Top

Published in:

01-04-2019 | Original Paper

Preventing Adolescent Substance Use: A Content Analysis of Peer Processes Targeted Within Universal School-Based Programs

Authors: Angela K. Henneberger, Scott D. Gest, Kathleen M. Zadzora

Published in: Journal of Prevention | Issue 2/2019

Abstract

Universal school-based substance use prevention programs are widely disseminated and often include a focus on peer relationships. Network theory and social network analysis (SNA) have emerged as useful theoretical and methodological frameworks for examining the role of peer relationships in prevention and intervention research. We used content analysis to systematically code the peer processes targeted by three universal school based prevention programs. We found that programs focused on peer socialization more than peer selection, and programs focused about evenly on descriptive and injunctive norms. Programs varied in their focus on positive and negative peer processes and behaviors, but most references to peer processes focused on positive processes and negative behaviors. The focus on peer processes at the dyadic, subgroup, and network levels varied across the three programs, with the heaviest focus on network level processes. When peer processes were targeted, it was rare that lessons focused on peer processes for an extended (> 50%) amount of the lesson content. However, when peer processes were a focus, discussion and reflection were commonly encouraged. These patterns are considered in the context of non-intervention research on adolescent peer relations, which highlights the importance of peer selection and dyad-level processes, and the existence of positive peer processes that promote adolescent development. In doing so, we provide a framework that can be used to (1) examine the extent to which a particular program focuses on the different peer processes, and (2) inform systematic experimental studies of the extent to which particular peer processes are malleable in response to intervention efforts.

Balsa, A. I., Homer, J. F., French, M. T., & Norton, E. C. (2011). Alcohol use and popularity: Social payoffs from conforming to peers’ behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00704.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Botvin, G. J. (1979–2000). Life skills training: Promoting health and personal development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Health Press.

Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (2004). Life skills training: empirical findings and future directions. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPP.0000042391.58573.5b.CrossRef

Bryant, A. L., Schulenberg, J. E., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (2003). How academic achievement, attitudes, and behaviors relate to the course of substance use during adolescence: A 6-year, multiwave national longitudinal study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 361–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1303005.CrossRef

Bukowski, W. M., Motzoi, C., & Meyer, F. (2009). Friendship as process, function, and outcome. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 217–231). New York: Guilford.

Cheadle, J. E., Walsemann, K. M., & Goosby, B. J. (2015). Teen alcohol use and social networks: The contributions of friend influence and friendship selection. Journal of Alcoholism and Drug Dependence, 3(5), 224. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6488.1000224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(21), 2249–2258. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0706154.CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.CrossRef

D.A.R.E. America. (2009). Keepin’ it REAL. Los Angeles, CA: D.A.R.E. America.

de la Haye, K., Green, H. D., Kennedy, D. P., Pollard, M. S., & Tucker, J. S. (2013). Selection and influence mechanisms associated with marijuana initiation and use in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12018.CrossRef

DeLay, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., Salmela-Aro, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2013). Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12017.CrossRef

Dusenbury, L., & Falco, M. (1995). Eleven components of effective drug abuse prevention curricula. Journal of School Health, 65, 420–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1995.tb08205.x.CrossRef

Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (2012). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York: Springer.

Faggiano, F., Minozzi, S., Versino, E., & Buscemi, D. (2014). Universal school-based prevention for illicit drug use. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(12), CD003020. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003020.pub3.CrossRef

Foxcroft, D. R., & Tsertsvadze, A. (2011). Universal school-based prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(5), CD009113. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009113.CrossRef

Friedkin, N. E. (1998). A structural theory of social influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Gest, S. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Bierman, K. L., & Moody, J. (2011). Strengthening prevention program theories and evaluations: Contributions from social network analysis. Prevention Science, 12, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0229-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Graham, J. W., Marks, G., & Hansen, W. B. (1991). Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.291.CrossRef

Green, H. D., Horta, M., de la Haye, K., Tucker, J. S., Kennedy, D. R., & Pollard, M. (2013). Peer influence and selection processes in adolescent smoking behavior: A comparative study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15, 534–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts191.CrossRef

Gremmen, M. C., Berger, C., Ryan, A. M., Steglich, C. E., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2018). Adolescents’ friendships, academic achievement, and risk behaviors: Same-behavior and cross-behavior selection and influence processes. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13045.CrossRefPubMed

Haas, S. A., & Schaefer, D. R. (2014). With a little help from my friends? Asymmetrical social influence on adolescent smoking initiation and cessation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146514532817.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hall, J. A., & Valente, T. W. (2007). Adolescent smoking networks: The effects of influence and selection on future smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 32(12), 3054–3059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hansen, W. B. (2004). All stars: Building bright futures. Greensboro, NC: Tanglewood Research Inc.

Hansen, W. B., & Graham, J. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(91)90039-7.CrossRefPubMed

Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105.CrossRefPubMed

Hecht, M. L., Marsiglia, F. F., Elek, E., Wagstaff, D. A., Kulis, S., Dustman, P., et al. (2003). Culturally grounded substance use prevention: An evaluation of the Keepin’ it R.E.A.L. Curriculum. Prevention Science, 4, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026016131401.CrossRefPubMed

Huang, G. C., Unger, J. B., Soto, D., Fujimoto, K., Pentz, M. A., Jordan-Marsh, M., et al. (2014). Peer influences: The impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(5), 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.001.CrossRef

Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Killeya-Jones, L. A., Nakajima, R., & Costanzo, P. R. (2007). Peer standing and substance use in early-adolescent grade-level networks: A short-term longitudinal study. Prevention Science, 8(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0053-2.CrossRefPubMed

Kindermann, T. A., & Gest, S. D. (2009). Assessment of the peer group: Identifying naturally occurring social networks and capturing their effects. In K. H. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 100–117). New York: Guilford.

