Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Medical Systems
Published in: Journal of Medical Systems 7/2018

01-07-2018 | Patient Facing Systems

Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics

Authors: Calvin Or, Ellen Tong, Joseph Tan, Summer Chan

Published in: Journal of Medical Systems | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The health care reform initiative led by the Hong Kong government’s Food and Health Bureau has started the implementation of an electronic sharing platform to provide an information infrastructure that enables public hospitals and private clinics to share their electronic medical records (EMRs) for improved access to patients’ health care information. However, previous attempts to convince the private clinics to adopt EMRs to document health information have faced challenges, as the EMR adoption has been voluntary. The lack of electronic data shared by private clinics carries direct impacts to the efficacy of electronic record sharing between public and private healthcare providers. To increase the likelihood of buy-in, it is essential to proactively identify the users’ and organizations’ needs and capabilities before large-scale implementation. As part of the reform initiative, this study examined factors affecting the adoption of EMRs in small or solo private general practice clinics, by analyzing the experiences and opinions of the physicians and clinical assistants during the pilot implementation of the technology, with the purpose to learn from it before full-scale rollout. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 physicians and clinical assistants from seven small or solo private general practice clinics to evaluate their experiences, expectations, and opinions regarding the deployment of EMRs. Interview transcripts were content analyzed to identify key factors. Factors affecting the adoption of EMRs to record and manage health care information were identified as follows: system interface design; system functions; stability and reliability of hardware, software, and computing networks; financial and time costs; task and outcome performance, work practice, and clinical workflow; physical space in clinics; trust in technology; users’ information technology literacy; training and technical support; and social and organizational influences. The factors are interrelated with the others. The adoption factors identified are multifaceted, ranging from technological characteristics, clinician-technology interactions, skills and knowledge, and the user-workflow-technology fit. Other findings, which have been relatively underrepresented in previous studies, contribute unique insights about the influence of work and social environment on the adoption of EMRs, including limited clinic space and the effects of physicians’ decision to use the technology on clinical staffs’ adoption decisions. Potential strategies to address the concerns, overcome adoption barriers, and define relevant policies are discussed.
Literature
1.
2.
Berg, M., Langenberg, C., vd Berg, I., and Kwakkernaat, J., Considerations for sociotechnical design: Experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. Int. J. Med. Inform. 52(1):243–251, 1998.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Berkowitz, L., Physician adoption strategies. In: Carter, J. H. (Ed.), Electronic health records: a guide for clinicians and administrators. Washington, DC: American College of Physicians, 2008, 249–274.
4.
Boonstra, A., and Broekhuis, M., Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv. Res. 10(1):231, 2010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Boonstra, A., Versluis, A., and Vos, J. F., Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14(1):370, 2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Chan, F. Y., Sun, D. T., Or, C., and So, H. Y., Feasibility of usability test in human error prone infusion device–a pilot study. Paper presented at the 33rd International Scientific Meeting on Quality and Safety in Health Care, Tokyo, Japan, October 16–19, 2016.
7.
8.
Collier, R., National physician survey: EMR use at 75%. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 187(1):E17–E18, 2015.CrossRef
9.
Ford, E. W., Menachemi, N., and Phillips, M. T., Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: When will health care be paperless? J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13(1):106–112, 2006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Hackos, J. T., and Redish, J., User and Task Analysis For Interface Design. New York: Wiley, 1998.
11.
Hong Kong Legislative Council Panel on Health Services, Administration's paper on development of a territory-wide electronic healthcare record sharing system. LC Paper No. CB(2) 1006/08–09(03), 1–43, (2009).
12.
Iakovidis, I., Towards personal health record: Current situation, obstacles and trends in implementation of electronic healthcare record in Europe. Int. J. Med. Inform. 52(1):105–115, 1998.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Institute of Medicine, Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
14.
Kandogan, E., and Shneiderman, B., Elastic Windows: a hierarchical multi-window World-Wide Web browser The Craft of Information Visualization (pp. 211–219): Elsevier, (2003).
15.
Karsh, B., Beyond usability: Designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. BMJ Qual. Saf. 13(5):388–394, 2004.CrossRef
16.
Karsh, B., Holden, R. J., and Or, C. K. L., Human factors and ergonomics of health information technology implementation. In: Carayon, P. (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care and Patient Safety. 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2011, 249–264.
