Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 1/2006

Open Access 01-09-2006 | Original Paper

The Business Case for Preconception Care: Methods and Issues

Authors: Scott D. Grosse, Sergey V. Sotnikov, Sheila Leatherman, Michele Curtis

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Special Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Only a limited number of economic evaluations have addressed the costs and benefits of preconception care. In order to persuade health care providers, payers, or purchasers to become actively involved in promoting preconception care, it is important to demonstrate the value of doing so through development of a “business case”. Perceived benefits in terms of organizational reputation and market share can be influential in forming a business case. In addition, it is standard to include an economic analysis of financial costs and benefits from the perspective of the provider practice, payer, or purchaser in a business case. The methods, data needs, and other issues involved with preparing an economic analysis of the likely financial return on investment in preconception care are presented here. This is accompanied by a review or case study of economic evaluations of preconception care for women with recognized diabetes. Although the data are not sufficient to draw firm conclusions, there are indications that such care may yield positive financial benefits to health care organizations through reduction in maternal and infant hospitalizations. More work is needed to establish how costs and economic benefits are distributed among different types of organizations. Also, the optimum methods of delivering preconception care for women with diabetes need to be evaluated. Similar assessments should also be conducted for other forms of preconception care, including comprehensive care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Petrini J, Damus K, Russell R, Poschman K, Davidoff MJ, Mattison D. Contribution of birth defects to infant mortality in the United States. Teratology 2002;66:S3–6.PubMedCrossRef Petrini J, Damus K, Russell R, Poschman K, Davidoff MJ, Mattison D. Contribution of birth defects to infant mortality in the United States. Teratology 2002;66:S3–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Economic costs associated with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment—United States, 2003. MMWR 2004;53:57–9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Economic costs associated with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment—United States, 2003. MMWR 2004;53:57–9.
3.
go back to reference Leatherman S, Berwick D, Iles D, Lewin LS, Davidoff F, Nolan T, et al. The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis. Health Aff 2003;22:17–30.CrossRef Leatherman S, Berwick D, Iles D, Lewin LS, Davidoff F, Nolan T, et al. The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis. Health Aff 2003;22:17–30.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Trueman P, Drummond M, Hutton J. Developing guidance for budget impact analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2001;19:609–21.PubMedCrossRef Trueman P, Drummond M, Hutton J. Developing guidance for budget impact analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2001;19:609–21.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Haddix AC, Teutsch SM, Corso PS, editors. Prevention Effectiveness: A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic Evaluation. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press; 2003. Haddix AC, Teutsch SM, Corso PS, editors. Prevention Effectiveness: A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic Evaluation. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press; 2003.
6.
go back to reference Coffield AB, Maciosek MV, McGinnis JM, Harris JR, Caldwell MB, Teutsch SM, et al. Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2001;21:1–9.PubMedCrossRef Coffield AB, Maciosek MV, McGinnis JM, Harris JR, Caldwell MB, Teutsch SM, et al. Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2001;21:1–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lu MC, Lin YG, Prietto NM, Garite TJ. Elimination of public funding of prenatal care for undocumented immigrants in California: a cost/benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:233–9.PubMedCrossRef Lu MC, Lin YG, Prietto NM, Garite TJ. Elimination of public funding of prenatal care for undocumented immigrants in California: a cost/benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:233–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Goetzel RZ, Juday TR, Ozminkowski RJ. A systematic review of return on investment (ROI) studies of corporate health and productivity management initiatives. AWHP’s Worksite Health 1999;Summer:12–21. Goetzel RZ, Juday TR, Ozminkowski RJ. A systematic review of return on investment (ROI) studies of corporate health and productivity management initiatives. AWHP’s Worksite Health 1999;Summer:12–21.
9.
go back to reference Finkelstein EA, Brown DS. A cost-benefit simulation model of coverage for bariatric surgery among full-time employees. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:641–6.PubMed Finkelstein EA, Brown DS. A cost-benefit simulation model of coverage for bariatric surgery among full-time employees. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:641–6.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Warner KE, Smith RJ, Smith DG, Fries BE. Health and economic implications of a work-site smoking-cessation program: a simulation analysis. J Occup Environ Med 1996;38:981–92.PubMedCrossRef Warner KE, Smith RJ, Smith DG, Fries BE. Health and economic implications of a work-site smoking-cessation program: a simulation analysis. J Occup Environ Med 1996;38:981–92.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Warner KE, Mendez D, Smith DG. The financial implications of coverage of smoking cessation treatment by managed care organizations. Inquiry 2004;41:57–69.PubMed Warner KE, Mendez D, Smith DG. The financial implications of coverage of smoking cessation treatment by managed care organizations. Inquiry 2004;41:57–69.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:398–412.PubMedCrossRef Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:398–412.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Aldana SG, Merrill RM, Price K, Hardy A, Hager R. Financial impact of a comprehensive multisite workplace health promotion program. Prev Med 2005;40:131–7.PubMedCrossRef Aldana SG, Merrill RM, Price K, Hardy A, Hager R. Financial impact of a comprehensive multisite workplace health promotion program. Prev Med 2005;40:131–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Korenbrot CC. Risk reduction in pregnancies of low-income women: comprehensive prenatal care through the OB Access Project. Mobius 1984;4:34–43. Korenbrot CC. Risk reduction in pregnancies of low-income women: comprehensive prenatal care through the OB Access Project. Mobius 1984;4:34–43.
