Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2010

01-09-2010

Epidural Analgesia and Risks of Cesarean and Operative Vaginal Deliveries in Nulliparous and Multiparous Women

Authors: Uyen-Sa D. T. Nguyen, Kenneth J. Rothman, Serkalem Demissie, Debra J. Jackson, Janet M. Lang, Jeffrey L. Ecker

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective is to examine the effect of epidural analgesia in first stage of labor on occurrence of cesarean and operative vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women and multiparous women without a previous cesarean delivery. Design of the Prospective cohort study. Prenatal care was received at 12 free-standing health centers, 7 private physician offices, or 2 hospital-based clinics; babies were delivered at a free standing birth center or at 3 hospitals, all in San Diego, CA. This study of 2,052 women used data from the San Diego Birth Center Study that enrolled women between 1994 and 1996 to compare the birthing management of the collaborative Certified Nurse Midwife-Medical Doctor Model with that of the traditional Medical Doctor Model. Main Outcome Measures of the Cesarean or operative vaginal deliveries. After adjusting for differences between women who used and those who did not use epidural analgesia in 1st stage of labor, epidural use was associated with a 2.5 relative risk (95% CI: 1.8, 3.4) for operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women, and a 5.9 relative risk (95% CI: 3.2, 11.1) in multiparous women. Epidural use was associated with a 2.4 relative risk (95% CI: 1.5, 3.7) for cesarean delivery in nulliparous women, and a 1.8 relative risk (95% CI: 0.6, 5.3) in multiparous women. Epidural anesthesia increases the risk for operative vaginal deliveries in both nulliparous and multiparous women, and increases risk for cesarean deliveries in nulliparous more so than in multiparous women.
Literature
1.
go back to reference ACOG Committee Opinion: Analgesia and cesarean delivery rates. (2006). Obstet gynecol, 107(6), 1487-8. ACOG Committee Opinion: Analgesia and cesarean delivery rates. (2006). Obstet gynecol, 107(6), 1487-8.
2.
go back to reference Thorp, J. A., Parisi, V. M., Boylan, M. B., & Johnston, D. A. (1989). The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 161, 670–675.PubMed Thorp, J. A., Parisi, V. M., Boylan, M. B., & Johnston, D. A. (1989). The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 161, 670–675.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sharma, S. K., McIntire, D. D., Wiley, J., & Leveno, K. J. (2004). Labor analgesia and cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology, 100, 142–148.CrossRefPubMed Sharma, S. K., McIntire, D. D., Wiley, J., & Leveno, K. J. (2004). Labor analgesia and cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology, 100, 142–148.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wong, C. A., Scavone, B. M., Peaceman, A. M., et al. (2005). The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(7), 655–665.CrossRefPubMed Wong, C. A., Scavone, B. M., Peaceman, A. M., et al. (2005). The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(7), 655–665.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Swartz, W., Jackson, D., Lang, J., et al. (1998). The birthplace collaborative practice model: Results from the San Diego birth center study. Primary care update for Ob/Gyns, 5(4), 207.CrossRefPubMed Swartz, W., Jackson, D., Lang, J., et al. (1998). The birthplace collaborative practice model: Results from the San Diego birth center study. Primary care update for Ob/Gyns, 5(4), 207.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Swartz, W. H. (1999). Final report: A prospective study of an out-of-hospital birth center. Washington DC/San Diego: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research/Primary Care Perinatal Services. Swartz, W. H. (1999). Final report: A prospective study of an out-of-hospital birth center. Washington DC/San Diego: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research/Primary Care Perinatal Services.
8.
go back to reference Jackson, D. J., Lang, J. M., Dickinson, C., et al. (1994). Use of the nurse-midwifery clinical dataset for classification of subjects in birth center research. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 39(4), 197–213.CrossRefPubMed Jackson, D. J., Lang, J. M., Dickinson, C., et al. (1994). Use of the nurse-midwifery clinical dataset for classification of subjects in birth center research. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 39(4), 197–213.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lieberman, E., Lang, J. M., Cohen, A., et al. (1996). Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 88(6), 993–1000.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman, E., Lang, J. M., Cohen, A., et al. (1996). Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 88(6), 993–1000.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Von Hippel, P. T. (2005). How many imputations are needed? A comment on Hershberger and Fisher (2003). Structural Equation Modeling, 12(2), 334–335.CrossRef Von Hippel, P. T. (2005). How many imputations are needed? A comment on Hershberger and Fisher (2003). Structural Equation Modeling, 12(2), 334–335.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Norton, N. J., Lipsitz, S. R., & Parzen, M. (2003). A Potential for bias when rounding in multiple imputation. American Statistician, 57(4), 229–232.CrossRef Norton, N. J., Lipsitz, S. R., & Parzen, M. (2003). A Potential for bias when rounding in multiple imputation. American Statistician, 57(4), 229–232.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: a data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(4), 545–571.CrossRef Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: a data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(4), 545–571.CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference D’Agostino, R. B., Jr. (1998). Propensity score method for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in medicine, 17, 2265–2281.CrossRefPubMed D’Agostino, R. B., Jr. (1998). Propensity score method for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in medicine, 17, 2265–2281.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cepeda, M. S., Boston, R., Farrar, J. T., et al. (2003). Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 280–287.CrossRefPubMed Cepeda, M. S., Boston, R., Farrar, J. T., et al. (2003). Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 280–287.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hernan, M. A., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Werler, M. M., et al. (2002). Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation an application to birth defects epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 176–184.CrossRefPubMed Hernan, M. A., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Werler, M. M., et al. (2002). Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation an application to birth defects epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 176–184.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Brookhart, M. A., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K. J., et al. (2006). Variable selection for propensity score models. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163, 1149–1156.CrossRefPubMed Brookhart, M. A., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K. J., et al. (2006). Variable selection for propensity score models. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163, 1149–1156.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jackson, D. J., Lang, J. M., Ecker, J., et al. (2003). Impact of collaborative management and early admission in labor on method of delivery. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 32, 147–157.CrossRefPubMed Jackson, D. J., Lang, J. M., Ecker, J., et al. (2003). Impact of collaborative management and early admission in labor on method of delivery. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 32, 147–157.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rothman, K. J., & Greenland, S. (1998). Introduction to stratified analysis. In K. J. Rothman & S. Greenland (Eds.), Modern epidemiology (2nd ed., pp. 253–300). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott–Raven. Rothman, K. J., & Greenland, S. (1998). Introduction to stratified analysis. In K. J. Rothman & S. Greenland (Eds.), Modern epidemiology (2nd ed., pp. 253–300). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott–Raven.
22.
go back to reference Sharma, S. K., Alexander, J. M., Messick, G., et al. (2002). Cesarean delivery a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology, 96, 546–551.CrossRefPubMed Sharma, S. K., Alexander, J. M., Messick, G., et al. (2002). Cesarean delivery a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology, 96, 546–551.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Thorp, J. A., Hu, D. H., Albin, R. M., et al. (1993). The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: A randomized, controlled, prospective trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 169(4), 851–858.PubMed Thorp, J. A., Hu, D. H., Albin, R. M., et al. (1993). The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: A randomized, controlled, prospective trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 169(4), 851–858.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Zhang, J., Yancey, M. K., Klebanoff, M. A., Schwarz, J., & Schweitzer, D. (2001). Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 185, 128–134.CrossRefPubMed Zhang, J., Yancey, M. K., Klebanoff, M. A., Schwarz, J., & Schweitzer, D. (2001). Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 185, 128–134.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lieberman, E. (2004). Epidemiology of epidural analgesia and cesarean delivery. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 47(2), 317–331.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman, E. (2004). Epidemiology of epidural analgesia and cesarean delivery. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 47(2), 317–331.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rothman, K. J., & Greenland, S. (1998). Precision and validity in epidemiologic studies. In K. J. Rothman & S. Greenland (Eds.), Modern Epidemiology (2nd ed., pp. 115–134). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott–Raven. Rothman, K. J., & Greenland, S. (1998). Precision and validity in epidemiologic studies. In K. J. Rothman & S. Greenland (Eds.), Modern Epidemiology (2nd ed., pp. 115–134). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott–Raven.
27.
go back to reference Klein, M. C. (2006). Does epidural analgesia increase rate of cesarean section? Canadian Family Physician, 52, 419–421.PubMed Klein, M. C. (2006). Does epidural analgesia increase rate of cesarean section? Canadian Family Physician, 52, 419–421.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Declercq, E., & Chalmers, B. (2008). Mothers’ reports of their maternity experiences in the USA and Canada. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(4), 295–308.CrossRef Declercq, E., & Chalmers, B. (2008). Mothers’ reports of their maternity experiences in the USA and Canada. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(4), 295–308.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Menacker, F., Declercq, E., & Macdorman, M. F. (2006). Cesarean delivery: background, trends and epidemiology. Seminars in Perinatology, 30(5), 235–241.CrossRefPubMed Menacker, F., Declercq, E., & Macdorman, M. F. (2006). Cesarean delivery: background, trends and epidemiology. Seminars in Perinatology, 30(5), 235–241.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Kurth, T., Walker, A. M., Glynn, R. J., et al. (2005). Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163, 262–270.CrossRefPubMed Kurth, T., Walker, A. M., Glynn, R. J., et al. (2005). Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163, 262–270.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Soledad Cepeda, M., Boston, R., Farrar, J. T., et al. (2003). Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 280–287.CrossRefPubMed Soledad Cepeda, M., Boston, R., Farrar, J. T., et al. (2003). Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 280–287.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Epidural Analgesia and Risks of Cesarean and Operative Vaginal Deliveries in Nulliparous and Multiparous Women
Authors
Uyen-Sa D. T. Nguyen
Kenneth J. Rothman
Serkalem Demissie
Debra J. Jackson
Janet M. Lang
Jeffrey L. Ecker
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0515-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2010 Go to the issue