Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Scientific Contribution

Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review

Authors: Jan Piasecki, Ewa Walkiewicz-Żarek, Justyna Figas-Skrzypulec, Anna Kordecka, Vilius Dranseika

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Digitization of a health record changes its accessibility. An electronic health record (EHR) can be accessed by multiple authorized users. Health information from EHRs contributes to learning healthcare systems’ development. The objective of this systematic review is to answer a question: What are ethical issues concerning research using EHRs in the literature? We searched Medline Ovid, Embase and Scopus for publications concerning ethical issues of research use of EHRs. We employed the constant comparative method to retrieve common ethical themes. We descriptively summarized empirical studies. The study reveals the breadth, depth, and complexity of ethical problems associated with research use of EHRs. The central ethical question that emerges from the review is how to manage access to EHRs. Managing accessibility consists of interconnected and overlapping issues: streamlining research access to EHRs, minimizing risk, engaging and educating patients, as well as ensuring trustworthy governance of EHR data. Most of the ethical problems concerning EHR-based research arise from rapid cultural change. The framing of concepts of privacy, as well as individual and public dimensions of beneficence, are changing. We are currently living in the middle of this transition period. Human emotions and mental habits, as well as laws, are lagging behind technological developments. In the medical tradition, individual patient’s health has always been in the center. Transformation of healthcare care, its digitalization, seems to have some impacts on our perspective of health care ethics, research ethics and public health ethics.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Aicardi, C., L. Del Savio, E.S. Dove, F. Lucivero, N. Tempini, and B. Prainsack. 2016. Emerging ethical issues regarding digital health data. On the World Medical Association Draft Declaration on Ethical Considerations Regarding Health Databases and Biobanks. Croatian Medical Journal 57 (2): 207–213.CrossRef Aicardi, C., L. Del Savio, E.S. Dove, F. Lucivero, N. Tempini, and B. Prainsack. 2016. Emerging ethical issues regarding digital health data. On the World Medical Association Draft Declaration on Ethical Considerations Regarding Health Databases and Biobanks. Croatian Medical Journal 57 (2): 207–213.CrossRef
go back to reference Aitken, M., J. de St Jorre, C. Pagliari, R. Jepson, and S. Cunningham-Burley. 2016. Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1): 73.CrossRef Aitken, M., J. de St Jorre, C. Pagliari, R. Jepson, and S. Cunningham-Burley. 2016. Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1): 73.CrossRef
go back to reference Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2013. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed., 480. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2013. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed., 480. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Boeije, H.A. 2002. Purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity 36 (4): 391–409.CrossRef Boeije, H.A. 2002. Purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity 36 (4): 391–409.CrossRef
go back to reference Botkin, J.R., E. Rothwell, R. Anderson, L.A. Stark, and J. Mitchell. 2014. Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research. Journal of Community Genetics 5 (3): 205–213.CrossRef Botkin, J.R., E. Rothwell, R. Anderson, L.A. Stark, and J. Mitchell. 2014. Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research. Journal of Community Genetics 5 (3): 205–213.CrossRef
go back to reference Chassang, G. 2017. The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research. E-Cancer Medical Science 11: 709. Chassang, G. 2017. The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research. E-Cancer Medical Science 11: 709.
go back to reference Clerkin, P., B.S. Buckley, A.W. Murphy, and A.E. MacFarlane. 2012. Patients’ views about the use of their personal information from general practice medical records in health research: A qualitative study in Ireland. Family Practice 30 (1): 105–112.CrossRef Clerkin, P., B.S. Buckley, A.W. Murphy, and A.E. MacFarlane. 2012. Patients’ views about the use of their personal information from general practice medical records in health research: A qualitative study in Ireland. Family Practice 30 (1): 105–112.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, I.G., and M.M. Mello. 2018. HIPAA and protecting health information in the 21st Century. JAMA 320 (3): 231–232.CrossRef Cohen, I.G., and M.M. Mello. 2018. HIPAA and protecting health information in the 21st Century. JAMA 320 (3): 231–232.CrossRef
go back to reference Daniels, N. 2001. Justice, health and healthcare. The American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2): 2–16.CrossRef Daniels, N. 2001. Justice, health and healthcare. The American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2): 2–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Dickert, N.W., N. Eyal, S.F. Goldkind, C. Grady, S. Joffe, B. Lo, et al. 2017. Reframing consent for clinical research: A function-based approach. The American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12): 3–11.CrossRef Dickert, N.W., N. Eyal, S.F. Goldkind, C. Grady, S. Joffe, B. Lo, et al. 2017. Reframing consent for clinical research: A function-based approach. The American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12): 3–11.CrossRef
go back to reference Dye, J., I. Schatz, B. Rosenberg, and S. Coleman. 2000. Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data. The Qualitative Report 4 (1/2): 1. Dye, J., I. Schatz, B. Rosenberg, and S. Coleman. 2000. Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data. The Qualitative Report 4 (1/2): 1.