17.
Keshavjee, K., Manji, A., Singh, B., and Pairaudeau, N., Failure of electronic medical records in Canada: A failure of policy or a failure of technology. Stud. Health. Technol. Inform. 143:107–114, 2009.
18.
Kruse, C. S., Kristof, C., Jones, B., Mitchell, E., and Martinez, A., Barriers to electronic health record adoption: A systematic literature review. J. Med. Syst. 40(12):252, 2016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Lambrew, J., More than half of doctors now use electronic health records thanks to administration policies. The White House Blog, 2013.
20.
Larkin, K., and Kelliher, A., Designing flexible EMR systems for recording and summarizing doctor-patient interactions (p. 1609–1614). Paper presented at the CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011.
21.
Larson, K., and Czerwinski, M., Web page design: Implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval (p. 25–32). Paper presented at the 1998 SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, 1998.
22.
Lei, J., Sockolow, P., Guan, P., Meng, Q., and Zhang, J., A comparison of electronic health records at two major Peking University Hospitals in China to United States meaningful use objectives. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 13(1):96, 2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
24.
Ludwick, D. A., and Doucette, J., Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78(1):22–31, 2009.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Miller, R. H., and Sim, I., Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions. Health Aff. 23(2):116–126, 2004.CrossRef
26.
27.
Montague, E., and Lee, J. D., Trust in health technologies. In: Carayon, P. (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care and Patient Safety. 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2011, 281–291.
28.
Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic Press, 1993.
29.
Nielsen, J., Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen, J., Mack, R. L. (Eds), Usability Inspection Methods. New York: Wiley, 1994, 25–62.
30.
Or, C., Pre-implementation case studies evaluating workflow and informatics challenges in private primary care clinics for electronic medical record implementation. Int. J. Healthc. Inf. Syst. Inform. 10(4):56–64, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Or, C., and Tao, D., Usability study of a computer-based self-management system for older adults with chronic diseases. JMIR Res. Protoc. 1(2):e13, 2012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
33.
Saleem, J. J., Russ, A. L., Justice, C. F., Hagg, H., Ebright, P. R., Woodbridge, P. A., and Doebbeling, B. N., Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78(9):618–628, 2009.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Samuel, C. A., Area-level factors associated with electronic health record adoption and meaningful use in the Regional Extension Center Program. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 21(6):976–983, 2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Shneiderman, B., The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. Paper presented at the IEEE Conference on Visual Languages (p. 336–343), Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1996
36.
Shneiderman, B., and Plaisant, C., Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. 4th edition. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2004.
37.
Simon, S. R., Kaushal, R., Cleary, P. D., Jenter, C. A., Volk, L. A., Poon, E. G. et al., Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: A statewide survey. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 14(1):110–117, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Sittig, D. F., and Singh, H., Eight rights of safe electronic health record use. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 302(10):1111–1113, 2009.CrossRef
39.
Song, J., Trust in health infomediaries. Decis. Support. Syst. 43(2):390–407, 2007.CrossRef
40.
Steinbrook, R., Health care and the American recovery and reinvestment act. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(11):1057–1060, 2009.CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
Thomas, D. R., A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am. J. Eval. 27(2):237–246, 2006.CrossRef
43.
44.
Metadata
Title
Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics
Authors
Calvin Or
Ellen Tong
Joseph Tan
Summer Chan
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0148-5598
Electronic ISSN: 1573-689X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0971-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Journal of Medical Systems 7/2018 Go to the issue

Mobile & Wireless Health

Smartphone Applications to Perform Body Balance Assessment: a Standardized Review

Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Using OPC and HL7 Standards to Incorporate an Industrial Big Data Historian in a Health IT Environment

Patient Facing Systems

Profiling Lung Cancer Patients Using Electronic Health Records

Education & Training

An Innovative Approach to Improve Communication and Reduce Physician Stress and Burnout in a University Affiliated Residency Program

Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Assessing the Relative Performance of Nurses Using Data Envelopment Analysis Matrix (DEAM)

Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Improving the Patient-Clinician Interface of Clinical Trials through Health Informatics Technologies