Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 2/2007

01-03-2007 | Original Paper

Factors Influencing Childbearing Decisions and Knowledge of Perinatal Risks among Canadian Men and Women

Authors: Suzanne Tough, Karen Benzies, Nonie Fraser-Lee, Christine Newburn-Cook

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Women age 35 and older account for an increasing proportion of births and are at increased risk of having difficulties conceiving and of delivering a multiple birth, low birth weight infant, and/or preterm infant. Little is known about men’s and women’s understanding of the maternal age related risks to pregnancy.Objectives: 1) To determine the factors influencing the timing of childbearing for non-parenting men and women, 2) to determine knowledge among non-parenting men and women about maternal age-related reproductive risks, the consequences of low birth weight and multiple birth, and issues related to infertility, and 3) to determine characteristics associated with limited knowledge of these reproductive risks.Methods: An age-stratified random sample of individuals, aged 20–45 years and without children, completed a computer-assisted telephone interview from two urban regions of Alberta, Canada (1006 women and 500 men).Results: Factors that influenced timing of childbearing for both men and women included: financial security (85.8%) and partner suitability to parent (80.2%). Over 70% of men and women recognized the direct relationship between older maternal age and conception difficulties. Less than half knew that advanced maternal age increased the risk of stillbirth, caesarean delivery, multiple birth and preterm delivery.Conclusions: Poor understanding of the links between childbearing after age 35, pregnancy complications and increased risk of adverse infant outcomes limits adults’ ability to make informed decisions about timing of childbearing.
Literature
1.
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Park MM. Births: Final data for 2000. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2002;50(5):1–101.
2.
Astolfi P, Zonta LA. Delayed maternity and risk at delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002;16(1):67–72.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Alberta Health and Wellness. Alberta reproductive health: Pregnancies and births. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Health and Wellness; 2002.
4.
Tough SC, Newburn-Cook C, Johnston DW, Svenson LW, Rose S, Belik J. Delayed childbearing and its impact on population rate changes in lower birth weight, multiple birth, and preterm delivery. Pediatrics 2002;109(3):399–403.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Ziadeh SM. Maternal and perinatal outcome in nulliparous women aged 35 and older. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002;54(1):6–10.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Tough SC, Tofflemire K. Maternal risk factors in relationship to birth outcome, Alberta 1997–2001. Prepared for Health Surveillance, Alberta Health and Wellness; 2003.
7.
Tough S, Svenson L, Schopflocher D. Maternal risk factors in relationship to birth outcome. Edmonton, AB: Health Surveillance, Alberta Health; 1999. Report No.: ISBN 0-7785-0207-4.
8.
Health Canada. Canadian perinatal health report, 2003. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2003.
9.
Nicoletti C, Tanturri ML. Differences in delaying motherhood across European countries: Empirical evidence from the ECHP. Colchester, UK: University of Essex; 2005. Report No.: paper 2005-4.
10.
Dion KK. Delayed parenthood and women’s expectations about the transition to parenthood. Int J Behav Dev 1995;18(2):315–33.
11.
Hansen JP. Older maternal age and pregnancy outcome: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1986;41(11):726–42.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Mansfield PK, McCool W. Toward a better understanding of the `advanced maternal age’ factor. Health Care Women Int 1989;10(4):395–415.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Wu Z, MacNeil L. Education, work, and childbearing after age 30. J Com Fam Stud 2003;33:191–213.
14.
Janz N, Champion V, Strecher V. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis F, editors. Health behavior and health education. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. pp. 45–66.
15.
Johnson K, Lero D, Rooney J. Work-Life Compendium 2001: 150 Canadian Statistics on Work, Family, and Well-Being. Guelph, ON, Canada: Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being, University of Guelph; 2001. Report No.: ISBN 0-88955-517-6.
16.
Chalmers B, Meyer D. What men say about pregnancy, birth and parenthood. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1996;17(1):47–52.PubMed