go back to reference El Emam, K., E. Jonker, L. Arbuckle, and B. Malin. 2011. A systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data. PLoS ONE 6 (12): e28071.CrossRef El Emam, K., E. Jonker, L. Arbuckle, and B. Malin. 2011. A systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data. PLoS ONE 6 (12): e28071.CrossRef
go back to reference El Emam, K., S. Rodgers, and B. Malin. 2015. Anonymizing and sharing individual patient’s data. BMJ 350: h1139.CrossRef El Emam, K., S. Rodgers, and B. Malin. 2015. Anonymizing and sharing individual patient’s data. BMJ 350: h1139.CrossRef
go back to reference Evans, B.J. 2011. Much ado about data ownership. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 25 (1): 69–130. Evans, B.J. 2011. Much ado about data ownership. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 25 (1): 69–130.
go back to reference Evans, R.S. 2016. Electronic health records: Then, now, and in the future. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1: S48-61. Evans, R.S. 2016. Electronic health records: Then, now, and in the future. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1: S48-61.
go back to reference Faden, R.R., N.E. Kass, S.N. Goodman, P. Pronovost, S. Tunis, and T.L. Beauchamp. 2013a. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: A departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Center Report 43 (s1): S16-27.CrossRef Faden, R.R., N.E. Kass, S.N. Goodman, P. Pronovost, S. Tunis, and T.L. Beauchamp. 2013a. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: A departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Center Report 43 (s1): S16-27.CrossRef
go back to reference Faden, R.R., N. Kass, D. Whicher, W. Stewart, and S. Tunis. 2013b. Ethics and informed consent for comparative effectiveness research with prospective electronic clinical data. Medical Care 1: S53–S57.CrossRef Faden, R.R., N. Kass, D. Whicher, W. Stewart, and S. Tunis. 2013b. Ethics and informed consent for comparative effectiveness research with prospective electronic clinical data. Medical Care 1: S53–S57.CrossRef
go back to reference Foley, T., and F. Fairmichael. 2015. The Potential of Learning Healthcare Systems. Newcastle: Learning Healthcare Project. Foley, T., and F. Fairmichael. 2015. The Potential of Learning Healthcare Systems. Newcastle: Learning Healthcare Project.
go back to reference Geissbuhler, A., Safran, C., Buchan, I., Bellazzi, R., Labkoff, S., Eilenberg, K., Leese, A., Richardson, C., Mantas, J., Murray, P., and G. De Moor. 2013 Trustworthy reuse of health data: a transnational perspective. International journal of medical informatics 82(1): 1–9. Geissbuhler, A., Safran, C., Buchan, I.,  Bellazzi, R., Labkoff, S.,  Eilenberg, K., Leese, A., Richardson, C.,  Mantas, J., Murray, P., and G. De Moor. 2013 Trustworthy reuse of health data: a transnational perspective. International journal of medical informatics 82(1): 1–9.
go back to reference Gibbs, G. 2009. Analysing Qualitative. Data Qualitative Research Kit, 176. London: SAGE. Gibbs, G. 2009. Analysing Qualitative. Data Qualitative Research Kit, 176. London: SAGE.
go back to reference Grande, D., N. Mitra, A. Shah, F. Wan, and D.A. Asch. 2013. Public preferences about secondary uses of electronic health information. JAMA Internal Medicine 173 (19): 1798–1806.CrossRef Grande, D., N. Mitra, A. Shah, F. Wan, and D.A. Asch. 2013. Public preferences about secondary uses of electronic health information. JAMA Internal Medicine 173 (19): 1798–1806.CrossRef
go back to reference Grande, D., N. Mitra, A. Shah, F. Wan, and D.A. Asch. 2014. The importance of purpose: Moving beyond consent in the societal use of personal health information. Annals of Internal Medicine 161 (12): 855–862.CrossRef Grande, D., N. Mitra, A. Shah, F. Wan, and D.A. Asch. 2014. The importance of purpose: Moving beyond consent in the societal use of personal health information. Annals of Internal Medicine 161 (12): 855–862.CrossRef
go back to reference Haddaway, N.R., A.M. Collins, D. Coughlin, and S. Kirk. 2015. The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS ONE 10 (9): e0138237.CrossRef Haddaway, N.R., A.M. Collins, D. Coughlin, and S. Kirk. 2015. The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS ONE 10 (9): e0138237.CrossRef
go back to reference Haislmaier, E.F. 2006. Health care information technology: Getting the policy right. The Heritage Foundation 1131: 1–3. Haislmaier, E.F. 2006. Health care information technology: Getting the policy right. The Heritage Foundation 1131: 1–3.
