Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2019

01-06-2019

Predicting Return to Work in a Heterogeneous Sample of Recently Injured Workers Using the Brief ÖMPSQ-SF

Authors: M. K. Nicholas, D. S. J. Costa, S. J. Linton, C. J. Main, W. S. Shaw, R. Pearce, M. Gleeson, R. Z. Pinto, F. M. Blyth, J. H. McCauley, C. G. Maher, R. J. E. M. Smeets, A. McGarity

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose (1) to examine the ability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire-short version (ÖMPSQ-SF) to predict time to return to pre-injury work duties (PID) following a work-related soft tissue injury (regardless of body location); and (2) to examine the appropriateness of 50/100 as a suitable cut-off score for case identification. Methods Injured workers (IW) from six public hospitals in Sydney, Australia, who had taken medically-sanctioned time off work due to their injury, were recruited by insurance case managers within 5–15 days of their injury. Eligible participants (N = 213 in total) were administered the ÖMPSQ-SF over the telephone by the case manager. For objective (1) Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to predict days to return to PID using the ÖMPSQ-SF. For objective (2) receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the ÖMPSQ-SF total score that optimises sensitivity and specificity in detecting whether or not participants had returned to PID within 2–7 weeks. Results The total ÖMPSQ-SF score significantly predicted number of days to return to PID, such that for every 1-point increase in the total ÖMPSQ-SF score the predicted chance of returning to work reduced by 4% (i.e., hazard ratio = 0.96), p < 0.001. Sensitivity and specificity for the ROC analysis comparing ÖMPSQ-SF total score to return to PID within 2–7 weeks suggested 48 as the optimal cut off (sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.79). Conclusion The results provide strong support for the use of the ÖMPSQ-SF in an applied setting for identifying those IW likely to have delayed RTW when administered within 15 days of the injury. While a score of 48/100 was the optimal cut point for sensitivity and specificity, pragmatically, 50/100 should be acceptable as a cut-off in future studies of this type.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(4):398–412.CrossRefPubMed Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(4):398–412.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Peterson CL, Murphy G. Transition from the labor market: older workers and retirement. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(4):609–627.CrossRefPubMed Peterson CL, Murphy G. Transition from the labor market: older workers and retirement. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(4):609–627.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Schofield DJ, Shrestha RN, Percival R, Callander EJ, Kelly SJ, Passey ME. Early retirement and the financial assets of individuals with back problems. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(5):731–736.CrossRefPubMed Schofield DJ, Shrestha RN, Percival R, Callander EJ, Kelly SJ, Passey ME. Early retirement and the financial assets of individuals with back problems. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(5):731–736.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Johnson D, Fry T. Factors affecting return to work after injury: a study for the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research; 2002. Johnson D, Fry T. Factors affecting return to work after injury: a study for the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research; 2002.
5.
go back to reference Landstad BJ, Wendelborg C, Hedlund M. Factors explaining return to work for long-term sick workers in Norway. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(15):1215–1226.CrossRefPubMed Landstad BJ, Wendelborg C, Hedlund M. Factors explaining return to work for long-term sick workers in Norway. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(15):1215–1226.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wynne-Jones G, Cowen J, Lordan JL, Uthman O, Main CJ, Glozier N, et al. Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(6):448–456.CrossRefPubMed Wynne-Jones G, Cowen J, Lordan JL, Uthman O, Main CJ, Glozier N, et al. Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(6):448–456.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening of DWP clients for risk of long-term incapacity: a conceptual and scientific review. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2003. Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening of DWP clients for risk of long-term incapacity: a conceptual and scientific review. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2003.
8.
go back to reference Carragee EJ, Alamin TF, Miller JL, Carragee JM. Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain. Spine J. 2005;5(1):24–35.CrossRefPubMed Carragee EJ, Alamin TF, Miller JL, Carragee JM. Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain. Spine J. 2005;5(1):24–35.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Street TD, Lacey SJ. A systematic review of studies identifying predictors of poor return to work outcomes following workplace injury. Work 2015;51(2):373–381.CrossRefPubMed Street TD, Lacey SJ. A systematic review of studies identifying predictors of poor return to work outcomes following workplace injury. Work 2015;51(2):373–381.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(13):1295–1302.CrossRef Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(13):1295–1302.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mallen CD, Peat G, Thomas E, Dunn KM, Croft PR. Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(541):655–661.PubMedPubMedCentral Mallen CD, Peat G, Thomas E, Dunn KM, Croft PR. Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(541):655–661.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ. The early identification and management of psychological risk factors (Yellow Flags) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737–753.CrossRefPubMed Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ. The early identification and management of psychological risk factors (Yellow Flags) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737–753.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hill JC, Dunn K, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(5):632–641.CrossRef Hill JC, Dunn K, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(5):632–641.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(2):80–86.CrossRefPubMed Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(2):80–86.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hockings RL, McAuley JH, Maher CG. A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Spine. 2008;33(15):E494–E500.CrossRefPubMed Hockings RL, McAuley JH, Maher CG. A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Spine. 2008;33(15):E494–E500.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Maher CG, Grotle M. Evaluation of the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(8):666–670.CrossRefPubMed Maher CG, Grotle M. Evaluation of the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(8):666–670.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Linton SJ, Nicholas MK, MacDonald S. Development of a Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Spine 2011;36(22):1891–1895.CrossRefPubMed Linton SJ, Nicholas MK, MacDonald S. Development of a Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Spine 2011;36(22):1891–1895.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hochberg Y. A sharper bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988;75(4):800–802.CrossRef Hochberg Y. A sharper bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988;75(4):800–802.CrossRef
21.
23.
go back to reference Kelly GA, Blake C, Power CK, O’Keeffe D, Fullen BM. The association between chronic low back pain and sleep: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(2):169–181.CrossRefPubMed Kelly GA, Blake C, Power CK, O’Keeffe D, Fullen BM. The association between chronic low back pain and sleep: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(2):169–181.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lotters F, Burdorf A. Prognostic factors for duration of sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(2):212–221.CrossRefPubMed Lotters F, Burdorf A. Prognostic factors for duration of sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(2):212–221.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Fadyl J, McPherson K. Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):362–374.CrossRefPubMed Fadyl J, McPherson K. Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):362–374.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Foster NE, Thomas E, Bishop A, Dunn KM, Main CJ. Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care. Pain 2010;148(3):398–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foster NE, Thomas E, Bishop A, Dunn KM, Main CJ. Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care. Pain 2010;148(3):398–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Leeuw M, Goossens MEJB., Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: state of the scientific evidence. J Behav Med. 2007;30(1):77–94.CrossRefPubMed Leeuw M, Goossens MEJB., Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: state of the scientific evidence. J Behav Med. 2007;30(1):77–94.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Wertli MM, Rasmussen-Barr E, Weiser S, Bachmann LM, Brunner F. The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J. 2014;14(5):816–836.CrossRefPubMed Wertli MM, Rasmussen-Barr E, Weiser S, Bachmann LM, Brunner F. The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J. 2014;14(5):816–836.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Gauthier N, Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Stanish WD, Thibault P. Investigating risk factors for chronicity: the importance of distinguishing between return-to-work status and self-report measures of disability. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(3):312–318.CrossRefPubMed Gauthier N, Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Stanish WD, Thibault P. Investigating risk factors for chronicity: the importance of distinguishing between return-to-work status and self-report measures of disability. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(3):312–318.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Main CJ, Nicholas MK, Shaw WS, Tetrick LE, Ehrhart MG, Pransky G. Implementation science and employer disability practices: embedding implementation factors in research designs. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):448–464.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Main CJ, Nicholas MK, Shaw WS, Tetrick LE, Ehrhart MG, Pransky G. Implementation science and employer disability practices: embedding implementation factors in research designs. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):448–464.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Predicting Return to Work in a Heterogeneous Sample of Recently Injured Workers Using the Brief ÖMPSQ-SF
Authors
M. K. Nicholas
D. S. J. Costa
S. J. Linton
C. J. Main
W. S. Shaw
R. Pearce
M. Gleeson
R. Z. Pinto
F. M. Blyth
J. H. McCauley
C. G. Maher
R. J. E. M. Smeets
A. McGarity
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9784-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2019 Go to the issue