Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2018

01-09-2018

Cancer Survivors’ Social Context in the Return to Work Process: Narrative Accounts of Social Support and Social Comparison Information

Authors: M. Armaou, L. Schumacher, E. A. Grunfeld

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose Returning to work is a process that is intertwined with the social aspects of one’s life, which can influence the way in which that person manages their return to work and also determines the support available to them. This study aimed to explore cancer patients’ perceptions of the role of their social context in relation to returning to work following treatment. Methods Twenty-three patients who had received a diagnosis of either urological, breast, gynaecological, or bowel cancer participated in semi-structured interviews examining general perceptions of cancer, work values and perceptions of the potential impact of their cancer diagnosis and treatment on work. Interviews were analysed using the iterative process of Framework Analysis. Results Two superordinate themes emerged as influential in the return to work process: Social support as a facilitator of return to work (e.g. co-workers’ support and support outside of the workplace) and Social comparison as an appraisal of readiness to return to work (e.g. comparisons with other cancer patients, colleagues, and employees in other organisations or professions). Conclusions Two functions of the social context of returning to work after cancer were apparent in the participants’ narrative: the importance of social support as a facilitator of returning to work and the utilisation of social comparison information in order to appraise one’s readiness to return to work. The role of social context in returning to work has largely been absent from the research literature to date. The findings of this study suggest that social support and social comparison mechanisms may have a significant impact on an individual’s successful return to the workplace.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amir Z, Moran T, Walsh L, Iddenden R, Luker K. Return to paid work after cancer: a British experience. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1(2):129–136.CrossRefPubMed Amir Z, Moran T, Walsh L, Iddenden R, Luker K. Return to paid work after cancer: a British experience. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1(2):129–136.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, de Graaf JH, Balak F, Groothoff JW. Sickness absence and return to work rates in women with breast cancer. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009;82:543–546.CrossRefPubMed Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, de Graaf JH, Balak F, Groothoff JW. Sickness absence and return to work rates in women with breast cancer. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009;82:543–546.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer 2013;119(Suppl 11):2151–2159.CrossRefPubMed Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer 2013;119(Suppl 11):2151–2159.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Taskila T, Lindbohm. ML Factos affecting cancer survivors’ employment and work ability. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(4):446–451.CrossRefPubMed Taskila T, Lindbohm. ML Factos affecting cancer survivors’ employment and work ability. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(4):446–451.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, Bruns GL, Stoler MR, Nassif T, Yu X. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(4):415–437.CrossRefPubMed Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, Bruns GL, Stoler MR, Nassif T, Yu X. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(4):415–437.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chow SL, Ting AS, Tin TS. Development of conceptual framework to understand factors with return to work among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Iran J Public Health 2014;43(4):391–405.PubMedPubMedCentral Chow SL, Ting AS, Tin TS. Development of conceptual framework to understand factors with return to work among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Iran J Public Health 2014;43(4):391–405.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Mbengi RK, Mortelmans K, Arbyn M, van Oyen H, Bouland C, de Brouwer C. Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action-rapid review and expert consulation. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):35.CrossRef Mbengi RK, Mortelmans K, Arbyn M, van Oyen H, Bouland C, de Brouwer C. Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action-rapid review and expert consulation. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):35.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rydström I, Englund CD, Dellve L, Ahlstorm L. Importance of social capital at the workplace for return to work among women with a history of long-term sick leave: a cohort study. BMC Nurs. 2017;16(1):38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rydström I, Englund CD, Dellve L, Ahlstorm L. Importance of social capital at the workplace for return to work among women with a history of long-term sick leave: a cohort study. BMC Nurs. 2017;16(1):38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Tamminga SJ, de Boer AGEM, Verbeek JHAM, Frings-Dresen MHW. Breast cancer survivors’ views of factors that influence the return-to-work process-a qualitative study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012;38(2):144–154.CrossRefPubMed Tamminga SJ, de Boer AGEM, Verbeek JHAM, Frings-Dresen MHW. Breast cancer survivors’ views of factors that influence the return-to-work process-a qualitative study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012;38(2):144–154.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mehnert A, Koch U. Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation: a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013;39(1):76–87.CrossRefPubMed Mehnert A, Koch U. Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation: a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013;39(1):76–87.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nachreiner NM, Dagher RK, McGovern PM, Baker BA, Alexander BH, Gerberich SG. Successful return to work for cancer survivors. AAOHN J. 2007;55(7):290–295.CrossRefPubMed Nachreiner NM, Dagher RK, McGovern PM, Baker BA, Alexander BH, Gerberich SG. Successful return to work for cancer survivors. AAOHN J. 2007;55(7):290–295.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tiedtke C, de Casterle BD, Donceel P, de Rijk A. Workplace support after breast cancer treatment: recognition of vulnerability. Disabil Regabil. 2015;37(19):1770–1776.CrossRef Tiedtke C, de Casterle BD, Donceel P, de Rijk A. Workplace support after breast cancer treatment: recognition of vulnerability. Disabil Regabil. 2015;37(19):1770–1776.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stergiou -K PC, Holness DL, Kirsh B, van Eerd D, Duncan A, Jones J. Am I ready to return to work? Assisting cancer survivors to determine work readiness. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(4):699–710.CrossRef Stergiou -K PC, Holness DL, Kirsh B, van Eerd D, Duncan A, Jones J. Am I ready to return to work? Assisting cancer survivors to determine work readiness. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(4):699–710.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Amir Z, Brocky J. Cancer survivorship and employment: epidemiology. Occup Med. 2009;59(6):373–377.CrossRef Amir Z, Brocky J. Cancer survivorship and employment: epidemiology. Occup Med. 2009;59(6):373–377.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wells M, Williams B, Firnigi D, Lang H, Coyle J, Kroll T, MacGillivray S. Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psycho-Oncology 2013;22(6):1208–1219.CrossRefPubMed Wells M, Williams B, Firnigi D, Lang H, Coyle J, Kroll T, MacGillivray S. Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psycho-Oncology 2013;22(6):1208–1219.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakkinen J, Hietanen JP. Cancer survivors received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer 2006;14(5):427–435.CrossRefPubMed Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakkinen J, Hietanen JP. Cancer survivors received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer 2006;14(5):427–435.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(2):145–161.CrossRefPubMed Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(2):145–161.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fong AJ, Scarapicchia TM, McDonough MHM, Wrosch C, Sabiston CM. Changes in social support predict emotional well-being in breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2017;26(5):664–671.CrossRefPubMed Fong AJ, Scarapicchia TM, McDonough MHM, Wrosch C, Sabiston CM. Changes in social support predict emotional well-being in breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2017;26(5):664–671.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Woods PL, Schumacher L, Sadhra SS, Sutton AJ, Zarkar A, Rolf P, Grunfeld EA. A guided workbook intervention (WorkPlan) to support work-related goals among cancer survivors: protocol of a feasibility randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(2):e75. doi:10.2196/resprot.5300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Woods PL, Schumacher L, Sadhra SS, Sutton AJ, Zarkar A, Rolf P, Grunfeld EA. A guided workbook intervention (WorkPlan) to support work-related goals among cancer survivors: protocol of a feasibility randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(2):e75. doi:10.​2196/​resprot.​5300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1993. pp. 173–194. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1993. pp. 173–194.
22.
go back to reference Glaser BG. The constant comparison method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems 1965;12(4):436–445.CrossRef Glaser BG. The constant comparison method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems 1965;12(4):436–445.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(3):190–197.CrossRefPubMed Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(3):190–197.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Stergiou -KM, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Hebert D, Phan S, Jones J. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):657–670.CrossRef Stergiou -KM, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Hebert D, Phan S, Jones J. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):657–670.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Grunfeld EA, Drudge-Coates L, Rixon L, Eaton E, Cooper AF. “The only way I know how to live is to work”: a qualitative study of work following treatment for prostate cancer. Health Psychol. 2013;32(1):75–82.CrossRefPubMed Grunfeld EA, Drudge-Coates L, Rixon L, Eaton E, Cooper AF. “The only way I know how to live is to work”: a qualitative study of work following treatment for prostate cancer. Health Psychol. 2013;32(1):75–82.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Love B, Thompson CM, Knapp J. The need to be superman: the psychosocial support challenges of young men affected by cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(1):21–27.CrossRef Love B, Thompson CM, Knapp J. The need to be superman: the psychosocial support challenges of young men affected by cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(1):21–27.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rising CJ, Bol N, Burke-Garcia A, Wright K. The ties that bind: the relationship between prostate cancer (PCa) Stigma, Social Support Network Preference, life stage and health outcomes. PscyhoOncology 2016;25(2):52–53. Rising CJ, Bol N, Burke-Garcia A, Wright K. The ties that bind: the relationship between prostate cancer (PCa) Stigma, Social Support Network Preference, life stage and health outcomes. PscyhoOncology 2016;25(2):52–53.
28.
