Top

Published in:

01-02-2018 | Original Paper

College Student Attitudes Towards “Smart” Guns: Results from a Nationwide Survey

Authors: Lacey N. Wallace, Kaylin C. Dunn

Published in: Journal of Community Health | Issue 1/2018

Abstract

Existing studies focusing on “smart” guns, weapons that can only be fired by an authorized user, have focused largely on overall views towards the topic. Little is known about how views differ within key demographics or why Americans feel positively or negatively towards smart guns. This study used data from a nationwide web survey of 520 college students to address these concerns. Multinomial regression was used to identify patterns of smart gun preference in quantitative data. Respondents’ open-ended reasoning for their views was examined through common themes and descriptive statistics. About half of the sample preferred smart guns over traditional firearms, with support more likely among females and liberals. Those with more advanced academic standing were more likely to have a traditional gun preference. The sample did not rank cost as a significant concern. Child protection was a much less prominent theme than concerns over (un)authorized users.

Bazinet, M. (2013). Americans skeptical of “smart guns”; Oppose their legislative mandate, national poll finds. Retrieved November 12, 2013 from http://www.nssf.org/newsroom/releases/show.cfm?PR=111213_americans-skeptical-of-wont-buy-smart-guns.cfm&path=2013.

Biofire Technologies. (2017). Biofire Technologies. Retrieved from https://biofire.io/.

Boots, D. P., Bihari, J., & Elliott, E. (2009). The state of the castle: An overview of recent trends in state castle doctrine legislation and public policy. Criminal Justice Review, 34(4), 515–535.CrossRef

Borrup, K., Heneghan, K., Herdandez-Arranz, G., Luna, R., & Lapidus, G. (2014). Accelerating the adoption of smart gun technology: A policy analysis. Quinnipiac Health Law Journal, 1, 14.

Cavanaugh, M. R., Bouffard, J. A., Wells, W., & Nobles, M. R. (2012). Student attitudes toward concealed handguns on campus at two universities. American Journal of Public Health, 102(12), 2245–2247.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Centers for Disease Control. (2014). FastStats: All injuries. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm.

Child Trends. (2015). Teen homicide, suicide and firearm deaths. Retrieved December 30, 2015 from http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=teen-homicide-suicide-and-firearm-deaths.

Fowler, K. A., Dahlberg, L. L., Haileyesus, T., & Annest, J. L. (2015). Firearm injuries in the United States. Preventive Medicine, 79, 5–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gewurz, D. (2013). Section 3: Gun ownership trends and demographics. Retrieved March 12, 2013 from http://www.people-press.org/2013/03/12/section-3-gun-ownership-trends-and-demographics/.

10.

Giles, M. (2015, October). How guns got smarter. Popular Science. Retrieved from http://www.popsci.com/how-guns-got-smarter.

11.

Greene, M. (2013). A review of gun safety technologies. National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/242500.pdf.

12.

Hemenway, D., & Solnick, S. J. (2015). Children and unintentional firearm death. Injury Epidemiology, 2(1), 26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Ingraham, C. (2015). There are now more guns than people in the United States. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/10/05/guns-in-the-united-states-one-for-every-man-woman-and-child-and-then-some/?utm_term=.d2b14ce79408.

14.

Kimberly, T. J. (2014). Higher caliber of regulation: Is making smart-gun technology mandatory constitutionally permissible. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 65, 251.

15.

Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. (2016). Personalized firearms. Retrieved from http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/consumer-child-safety/personalized-firearms/.

16.

Loomis, J., Bell, P., Cooney, H., & Asmus, C. (2009). A comparison of actual and hypothetical willingness to pay of parents and non-parents for protecting infant health: The case of nitrates in drinking water. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 41(3), 697–712.CrossRef

17.

Mauser, G. A., & Margolis, M. (1992). The politics of gun control: Comparing Canadian and American patterns. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 10(2), 189–209.CrossRef

18.

McDonald, M. P. (2016). Voter turnout demographics. Retrieved from http://www.electproject.org/home/voter-turnout/demographics.

19.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Fast facts. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=98.

20.

NCSL. (2017). Guns on Campus: Overview. Retrieved March 31, 2017 from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/guns-on-campus-overview.aspx.

21.

NRA-ILA (2016). “Smart” guns/Personalized firearms. Retrieved from https://www.nraila.org/issues/smart-gunspersonalized-firearms/.

22.

Payne, B. K., & Robert Riedel, J. (2002). Gun control attitudes and the criminal justice student: do differences exist? College Student Journal, 36(2), 314–323.

23.

Pew Research Center. (2011). Views of gun control: A detailed demographic breakdown. Retrieved January 13, 2011 from http://www.pewresearch.org/2011/01/13/views-of-gun-control-a-detailed-demographic-breakdown/.

24.

Rosenwald, M. S. (2014, May 2). Maryland dealer, under pressure from gun-rights activists, drops plan to sell smart gun. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/maryland-dealer-will-defy-gun-rights-advocates-by-selling-nations-first-smart-gun/2014/05/01/564efa48-d14d-11e3-937f-d3026234b51c_story.html?utm_term=.5c066caf3054.

25.

Swift, A. (2013). Personal safety top reason Americans own guns today. Retrieved October 28, 2013 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/165605/personal-safety-top-reason-americans-own-guns-today.aspx.

26.

Teret, S. P., Defrancesco, S., Hargarten, S. W., & Robinson, K. D. (1998). Making guns safer. Issues in Science and Technology, 14(4), 37–40.

27.

The White House. (2016). Memorandum: Promoting smart gun technology. Retrieved January 4, 2016 from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/05/memorandum-promoting-smart-gun-technology.

28.

Wallace, L. N. (2016). American preferences for “smart” guns versus traditional weapons: Results from a nationwide survey. Preventive Medicine Reports, 4, 11–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Wirbinski, J. W. (2001). Smart gun technology project update. Sandia National Labratories. Retrieved from http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2001/013499.pdf.

30.

Wolfson, J. A., Teret, S. P., Frattaroli, S., Miller, M., & Azrael, D. (2016). The US public’s preference for safer guns. American Journal of Public Health, 106(3), 411–413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: College Student Attitudes Towards “Smart” Guns: Results from a Nationwide Survey
Authors: Lacey N. Wallace
Kaylin C. Dunn
Publication date: 01-02-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Community Health / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0387-7

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

College Student Attitudes Towards “Smart” Guns: Results from a Nationwide Survey

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

US Media Coverage of Tobacco Industry Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives

Distracted Pedestrian Behavior on two Urban College Campuses

Colon Cancer Worry in Appalachia

An Enhanced Shared Decision Making Model to Address Willingness and Ability to Undergo Lung Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Treatment in Minority Underserved Populations

Integrating Traditional Healers into the Health Care System: Challenges and Opportunities in Rural Northern Ghana

The Role of Primary Health Care in Hepatitis B Testing and Management: A Case Study