15.
go back to reference Gorsky RD, Colby JP Jr. The cost effectiveness of prenatal care in reducing low birth weight in New Hampshire. Health Serv Res 1989;24:583–98.PubMed Gorsky RD, Colby JP Jr. The cost effectiveness of prenatal care in reducing low birth weight in New Hampshire. Health Serv Res 1989;24:583–98.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Schramm WF. Weighing costs and benefits of adequate prenatal care for 12,023 births in Missouri’s Medicaid program, 1988. Public Health Rep 1992;107:647–52.PubMed Schramm WF. Weighing costs and benefits of adequate prenatal care for 12,023 births in Missouri’s Medicaid program, 1988. Public Health Rep 1992;107:647–52.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Howell EM. The impact of the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women: a synthesis of the evidence. Med Care Res Rev 2001;58:3–30.PubMed Howell EM. The impact of the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women: a synthesis of the evidence. Med Care Res Rev 2001;58:3–30.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Huntington J, Connell FA. For every dollar spent—the cost-savings argument for prenatal care. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1303–7.PubMedCrossRef Huntington J, Connell FA. For every dollar spent—the cost-savings argument for prenatal care. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1303–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Farnham PG, Gorsky RD. Costs to business for an HIV-infected worker. Inquiry 1994;31:76–88.PubMed Farnham PG, Gorsky RD. Costs to business for an HIV-infected worker. Inquiry 1994;31:76–88.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Chollet DJ, Newman JF Jr, Sumner AT. The cost of poor birth outcomes in employer-sponsored health plans. Med Care 1996;34:1219–34. Chollet DJ, Newman JF Jr, Sumner AT. The cost of poor birth outcomes in employer-sponsored health plans. Med Care 1996;34:1219–34.
21.
go back to reference Grosse SD, Waitzman NJ, Romano PS, Mulinare J. Re-evaluating the benefits of folic acid fortification in the United States: economic analysis, regulation, and public health. Am J Public Health. 2005; in press. Grosse SD, Waitzman NJ, Romano PS, Mulinare J. Re-evaluating the benefits of folic acid fortification in the United States: economic analysis, regulation, and public health. Am J Public Health. 2005; in press.
22.
go back to reference Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ, Villagra VG, Duffy J. A review of the return on investment in disease management. Health Care Financ Rev 2005;26(4):1–19.PubMed Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ, Villagra VG, Duffy J. A review of the return on investment in disease management. Health Care Financ Rev 2005;26(4):1–19.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Aldana SG. Financial impact of health promotion programs: a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Health Promot 2001;15:296–320.PubMed Aldana SG. Financial impact of health promotion programs: a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Health Promot 2001;15:296–320.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Kilpatrick KE, Lohr KN, Leatherman S, Pink G, Buckel JM, Legarde C, et al. The insufficiency of evidence to establish the business case for quality. Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:347–55.PubMedCrossRef Kilpatrick KE, Lohr KN, Leatherman S, Pink G, Buckel JM, Legarde C, et al. The insufficiency of evidence to establish the business case for quality. Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:347–55.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Homer C. Child Health Business Case Working Group. Exploring the business case for improving the quality of health care for children. Health Aff 2004;23:159–66.CrossRef Homer C. Child Health Business Case Working Group. Exploring the business case for improving the quality of health care for children. Health Aff 2004;23:159–66.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hawkins MR. The impact of a high-risk disease management program on perinatal outcomes in a managed care organization. Case Manager 2005;16:59–63.PubMedCrossRef Hawkins MR. The impact of a high-risk disease management program on perinatal outcomes in a managed care organization. Case Manager 2005;16:59–63.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sackett K, Pope RK, Erdley WS. Demonstrating a positive return on investment for a prenatal program at a managed care organization. An economic analysis. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2004;18:117–27.PubMed Sackett K, Pope RK, Erdley WS. Demonstrating a positive return on investment for a prenatal program at a managed care organization. An economic analysis. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2004;18:117–27.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Stankaitis JA, Brill HR, Walker DM. Reduction in neonatal intensive care unit admission rates in a Medicaid managed care program. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:166–72.PubMed Stankaitis JA, Brill HR, Walker DM. Reduction in neonatal intensive care unit admission rates in a Medicaid managed care program. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:166–72.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Diehl-Svrjcek BC, Richardson R. Decreasing NICU costs in the managed care arena: the positive impact of collaborative high-risk OB and NICU disease management programs. Lippincotts Case Manag 2005;10:159–66.PubMedCrossRef Diehl-Svrjcek BC, Richardson R. Decreasing NICU costs in the managed care arena: the positive impact of collaborative high-risk OB and NICU disease management programs. Lippincotts Case Manag 2005;10:159–66.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kelly AE, Haddix AC, Scanlon KS, Helmick CG, Mulinare J. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent neural tube defects. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, editors. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 313–48. Kelly AE, Haddix AC, Scanlon KS, Helmick CG, Mulinare J. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent neural tube defects. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, editors. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 313–48.
31.
go back to reference Ray JG, O’Brien TE, Chan WS. Preconception care and the risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with diabetes mellitus. Q J Med 2001;94:435–44. Ray JG, O’Brien TE, Chan WS. Preconception care and the risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with diabetes mellitus. Q J Med 2001;94:435–44.
32.
go back to reference Jovanovic L, Nakai Y. Successful pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: from preconception through postpartum care. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2006;35:79–97.PubMedCrossRef Jovanovic L, Nakai Y. Successful pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: from preconception through postpartum care. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2006;35:79–97.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Willhoite MB, Bennert HW Jr, Palomaki GE, Zaremba MM, Herman WH, Williams JR, et al. The impact of preconception counseling on pregnancy outcomes. The experience of the Maine Diabetes in Pregnancy Program. Diabetes Care 1993;16:450–5.PubMedCrossRef Willhoite MB, Bennert HW Jr, Palomaki GE, Zaremba MM, Herman WH, Williams JR, et al. The impact of preconception counseling on pregnancy outcomes. The experience of the Maine Diabetes in Pregnancy Program. Diabetes Care 1993;16:450–5.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Loeken MR. Current perspectives on the causes of neural tube defects resulting from diabetic pregnancy. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2005;135:77–87.PubMed Loeken MR. Current perspectives on the causes of neural tube defects resulting from diabetic pregnancy. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2005;135:77–87.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Elixhauser A, Weschler JM, Kitzmiller JL, Marks JS, Bennert HW Jr, Coustan DR, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of preconception care for women with established diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1993;16:1146–57.PubMedCrossRef Elixhauser A, Weschler JM, Kitzmiller JL, Marks JS, Bennert HW Jr, Coustan DR, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of preconception care for women with established diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1993;16:1146–57.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Scheffler RM, Feuchtbaum LB, Phibbs CS. Prevention: the cost-effectiveness of the California Diabetes and Pregnancy Program. Am J Public Health 1992;82:168–75.PubMedCrossRef Scheffler RM, Feuchtbaum LB, Phibbs CS. Prevention: the cost-effectiveness of the California Diabetes and Pregnancy Program. Am J Public Health 1992;82:168–75.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Herman WH, Janz NK, Becker MP, Charron-Prochownik D. Diabetes and pregnancy. Preconception care, pregnancy outcomes, resource utilization and costs. J Reprod Med 1999;44:33–8.PubMed Herman WH, Janz NK, Becker MP, Charron-Prochownik D. Diabetes and pregnancy. Preconception care, pregnancy outcomes, resource utilization and costs. J Reprod Med 1999;44:33–8.PubMed
38.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Preconception care of women with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:S76–8.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Preconception care of women with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:S76–8.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 60, March 2005. Pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:675–85. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 60, March 2005. Pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:675–85.
40.
go back to reference Kim C, Ferrara A, McEwen LN, Marrero DG, Gerzoff RB, Herman WH; TRIAD Study Group. Preconception care in managed care: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:227–32.PubMedCrossRef Kim C, Ferrara A, McEwen LN, Marrero DG, Gerzoff RB, Herman WH; TRIAD Study Group. Preconception care in managed care: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:227–32.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Prue C, Lyon Daniel K. Marketing: planning before conceiving preconception care. Matern Child Health J. In press. Prue C, Lyon Daniel K. Marketing: planning before conceiving preconception care. Matern Child Health J. In press.
42.
go back to reference Russell LB, Suh DC, Safford MA. Time requirements for diabetes self-management: too much for many? J Fam Pract 2005;54:52–6.PubMed Russell LB, Suh DC, Safford MA. Time requirements for diabetes self-management: too much for many? J Fam Pract 2005;54:52–6.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The Business Case for Preconception Care: Methods and Issues
Authors
Scott D. Grosse
Sergey V. Sotnikov
Sheila Leatherman
Michele Curtis
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue Special Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-006-0101-3

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2006

Maternal and Child Health Journal 1/2006 Go to the issue