Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 9/2013

01-11-2013

Family Physicians in the Maternity Care Workforce: Factors Influencing Declining Trends

Authors: Sebastian T. Tong, Laura A. Makaroff, Imam M. Xierali, James C. Puffer, Warren P. Newton, Andrew W. Bazemore

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Family physicians provide access to maternity care for a disproportionate share of rural and urban underserved communities. This paper aims to determine trends in maternity care provision by family physicians and the characteristics of family physicians that provide maternity care. We used American Board of Family Medicine survey data collected from every family physician during application for the Maintenance of Certification Examination to determine the percentage of family physicians that provided maternity care from 2000 to 2010. Using a cross-sectional study design, logistic regression analysis was performed to examine association between maternity care provision and various physician demographic and practice characteristics. Maternity care provision by family physicians declined from 23.3 % in 2000 to 9.7 % in 2010 (p < 0.0001). Family physicians who were female, younger and US medical graduates were more likely to practice maternity care. Practicing in a rural setting (OR = 2.2; 95 % CL 2.1–2.4), an educational setting (OR = 6.4; 95 % CL 5.7–7.1) and in either the Midwest (OR = 2.6; 95 % CL 2.3–2.9) or West (OR = 2.3; 95 % CL 2.1–2.6) were the strongest predictors of higher likelihood of providing maternity care. While family physicians continue to play an important role in providing maternity care in many parts of the United States, the steep decline in the percentage of family physicians providing maternity care is concerning. Formal collaborations with midwives and obstetrician-gynecologists, malpractice reform, payment changes and graduate medical education innovations are potential avenues to explore to ensure access to maternity care.
Literature
1.
Jacoby, I., et al. (1998). Modeling the future workforce of obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 92, 450–456.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Cohen, D., et al. (2003). Family physicians make a substantial contribution to maternity care: The case of the state of Maine. American Family Physician, 68, 405.PubMed
3.
4.
5.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. (2007). Program requirements for graduate medical education in family medicine. Section IV.A.5.b) (3). Last revised July 1, 2007.
6.
Rosenthal, T. C. (2000). Outcomes of rural training tracks: A review. The Journal of Rural Health, 16, 213–216.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Cohen, D., & Coco, A. (2009). Declining trends in the provision of prenatal care visits by family physicians. Annals of Family Medicine, 7, 128–133.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Guirguis-Blake, J., et al. (2002). Family physicians’ declining contribution to prenatal care in the United States. American Family Physician, 66, 2192.
9.
Nesbitt, T. S. (2002). Obstetrics in family medicine: Can it survive? Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 15, 77–79.
10.
Chen, F. M., et al. (2006). Prepared but not practicing: Declining pregnancy care among recent family medicine residency graduates. Family Medicine, 38, 423–426.PubMed
11.
Smits, A. K., et al. (2004). Factors influencing cessation of pregnancy care in Oregon. Family Medicine, 36, 490–495.PubMed
12.
Dunlop, A. L., Jack, B., & Frey, K. (2007). National recommendations for preconception care: The essential role of the family physician. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 20, 81–84.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Ruddy, G. R., et al. (2005). The family physician workforce: The special case of rural populations. American Family Physician, 72, 147.
14.
Colwill, J. M., & Cultice, J. M. (2003). The future supply of family physicians: Implications for rural America. Health Affairs (Millwood), 22, 190–198.CrossRef
15.
Rosenblatt, R. A. et al. (2010). The future of family medicine and implications for rural primary care physician supply. Final Report #125. Seattle, WA: WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington; 2010.
16.
Nesbitt, T. S., et al. (1990). Access to obstetric care in rural areas: Effect on birth outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 80, 814–818.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Allen, D. I., & Kamradt, J. M. (1991). Relationship of infant mortality to the availability of obstetric care in Indiana. Journal of Family Practice, 33, 609–613.PubMed
18.
