Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2019

01-12-2019 | Scientific Contribution

Mobile health ethics and the expanding role of autonomy

Authors: Bettina Schmietow, Georg Marckmann

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Mhealth technology is mushrooming world-wide and, in a variety of forms, reaches increasing numbers of users in ever-widening contexts and virtually independent from standard medical evidence assessment. Yet, debate on the broader societal impact including in particular mapping and classification of ethical issues raised has been limited. This article, as part of an ongoing empirically informed ethical research project, provides an overview of ethical issues of mhealth applications with a specific focus on implications on autonomy as a key notion in the debate. A multi-stage model of references to the potential of mhealth use for strengthening some or other form of self-determination will be proposed as a descriptive tool. It illustrates an assumed continuum of enhanced autonomy via mhealth broadly conceived: from patient to user autonomy, to improved health literacy, and finally to the vision of supra-individual empowerment and democratised, participatory health and medicine as a whole. On closer examination, however, these references are frequently ambivalent or vague, perpetuating the at times uncritical use of established autonomy concepts in medical ethics. The article suggests zooming in on the range of autonomy-related aspects against the backdrop of digital innovation and datafied health more generally, and on this basis add to existing frameworks for the ethical evaluation of mhealth more specifically.
Footnotes
1
‘Datafication’ may also be used prescriptively. Couldry and Yu refer to “the process whereby life-processes must be converted into streams of data inputs for computer-based processing” which “is deemed a natural stage of development” (Couldry and Yu 2018: 4473).
 
2
These perspectives highlight, for example, the effort to create a “culture of transparency” (Smith et al. 2016), questions concerning ownership and data access, and the trade-off between accelerated innovation, ethics and regulation (cf. Dorn 2015; Mittelstadt 2017; Torous and Roberts 2017).
 
3
These kinds of enhanced autonomy, however, in turn raise new questions as regards the applicability of professional norms and responsibilities such as when lay persons are involved in mobile care offers that blur the boundary to regular psychotherapy (Kreitmair and Cho 2017).
 