17.
Dudgeon MR, Inhorn MC. Men’s influences on women’s reproductive health: Medical anthropological perspectives. Soc Sci Med 2004;59(7):1379–95.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Laing LM. Declining fertility in a religious isolate: The Hutterite population of Alberta, Canada,1951–1971. Hum Biol 1980;52(2):288–310.PubMed
19.
Dunson DB, Colombo B, Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2002;17(5):1399–403.PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
22.
Hollier LM, Leveno KJ, Kelly MA, MCIntire DD, Cunningham FG. Maternal age and malformations in singleton births. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96(5 Pt 1):701–6.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Forrester MB, Merz RD. Maternal age-specific down syndrome rates by maternal race/ethnicity, Hawaii, 1986–2000. Birth Defects Res 2003;67(9):625–9.CrossRef
24.
Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104(4):727–33.PubMed
25.
Barton JR, Bergauer NK, Jacques DI, Coleman SK, Stanziano GJ, Sibai BM. Does advanced maternal age affect pregnancy outcome in women with mild hypertension remote from term? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176(6):1236–40.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, Klebanoff MA, Esterlitz J, Catalano PM, Goldenberg RL, Joffe G. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) study group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177(5):1003–10.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Bobrowski RA, Bottoms SF. Underappreciated risks of the elderly multipara. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(6):1764–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Dildy GA, Jackson GM, Fowers GK, Oshiro BT, Varner MW, Clark SL. Very advanced maternal age: Pregnancy after age 45. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175(3 Pt 1):668–74.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Main DM, Main EK, Moore DH. The relationship between maternal age and uterine dysfunction: A continuous effect throughout reproductive life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182(6):1312–20.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Aldous MB, Edmonson MB. Maternal age at first childbirth and risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery in Washington State. JAMA 1993;270(21):2574–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Roberts CL, Algert CS, March LM. Delayed childbearing–are there any risks? Med J Aust 1994;160(9):539–44.PubMed
32.
Steegers-Theunissen RP, Zwertbroek WM, Huisjes AJ, Kanhai HH, Bruinse HW, Merkus HM. Multiple birth prevalence in The Netherlands. Impact of maternal age and assisted reproductive techniques. J Reprod Med 1998;43(3):173–9.PubMed
33.
Tough SC, Svenson LW, Johnston DW, Schopflocher D. Characteristics of preterm delivery and low birth weight among 113,994 infants in Alberta: 1994–1996. Can J Public Health 2001;92(4):276–80.PubMed
34.
Blondel B, Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Dattani N, Kramer MS, Macfarlane A, Wen SW. The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birth weight: An international study. Am J Public Health 2002;92(8):1323–30.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Tough SC, Greene CA, Svenson LW, Belik J. Effects of in vitro fertilization on low birth weight, preterm delivery, and multiple birth. J Pediatr 2000;136(5):618–22.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Newman RB, Ellings JM. Antepartum management of the multiple gestation: The case for specialized care. Semin Perinatol 1995;19(5):387–403.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Millar WJ, Wadhera S, Nimrod C. Multiple births: Trends and patterns in Canada, 1974–1990. Health Rep 1992;4(3):223–50.PubMed
38.
Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol 2002;26(4):239–49.PubMedCrossRef
39.
McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med 1985;312(2):82–90.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Statistics Canada (2005, July 12). Births, 2003. The Daily. Retrieved from: http://​www.​statscan.​ca/​Daily/​English/​050712/​ d050712a.htm
41.
Moutquin J, Lalonde A. The cost of prematurity in Canada. Preterm Birth Prevention Conference: Report and Background Papers. Ottawa, ON: 1998.
42.
Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005;352(1):9–19.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Cooke RW. Perinatal and postnatal factors in very preterm infants and subsequent cognitive and motor abilities. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90(1):F60–3.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Grunau RE, Whitfield MF, Fay TB. Psychosocial and academic characteristics of extremely low birth weight (<or = 800 g) adolescents who are free of major impairment compared with term-born control subjects. Pediatrics 2004;114(6):725–32.CrossRef
