Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2014

01-06-2014 | Clinical Study

A phase 2 trial of verubulin for recurrent glioblastoma: a prospective study by the brain tumor investigational consortium (BTIC)

Authors: Marc C. Chamberlain, Sean Grimm, Surasak Phuphanich, Larry Recht, Jay Z. Zhu, Lyndon Kim, Steve Rosenfeld, Camilo E. Fadul, Brain Tumor Investigational Consortium (BTIC)

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Treatment options are limited for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Verubulin is a microtubule destabilizer and vascular disrupting agent that achieve high brain concentration relative to plasma in animals. Adults with recurrent GBM who failed prior standard therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was 1-month progression-free survival (PFS-1) for bevacizumab refractory (Group 2) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6) for bevacizumab naïve patients (Group 1). Verubulin was administered at 3.3 mg/m2 as a 2-h intravenous infusion once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks in a 4-week cycle. The planned sample size was 34 subjects per cohort. 56 patients (37 men, 19 women) were enrolled, 31 in Group 1 and 25 in Group 2. The PFS-6 for Group 1 was 14 % and the PFS-1 for Group 2 was 20 %. Median survival from onset of treatment was 9.5 months in Group 1 and 3.4 months in Group 2. Best overall response was partial response (n = 3; 10 % in Group 1; n = 1; 4.2 % in Group 2) and stable disease (n = 7; 23 % in Group 1; n = 5; 21 % in Group 2). In Group 1, 38.7 % of patients experienced a serious adverse event; however only 3.2 % were potentially attributable to study drug. In Group 2, 44 % of patients experienced a serious adverse event although none were attributable to study drug. Accrual was terminated early for futility. Single agent verubulin, in this dose and schedule, is well tolerated, associated with moderate but tolerable toxicity but has limited activity in either bevacizumab naïve or refractory recurrent GBM.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Farah P, Onderacek A, Chen Y, Wolinsjy Y, Stroup NE, Kruchko C, Branholtz-Sloan J (2013) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006–2010. Neuro Oncol 15:ii1–ii56PubMedCrossRef Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Farah P, Onderacek A, Chen Y, Wolinsjy Y, Stroup NE, Kruchko C, Branholtz-Sloan J (2013) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006–2010. Neuro Oncol 15:ii1–ii56PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Eng J Med 352:987–996CrossRef Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Eng J Med 352:987–996CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grossman SA, Ye X, Piantadosi S, Desideri S, Nabors LB, Rosenfeld M, Fisher J (2010) Survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiation and temozolomide in research studies in the United States. Clin Cancer Res 16:2443–2449PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Grossman SA, Ye X, Piantadosi S, Desideri S, Nabors LB, Rosenfeld M, Fisher J (2010) Survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiation and temozolomide in research studies in the United States. Clin Cancer Res 16:2443–2449PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chamberlain M (2011) Evolving strategies: future treatment of glioblastoma. Expert Rev Neurother 11:519–532PubMedCrossRef Chamberlain M (2011) Evolving strategies: future treatment of glioblastoma. Expert Rev Neurother 11:519–532PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Grimm S, Chamberlain MC (2012) State of art and perspectives on the treatment of glioblastoma. CNS Oncol 1:49–70CrossRef Grimm S, Chamberlain MC (2012) State of art and perspectives on the treatment of glioblastoma. CNS Oncol 1:49–70CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, Mikkelsen T, Schiff D, Abrey LE et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27:4733–4740PubMedCrossRef Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, Mikkelsen T, Schiff D, Abrey LE et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27:4733–4740PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, Duic P, Royce C, Stroud I et al (2009) Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27:740–745PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, Duic P, Royce C, Stroud I et al (2009) Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27:740–745PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Norden AD, Young GS, Setayesh K, Muzikansky A, Klufas R, Ross GL et al (2008) Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: efficacy, toxicity, and patterns of recurrence. Neurology 70:779–787PubMedCrossRef Norden AD, Young GS, Setayesh K, Muzikansky A, Klufas R, Ross GL et al (2008) Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: efficacy, toxicity, and patterns of recurrence. Neurology 70:779–787PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kargiotis O, Rao J, Kyritsis AP et al (2006) Mechanisms of angiogenesis in gliomas. J Neuro Oncol 78:281–293CrossRef Kargiotis O, Rao J, Kyritsis AP et al (2006) Mechanisms of angiogenesis in gliomas. J Neuro Oncol 78:281–293CrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Tozer GM, Kanthou C, Baguley BC et al (2005) Disrupting tumour blood vessels. Nat Rev Cancer 5(6):423–435PubMedCrossRef Tozer GM, Kanthou C, Baguley BC et al (2005) Disrupting tumour blood vessels. Nat Rev Cancer 5(6):423–435PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Siemann D, Bibby M, Dark GG, Dicker AP, Eskens FA, Horsman MR et al (2005) Differentiation and definition of vascular-targeted therapies. Clin Cancer Res 11(2 pt 1):416–420PubMed Siemann D, Bibby M, Dark GG, Dicker AP, Eskens FA, Horsman MR et al (2005) Differentiation and definition of vascular-targeted therapies. Clin Cancer Res 11(2 pt 1):416–420PubMed
15.