Literature
go back to reference Albrecht, Urs-Vito, and Heiner Fangerau. 2015. Do ethics need to be adapted to mhealth? A plea for developing a consistent framework. World Medical Journal 61 (2): 72–75. Albrecht, Urs-Vito, and Heiner Fangerau. 2015. Do ethics need to be adapted to mhealth? A plea for developing a consistent framework. World Medical Journal 61 (2): 72–75.
go back to reference Alpay, Laurence, Paul van der Boog, and Adrie Dumaij. 2011. An empowerment-based approach to developing innovative e-health tools for self-management. Health Informatics Journal 17 (4): 247–255. Alpay, Laurence, Paul van der Boog, and Adrie Dumaij. 2011. An empowerment-based approach to developing innovative e-health tools for self-management. Health Informatics Journal 17 (4): 247–255.
go back to reference Árnason, Vilhjálmur. 2012. The personal is political: Ethics and personalized medicine. Ethical Perspectives 19 (1): 103–122. Árnason, Vilhjálmur. 2012. The personal is political: Ethics and personalized medicine. Ethical Perspectives 19 (1): 103–122.
go back to reference Becker, Stefan, Talva Miron-Shatz, Nikolaus Schumacher, Johann Krocza, Clarissa Diamantidis, and Urs-Vito Albrecht. 2014. mhealth 2.0: Experiences, possibilities, and perspectives. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2 (2): e24. Becker, Stefan, Talva Miron-Shatz, Nikolaus Schumacher, Johann Krocza, Clarissa Diamantidis, and Urs-Vito Albrecht. 2014. mhealth 2.0: Experiences, possibilities, and perspectives. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2 (2): e24.
go back to reference Bhuyan, Soumitra, Hyunmin Kim, Oluwaseyi O. Isehunwa, Naveen Kumar, Jay Bhatt, David K. Wyant, et al. 2017. Privacy and security issues in mobile health: Current research and future directions. Health Policy and Technology 6 (2): 188–191. Bhuyan, Soumitra, Hyunmin Kim, Oluwaseyi O. Isehunwa, Naveen Kumar, Jay Bhatt, David K. Wyant, et al. 2017. Privacy and security issues in mobile health: Current research and future directions. Health Policy and Technology 6 (2): 188–191.
go back to reference Brown, Ian, and Andrew A. Adams. 2007. The ethical challenges of ubiquitous healthcare. International Review of Information Ethics 8 (12): 53–60. Brown, Ian, and Andrew A. Adams. 2007. The ethical challenges of ubiquitous healthcare. International Review of Information Ethics 8 (12): 53–60.
go back to reference Carter, Adrian, Jacki Liddle, Wayne Hall, and Helen Chenery. 2015. Mobile phones in research and treatment: Ethical guidelines and future directions. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 3 (4): e95. Carter, Adrian, Jacki Liddle, Wayne Hall, and Helen Chenery. 2015. Mobile phones in research and treatment: Ethical guidelines and future directions. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 3 (4): e95.
go back to reference Char, Danton S., Nigam H. Shah, and David Magnus. 2018. Implementing machine learning in health care—Addressing ethical challenges. The New England Journal of Medicine 378 (11): 979–981. Char, Danton S., Nigam H. Shah, and David Magnus. 2018. Implementing machine learning in health care—Addressing ethical challenges. The New England Journal of Medicine 378 (11): 979–981.
go back to reference Couldry, Nick, and Jun Yu. 2018. Deconstructing datafication’s brave new world. New Media & Society 20 (12): 4473–4491. Couldry, Nick, and Jun Yu. 2018. Deconstructing datafication’s brave new world. New Media & Society 20 (12): 4473–4491.
go back to reference Dorn, Spencer D. 2015. Digital health: Hope, hype, and Amara’s law. Gastroenterology 149 (3): 516–520. Dorn, Spencer D. 2015. Digital health: Hope, hype, and Amara’s law. Gastroenterology 149 (3): 516–520.
go back to reference Goldstein, Melissa M., and Daniel G. Bowers. 2015. The patient as consumer: Empowerment or commodification? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (1): 162–165. Goldstein, Melissa M., and Daniel G. Bowers. 2015. The patient as consumer: Empowerment or commodification? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (1): 162–165.
go back to reference Groß, Dominik, and Mathias Schmidt. 2018. E-Health und Gesundheitsapps aus medizinethischer Sicht: wollen wir alles, was wir können? Bundesgesundheitsblatt 61 (3): 349–357. Groß, Dominik, and Mathias Schmidt. 2018. E-Health und Gesundheitsapps aus medizinethischer Sicht: wollen wir alles, was wir können? Bundesgesundheitsblatt 61 (3): 349–357.
go back to reference Hall, Charles S., Edward Fottrell, Sophia Wilkinson, and Peter Byass. 2014. Assessing the impact of mHealth interventions in low- and middle-income countries—What has been shown to work? Global Health Action 7 (1): 25606. Hall, Charles S., Edward Fottrell, Sophia Wilkinson, and Peter Byass. 2014. Assessing the impact of mHealth interventions in low- and middle-income countries—What has been shown to work? Global Health Action 7 (1): 25606.
go back to reference Ho, Anita, and Oliver Quick. 2018. Leaving patients to their own devices? Smart technology, safety and therapeutic relationships. BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1): 18. Ho, Anita, and Oliver Quick. 2018. Leaving patients to their own devices? Smart technology, safety and therapeutic relationships. BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1): 18.
go back to reference Kim, Henna, and Bo Xie. 2017. Health literacy in the ehealth era: A systematic review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling 100 (6): 1073–1082. Kim, Henna, and Bo Xie. 2017. Health literacy in the ehealth era: A systematic review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling 100 (6): 1073–1082.
go back to reference Kreitmair, Karola V., and Mildred K. Cho. 2017. The neuroethical future of wearable and mobile health technology. In Neuroethics: Anticipating the future, ed. Judy Illes, 80–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kreitmair, Karola V., and Mildred K. Cho. 2017. The neuroethical future of wearable and mobile health technology. In Neuroethics: Anticipating the future, ed. Judy Illes, 80–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Kreps, Gary L. 2017. The relevance of health literacy to mHealth. Information Services and Use 37 (2): 123–130. Kreps, Gary L. 2017. The relevance of health literacy to mHealth. Information Services and Use 37 (2): 123–130.
go back to reference Krieger, William H. 2013. Medical apps: Public and academic perspectives. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 56 (2): 259–273. Krieger, William H. 2013. Medical apps: Public and academic perspectives. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 56 (2): 259–273.
go back to reference Lemire, Marc. 2010. What can be expected of information and communication technologies in terms of patient empowerment in health? Journal of Health Organization and Management 24 (2): 167–181. Lemire, Marc. 2010. What can be expected of information and communication technologies in terms of patient empowerment in health? Journal of Health Organization and Management 24 (2): 167–181.