go back to reference Hall, M.A., and K.A. Schulman. 2009. Ownership of medical information. JAMA 301 (12): 1282–1284.CrossRef Hall, M.A., and K.A. Schulman. 2009. Ownership of medical information. JAMA 301 (12): 1282–1284.CrossRef
go back to reference Hall, M.A. 2010. Property, privacy, and the pursuit of interconnected electronic medical records. Iowa Law Review 95 (2): 631–663. Hall, M.A. 2010. Property, privacy, and the pursuit of interconnected electronic medical records. Iowa Law Review 95 (2): 631–663.
go back to reference Hansson, M.G. 2010. Need for a wider view of autonomy in epidemiological research. BMJ (clinical Research) 340: c2335.CrossRef Hansson, M.G. 2010. Need for a wider view of autonomy in epidemiological research. BMJ (clinical Research) 340: c2335.CrossRef
go back to reference Häyrinen, K., K. Saranto, and P. Nykänen. 2008. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 77 (5): 291–304.CrossRef Häyrinen, K., K. Saranto, and P. Nykänen. 2008. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 77 (5): 291–304.CrossRef
go back to reference Helgesson, G., and S. Eriksson. 2008. Against the principle that the individual shall have priority over science. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1): 54–56.CrossRef Helgesson, G., and S. Eriksson. 2008. Against the principle that the individual shall have priority over science. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1): 54–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Hill, E.M., E.L. Turner, R.M. Martin, and J.L. Donovan. 2013. “Let’s get the best quality research we can”: Public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: A systematic review and qualitative study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 13: 72.CrossRef Hill, E.M., E.L. Turner, R.M. Martin, and J.L. Donovan. 2013. “Let’s get the best quality research we can”: Public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: A systematic review and qualitative study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 13: 72.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, R.D., A.N. Sabolch, E. Aakhus, R.A. Spence, A.R. Bradbury, and R. Jagsi. 2017. Patient perspectives on the ethical implementation of a rapid learning system for oncology care. Journal of Oncology Practice 13 (3): e163–e175.CrossRef Jones, R.D., A.N. Sabolch, E. Aakhus, R.A. Spence, A.R. Bradbury, and R. Jagsi. 2017. Patient perspectives on the ethical implementation of a rapid learning system for oncology care. Journal of Oncology Practice 13 (3): e163–e175.CrossRef
go back to reference Kass, N.E. 2001. An ethics framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health 91 (11): 1776–1782.CrossRef Kass, N.E. 2001. An ethics framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health 91 (11): 1776–1782.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, K.K., P. Sankar, M.D. Wilson, and S.C. Haynes. 2017. Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers. BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1): 25.CrossRef Kim, K.K., P. Sankar, M.D. Wilson, and S.C. Haynes. 2017. Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers. BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1): 25.CrossRef
go back to reference King, T., L. Brankovic, and P. Gillard. 2012. Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases. International Journal of Medical Informatics 81 (4): 279–289.CrossRef King, T., L. Brankovic, and P. Gillard. 2012. Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases. International Journal of Medical Informatics 81 (4): 279–289.CrossRef
go back to reference Klingler, C., D.S. Silva, C. Schuermann, A.A. Reis, A. Saxena, and D. Strech. 2017. Ethical issues in public health surveillance: A systematic qualitative review. BMC Public Health 17 (1): 295.CrossRef Klingler, C., D.S. Silva, C. Schuermann, A.A. Reis, A. Saxena, and D. Strech. 2017. Ethical issues in public health surveillance: A systematic qualitative review. BMC Public Health 17 (1): 295.CrossRef
go back to reference McLennan, S., H. Kahrass, S. Wieschowski, D. Strech, and H. Langhof. 2018. The spectrum of ethical issues in a Learning Health Care System: A systematic qualitative review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 30 (3): 161–168.CrossRef McLennan, S., H. Kahrass, S. Wieschowski, D. Strech, and H. Langhof. 2018. The spectrum of ethical issues in a Learning Health Care System: A systematic qualitative review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 30 (3): 161–168.CrossRef
go back to reference Mirchev, M., I. Mircheva, and A. Kerekovska. 2020. The academic viewpoint on patient data ownership in the context of big data: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22 (8): e22214.CrossRef Mirchev, M., I. Mircheva, and A. Kerekovska. 2020. The academic viewpoint on patient data ownership in the context of big data: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22 (8): e22214.CrossRef
go back to reference Nair, K., D. Willison, A. Holbrook, and K. Keshavjee. 2004. Patients’ consent preferences regarding the use of their health information for research purposes: A qualitative study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 9 (1): 22–27.CrossRef Nair, K., D. Willison, A. Holbrook, and K. Keshavjee. 2004. Patients’ consent preferences regarding the use of their health information for research purposes: A qualitative study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 9 (1): 22–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Painsack, B. 2019. Logged out: Ownership, exclusion and public value in the digital data and information commons. Big Data & Society 6 (1): 1–15. Painsack, B. 2019. Logged out: Ownership, exclusion and public value in the digital data and information commons. Big Data & Society 6 (1): 1–15.