Rosenthal, T. C., et al. (1990). Primary care obstetrics in rural western New York. A multi-center case review. New York State Journal of Medicine, 90, 537–540.PubMed
19.
Nesbitt, T. S. (1997). Access to maternity care in rural Washington: Its effect on neonatal outcomes and resource use. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 85–90.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Barbieri, R. L. (2004). Geographic distribution of obstetric and gynecology resident training positions. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103, 1317–1320.PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
Vanderboom, C. P., & Madigan, E. A. (2007). Federal definitions of rurality and the impact on nursing research. Research in Nursing and Health, 30, 175–184.PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
Shaw-Battista, J., et al. (2011). Obstetrician and nurse-midwife collaboration: Successful public health and private practice partnership. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118, 663–672.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Wiegers, T. A. (2003). General practitioners and their role in maternity care. Health Policy, 66, 51–59.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Joint Task Force of the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (1998). AAFP-ACOG joint statement on cooperative practice and hospital privileges. American Family Physician, 58, 277–278.
27.
Berman, D. R., et al. (2000). Model of family medicine and obstetrics-gynecology collaboration in obstetric care at the University of Michigan. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 96, 308–313.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Brown, D. R., et al. (2011). The phenomenon of collaboration: a phenomenologic study of collaboration between family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology departments at an academic medical center. The Qualitative Report, 16, 657–681.
29.
Funk, C. et al. (2010). Survey of obstetric and gynecologic hospitalists and laborists. American Journal of Obstetrics and GYnecology, 203, 177.e1–177.e4.
30.
Abyad, A., & Homsi, R. (1993). A comparison of pregnancy care delivered by family physicians versus obstetricians in Lebanon. Family Medicine, 25, 465–470.PubMed
31.
Klein, M. (1993). The effectiveness of family practice maternity care. A cross-cultural and environmental view. Primary Care, 20, 523–536.PubMed
32.
Deutchman, M. E., Sills, D., & Connor, P. D. (1995). Perinatal outcomes: A comparison between family physicians and obstetricians. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 8, 440–447.PubMed
33.
Barr, W. B. (2005). Why pregnancy care should be an essential part of family medicine training. Family Medicine, 37, 364–366.PubMed
34.
Tiemstra, J. D. (2004). Fixing family medicine residency training. Family Medicine, 36, 666–668.PubMed
35.
Coonrod, R. A., et al. (2011). Tiered maternity care training in family medicine. Family Medicine, 43, 631–637.PubMed
36.
Smits, A. K., et al. (2009). Change in Oregon maternity care workforce after malpractice premium subsidy implementation. Health Services Res, 44(4), 1253.CrossRef
37.
Rodney, W. M., & Hahn, R. G. (2002). Impact of the limited generalist (no hospital, no procedures) model on the viability of family practice training. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 15, 191–200.
38.
Rodney, W. M., et al. (2006). Impact of deliveries on the office practice of family medicine. Journal of the National Medical Association, 98, 1685–1690.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Family Physicians in the Maternity Care Workforce: Factors Influencing Declining Trends
Authors
Sebastian T. Tong
Laura A. Makaroff
Imam M. Xierali
James C. Puffer
Warren P. Newton
Andrew W. Bazemore
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1159-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

Maternal and Child Health Journal 9/2013 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Suburban Migration and the Birth Outcome of Chicago-Born White and African–American Women: The Merit of the Healthy Migrant Theory?

OriginalPaper

Demographic and Placement Variables Associated with Overweight and Obesity in Children in Long-Term Foster Care

OriginalPaper

Influenza and Pertussis Vaccination Coverage Among Privately Insured Women of Reproductive Age

OriginalPaper

The Effect of Breastfeeding on Neuro-Development in Infancy

OriginalPaper

Nature or Nurture: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Socio-economic Status on the Developmental and Cognitive Outcomes of Children Born Preterm

OriginalPaper

Development of the Drug-Exposed Infant Identification Algorithm (DEIIA) and Its Application to Measuring Part C Early Intervention Referral and Eligibility in Massachusetts, 1998–2005