Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2016

01-03-2016

Measuring the Virtues and Character Traits of Rehabilitation Clients: The Adapted Inventory of Virtues and Strengths

Authors: Jeong Han Kim, Christine A. Reid, Brian McMahon, Rene Gonzalez, Dong Hun Lee, Phillip Keck

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose To develop the Adapted Inventory of Virtues and Strengths (AIVS), a measure of rehabilitation clients’ virtues and character traits. Methods Test items were devised through a multi-step procedure, and exploratory factor analysis was employed to derive the factor structure of the AIVS. Item-total correlation and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) were examined to test reliability of the AIVS. Results AIVS subscales include Emotional Transcendence, Practical Wisdom, Integrity, Courage, and Commitment to Action. Construct validity of this measure was evaluated by correlating AIVS factors with measures of resilience, life satisfaction, and four types of well-being: physical, psychological, financial, and family and social well-being. AIVS subscales of Emotional Transcendence and Commitment to Action were moderately correlated with life satisfaction and three well-being areas, including family and social, physical, and psychological life. Most of the correlation coefficients between AIVS Practical Wisdom, Courage and Integrity factors and measures of life satisfaction and well-being fell below r = .3. However, greater correlations were found between all AIVS factors and resilience. Reliability information was examined through internal consistency (coefficient alpha) for each AIVS subscale, as well as examination of item-total correlation analysis within each subscale. Internal consistency estimates for AIVS subscales ranged from .77 to .84. Conclusion The AIVS is a reliable measure when used with the studied sample; implications for studying virtue and character strengths in rehabilitation, as well as potential for clinical use of the AIVS, are addressed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim JH, Keck PS, Miller DJ, Gonzalez R. Introduction to positive psychology: overview and controversies. J Asia Pac Couns. 2012;2(1):45–60.CrossRef Kim JH, Keck PS, Miller DJ, Gonzalez R. Introduction to positive psychology: overview and controversies. J Asia Pac Couns. 2012;2(1):45–60.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fowers BJ. Virtue and psychology: pursuing excellence in ordinary practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005.CrossRef Fowers BJ. Virtue and psychology: pursuing excellence in ordinary practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character strengths and virtues: a classification and handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character strengths and virtues: a classification and handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
4.
go back to reference Adams RM. A theory of virtue: excellence in being for the good. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRef Adams RM. A theory of virtue: excellence in being for the good. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Matthews MD, Eid J, Kelly D, Bailey JK, Peterson C. Character strengths and virtues of developing military leaders: an international comparison. Milit Psychol. 2006;18(Suppl.):S57–68.CrossRef Matthews MD, Eid J, Kelly D, Bailey JK, Peterson C. Character strengths and virtues of developing military leaders: an international comparison. Milit Psychol. 2006;18(Suppl.):S57–68.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shimai S, Otake K, Park N, Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Convergence of character strengths in American and Japanese young adults. J Happiness Stud. 2006;7(3):311–22.CrossRef Shimai S, Otake K, Park N, Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Convergence of character strengths in American and Japanese young adults. J Happiness Stud. 2006;7(3):311–22.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Linley PA, Maltby J, Wood AM, Joseph S, Harrington S, Peterson C, Park N, Seligman MEP. Character strengths in the United Kingdom: the VIA Inventory of strengths. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;43(2):341–51.CrossRef Linley PA, Maltby J, Wood AM, Joseph S, Harrington S, Peterson C, Park N, Seligman MEP. Character strengths in the United Kingdom: the VIA Inventory of strengths. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;43(2):341–51.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Miller D. Character strengths and virtues in relation to well-being in gay and lesbian individuals [Master’s thesis]. Muncie, Indiana: Ball State University. Available from: Ball State University E-Reserve; 2010. Miller D. Character strengths and virtues in relation to well-being in gay and lesbian individuals [Master’s thesis]. Muncie, Indiana: Ball State University. Available from: Ball State University E-Reserve; 2010.
