Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Community Health 5/2013

01-10-2013 | Original Paper

Perceptions of Under and Overutilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services at Latino-Serving Community Health Centers

Authors: Gloria D. Coronado, Amanda Petrik, Mark Spofford, Jocelyn Talbot, Huyen Hoai Do, Jennifer Sanchez, Tanya Kapka, Vicky Taylor

Published in: Journal of Community Health | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

We sought to gather the perceptions of clinic personnel at Latino-serving Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) about patients’ utilization of screening services for cervical cancer. We conducted one-on-one interviews among 17 clinic personnel at four Latino-serving FQHCs in Oregon. The clinic personnel we interviewed observed both under and overutilization of cervical cancer screening services. Clinic personnel estimated that 20–60 % of eligible patients were underscreened for cervical cancer, with 30 % the most commonly cited percentage. Underscreening was thought to occur among low-income, underinsured, and undocumented patients. Overscreening for cervical cancer was estimated to occur in 10–50 % of eligible patients, with 10 % the most frequently cited proportion. Overscreening was thought to occur among women younger than age 21 and women with a recent pregnancy. Our findings may inform future efforts to promote guideline-appropriate cancer screening and coordinated follow-up care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. (2012). U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for cervical cancer. US Preventive Services Task Force. (2012). U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for cervical cancer.
3.
go back to reference Kyrgiou, M., Koliopoulos, G., Martin-Hirsch, P., Arbyn, M., Prendiville, W., et al. (2006). Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 367(9509), 489–498.PubMedCrossRef Kyrgiou, M., Koliopoulos, G., Martin-Hirsch, P., Arbyn, M., Prendiville, W., et al. (2006). Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 367(9509), 489–498.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Saraiya, M., Berkowitz, Z., Yabroff, K. R., Wideroff, L., Kobrin, S., et al. (2010). Cervical cancer screening with both human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou testing vs Papanicolaou testing alone: What screening intervals are physicians recommending? Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(11), 977–985.PubMedCrossRef Saraiya, M., Berkowitz, Z., Yabroff, K. R., Wideroff, L., Kobrin, S., et al. (2010). Cervical cancer screening with both human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou testing vs Papanicolaou testing alone: What screening intervals are physicians recommending? Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(11), 977–985.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eltoum, I. A., & Roberson, J. (2007). Impact of HPV testing, HPV vaccine development, and changing screening frequency on national Pap test volume: Projections from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Cancer, 111(1), 34–40.PubMedCrossRef Eltoum, I. A., & Roberson, J. (2007). Impact of HPV testing, HPV vaccine development, and changing screening frequency on national Pap test volume: Projections from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Cancer, 111(1), 34–40.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.PubMedCrossRef Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.PubMedCrossRef Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Cancer screening—United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(3), 41–45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Cancer screening—United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(3), 41–45.
Metadata
Title
Perceptions of Under and Overutilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services at Latino-Serving Community Health Centers
Authors
Gloria D. Coronado
Amanda Petrik
Mark Spofford
Jocelyn Talbot
Huyen Hoai Do
Jennifer Sanchez
Tanya Kapka
Vicky Taylor
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Community Health / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9701-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Journal of Community Health 5/2013 Go to the issue