11 months, CI 2.69–5.55, p = 0.19). In patients with first recurrence, there was a trend towards longer median PFS time in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.96 months, CI 4.17–13.44) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (3.22 months CI 2.5–6.01, p = 0.08). The combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine was not superior to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Although the study was not designed to exclusively evaluate patients at first recurrence, a strong trend towards improved PFS was seen in that subgroup for the combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine. Further studies are needed to better identify such subgroups that may most benefit from the combination treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD et al (2013) Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 31(32):4085–4091CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD et al (2013) Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 31(32):4085–4091CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ et al (1999) Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 17(8):2572–2578PubMed Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ et al (1999) Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 17(8):2572–2578PubMed
4.
go back to reference Wick W, Puduvalli VK, Chamberlain MC et al (2010) Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 28(7):1168–1174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wick W, Puduvalli VK, Chamberlain MC et al (2010) Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 28(7):1168–1174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Jain RK (2005) Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 307(5706):58–62CrossRefPubMed Jain RK (2005) Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 307(5706):58–62CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cohen MH, Shen YL, Keegan P, Pazdur R (2009) FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (Avastin) as treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Oncologist 14(11):1131–1138CrossRefPubMed Cohen MH, Shen YL, Keegan P, Pazdur R (2009) FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (Avastin) as treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Oncologist 14(11):1131–1138CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE 2nd et al (2007) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 25(30):4722–4729CrossRefPubMed Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE 2nd et al (2007) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 25(30):4722–4729CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE 2nd et al (2007) Phase II trial of bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res 13(4):1253–1259CrossRefPubMed Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE 2nd et al (2007) Phase II trial of bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res 13(4):1253–1259CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27(28):4733–4740CrossRefPubMed Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27(28):4733–4740CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Chinot OL, Wick W, Cloughesy T (2014) Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370(21):2049CrossRefPubMed Chinot OL, Wick W, Cloughesy T (2014) Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370(21):2049CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Jain RK (2001) Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med 7(9):987–989CrossRefPubMed Jain RK (2001) Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med 7(9):987–989CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Winkler F, Kozin SV, Tong RT et al (2004) Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell 6(6):553–563PubMed Winkler F, Kozin SV, Tong RT et al (2004) Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell 6(6):553–563PubMed
15.
go back to reference von Baumgarten L, Brucker D, Tirniceru A et al (2011) Bevacizumab has differential and dose-dependent effects on glioma blood vessels and tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res 17(19):6192–6205CrossRef von Baumgarten L, Brucker D, Tirniceru A et al (2011) Bevacizumab has differential and dose-dependent effects on glioma blood vessels and tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res 17(19):6192–6205CrossRef
16.
go back to reference de Groot JF (2011) High-dose antiangiogenic therapy for glioblastoma: less may be more? Clin Cancer Res 17(19):6109–6111CrossRefPubMed de Groot JF (2011) High-dose antiangiogenic therapy for glioblastoma: less may be more? Clin Cancer Res 17(19):6109–6111CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lorgis V, Maura G, Coppa G et al (2012) Relation between bevacizumab dose intensity and high-grade glioma survival: a retrospective study in two large cohorts. J Neurooncol 107(2):351–358CrossRefPubMed Lorgis V, Maura G, Coppa G et al (2012) Relation between bevacizumab dose intensity and high-grade glioma survival: a retrospective study in two large cohorts. J Neurooncol 107(2):351–358CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Stark-Vance V (2005) Bevacizumab and CPT-11 in the treatment of relapsed malignant glioma. Paper presented at World Federation of Neuro-Oncology, Edinburgh Stark-Vance V (2005) Bevacizumab and CPT-11 in the treatment of relapsed malignant glioma. Paper presented at World Federation of Neuro-Oncology, Edinburgh
19.
