Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Systems 4/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Paper

Technology Enabled Knowledge Exchange: Development of a Conceptual Framework

Authors: Mowafa Househ, Andre Kushniruk, Denise Cloutier-Fisher, Bruce Carleton

Published in: Journal of Medical Systems | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

As the need for knowledge exchange grows, so does the need to find new ways for researchers, decision makers, and educators to communicate and collaborate with each other on how to improve drug prescribing and use. In this paper, we introduce a conceptual framework for evaluating knowledge exchange activities within drug policy groups. The framework is grounded in the information and communication technologies (ICT) and knowledge exchange literature and is composed of various inputs, processes, and outputs. Inputs into the framework are research task, communication medium (face-to-face, teleconferencing, and web-conferencing), group characteristics (size, experience, goals, and roles), and context (description of linkage and exchange within the policy domain and group type). The inputs will affect how the social interaction process, knowledge brokering process, and information exchange process between drug policy groups (decision-makers, researchers, and educators) develop as part of the linkage and exchange knowledge exchange process. The inputs and how they shape the linkage and exchange knowledge exchange process will lead to different levels of engagement outputs and linkage and exchange outputs. Results of a refined conceptual framework based on a 2-year case study are also provided in the model where new inputs and processes are introduced.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berg, B., Qualitative research methodology, 3rd edition. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1989. Berg, B., Qualitative research methodology, 3rd edition. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1989.
2.
go back to reference Burke, K., Aytes, K., and Chidambaram, L., Media effect on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer-supported workgroups. Inf. Technol. People. 14 (2)122–141, 2001.CrossRef Burke, K., Aytes, K., and Chidambaram, L., Media effect on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer-supported workgroups. Inf. Technol. People. 14 (2)122–141, 2001.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Clawson, V., Bostrom, R., and Anson, R., The role of the facilitator in computer-supported meetings. Small Group Res. 24 (4)524–547, 1993.CrossRef Clawson, V., Bostrom, R., and Anson, R., The role of the facilitator in computer-supported meetings. Small Group Res. 24 (4)524–547, 1993.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dennis, A. R., Information exchange and use in small group decision-making. Small Group Res. 27 (4)532–550, 1996.CrossRef Dennis, A. R., Information exchange and use in small group decision-making. Small Group Res. 27 (4)532–550, 1996.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Huberman, M., Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. Am. Educ. Res. J. 27 (2)363–391, 1990. Huberman, M., Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. Am. Educ. Res. J. 27 (2)363–391, 1990.
8.
go back to reference Kondracki, N., Wellman, N., and Amundson, D., Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 34 (4)224–230, 2002.CrossRef Kondracki, N., Wellman, N., and Amundson, D., Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 34 (4)224–230, 2002.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lau, F., and Hayward, R., Building a virtual network in a community health research training program. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7:361–377, 2000.CrossRef Lau, F., and Hayward, R., Building a virtual network in a community health research training program. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7:361–377, 2000.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Landry, R., Lamara, M., and Amari, N., Climbing the ladder of research utilization. Sci. Commun. 22:396–422, 2001.CrossRef Landry, R., Lamara, M., and Amari, N., Climbing the ladder of research utilization. Sci. Commun. 22:396–422, 2001.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lenfant, C., Shattuck lecture—Clinical research to clinical practice—Lost in translation? N. Engl. J. Med. 349 (9)868–874. Lenfant, C., Shattuck lecture—Clinical research to clinical practice—Lost in translation? N. Engl. J. Med. 349 (9)868–874.
12.
go back to reference Lomas, J., Using “Linkage and Exchange” to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation: Encouraging partnerships between researchers and policy makers is the goal of a promising new Canadian initiative. Health Aff. 18:236–240, 2000.CrossRef Lomas, J., Using “Linkage and Exchange” to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation: Encouraging partnerships between researchers and policy makers is the goal of a promising new Canadian initiative. Health Aff. 18:236–240, 2000.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference McGrath, J. E., Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1984. McGrath, J. E., Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1984.
14.
go back to reference Mehta, V., Kushniruk, A., Gauthier, S., Richard, Y., Deland, E., Veilleux, M., and Grant, A., Use of evidence in the process of practice change in a clinical team: A study forming part of the Autocontrol project. Int. J. Med. Inf. 51:169–180, 1998.CrossRef Mehta, V., Kushniruk, A., Gauthier, S., Richard, Y., Deland, E., Veilleux, M., and Grant, A., Use of evidence in the process of practice change in a clinical team: A study forming part of the Autocontrol project. Int. J. Med. Inf. 51:169–180, 1998.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Miranda, M. S., and Bostrom, P. R., The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 10 (3)63–96, 1993. Miranda, M. S., and Bostrom, P. R., The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 10 (3)63–96, 1993.
16.
go back to reference Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., and George, J. F., Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Commun. ACM. 34 (7)40–61, 1991.CrossRef Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., and George, J. F., Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Commun. ACM. 34 (7)40–61, 1991.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pinsonneault, A., and Kramer, K. L., The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decis. Support Syst. 5 (2)197–216, 1989.CrossRef Pinsonneault, A., and Kramer, K. L., The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decis. Support Syst. 5 (2)197–216, 1989.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rich, R. F., Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outputs. Knowl. Policy: Int. J. Knowl. Transf. Util. 3:11–24, 1997. Rich, R. F., Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outputs. Knowl. Policy: Int. J. Knowl. Transf. Util. 3:11–24, 1997.
19.
go back to reference Rich, R., Knowledge creation diffusions and utilization. Creation, Diffusion, Utilization. 12 (3)319–337, 1991.MathSciNet Rich, R., Knowledge creation diffusions and utilization. Creation, Diffusion, Utilization. 12 (3)319–337, 1991.MathSciNet
20.
go back to reference Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W., Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. J. Dist. Educ. 14 (3)51–70, 2001. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W., Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. J. Dist. Educ. 14 (3)51–70, 2001.
21.
go back to reference Sambamurthy, V., Poole, M. S., and Kelly, J., The effects of variations in GDSS capabilities on decision making processes in groups. Small Group Res. 24 (4)523–546, 1993.CrossRef Sambamurthy, V., Poole, M. S., and Kelly, J., The effects of variations in GDSS capabilities on decision making processes in groups. Small Group Res. 24 (4)523–546, 1993.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Straus, S., Technology, group process and group outputs: Testing the connections in computer mediated and face-to-face groups. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 12 (3)227–266, 1997.CrossRef Straus, S., Technology, group process and group outputs: Testing the connections in computer mediated and face-to-face groups. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 12 (3)227–266, 1997.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tellis, W., Introduction to case study. The Qualitative Report. 3(2). Retrieved, 1997. Tellis, W., Introduction to case study. The Qualitative Report. 3(2). Retrieved, 1997.
25.
go back to reference Yin, R. K., Case study research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2003. Yin, R. K., Case study research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2003.
Metadata
Title
Technology Enabled Knowledge Exchange: Development of a Conceptual Framework
Authors
Mowafa Househ
Andre Kushniruk
Denise Cloutier-Fisher
Bruce Carleton
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0148-5598
Electronic ISSN: 1573-689X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9408-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Journal of Medical Systems 4/2011 Go to the issue