Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-09-2013

Reliability and Safety of Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Whiplash Associated Disorders

Authors: M. A. Trippolini, M. F. Reneman, B. Jansen, P. U. Dijkstra, J. H. B. Geertzen

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2013

Abstract

Introduction Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) are a burden for both individuals and society. It is recommended to evaluate patients with WAD at risk of chronification to enhance rehabilitation and promote an early return to work. In patients with low back pain (LBP), functional capacity evaluation (FCE) contributes to clinical decisions regarding fitness-for-work. FCE should have demonstrated sufficient clinimetric properties. Reliability and safety of FCE for patients with WAD is unknown. Methods Thirty-two participants (11 females and 21 males; mean age 39.6 years) with WAD (Grade I or II) were included. The FCE consisted of 12 tests, including material handling, hand grip strength, repetitive arm movements, static arm activities, walking speed, and a 3 min step test. Overall the FCE duration was 60 min. The test–retest interval was 7 days. Interclass correlations (model 1) (ICCs) and limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. Safety was assessed by a Pain Response Questionnaire, observation criteria and heart rate monitoring. Results ICCs ranged between 0.57 (3 min step test) and 0.96 (short two-handed carry). LoA relative to mean performance ranged between 15 % (50 m walking test) and 57 % (lifting waist to overhead). Pain reactions after WAD FCE decreased within days. Observations and heart rate measurements fell within the safety criteria. Conclusions The reliability of the WAD FCE was moderate in two tests, good in five tests and excellent in five tests. Safety-criteria were fulfilled. Interpretation at the patient level should be performed with care because LoA were substantial.

Available only for authorised users

Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20:1S–73S.

Ferrari R, Russell AS, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD. A re-examination of the whiplash associated disorders (WAD) as a systemic illness. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1337–42.PubMedCrossRef

Radanov BP, di Stefano G, Schnidrig A, Ballinari P. Role of psychosocial stress in recovery from common whiplash [see comment]. Lancet. 1991;338:712–5.PubMedCrossRef

Chappuis G, Soltermann B. Accident rates and Costs of Whiplash Associated Disorders. A Swiss pecularity? Rev Med Suisse. 2006;6:398–406.

Holm LW, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Hogg-Johnson S, Cote P, Guzman J, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders after traffic collisions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:S52–59.

Kamper SJ, Rebbeck TJ, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Sterling M. Course and prognostic factors of whiplash: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2008;138:617–29.PubMedCrossRef

Strebel H, Ettlin T, Annoni J, Caravatti M, Jan S, Gianella C, et al. Diagnostics and therapeutic approach in the acute phase of whiplash associated disorders. Guidelines of the Swiss WAD Task Force. Schweiz Med Forum. 2002;2:119–25.

Stöckli H, Ettlin T, Gysi F, Knüsel O, Marelli R. B S [Diagnostics and therapeutic approach in the chronic phase of whiplash associated disorders]. Schweiz Med Forum. 2005;5:1182–7.

Genovese E, Galper JS. Guide to the evaluation of functional ability: how to request, interpret, and apply functional capacity evaluations. ed: American Medical Association, 2009.

10.

Kuijer PP, Gouttebarge V, Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Frings-Dresen MH. Are performance-based measures predictive of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011;85:109–23.PubMedCrossRef

11.

U.S. Department of Labor. The revised handbook for analyzing jobs. 4th ed. Indianapolis: JIST Works, Inc.; 1991.

12.

Soer R, van der Schans CP, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Towards consensus in operational definitions in functional capacity evaluation: a Delphi Survey. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:389–400.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Reneman M, Wittink H, Gross DP. The scientific status of functional capacity evaluation. In Genovese E, Galper JS eds. Guide to the evaluation of functional ability: how to request, interpret, and apply functional capacity evaluations: American Medical Association, 2009:393–420.

14.

Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:207–18.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Reneman MF, Brouwer S, Meinema A, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW. Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in healthy adults. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14:295–305.PubMedCrossRef

16.

van Ittersum MW, Bieleman HJ, Reneman MF, Oosterveld FG, Groothoff JW, van der Schans CP. Functional capacity evaluation in subjects with early osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee; is two-day testing needed? J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:238–44.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Soer R, Gerrits EH, Reneman MF. Test-retest reliability of a WRULD functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. Work. 2006;26:273–80.PubMed

18.

Reesink DD, Jorritsma W, Reneman MF. Basis for a functional capacity evaluation methodology for patients with work-related neck disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:436–49.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. How to assess physical work-ability with Functional Capacity Evaluation methods in a more specific and efficient way? Work. 2010;37:111–5.PubMed

20.