go back to reference mcCaughan E, Parahoo K, Prue G. Comparing cancer experiences among people with colorectal cancer: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(12):2686–2695.CrossRefPubMed mcCaughan E, Parahoo K, Prue G. Comparing cancer experiences among people with colorectal cancer: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(12):2686–2695.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Sparkes AC, Víctor PS, Brett S. Social comparison processes, narrative mapping and their shaping of the cancer experience: a case study of an elite athlete. Health (London) 2012;16(5):467–488.CrossRef Sparkes AC, Víctor PS, Brett S. Social comparison processes, narrative mapping and their shaping of the cancer experience: a case study of an elite athlete. Health (London) 2012;16(5):467–488.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Brown D, Ferris DJ, Heller D, Keeping LM. Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work. Organ Beh Hum Decis Process. 2007;102(1):59–75.CrossRef Brown D, Ferris DJ, Heller D, Keeping LM. Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work. Organ Beh Hum Decis Process. 2007;102(1):59–75.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Taylor CLC, Kulik J, Badr H, Smith M, Bassen-Engquist K, Penedo F, Gritz ER. A social comparison theory analysis of group composition and efficacy of cancer support group programs. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(2):262–273.CrossRef Taylor CLC, Kulik J, Badr H, Smith M, Bassen-Engquist K, Penedo F, Gritz ER. A social comparison theory analysis of group composition and efficacy of cancer support group programs. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(2):262–273.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Aspinwall LG, Taylor SE. Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;64(5):708–722.CrossRefPubMed Aspinwall LG, Taylor SE. Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;64(5):708–722.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Taylor S, Lobel M. Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychol Rev. 1989;96(4):569–575.CrossRefPubMed Taylor S, Lobel M. Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychol Rev. 1989;96(4):569–575.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Stanton A, Danoff-Burg S, Cameron C, Snider PR, Kirk SB. Social comparison and adjustment to breast cancer: an experimental examination of upward affiliation and downward evaluation. Health Psychol. 1999;18(2):151–158.CrossRefPubMed Stanton A, Danoff-Burg S, Cameron C, Snider PR, Kirk SB. Social comparison and adjustment to breast cancer: an experimental examination of upward affiliation and downward evaluation. Health Psychol. 1999;18(2):151–158.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Heckhausen J. Developmental regulation in adulthood. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999. Heckhausen J. Developmental regulation in adulthood. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
37.
go back to reference Belizzi KM, Blank TO, Oakes CE. Social comparison processes in autobiographies of adult cancer survivors. J Health Psychol. 2006;11(5):777–786.CrossRef Belizzi KM, Blank TO, Oakes CE. Social comparison processes in autobiographies of adult cancer survivors. J Health Psychol. 2006;11(5):777–786.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Meltzer LJ, Rourke MT. Oncology summer camp: benefits of social comparison. Child Health Care 2005;34(4):305–314.CrossRef Meltzer LJ, Rourke MT. Oncology summer camp: benefits of social comparison. Child Health Care 2005;34(4):305–314.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cooper AF, Hankins M, Rixon L, Eaton E, Grunfeld EA. Distinct work-related, clinical and psychological factors predict return to work following treatment in four different cancer types. PsychoOncology 2013;22(3):659–668.CrossRefPubMed Cooper AF, Hankins M, Rixon L, Eaton E, Grunfeld EA. Distinct work-related, clinical and psychological factors predict return to work following treatment in four different cancer types. PsychoOncology 2013;22(3):659–668.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Morrison T, Thomas R. Comparing men and women’s experience following work of work after cancer: a photovoice study. Support Care Cancer 2015;23(10):3015–3023.CrossRefPubMed Morrison T, Thomas R. Comparing men and women’s experience following work of work after cancer: a photovoice study. Support Care Cancer 2015;23(10):3015–3023.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Grunfeld EA, Cooper AF. A longitudinal qualitative study of the experience of working following treatment for gynaecological cancer. Psychooncology 2012;21(1):82–89.CrossRefPubMed Grunfeld EA, Cooper AF. A longitudinal qualitative study of the experience of working following treatment for gynaecological cancer. Psychooncology 2012;21(1):82–89.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Spelten ER, Verbeek JH, Uitterhoeve AL, Ansink AC, van der Lelie J, de Reijke TM, Kammeijer M, de Haes JC, Sprangers MA. Cancer, fatigue and the return of patients to work-a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(11):1562–2156.CrossRefPubMed Spelten ER, Verbeek JH, Uitterhoeve AL, Ansink AC, van der Lelie J, de Reijke TM, Kammeijer M, de Haes JC, Sprangers MA. Cancer, fatigue and the return of patients to work-a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(11):1562–2156.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, Pryce J. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 2007;16(1):17–25.CrossRef Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, Pryce J. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 2007;16(1):17–25.CrossRef
45.
46.
go back to reference Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Bultmann U. Sickness absence and full return to work after cancer: 2-year follow-up of register data for different cancer sites. Psychooncology 2011;20(9), 1001–1006.PubMed Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Bultmann U. Sickness absence and full return to work after cancer: 2-year follow-up of register data for different cancer sites. Psychooncology 2011;20(9), 1001–1006.PubMed
47.
go back to reference Park JH, Park EC, Park JH, Kim SG, Lee SY. Job loss and re-employment of cancer patients in Korean employees: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1302–1309.CrossRefPubMed Park JH, Park EC, Park JH, Kim SG, Lee SY. Job loss and re-employment of cancer patients in Korean employees: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1302–1309.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Hogan BE, Linden W, Najarian B. Social support interventions. Do they work?. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22(3), 381–440.CrossRef Hogan BE, Linden W, Najarian B. Social support interventions. Do they work?. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22(3), 381–440.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Stiwne EE, Ekberg K. The social interaction of return-to-work explored from co-workers experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21–22):1979–1989.CrossRefPubMed Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Stiwne EE, Ekberg K. The social interaction of return-to-work explored from co-workers experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21–22):1979–1989.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cancer Survivors’ Social Context in the Return to Work Process: Narrative Accounts of Social Support and Social Comparison Information
Authors
M. Armaou
L. Schumacher
E. A. Grunfeld
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9735-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2018 Go to the issue