Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016

Employer Policies and Practices to Manage and Prevent Disability: Foreword to the Special Issue

Authors: William S. Shaw, Chris J. Main, Glenn Pransky, Michael K. Nicholas, Johannes R. Anema, Steven J. Linton, the Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose Employer policies and practices have been shown to impact workplace disability, but research in this area has waned in recent years despite an aging workforce, a growing prevalence of chronic health conditions, and a larger proportion of working-age adults on permanent work disability in many jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to describe the background rationale and methodology for an invited conference designed to improve research of employer strategies to curtail work disability. Methods A multidisciplinary team of 26 international researchers with published research in employer-based disability management or related fields were invited to attend a 3-day conference in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The overall goal was to review the status of current research of workplace disability management and prevention, examine its relevance for employer decision-making, compare conceptual frameworks or theoretical perspectives, and recommend future research directions. Working groups were organized and draft manuscripts were prepared in advance. Conference activities included working group presentations and critiques, discussions with a panel of industry consultants and advisors, group interaction and debate, generation of final recommendations, and manuscript revision. Results/Conclusion Six principal domains were established with respect to future research: (a) further elucidation of the key workplace factors that buffer the disabling effects of injury and illness; (b) more innovative and feasible options for workplace intervention; (c) measurement of workplace-relevant disability outcomes; (d) a stronger theoretical framework for understanding the factors behind employer uptake and implementation; (e) a focus on special clinical populations and occupations where disability risk is most troubling; and (f) better representation of workers and employers that reflect the diverse and changing nature of work. Final comments and recommendations of the working groups are presented in the following six articles in this special issue of the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. Conference attendees recommended changes in methodology, collaboration strategies, and theoretical perspectives to improve the practical and scientific impact of future research of employer practices.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Budget of the U.S. Government, Historical Tables, Table 13.1. 2014. Budget of the U.S. Government, Historical Tables, Table 13.1. 2014.
2.
go back to reference U.S. Social Security Adminstration. Fact sheet. February 7, 2013. U.S. Social Security Adminstration. Fact sheet. February 7, 2013.
3.
go back to reference U.S. Social Security Administration. Annual statistical report on the Security Disability Insurance Program. (SSA Publication No. 12-11826), December 2014. U.S. Social Security Administration. Annual statistical report on the Security Disability Insurance Program. (SSA Publication No. 12-11826), December 2014.
7.
go back to reference Brault M, Hootman J, Helmick C, Theis K, Armour B. Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults—United States, 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:421–6. Brault M, Hootman J, Helmick C, Theis K, Armour B. Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults—United States, 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:421–6.
8.
go back to reference Boden L. Occupational injury and illness meet the labor market: lessons from labor economics about lost earnings. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1076:858–70.CrossRefPubMed Boden L. Occupational injury and illness meet the labor market: lessons from labor economics about lost earnings. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1076:858–70.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Alonso J, Vilagut G, Adroher ND, Chatterji S, He Y, Andrade LH, et al. Disability mediates the impact of common conditions on perceived health. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alonso J, Vilagut G, Adroher ND, Chatterji S, He Y, Andrade LH, et al. Disability mediates the impact of common conditions on perceived health. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Schofield D, Shrestha R, Percival R, Passey M, Callender E, Kelly S. The personal and national costs of mental health conditions: impacts on income, taxes, government support payments due to lost labour force participation. BMC Psychiatry. 2006;11:72.CrossRef Schofield D, Shrestha R, Percival R, Passey M, Callender E, Kelly S. The personal and national costs of mental health conditions: impacts on income, taxes, government support payments due to lost labour force participation. BMC Psychiatry. 2006;11:72.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Waddell G, Burton A. Is work good for your health and well-being?. London: TSO; 2006. Waddell G, Burton A. Is work good for your health and well-being?. London: TSO; 2006.
13.
go back to reference Eckleberry N. The injured workman-methods of handling to get him back on the job. Ind Med. 1936;5:557–60. Eckleberry N. The injured workman-methods of handling to get him back on the job. Ind Med. 1936;5:557–60.
14.
go back to reference Akabas S, Gates L, Galvin D. Disability Management: a complete system to reduce costs, increase productivity, meet employer needs, and ensure legal compliance. New York: AMACOM; 1992. Akabas S, Gates L, Galvin D. Disability Management: a complete system to reduce costs, increase productivity, meet employer needs, and ensure legal compliance. New York: AMACOM; 1992.
15.
go back to reference Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, Mcpherson KM, Anema J, Van Poppel MN. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:543–56.CrossRefPubMed Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, Mcpherson KM, Anema J, Van Poppel MN. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:543–56.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Franche R-L, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:525–42.CrossRefPubMed Franche R-L, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:525–42.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Main C, Shaw W. Conceptual, methodological, and measurement challenges in addressing return to work in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. In: Schultz I, Gatchel R, editors. Handbooks in health, work, and disability. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 423–38. Main C, Shaw W. Conceptual, methodological, and measurement challenges in addressing return to work in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. In: Schultz I, Gatchel R, editors. Handbooks in health, work, and disability. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 423–38.