go back to reference Piasecki, J. , Waligora, M., and V. Dranseika. 2018. Google search as an additional source in systematic reviews. Science and Engineering Ethics 24: 809–810. Piasecki, J. , Waligora, M., and V. Dranseika. 2018. Google search as an additional source in systematic reviews. Science and Engineering Ethics 24: 809–810.
go back to reference Piasecki, J., and V. Dranseika. 2019a. Research versus practice: The dilemmas of research ethics in the era of learning health‐care systems. Bioethics 33(5): 617–624. Piasecki, J., and V. Dranseika. 2019a. Research versus practice: The dilemmas of research ethics in the era of learning health‐care systems. Bioethics 33(5): 617–624.
go back to reference Piasecki, J., and V. Dranseika. 2019b. Learning to regulate learning healthcare systems. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28(2): 369–377. Piasecki, J., and V. Dranseika. 2019b. Learning to regulate learning healthcare systems. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28(2): 369–377.
go back to reference Piasecki, J., and V. Dranseika. 2021. Balancing professional obligations and risks to providers in learning healthcare systems. Journal of medical ethics 47(6): 413–416. Piasecki, J., and V. Dranseika. 2021. Balancing professional obligations and risks to providers in learning healthcare systems. Journal of medical ethics 47(6): 413–416.
go back to reference Prainsack, B., and A. Buyx. 2013. A solidarity-based approach to the governance of research biobanks. Medical Law Review 21: 71–91.CrossRef Prainsack, B., and A. Buyx. 2013. A solidarity-based approach to the governance of research biobanks. Medical Law Review 21: 71–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Purtova, N. 2015. The illusion of personal data as no one’s property. Law, Innovation and Technology 7 (1): 83–111.CrossRef Purtova, N. 2015. The illusion of personal data as no one’s property. Law, Innovation and Technology 7 (1): 83–111.CrossRef
go back to reference Purtova, N. 2017. Health data for common good: Defining the boundaries and social dilemmas of data commons. In Under observation: The interplay between eHealth and surveillance. Law, Governance and Technology Series. Issues in Privacy and Data Protection, vol. 35, ed. S. Adams, N. Purtova, and R. Leenes, 177–210. Cham: Springer. Purtova, N. 2017. Health data for common good: Defining the boundaries and social dilemmas of data commons. In Under observation: The interplay between eHealth and surveillance. Law, Governance and Technology Series. Issues in Privacy and Data Protection, vol. 35, ed. S. Adams, N. Purtova, and R. Leenes, 177–210. Cham: Springer.