go back to reference Kasibhatla S, Baichwal V, Cai SX, Roth B, Skvortsova I, Skvortsov S et al (2007) MPC-6827: A small-molecule inhibitor of microtubule formation that is not a substrate for multidrug resistance pumps. Can Res 67:5865–5871CrossRef Kasibhatla S, Baichwal V, Cai SX, Roth B, Skvortsova I, Skvortsov S et al (2007) MPC-6827: A small-molecule inhibitor of microtubule formation that is not a substrate for multidrug resistance pumps. Can Res 67:5865–5871CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sirisoma N, Pervin A, Zhang H, Jiang S, Adam Willardsen J, Anderson MB et al (2010) Discovery of N-methyl-4-(4-methoxyanilino) quinazolines as potent apoptosis inducers. Structure-activity relationship of the quinazoline ring. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20:2330–2334PubMedCrossRef Sirisoma N, Pervin A, Zhang H, Jiang S, Adam Willardsen J, Anderson MB et al (2010) Discovery of N-methyl-4-(4-methoxyanilino) quinazolines as potent apoptosis inducers. Structure-activity relationship of the quinazoline ring. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20:2330–2334PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sirisoma N, Pervin A, Zhang H, Jiang S, Willardsen JA, Anderson MB et al (2009) Discovery of N-(4-methoxyphenyl)-N,2-dimethylquinazolin-4-amine, a potent apoptosis inducer and efficacious anticancer agent with high blood brain barrier penetration. J Med Chem 52:2341–2351PubMedCrossRef Sirisoma N, Pervin A, Zhang H, Jiang S, Willardsen JA, Anderson MB et al (2009) Discovery of N-(4-methoxyphenyl)-N,2-dimethylquinazolin-4-amine, a potent apoptosis inducer and efficacious anticancer agent with high blood brain barrier penetration. J Med Chem 52:2341–2351PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pleiman C, Baichwal V, Bhoite L, et al (2007) Vascular disruption effects of MPC-6827. In: 98th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2007 in Los Angeles, California (Abstract/Poster) Pleiman C, Baichwal V, Bhoite L, et al (2007) Vascular disruption effects of MPC-6827. In: 98th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2007 in Los Angeles, California (Abstract/Poster)
19.
go back to reference Jessing K, Mauck K, Bradford C, et al (2005) MPC-6827, a small molecule inhibitor of microtubule formation with high brain penetration: absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and clinical considerations. In: 96th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2005 in Anaheim, California (Abstract/Poster) Jessing K, Mauck K, Bradford C, et al (2005) MPC-6827, a small molecule inhibitor of microtubule formation with high brain penetration: absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and clinical considerations. In: 96th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2005 in Anaheim, California (Abstract/Poster)
20.
go back to reference Yu MK (2009) MPC-6827: Anti-tumor activity in an orthotopic brain model and in combination with bevacizumab. In: The 2009 Joint Meeting of the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the AANS/CNS Section, October 23, 2009 in New Orleans, LA Yu MK (2009) MPC-6827: Anti-tumor activity in an orthotopic brain model and in combination with bevacizumab. In: The 2009 Joint Meeting of the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the AANS/CNS Section, October 23, 2009 in New Orleans, LA
21.
go back to reference Jones JT (2009) MPC-6827: A potent tubulin binding and vascular disrupting agent with high brain penetration and anti-tumor activity in a mouse orthotopic glioma model. In: The 100th meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), April 22, 2009 in Denver, CO Jones JT (2009) MPC-6827: A potent tubulin binding and vascular disrupting agent with high brain penetration and anti-tumor activity in a mouse orthotopic glioma model. In: The 100th meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), April 22, 2009 in Denver, CO
22.