Knecht, A. B., Burk, W. J., Weesie, J., & Steglich, C. (2011). Friendship and alcohol use in early adolescence: A multilevel social network approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(2), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00685.x.CrossRef

Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

La Greca, A. M., Prinstein, M. J., & Fetter, M. D. (2001). Adolescent peer crowd affiliation: Linkages with health-risk behaviors and close friendships. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/26.3.131.CrossRefPubMed

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. C. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.CrossRefPubMed

Lansford, J. E., Criss, M. M., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2003). Friendship quality, peer group affiliation, and peer antisocial behavior as moderators of the link between negative parenting and adolescent externalizing behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1302002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger & T. Abel (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (Vol. 2, pp. 18–66). New York: Van Nostrand.

Logis, H. A., Rodkin, P. C., Gest, S. D., & Ahn, H.-J. (2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12033.CrossRef

Mathys, C., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2013). Popularity as a moderator of peer selection and socialization of adolescent alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12031.CrossRef

Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E., & De Vries, H. (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.005.CrossRef

Moody, J., Brynildsen, W. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., & Gest, S. (2011). Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Social Networks, 33(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.10.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Moody, J., Feinberg, M. E., Osgood, D. W., & Gest, S. D. (2010). Mining the network: Peers and adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47(4), 324–326.CrossRef

Mundt, M. P. (2011). The impact of peer social networks on adolescent alcohol use initiation. Academic Pediatrics, 11(5), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2011.05.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mundt, M. P., Mercken, L., & Zakletskaia, L. (2012). Peer selection and influence effects on adolescent alcohol use: A stochastic actor-based model. BMC Pediatrics, 12(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.306.CrossRef

Osgood, D. W., Ragan, D. T., Wallace, L., Gest, S. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Moody, J. (2013). Peers and the emergence of alcohol use: Influence and selection processes in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 500–512.CrossRef

Park, H. S., & Smith, S. W. (2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00296.x.CrossRef

Pearson, M., Steglich, C., & Snijders, T. (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections, 27(1), 47–63.

Poulin, F., Kiesner, J., Pedersen, S., & Dishion, T. J. (2011). A short-term longitudinal analysis of friendship selection on early adolescent substance use. Journal of Adolescence, 34(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.006.CrossRefPubMed

Prinstein, M. J., & Wang, S. S. (2005). False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: Examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends’ deviant and health risk behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 293–306.CrossRefPubMed

Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., Parker, J. G., & Bowker, J. C. (2008). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (pp. 141–180). Hoboken: Wiley.

Schaefer, D. R., Haas, S. A., & Bishop, N. J. (2012). A dynamic model of US adolescents’ smoking and friendship networks. American Journal of Public Health, 102(6), e12–e18. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300705.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shamblen, S. R., & Derzon, J. H. (2009). A preliminary study of the population-adjusted effectiveness of substance abuse prevention programming: Towards making IOM program types comparable. Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-009-0168-x.CrossRef

Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x.CrossRef

Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention, 20(4), 275–336. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021314704811.CrossRef

Tucker, J. S., Green, H. D., Zhou, A. J., Miles, J. N., Shih, R. A., & D’Amico, E. J. (2011). Substance use among middle school students: Associations with self-rated and peer-nominated popularity. Journal of Adolescence, 34(3), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.016.CrossRefPubMed

Valente, T. W., Gallaher, P., & Mouttapa, M. (2004). Using social networks to understand and prevent substance use: A transdisciplinary perspective. Substance Use and Misuse, 39(10–12), 1685–1712.CrossRefPubMed

Valente, T. W., Unger, J. B., & Johnson, C. A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(4), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.10.016.CrossRef

Van Ryzin, M. J., DeLay, D., & Dishion, T. J. (2016). Being well-liked predicts increased use of alcohol but not tobacco in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 53, 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.10.017.CrossRefPubMed

Véronneau, M. H., & Dishion, T. J. (2011). Middle school friendships and academic achievement in early adolescence: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610384485.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Weber, R. P. (Ed.). (1990). Basic content analysis (No. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01994.x.CrossRefPubMed

Wills, T. A., & Cleary, S. D. (1999). Peer and adolescent substance use among 6th–9th graders: Latent growth analyses of influence versus selection mechanisms. Health Psychology, 18(5), 453. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.18.5.453.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Preventing Adolescent Substance Use: A Content Analysis of Peer Processes Targeted Within Universal School-Based Programs
Authors: Angela K. Henneberger
Scott D. Gest
Kathleen M. Zadzora
Publication date: 01-04-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Prevention / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2731-5533
Electronic ISSN: 2731-5541
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00544-5

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Preventing Adolescent Substance Use: A Content Analysis of Peer Processes Targeted Within Universal School-Based Programs

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Social Media Use, School Connectedness, and Academic Performance Among Adolescents

A School-Based Program to Promote Well-Being in Preadolescents: Results From a Cluster Quasi-Experimental Controlled Study

CARING: The Impact of a Parent–Child, Play-Based Intervention to Promote Latino Head Start Children’s Social–Emotional Development

Framework for Supporting Adolescent Peer Leaders: A Pilot Using Text Messaging in a School-Based Substance Use Prevention Program

Linking Sleep to Externalizing Behavioral Difficulties: A Longitudinal Psychometric Survey in a Cohort of Italian School-Age Children