Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2009

Open Access 01-06-2009

Stuck at the Bottom Rung: Occupational Characteristics of Workers with Disabilities

Author: H. Stephen Kaye

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction The proportion of workers reporting disabilities varies tremendously across occupations. Although differences in the occupational distributions may partly explain the large disparities in earnings and job security between workers with and without disabilities, little is known about the reasons that workers with disabilities are underrepresented in certain occupations and overrepresented in others. Methods Using a large, national survey of the US population combined with official data on the skill and experience requirements and occupational risks of 269 occupations, a multilevel regression analysis was performed to identify occupational and individual factors that influence the representation of workers with disabilities across occupations. Models of overall, sensory, mobility, and cognitive disability were constructed for working-age labor force participants, as were models of overall disability for younger, in-between, and older workers. Results At the occupational level, reported disability is negatively associated with occupational requirements for information and communication skills and with the amount of prior work experience that is required, after controlling for individual factors such as age and educational attainment. Little relationship is found between disability status and a set of occupational risk factors. These findings generally hold true across disability types and age groups. Conclusions Even after taking into account their lower average educational attainment, workers with disabilities appear to be disproportionately relegated to entry-level occupations that do not emphasize the better-remunerated job skills. Underemployment results in lower wages and less job security and stability. Possible reasons include employer discrimination, low expectations, deficits in relevant skills or experience, and work disincentives.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Steinmetz E. Americans with disabilities: 2002. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census; 2006. Report No P70-107. Steinmetz E. Americans with disabilities: 2002. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census; 2006. Report No P70-107.
3.
go back to reference Yelin EH, Trupin L. Disability and the characteristics of employment. Monthly Labor Rev. 2003;126(5):20–31. Yelin EH, Trupin L. Disability and the characteristics of employment. Monthly Labor Rev. 2003;126(5):20–31.
4.
6.
go back to reference Schur L, Kruse D, Blasi J, Blanck PD. Is Disability disabling all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Ind Relat. 2009;48(3):381–410.CrossRef Schur L, Kruse D, Blasi J, Blanck PD. Is Disability disabling all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Ind Relat. 2009;48(3):381–410.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference US Bureau of Labor Statistics. National Compensation Survey. Occupational Wages in the United States, June 2006. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor; 2007. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. National Compensation Survey. Occupational Wages in the United States, June 2006. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor; 2007.
8.
go back to reference Baldwin ML, Johnson WA. A critical review of studies of discrimination against workers with disabilities. In: Rodgers WM III, editor. Handbook on the economics of discrimination. Northampton, MA: Edgar Elgar Publishing; 2006. p. 119–57. Baldwin ML, Johnson WA. A critical review of studies of discrimination against workers with disabilities. In: Rodgers WM III, editor. Handbook on the economics of discrimination. Northampton, MA: Edgar Elgar Publishing; 2006. p. 119–57.
9.
go back to reference US Census Bureau. American community survey operations plan: release 1. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2003. US Census Bureau. American community survey operations plan: release 1. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2003.
10.
go back to reference Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS, Cheong YF, Congdon R. HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 2004. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS, Cheong YF, Congdon R. HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 2004.
11.
go back to reference Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2008. p. 248. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2008. p. 248.
13.
go back to reference Kaye HS. Disability Watch, Volume 2: The status of people with disabilities in the United States. Oakland, CA: Disabliity Rights Advocates, Inc.; 2001. Kaye HS. Disability Watch, Volume 2: The status of people with disabilities in the United States. Oakland, CA: Disabliity Rights Advocates, Inc.; 2001.
14.
go back to reference Dray-Spira R, Gueguen A, Lert F. Disease severity, self-reported experience of workplace discrimination and employment loss during the course of chronic HIV disease: differences according to gender and education. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(2):112–9. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.034363.PubMedCrossRef Dray-Spira R, Gueguen A, Lert F. Disease severity, self-reported experience of workplace discrimination and employment loss during the course of chronic HIV disease: differences according to gender and education. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(2):112–9. doi:10.​1136/​oem.​2007.​034363.PubMedCrossRef
16.
20.
go back to reference Schartz HA, Hendricks DJ, Blanck P. Workplace accommodations: evidence based outcomes. Work. 2006;27(4):345–54.PubMed Schartz HA, Hendricks DJ, Blanck P. Workplace accommodations: evidence based outcomes. Work. 2006;27(4):345–54.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Stuck at the Bottom Rung: Occupational Characteristics of Workers with Disabilities
Author
H. Stephen Kaye
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9175-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2009 Go to the issue