45.
Svenson L, Schopflocher D. Birth weight and the Use of Physician Services: Results for the Alberta Children’s Health Study: Graph of the Week. 1997. Report No.: 45.
46.
Robertson CM, Svenson LW, Joffres MR. Prevalence of cerebral palsy in Alberta. Can J Neurol Sci 1998;25(2):117–22.PubMed
47.
Jackson K, Ternestedt BM, Schollin J. From alienation to familiarity: Experiences of mothers and fathers of preterm infants. J Adv Nurs 2003;43(2):120–9.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Kleinbaum D, Kupper L, Muller K. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 2nd ed. Boston: PWS-Kent; 1988.
49.
Tough SC, Benzies K, Newburn-Cook C, Tofflemire K, Fraser-Lee NJ, Sauve R. What do women know about the risks of delayed childbearing? Can J Public Health 2006;38(5):188–194.
50.
Krueger R. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1994.
51.
Slade GD, Brennan D, Spencer AJ. Methodological aspects of a computer-assisted telephone interview survey of oral health. Aust Dent J 1995;40(5):306–10.PubMedCrossRef
52.
McCormick MC, Workman-Daniels K, Brooks-Gunn J, Peckham GJ. When you’re only a phone call away: A comparison of the information in telephone and face-to-face interviews. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1993;14(4):250–5.PubMedCrossRef
53.
The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2004.
54.
Hammarberg K, Clarke VE. Reasons for delaying childbearing. Aust Fam Physician 2005;34(3):187–8.PubMed
55.
Zabin LS, Huggins GR, Emerson MR, Cullins VE. Partner effects on a woman’s intention to conceive: “Not with this partner.” Fam Plann Perspect 2000;32(1):39–45.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Steinberg S, Kruckman L, Steinberg S. Reinventing fatherhood in Japan and Canada. Soc Sci Med 2000;50(9):1257–72.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Mulitinovic S, Tough SC. Caring For Our Young: An International Comparison of Economics, Health Systems, and Health Outcomes. Prepared for the Calgary Children’s Initiative; 2001.
58.
Kemkes-Grottenthaler A. Postponing or rejecting parenthood? Results of a survey among female academic professionals. J Biosoc Sci 2003;35(2):213–26.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Sharpe S. Middle-aged mom. Apple 2004;16–19.
60.
61.
Peters D. Your get-pregnant guide. Chatelaine 2004;83–88.
62.
MacKenzie I. Should women who elect to have caesarean sections pay for them? BMJ 1999;318(7190):1070.PubMed
63.
Behague DP, Victora CG, Barros FC. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: Informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ 2002;324(7343):942–5.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Reagan PB, Salsberry PJ. Race and ethnic differences in determinants of preterm birth in the USA: Broadening the social context. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(10):2217–28.PubMed
65.
Mohsin M, Wong F, Bauman A, Bai J. Maternal and neonatal factors influencing premature birth and low birth weight in Australia. J Biosoc Sci 2003;35(2):161–74.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Robinson JN, Regan JA, Norwitz ER. The epidemiology of preterm labor. Semin Perinatol 2001;25(4):204–14.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Coleman CL. The influence of mass media and interpersonal communication on societal and personal risk judgments. Commun Res 1993;20:611–28.
68.
French DP, Sutton SR, Marteau TM, Kinmonth AL. The impact of personal and social comparison information about health risk. Br J Health Psychol 2004;9:187–200.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors Influencing Childbearing Decisions and Knowledge of Perinatal Risks among Canadian Men and Women
Authors
Suzanne Tough
Karen Benzies
Nonie Fraser-Lee
Christine Newburn-Cook
Publication date
01-03-2007
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-006-0156-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Maternal and Child Health Journal 2/2007 Go to the issue

OriginalArticle

Impact of Prenatal Care on Infant Survival in Bangladesh

Original Paper

Geographic Access to Family Planning Facilities and the Risk of Unintended and Teenage Pregnancy

Original Paper

Assessing Diet Quality in a Population of Low-Income Pregnant Women: A Comparison Between Native Americans and Whites

Original Paper

Prenatal and Parenting Stress on Adolescent Maternal Adjustment: Identifying a High-Risk Subgroup

Original Paper

Child Care Health Consultation Programs: Barriers and Recommendations

Original Paper

Validity of Self-reported Height and Weight in Women of Reproductive Age