go back to reference Lin, Trisha T.C., and John Robert Bautista. 2017. Understanding the relationships between mHealth apps’ characteristics, trialability, and mhealth literacy. Journal of Health Communication 22 (4): 346–354. Lin, Trisha T.C., and John Robert Bautista. 2017. Understanding the relationships between mHealth apps’ characteristics, trialability, and mhealth literacy. Journal of Health Communication 22 (4): 346–354.
go back to reference Lupton, Deborah. 2013. The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health 11 (3): 256–270. Lupton, Deborah. 2013. The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health 11 (3): 256–270.
go back to reference Mai, Jens-Erik. 2016. Big data privacy: The datafication of personal information. The Information Society 32 (3): 192–199. Mai, Jens-Erik. 2016. Big data privacy: The datafication of personal information. The Information Society 32 (3): 192–199.
go back to reference Mantwill, Sarah, Maddalena Fiordelli, Ramona Ludolph, and Peter J. Schulz. 2015. EMPOWER-support of patient empowerment by an intelligent self-management pathway for patients: Study protocol. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 15: 18. Mantwill, Sarah, Maddalena Fiordelli, Ramona Ludolph, and Peter J. Schulz. 2015. EMPOWER-support of patient empowerment by an intelligent self-management pathway for patients: Study protocol. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 15: 18.
go back to reference Marckmann, Georg. 2016. Ethische Aspekte von eHealth. In ehealth in Deutschland: Anforderungen und Potenziale innovativer Versorgungsstrukturen, ed. Florian Fischer and Alexander Krämer, 83–99. Berlin: Springer. Marckmann, Georg. 2016. Ethische Aspekte von eHealth. In ehealth in Deutschland: Anforderungen und Potenziale innovativer Versorgungsstrukturen, ed. Florian Fischer and Alexander Krämer, 83–99. Berlin: Springer.
go back to reference Maturo, Antonio, and Veronica Moretti. 2018. Digital health and the gamification of life: How apps can promote a positive medicalization. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. Maturo, Antonio, and Veronica Moretti. 2018. Digital health and the gamification of life: How apps can promote a positive medicalization. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
go back to reference Mittelstadt, Brent. 2017. Ethics of the health-related internet of things: A narrative review. Ethics and Information Technology 19 (3): 157–175. Mittelstadt, Brent. 2017. Ethics of the health-related internet of things: A narrative review. Ethics and Information Technology 19 (3): 157–175.
go back to reference Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1–21. Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1–21.
go back to reference Ofili, Elizabeth O., et al. 2018. Democratizing discovery health with n=me. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association 129: 215–234. Ofili, Elizabeth O., et al. 2018. Democratizing discovery health with n=me. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association 129: 215–234.
go back to reference Patrick, John R. 2015. How mHealth will spur consumer-led healthcare. mHealth 1: 14. Patrick, John R. 2015. How mHealth will spur consumer-led healthcare. mHealth 1: 14.
go back to reference Rich, Emma, and Andy Miah. 2017. Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: Towards a critical research agenda. Health Sociology Review 26 (1): 84–97. Rich, Emma, and Andy Miah. 2017. Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: Towards a critical research agenda. Health Sociology Review 26 (1): 84–97.
go back to reference Risling, Tracie, Juan Martinez, Jeremy Young, and Nancy Thorp-Froslie. 2017. Evaluating patient empowerment in association with eHealth technology: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (9): e329. Risling, Tracie, Juan Martinez, Jeremy Young, and Nancy Thorp-Froslie. 2017. Evaluating patient empowerment in association with eHealth technology: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (9): e329.
go back to reference Rubeis, Giovanni, Maximilian Schochow, and Florian Steger. 2018. Patient autonomy and quality of care in telehealthcare. Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1): 93–107. Rubeis, Giovanni, Maximilian Schochow, and Florian Steger. 2018. Patient autonomy and quality of care in telehealthcare. Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1): 93–107.
go back to reference Ruckenstein, Minna, and Natasha Dow Schüll. 2017. The datafication of health. Annual Review of Anthropology 46 (1): 261–278. Ruckenstein, Minna, and Natasha Dow Schüll. 2017. The datafication of health. Annual Review of Anthropology 46 (1): 261–278.
go back to reference Schüll, Natasha Dow. 2016. Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties 11 (3): 317–333. Schüll, Natasha Dow. 2016. Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties 11 (3): 317–333.
go back to reference Sharon, Tamar. 2015. Healthy citizenship beyond autonomy and discipline: Tactical engagements with genetic testing. BioSocieties 10 (3): 295–316. Sharon, Tamar. 2015. Healthy citizenship beyond autonomy and discipline: Tactical engagements with genetic testing. BioSocieties 10 (3): 295–316.
go back to reference Sharon, Tamar. 2017. Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy and Technology 30 (1): 93–121. Sharon, Tamar. 2017. Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy and Technology 30 (1): 93–121.
go back to reference Smith, Robert J., et al. 2016. Transforming scientific inquiry: Tapping into digital data by building a culture of transparency and consent. Academic Medicine 91 (4): 469–472. Smith, Robert J., et al. 2016. Transforming scientific inquiry: Tapping into digital data by building a culture of transparency and consent. Academic Medicine 91 (4): 469–472.
go back to reference Swan, Melanie. 2012. Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2 (3): 93–118. Swan, Melanie. 2012. Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2 (3): 93–118.
go back to reference Topol, Eric J. 2012. The creative destruction of medicine: How the digital revolution will create better health care. New York: Basic Books. Topol, Eric J. 2012. The creative destruction of medicine: How the digital revolution will create better health care. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Topol, Eric J. 2015. The patient will see you now: The future of medicine is in your hands. New York: Basic Books. Topol, Eric J. 2015. The patient will see you now: The future of medicine is in your hands. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Torous, John, and Laura Weiss Roberts. 2017. Needed innovation in digital health and smartphone applications for mental health: Transparency and trust. JAMA Psychiatry 74 (5): 437–438. Torous, John, and Laura Weiss Roberts. 2017. Needed innovation in digital health and smartphone applications for mental health: Transparency and trust. JAMA Psychiatry 74 (5): 437–438.
Metadata
Title
Mobile health ethics and the expanding role of autonomy
Authors
Bettina Schmietow
Georg Marckmann
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09900-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2019 Go to the issue