Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 7/2016

01-07-2016

The Impact of WIC on Birth Outcomes: New Evidence from South Carolina

Author: Lyudmyla Sonchak

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the impact of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) on a variety of infant health outcomes using recent South Carolina Vital Statistics data (2004–2012). Methods To account for non-random WIC participation, the study relies on a maternal fixed effects estimation, due to the availability of unique maternally linked data. Results The results indicate that WIC participation is associated with an increase in birth weight and length of gestation, decrease in the probability of low birth weight, prematurity, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission. Additionally, addressing gestational bias and accounting for the length of gestation, WIC participation is associated with a decrease in the probability of delivering a low weight infant and a small for gestational age infant among black mothers. Conclusions for Practice Accounting for non-random program participation, the study documents a large improvement in birth outcomes among infants of WIC participating mothers. Even in the context of somewhat restrictive gestation-adjusted specification, the positive impact of WIC remains within the subsample of black mothers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alexander, G. R. (1996). A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87(2), 163–168.CrossRefPubMed Alexander, G. R. (1996). A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87(2), 163–168.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Almond, D., et al. (2005). The cost of low birth weight. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 1031–1083. Almond, D., et al. (2005). The cost of low birth weight. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 1031–1083.
3.
go back to reference Besharov, D. J., & Germanis, D. (2001). Rethinking WIC: An evaluation of the women, infants and children program. Washington, DC: AEI Press. Besharov, D. J., & Germanis, D. (2001). Rethinking WIC: An evaluation of the women, infants and children program. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
4.
go back to reference Bitler, M., & Currie, J. (2005). Does WIC work? The effect of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(4), 73–91.CrossRef Bitler, M., & Currie, J. (2005). Does WIC work? The effect of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(4), 73–91.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Black, S., Devereux, P., & Salvanes, K. (2007). From the cradle to the labor market? The effect of birth weight on adult outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(1), 409–439.CrossRef Black, S., Devereux, P., & Salvanes, K. (2007). From the cradle to the labor market? The effect of birth weight on adult outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(1), 409–439.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Behrman, J., & Rosenzweig, M. (2004). Returns to birthweight. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 586–601.CrossRef Behrman, J., & Rosenzweig, M. (2004). Returns to birthweight. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 586–601.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brien, M.J., & Swann, C.A. (2001). Prenatal WIC participation and infant health: Selection and maternal fixed effects. Manuscript, SUNY-Stony-Brook Department of Economics. Brien, M.J., & Swann, C.A. (2001). Prenatal WIC participation and infant health: Selection and maternal fixed effects. Manuscript, SUNY-Stony-Brook Department of Economics.
8.
go back to reference Conway, K. S., & Deb, P. (2005). Is prenatal care really ineffective? Or, is the “devil” in the distribution? Journal of Health Economics, 24(3), 489–513.CrossRefPubMed Conway, K. S., & Deb, P. (2005). Is prenatal care really ineffective? Or, is the “devil” in the distribution? Journal of Health Economics, 24(3), 489–513.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Currie, J. (2001). Early childhood intervention programs: What do we know? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 213–238.CrossRef Currie, J. (2001). Early childhood intervention programs: What do we know? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 213–238.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Currie, J., & Rajani, I. (2015). Within mother estimates of the effects of WIC on birth outcomes in New York city. Economic Inquiry, 53(4), 1691–1701.CrossRef Currie, J., & Rajani, I. (2015). Within mother estimates of the effects of WIC on birth outcomes in New York city. Economic Inquiry, 53(4), 1691–1701.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1995). Does head start make a difference? The American Economic Review, 85(3), 341–364. Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1995). Does head start make a difference? The American Economic Review, 85(3), 341–364.
12.
go back to reference Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. (1986). Errors in variables in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 93–118.CrossRef Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. (1986). Errors in variables in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 93–118.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hoynes, H., Page, M., & Stevens, A. (2011). Can targeted transfers improve birth outcomes? Evidence from the introduction of the WIC program. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 813–827.CrossRef Hoynes, H., Page, M., & Stevens, A. (2011). Can targeted transfers improve birth outcomes? Evidence from the introduction of the WIC program. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 813–827.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Joyce, T., Gibson, D., & Colman, S. (2005). The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York City. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 663–685.CrossRef Joyce, T., Gibson, D., & Colman, S. (2005). The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York City. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 663–685.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Joyce, T., Racine, A., & Yunzal-Butler, C. (2008). Reassessing the WIC effect: Evidence from the Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(2), 277–303.CrossRefPubMed Joyce, T., Racine, A., & Yunzal-Butler, C. (2008). Reassessing the WIC effect: Evidence from the Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(2), 277–303.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kowaleski-Jones, Lori, & Duncan, Greg. (2002). Effects of Participation in the WIC Program on birth weight: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. American Journal of Public Health, 92(5), 799–804.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kowaleski-Jones, Lori, & Duncan, Greg. (2002). Effects of Participation in the WIC Program on birth weight: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. American Journal of Public Health, 92(5), 799–804.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Ludwig, Jens, & Miller, Matthew. (2005). Interpreting the WIC debate. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 691–701.CrossRefPubMed Ludwig, Jens, & Miller, Matthew. (2005). Interpreting the WIC debate. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 691–701.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Martin, J., et al. (2013). Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: Results from two states. National Vital Statistics Reports, 62 (2). Martin, J., et al. (2013). Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: Results from two states. National Vital Statistics Reports, 62 (2).
20.
go back to reference Oliveira, V., Racine, E., Olmsted, J., & Ghelfi, L. (2002). The WIC Program: Background and trends, USDA economics research service, food assistance and nutrition research report number 27. Oliveira, V., Racine, E., Olmsted, J., & Ghelfi, L. (2002). The WIC Program: Background and trends, USDA economics research service, food assistance and nutrition research report number 27.
21.
go back to reference Stockbauer, J. W. (1987). WIC prenatal participation and its relation to pregnancy outcomes in Missouri: A second look. American Journal of Public Health, 77(7), 813–818.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stockbauer, J. W. (1987). WIC prenatal participation and its relation to pregnancy outcomes in Missouri: A second look. American Journal of Public Health, 77(7), 813–818.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Yunzal-Butler, et al. (2010). Maternal smoking and the timing of WIC enrollment. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(3), 318–331.CrossRefPubMed Yunzal-Butler, et al. (2010). Maternal smoking and the timing of WIC enrollment. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(3), 318–331.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Impact of WIC on Birth Outcomes: New Evidence from South Carolina
Author
Lyudmyla Sonchak
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-1951-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Maternal and Child Health Journal 7/2016 Go to the issue