go back to reference Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ et al (1999) Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 17:2572–2578PubMed Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ et al (1999) Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 17:2572–2578PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lamborn KR, Yung WK, Chang SM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF, DeAngelis LM et al (2008) Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 10:162–170PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lamborn KR, Yung WK, Chang SM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF, DeAngelis LM et al (2008) Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 10:162–170PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ballman KV, Buckner JC, Brown PD, Giannini C, Flynn PJ, LaPlant BR, Jaeckle KA (2007) The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol 9:29–38PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ballman KV, Buckner JC, Brown PD, Giannini C, Flynn PJ, LaPlant BR, Jaeckle KA (2007) The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol 9:29–38PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Quant EC, Norden AD, Drappatz J, Muzikansky A, Doherty L, Lafrankie D et al (2007) Role of a second chemotherapy in recurrent malignant glioma patients who progress on bevacizumab. Neuro Oncol 11:550–555CrossRef Quant EC, Norden AD, Drappatz J, Muzikansky A, Doherty L, Lafrankie D et al (2007) Role of a second chemotherapy in recurrent malignant glioma patients who progress on bevacizumab. Neuro Oncol 11:550–555CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK (2010) Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol 96:259–269CrossRef Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK (2010) Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol 96:259–269CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tsimberidou AM, Akerley W, Schabel MC, Hong DS, Uehara C et al (2010) Phase I clinical trial of MPC-6827 (Azixa), a microtubule destabilizing agent, in patients with advanced cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 9:3410–3419PubMedCrossRef Tsimberidou AM, Akerley W, Schabel MC, Hong DS, Uehara C et al (2010) Phase I clinical trial of MPC-6827 (Azixa), a microtubule destabilizing agent, in patients with advanced cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 9:3410–3419PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hwu WJ, Akerley WL, Stephenson J, et al (2010) Final report: MPC-6827 is safely combined with temozolomide for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 28: 15 s (Suppl; abstr 8531) Hwu WJ, Akerley WL, Stephenson J, et al (2010) Final report: MPC-6827 is safely combined with temozolomide for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 28: 15 s (Suppl; abstr 8531)
29.
go back to reference Grossman K, Colman H, Akerley W, Glantz M, Matsuoko Y, Beelen AP et al (2012) Phase I trial of verubulin (MPC-6827) plus carboplatin in patients with relapsed glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol 110:257–264CrossRef Grossman K, Colman H, Akerley W, Glantz M, Matsuoko Y, Beelen AP et al (2012) Phase I trial of verubulin (MPC-6827) plus carboplatin in patients with relapsed glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol 110:257–264CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280PubMed Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280PubMed
31.
go back to reference Wen P, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972PubMedCrossRef Wen P, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference van Heeckeren WJ, Bhakta S, Ortiz J, Duerk J, Cooney MM, Dowlati A et al (2006) Promise of new vascular-disrupting agents balanced with cardiac toxicity: Is it time for oncologists to get to know their cardiologists? J Clin Oncol 24:1485–1488PubMedCrossRef van Heeckeren WJ, Bhakta S, Ortiz J, Duerk J, Cooney MM, Dowlati A et al (2006) Promise of new vascular-disrupting agents balanced with cardiac toxicity: Is it time for oncologists to get to know their cardiologists? J Clin Oncol 24:1485–1488PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference LoRusso PM, Boerner SA, Hunsberger S (2011) Clinical development of vascular disrupting agents: what lessons can we learn from ASA404? J Clin Oncol 29:2952–2955PubMedCrossRef LoRusso PM, Boerner SA, Hunsberger S (2011) Clinical development of vascular disrupting agents: what lessons can we learn from ASA404? J Clin Oncol 29:2952–2955PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wang ES, Pili R, Seshadri M (2012) Modulation of chemotherapeutic efficacy by vascular disrupting agents: optimizing the sequence and schedule. J Clin Oncol 30:760–761PubMedCrossRef Wang ES, Pili R, Seshadri M (2012) Modulation of chemotherapeutic efficacy by vascular disrupting agents: optimizing the sequence and schedule. J Clin Oncol 30:760–761PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bottsford-Miller JN, Colleman RL, Sood AK (2012) Resistance and escape from antiangiogenesis therapy: clinical implications and future strategies. J Clin Oncol 30:4026–4034PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bottsford-Miller JN, Colleman RL, Sood AK (2012) Resistance and escape from antiangiogenesis therapy: clinical implications and future strategies. J Clin Oncol 30:4026–4034PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A phase 2 trial of verubulin for recurrent glioblastoma: a prospective study by the brain tumor investigational consortium (BTIC)
Authors
Marc C. Chamberlain
Sean Grimm
Surasak Phuphanich
Larry Recht
Jay Z. Zhu
Lyndon Kim
Steve Rosenfeld
Camilo E. Fadul
Brain Tumor Investigational Consortium (BTIC)
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1437-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2014 Go to the issue