Gross DP, Battie MC, Asante AK. Evaluation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation: less may be best. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:422–35.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Reneman MF, Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Preuper HR, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, et al. Symptom increase following a functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: an explorative study of safety. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:197–205.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Gibson L, Strong J. Safety issues in functional capacity evaluation: findings from a trial of a new approach for evaluating clients with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:237–51.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Denier-Bont F, Fischer V, Oesch P, Oliveri M. Functional Capacity Evaluation: Course manual. Bellikon: Verein IG Ergonomie, Swiss Association of Rehabilitation; 2007.

24.

Soer R, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, van der Schans CP, Reesink DD, Reneman MF. Pain response of healthy workers following a functional capacity evaluation and implications for clinical interpretation. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:290–8.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Isernhagen SJ. Functional capacity evaluation: rational, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2:157–68.CrossRef

26.

Harding VR, Williams AC, Richardson PH, Nicholas MK, Jackson JL, Richardson IH, et al. The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain. 1994;58:367–75.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Golding LA. YMCA fitness testing and assessment manual. 4th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2000.

28.

Pool JJ, Ostelo RW, Hoving JL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Minimal clinically important change of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:3047–3051.

29.

Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1990;17:1022–4.PubMed

30.

MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:400–17.PubMed

31.

Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:69–77.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Snaith RP, Zigmond AS. HADS: hospital anxiety and depression scaleed. Windsor: NFER Nelson; 1994.

33.

Borloz S, Trippolini MA, Ballabeni P, Luthi F, Deriaz O. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, internal consistency and validation of the spinal function sort (SFS) for French- and German-speaking patients with back complaints. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:387–93.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med. 1990;20:337–40.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Reneman MF, Soer R, Gerrits EH. Basis for an FCE methodology for patients with work-related upper limb disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:353–63.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Innes E. Handgrip strength testing: a review of the literature. Aust Occup Ther J. 1999;46:120–40.CrossRef

38.

Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:269–75.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Smeets RJ, Hijdra HJ, Kester AD, Hitters MW, Knottnerus JA. The usability of six physical performance tasks in a rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:989–97.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Lygren H, Dragesund T, Joensen J, Ask T, Moe-Nilssen R. Test-retest reliability of the Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:1070–1074.

41.

Altman DG. Some common prolems in medical research. In: Altman DG, editor. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991. p. 396–403.

42.

Keller A, Hellesnes J, Brox JI. Reliability of the isokinetic trunk extensor test, Biering-Sorensen test, and Astrand bicycle test: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficient and critical difference in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:771–777.

43.

Gross DP, Battie MC. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2002;82:364–71.PubMed

44.

Portney LG, Watkins MP. Reliability. Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Health, 2000:67.

45.

Lomond KV, Cote JN. Shoulder functional assessments in persons with chronic neck/shoulder pain and healthy subjects: reliability and effects of movement repetition. Work. 2011;38:169–80.PubMed

46.

Population size and population composition [Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland], 2011. Available from: http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/01/02.html. Accessed 10.12.2011.

47.

Burrus C, Ballabeni P, Deriaz O, Gobelet C, Luthi F. Predictors of nonresponse in a questionnaire-based outcome study of vocational rehabilitation patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1499–505.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LM. Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation. Work. 1999;12:145–50.PubMed

49.

Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Hogg-Johnson S, Cote P, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S, et al. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32:S97–107.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Reliability and Safety of Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Whiplash Associated Disorders
Authors: M. A. Trippolini
M. F. Reneman
B. Jansen
P. U. Dijkstra
J. H. B. Geertzen
Publication date: 01-09-2013
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9403-z

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Reliability and Safety of Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Whiplash Associated Disorders

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Spine Kinematics Predict Symptom and Lost Time Recurrence: How Much Recovery is Enough?

Psychometric Properties of the Readiness for Return to Work Scale in Inpatient Occupational Rehabilitation in Norway

Quantification of the Safe Maximal Lift in Functional Capacity Evaluations: Comparison of Muscle Recruitment Using SEMG and Therapist Observation

The Predictive Validity of OMPQ on the Rehabilitation Outcomes for Patients with Acute and Subacute Non-Specific LBP in a Chinese Population

Methods in Measuring Return to Work: A Comparison of Measures of Return to Work Following Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease

Leadership Effectiveness: A Supervisor’s Approach to Manage Return to Work