18.
go back to reference Main C, Shaw W, Mitchell J. Towards an approach to return to work interventions in musculoskeletal disorders. In: Schultz I, Gatchel R, editors. Handbooks in health, work, and disability. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 439–57. Main C, Shaw W, Mitchell J. Towards an approach to return to work interventions in musculoskeletal disorders. In: Schultz I, Gatchel R, editors. Handbooks in health, work, and disability. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 439–57.
19.
go back to reference Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:607–31.CrossRefPubMed Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:607–31.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Durand M-J, Corbière M, Coutu M-F, Reinharz D, Albert V. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48:579–89.PubMed Durand M-J, Corbière M, Coutu M-F, Reinharz D, Albert V. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48:579–89.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Gensby U, Labriola M, Irvin E, Amick BI, Lund T. A classification of components of workplace disability management programs: results from a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:220–41.CrossRefPubMed Gensby U, Labriola M, Irvin E, Amick BI, Lund T. A classification of components of workplace disability management programs: results from a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:220–41.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Williams RM, Westmorland M. Perspectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work. 2002;19:87–93.PubMed Williams RM, Westmorland M. Perspectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work. 2002;19:87–93.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Tjulin Å, Maceachen E, Stiwne EE, Ekberg K. The social interaction of return to work explored from co-workers experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1979–89.CrossRefPubMed Tjulin Å, Maceachen E, Stiwne EE, Ekberg K. The social interaction of return to work explored from co-workers experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1979–89.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Anema J, Schellart A, Cassidy J, Loisel P, Veerman T, Van Der Beek A. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:419–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anema J, Schellart A, Cassidy J, Loisel P, Veerman T, Van Der Beek A. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:419–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Kristman V, Shaw W, Boot C, Delclos G, Sullivan M, Ehrhart M. Researching complex and multi-level workplace factors affecting disability and prolonged sickness absence. J Occup Rehabil. (in press). Kristman V, Shaw W, Boot C, Delclos G, Sullivan M, Ehrhart M. Researching complex and multi-level workplace factors affecting disability and prolonged sickness absence. J Occup Rehabil. (in press).
26.
go back to reference Williams-Whitt K, Bültmann U, Amick BI, Munir F, Tveito T, Anema J. Workplace interventions to prevent disability from both the scientific and practice perspectives: a review of the scientific and grey literature. J Occup Rehabil. (in press). Williams-Whitt K, Bültmann U, Amick BI, Munir F, Tveito T, Anema J. Workplace interventions to prevent disability from both the scientific and practice perspectives: a review of the scientific and grey literature. J Occup Rehabil. (in press).
27.
go back to reference Young A, Viikari-Juntura E, Boot C, Chan C, Gimeno D, Linton S. Integrating employer and longitudinal perspectives in outcome assessment in work disability prevention research. J Occup Rehabil. (in press). Young A, Viikari-Juntura E, Boot C, Chan C, Gimeno D, Linton S. Integrating employer and longitudinal perspectives in outcome assessment in work disability prevention research. J Occup Rehabil. (in press).
28.
go back to reference Nicholas MK, Main CJ, Shaw WS, Tetrick LE, Ehrhart MG, Pransky G. Implementation Science and employer disability practices: Should implementation factors be imbedded in research designs? J Occup Rehabil. (in press). Nicholas MK, Main CJ, Shaw WS, Tetrick LE, Ehrhart MG, Pransky G. Implementation Science and employer disability practices: Should implementation factors be imbedded in research designs? J Occup Rehabil. (in press).
29.
go back to reference Pransky G, Besen E, Blanck P, Ekberg K, Fassier J-B, Feuerstein M, et al. Sustaining work participation across the life course: addressing chronic health conditions in research of disability management practices. J Occup Rehabil. (in press). Pransky G, Besen E, Blanck P, Ekberg K, Fassier J-B, Feuerstein M, et al. Sustaining work participation across the life course: addressing chronic health conditions in research of disability management practices. J Occup Rehabil. (in press).
30.
go back to reference Ekberg K, Pransky G, Besen E, Fassier J-B, Feuerstein M, Munir F, et al. New business structures creating organizational opportunities and challenges for work disability prevention. J Occup Rehabil. (in press). Ekberg K, Pransky G, Besen E, Fassier J-B, Feuerstein M, Munir F, et al. New business structures creating organizational opportunities and challenges for work disability prevention. J Occup Rehabil. (in press).
31.
go back to reference Main CJ, Shaw WS, the Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention. Employer policies and practices to manage and prevent disability: conclusion to the Special issue. J Occup Rehabil. (in press). Main CJ, Shaw WS, the Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention. Employer policies and practices to manage and prevent disability: conclusion to the Special issue. J Occup Rehabil. (in press).
Metadata
Title
Employer Policies and Practices to Manage and Prevent Disability: Foreword to the Special Issue
Authors
William S. Shaw
Chris J. Main
Glenn Pransky
Michael K. Nicholas
Johannes R. Anema
Steven J. Linton
the Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9658-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2016 Go to the issue