go back to reference Riordan, F., C. Papoutsi, J.E. Reed, C. Marston, D. Bell, and A. Majeed. 2015. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK. International Journal of Medical Informatics 84 (4): 237–247.CrossRef Riordan, F., C. Papoutsi, J.E. Reed, C. Marston, D. Bell, and A. Majeed. 2015. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK. International Journal of Medical Informatics 84 (4): 237–247.CrossRef
go back to reference Rumbold, J.M., and B. Pierscionek. 2017. The effect of the general data protection regulation on medical research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (2): e47.CrossRef Rumbold, J.M., and B. Pierscionek. 2017. The effect of the general data protection regulation on medical research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (2): e47.CrossRef
go back to reference Shelton, R.H. 2011. Electronic consent channels: preserving patient privacy without handcuffing researchers. Science Translational Medicine 3 (69): 69cm4.CrossRef Shelton, R.H. 2011. Electronic consent channels: preserving patient privacy without handcuffing researchers. Science Translational Medicine 3 (69): 69cm4.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, G.E., G. Coronado, L.L. DeBar, L.M. Dember, B.B. Green, S.S. Huang, et al. 2017. Data sharing and embedded research. Annals of Internal Medicine 167 (9): 668–670.CrossRef Simon, G.E., G. Coronado, L.L. DeBar, L.M. Dember, B.B. Green, S.S. Huang, et al. 2017. Data sharing and embedded research. Annals of Internal Medicine 167 (9): 668–670.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, G.E., S.M. Shortreed, R.Y. Coley, R.B. Penfold, R.C. Rossom, B.E. Waitzfelder, K. Sanchez, and F.L. Lynch. 2019. Assessing and minimizing re-identification risk in research data derived from health care records. eGEMs (generation Evidence & Methods to Improve Patient Outcomes) 7 (1): 6.CrossRef Simon, G.E., S.M. Shortreed, R.Y. Coley, R.B. Penfold, R.C. Rossom, B.E. Waitzfelder, K. Sanchez, and F.L. Lynch. 2019. Assessing and minimizing re-identification risk in research data derived from health care records. eGEMs (generation Evidence & Methods to Improve Patient Outcomes) 7 (1): 6.CrossRef
go back to reference Skovgaard, L. L., Wadmann, S., and K. Hoeyer. 2019. A review of attitudes towards the reuse of health data among people in the European Union: The primacy of purpose and the common good. Health policy 123(6): 564-571. Skovgaard, L. L., Wadmann, S., and K. Hoeyer. 2019. A review of attitudes towards the reuse of health data among people in the European Union: The primacy of purpose and the common good. Health policy 123(6): 564-571.
go back to reference Stevenson, F. 2015. The use of electronic patient records for medical research: Conflicts and contradictions. BMC Health Services Research 15 (1): 124.CrossRef Stevenson, F. 2015. The use of electronic patient records for medical research: Conflicts and contradictions. BMC Health Services Research 15 (1): 124.CrossRef
go back to reference Stevenson, F., N. Lloyd, L. Harrington, and P. Wallace. 2012. Use of electronic patient records for research: Views of patients and staff in general practice. Family Practice 30 (2): 227–232.CrossRef Stevenson, F., N. Lloyd, L. Harrington, and P. Wallace. 2012. Use of electronic patient records for research: Views of patients and staff in general practice. Family Practice 30 (2): 227–232.CrossRef
go back to reference Strech, D., M. Mertz, H. Knuppel, G. Neitzke, and M. Schmidhuber. 2013. The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia care: Systematic qualitative review. The British Journal of Psychiatry: THe Journal of Mental Science 202: 400–406.CrossRef Strech, D., M. Mertz, H. Knuppel, G. Neitzke, and M. Schmidhuber. 2013. The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia care: Systematic qualitative review. The British Journal of Psychiatry: THe Journal of Mental Science 202: 400–406.CrossRef
go back to reference Taylor, L., L. Floridi, and B. Van der Sloot, eds. 2016. Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies, 250. Cham: Springer. Taylor, L., L. Floridi, and B. Van der Sloot, eds. 2016. Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies, 250. Cham: Springer.
go back to reference Wallace, S.E., and J. Miola. 2021. Adding dynamic consent to a longitudinal cohort study: A qualitative study of EXCEED participant perspectives. BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 1–10.CrossRef Wallace, S.E., and J. Miola. 2021. Adding dynamic consent to a longitudinal cohort study: A qualitative study of EXCEED participant perspectives. BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 1–10.CrossRef
go back to reference Weitzman, E.R., L. Kaci, and K.D. Mandl. 2010. Sharing medical data for health research: The early personal health record experience. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12 (2): e14.CrossRef Weitzman, E.R., L. Kaci, and K.D. Mandl. 2010. Sharing medical data for health research: The early personal health record experience. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12 (2): e14.CrossRef
go back to reference Weitzman, E.R., S. Kelemen, L. Kaci, and K.D. Mandl. 2012. Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: A survey of experienced personal health record users. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12 (1): 39.CrossRef Weitzman, E.R., S. Kelemen, L. Kaci, and K.D. Mandl. 2012. Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: A survey of experienced personal health record users. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12 (1): 39.CrossRef
go back to reference Willison, D.J., M. Swinton, L. Schwartz, J. Abelson, C. Charles, D. Northrup, and L. Thabane. 2008. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: Insights from a public dialogue. BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1): 18.CrossRef Willison, D.J., M. Swinton, L. Schwartz, J. Abelson, C. Charles, D. Northrup, and L. Thabane. 2008. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: Insights from a public dialogue. BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1): 18.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review
Authors
Jan Piasecki
Ewa Walkiewicz-Żarek
Justyna Figas-Skrzypulec
Anna Kordecka
Vilius Dranseika
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10031-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2021 Go to the issue