12.
go back to reference Keck P. New frontiers in rehabilitation psychology: Scale development for the assessment of positive traits in individuals with physical disabilities [Master’s Thesis]. Muncie, Indiana: Ball State University; 2011 Keck P. New frontiers in rehabilitation psychology: Scale development for the assessment of positive traits in individuals with physical disabilities [Master’s Thesis]. Muncie, Indiana: Ball State University; 2011
13.
go back to reference Kim JH. Measuring positive traits of rehabilitation clients to aid their pursuit of excellence. Paper presented at: The National Council on Rehabilitation Education Conference. California, USA; 2014 March 12–14 Kim JH. Measuring positive traits of rehabilitation clients to aid their pursuit of excellence. Paper presented at: The National Council on Rehabilitation Education Conference. California, USA; 2014 March 12–14
14.
go back to reference Monette D, Sullivan T, DeJong C. Applied social research: a tool for the human services. Boston: Brooks/Cole; 2010. Monette D, Sullivan T, DeJong C. Applied social research: a tool for the human services. Boston: Brooks/Cole; 2010.
15.
go back to reference Friborg O, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge J. H. Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological construct: a psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40(5):873–884. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.015.CrossRef Friborg O, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge J. H. Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological construct: a psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40(5):873–884. doi:10.​1016/​j.​paid.​2005.​08.​015.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Van Beuningen J. The Satisfaction with Life Scale examining construct validity. Discussion paper. Statistics Netherlands. CBS: Den Haag/Heerlen; 2012. Van Beuningen J. The Satisfaction with Life Scale examining construct validity. Discussion paper. Statistics Netherlands. CBS: Den Haag/Heerlen; 2012.
20.
go back to reference Rubin SE, Chan F, Bishop M, Miller S. Psychometric validation of the Sense of Well-Being Inventory for program evaluation in rehabilitation. Prof Rehabil. 2003;11(2):54–9. Rubin SE, Chan F, Bishop M, Miller S. Psychometric validation of the Sense of Well-Being Inventory for program evaluation in rehabilitation. Prof Rehabil. 2003;11(2):54–9.
21.
go back to reference Catalano D, Kim JH, Ditchman NM, Shin HU, Chan F. Measurement structure of the Sense of Well-Being Inventory in a sample of persons with spinal cord injuries. Aust J Rehabil Couns. 2010;16(2):57–72.CrossRef Catalano D, Kim JH, Ditchman NM, Shin HU, Chan F. Measurement structure of the Sense of Well-Being Inventory in a sample of persons with spinal cord injuries. Aust J Rehabil Couns. 2010;16(2):57–72.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bartholomew DJ, Steele F, Moustaki I, Galbraith JI. The analysis and interpretation of multivariate data for social scientists. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2002. Bartholomew DJ, Steele F, Moustaki I, Galbraith JI. The analysis and interpretation of multivariate data for social scientists. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2002.
23.
go back to reference Cohen J 2nd, editor. Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral science. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates; 1988. Cohen J 2nd, editor. Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral science. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
24.
go back to reference Vash CL, Crewe NM 2nd, editors. Psychology of disability. Berlin: Springer; 2004. Vash CL, Crewe NM 2nd, editors. Psychology of disability. Berlin: Springer; 2004.
28.
go back to reference Rapp CA, Saleebey D, Sullivan WP. The future of strengths-based social work. Adv Social Work. 2005;6(1):79–90. Rapp CA, Saleebey D, Sullivan WP. The future of strengths-based social work. Adv Social Work. 2005;6(1):79–90.
Metadata
Title
Measuring the Virtues and Character Traits of Rehabilitation Clients: The Adapted Inventory of Virtues and Strengths
Authors
Jeong Han Kim
Christine A. Reid
Brian McMahon
Rene Gonzalez
Dong Hun Lee
Phillip Keck
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9619-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2016 Go to the issue