20.
go back to reference Field KM, Jordan JT, Wen PY, Rosenthal MA, Reardon DA (2015) Bevacizumab and glioblastoma: scientific review, newly reported updates, and ongoing controversies. Cancer 121(7):997–1007CrossRefPubMed Field KM, Jordan JT, Wen PY, Rosenthal MA, Reardon DA (2015) Bevacizumab and glioblastoma: scientific review, newly reported updates, and ongoing controversies. Cancer 121(7):997–1007CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1963–1972CrossRefPubMed Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1963–1972CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rubinstein LV, Korn EL, Freidlin B, Hunsberger S, Ivy SP, Smith MA (2005) Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol 23(28):7199–7206CrossRefPubMed Rubinstein LV, Korn EL, Freidlin B, Hunsberger S, Ivy SP, Smith MA (2005) Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol 23(28):7199–7206CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM et al (2014) Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(9):943–953CrossRefPubMed Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM et al (2014) Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(9):943–953CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wick W, Brandes A, Gorlia T et al (2015) LB-05PHASE III trial exploring the combination of bevacizumab and lomustine in patients with first recurrence of a glioblastoma: the EORTC 26101 trial. Neurooncol 17(suppl 5):v1 Wick W, Brandes A, Gorlia T et al (2015) LB-05PHASE III trial exploring the combination of bevacizumab and lomustine in patients with first recurrence of a glioblastoma: the EORTC 26101 trial. Neurooncol 17(suppl 5):v1
25.
go back to reference Heiland DH, Masalha W, Franco P, Machein MR, Weyerbrock A (2016) Progression-free and overall survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme treated with last-line bevacizumab versus bevacizumab/lomustine. J Neurooncol 126(3):567–575CrossRefPubMed Heiland DH, Masalha W, Franco P, Machein MR, Weyerbrock A (2016) Progression-free and overall survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme treated with last-line bevacizumab versus bevacizumab/lomustine. J Neurooncol 126(3):567–575CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tonder M, Eisele G, Weiss T et al (2014) Addition of lomustine for bevacizumab-refractory recurrent glioblastoma. Acta Oncol 53(10):1436–1440CrossRefPubMed Tonder M, Eisele G, Weiss T et al (2014) Addition of lomustine for bevacizumab-refractory recurrent glioblastoma. Acta Oncol 53(10):1436–1440CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wiestler B, Radbruch A, Osswald M et al (2014) Towards optimizing the sequence of bevacizumab and nitrosoureas in recurrent malignant glioma. J Neurooncol 117(1):85–92CrossRefPubMed Wiestler B, Radbruch A, Osswald M et al (2014) Towards optimizing the sequence of bevacizumab and nitrosoureas in recurrent malignant glioma. J Neurooncol 117(1):85–92CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kaloshi G, Brace G, Rroji A et al (2013) Bevacizumab alone at mg/kg in an every-3-week schedule for patients with recurrent glioblastomas: a single center experience. Tumori 99(5):601–603PubMed Kaloshi G, Brace G, Rroji A et al (2013) Bevacizumab alone at mg/kg in an every-3-week schedule for patients with recurrent glioblastomas: a single center experience. Tumori 99(5):601–603PubMed
29.
go back to reference Desjardins A, Reardon DA, Coan A et al (2012) Bevacizumab and daily temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma. Cancer 118(5):1302–1312CrossRefPubMed Desjardins A, Reardon DA, Coan A et al (2012) Bevacizumab and daily temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma. Cancer 118(5):1302–1312CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Reardon DA, Desjardins A, Peters K et al (2011) Phase II study of metronomic chemotherapy with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma after progression on bevacizumab therapy. J Neurooncol 103(2):371–379CrossRefPubMed Reardon DA, Desjardins A, Peters K et al (2011) Phase II study of metronomic chemotherapy with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma after progression on bevacizumab therapy. J Neurooncol 103(2):371–379CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Reardon DA, Desjardins A, Peters KB et al (2012) Phase II study of carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for bevacizumab naive, recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 107(1):155–164CrossRefPubMed Reardon DA, Desjardins A, Peters KB et al (2012) Phase II study of carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for bevacizumab naive, recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 107(1):155–164CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Lu-Emerson C, Norden AD, Drappatz J et al (2011) Retrospective study of dasatinib for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab failure. J Neurooncol 104(1):287–291CrossRefPubMed Lu-Emerson C, Norden AD, Drappatz J et al (2011) Retrospective study of dasatinib for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab failure. J Neurooncol 104(1):287–291CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A randomized phase II trial of standard dose bevacizumab versus low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine (CCNU) in adults with recurrent glioblastoma
Authors
Shiao-Pei Weathers
Xiaosi Han
Diane D. Liu
Charles A. Conrad
Mark R. Gilbert
Monica E. Loghin
Barbara J. O’Brien
Marta Penas-Prado
Vinay K. Puduvalli
Ivo Tremont-Lukats
Rivka R. Colen
W. K. Alfred Yung
John F. de Groot
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2195-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2016 Go to the issue